Olaparib enhances sensitization of BRCA-proficient breast cancer cells to x-rays and protons.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the radiosensitizing effect of the PARP inhibitor, Olaparib, between proton and X-rays irradiations in BRCA-proficient breast cancer (BC) cells. METHODS: Two BRCA-proficient BC cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and T47D BC, were used. Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK-8 assay, and radiosensitivity was determined through the clonogenic survival assay. Flow cytometry was employed to analyze cell cycle distribution and apoptosis. The kinetics of DNA damage repair were evaluated using γH2AX immunofluorescence imaging and the comet assay. Tumor spheroid assays were conducted to test radiosensitivity in a three-dimensional culture condition. RESULTS: Olaparib sensitized both MDA-MB-231 and T47D cells to proton and X-ray irradiation in the clonogenic assay. MDA-MB-231 cells exhibited a higher dose enhancement factor for Olaparib than T47D cells. Olaparib increased radiation-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis specifically in MDA-MB-231 cells. γH2AX immunostaining and the comet assay showed Olaparib augmented radiation-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. The enhancement effect of Olaparib was more pronounced in proton irradiation than in X-ray irradiation, particularly in MDA-MB-231 cells than T47D cells. Both radiation and Olaparib dose-dependently inhibited spheroid growth in both cell lines. The synergy scores demonstrated that Olaparib interacted more strongly with protons than X-rays. The addition of an ATR inhibitor further enhanced Olaparib-induced proton radiosensitization in MDA-MB-231 cells. CONCLUSION: This study found that Olaparib enhanced radiation efficacy in BRCA-proficient breast cancer cells, with a more pronounced effect observed with proton irradiation compared to X-ray irradiation. Combining Olaparib with an ATR inhibitor increased the radiosensitizing effect of protons.

Quantitative assessment of breast volume changes after whole-breast irradiation for breast cancer using breast auto-segmentation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantitatively estimate the changes in breast volume associated with radiotherapy in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (WBI). METHODS: Pre-WBI simulation computed tomography (CT) scans and post-WBI follow-up chest CT scans from a total of 1,151 breast cancer patients were analyzed using a deep-learning-driven auto-segmentation approach. The CT-based asymmetry index (CTAI) was calculated by dividing the volume of the irradiated breast by the volume of the contralateral breast. Significant breast shrinkage was defined as a CTAI < 0.85. To quantify changes in CTAI over the follow-up period, the CTAI ratio was determined as the post-WBI CTAI divided by the pre-WBI CTAI. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential variables associated with post-WBI significant breast shrinkage. RESULTS: The median CTAI values for pre- and post-WBI CT scans were 0.973 (interquartile range: 0.887-1.069) and 0.866 (interquartile range: 0.773-0.967), respectively. The difference between them was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Following WBI, there was an increase in the rate of significant breast shrinkage from 16.3 to 44.8%. The CTAI ratio showed a negative association with the time interval (p < 0.001, Pearson r = - 0.310). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, lower pre-WBI CTAI, younger age, and longer interval between CT scans were found to be significantly associated with a higher occurrence of post-WBI significant breast shrinkage. CONCLUSION: Breast volume decreases following WBI, and this decrease is correlated with an increased duration after WBI. These findings highlight the long-term consequences of WBI on breast asymmetry.

Modified Albumin-Bilirubin Grade After Curative Treatment: Predicting the Risk of Late Intrahepatic Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify the prognostic factors for late intrahepatic recurrence (IHR), defined as recurrence more than two years after curative treatment of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, very early, or early HCC treated with initial curative treatment and followed up without recurrence for more than two years, excluding early IHR defined as recurrence within two years in single center. Late IHR-free survival (IHRFS) was defined as the time interval from initial curative treatment to the first IHR or death without IHR, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: Among all the enrolled 2,304 patients, 1,427 (61.9%) underwent curative intent hepatectomy and the remaining 877 (38.1%) underwent local ablative therapy (LAT). During the follow-up after curative treatment (median, 82.6 months; range, 24.1 to 195.7), late IHR was detected in 816 (35.4%) patients. In the multivariable analysis, age, male sex, cirrhotic liver at diagnosis, type of initial treatment, and modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade were significant prognostic baseline factors. Furthermore, mALBI grade at three (2a vs. 1, P = 0.02, hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.70; 2b/3 vs. 1, P = 0.03; HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03-1.94) and six months (2b/3 vs. 1; P = 0.006; HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13-2.30) after initial curative treatment was also a significant prognostic factor for late IHR. CONCLUSION: After curative treatment for newly diagnosed early HCC, the mALBI grade at three and six months after initial curative treatment, as well as at baseline, was one of the most crucial prognostic factors for late IHR.

Impact of boost sequence in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal surgical resection followed by conventional fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a total dose of 60 Gy. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal boost technique for CCRT in GBM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 398 patients treated with CCRT between 2016 and 2021, using data from two institutional databases. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving sequential boost (SEB, N = 119) and those receiving simultaneous integrated boost (SIB, N = 279). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To minimize differences between the SIB and SEB groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 18.6 months. Before PSM, SEB showed better OS compared to SIB (2-year, 55.6% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.014). However, after PSM, there was no significant difference between two groups (2-year, 55.6% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.300). The boost sequence was not associated with inferior OS before and after PSM (all p-values > 0.05). Additionally, the rates of symptomatic pseudo-progression were similar between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.75, p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant difference in OS between SEB and SIB for GBM patients treated with CCRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to determine the optimal boost techniques for this patient population.

Patterns of regional recurrence according to molecular subtype in patients with pN2 breast cancer treated with limited field regional irradiation.

OBJECTIVE: There is little evidence regarding the radiotherapy modification based on molecular subtypes in breast cancer. This study aimed to identify the risk and patterns of regional recurrence according to molecular subtype in patients with pN2 breast cancer. METHODS: We identified 454 patients who underwent radical surgery for breast cancer with 4-9 axillary lymph node metastases. All patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection, adjuvant chemotherapy and limited-field regional nodal irradiation. The rates and patterns of regional recurrence were compared between the following three subgroups: luminal type (estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive), HER2-type (estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative and HER2-positive) and triple-negative type (estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and HER2-negative). RESULTS: Regional recurrence occurred in 18/454 patients (4%). The risk of regional recurrence was higher in the triple-negative (hazard ratio 7.641) and HER2-type (hazard ratio 4.032) subtypes than in the luminal subtype. The predominant pattern of regional recurrence was inside the radiotherapy field in triple-negative breast cancer and outside the radiotherapy field in HER2-type and luminal-type cancers. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pN2 breast cancer, the risk of regional recurrence was higher in the triple-negative and HER2-type than in the luminal type. In-field recurrence was predominant in triple-negative cancer, while out-field recurrence was frequent in luminal and HER2-type breast cancers.

Radiotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: updated results of involved-field radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to update the possible clinical benefits of radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 495 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after initially undergoing maximal cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy based on the pathologic stage between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed: 309 and 186 patients were treated without and with involved-field radiation therapy, respectively. Involved-field radiation therapy is defined as radiation therapy only to the areas of the body involved by tumor. The prescribed doses were ≥45 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction). Overall survival was compared between patients treated with and without involved-field radiation therapy. The favorable group was defined as patients who satisfied at least four of the following factors: good performance, no ascites, normal CA-125, platinum-sensitive tumor, and nodal recurrence. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 49-63) and median time to recurrence was 11.1 months (range 6.1-15.5). 217 patients (43.8%) were treated at a single site. Radiation therapy, performance status, CA-125, platinum sensitivity, residual disease, and ascites were all significant prognostic factors. The 3-year overall survival of all patients, patients treated without radiation therapy, and patients treated with radiation therapy was 54.0%, 44.8%, and 69.3%, respectively. Radiation therapy was associated with higher overall survival rates in the unfavorable and favorable patient groups. Patient characteristics showed higher rates of normal CA-125, lymph node metastasis only, lower platinum sensitivity, and higher rates of ascites in the radiation therapy group. After propensity score matching, the radiation therapy group showed superior overall survival to the non-radiation therapy group. Normal CA-125, good performance status, and platinum sensitivity were associated with a good prognosis in patients treated with radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that higher overall survival was observed in patients treated with radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05).

PURPOSE: We previously constructed a nomogram for predicting the risk of arm lymphedema following contemporary breast cancer treatment. This nomogram should be validated in patients with different background characteristics before use. Therefore, we aimed to externally validate the nomogram in a large multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: Overall, 8835 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery during 2007-2017 were identified. Data of variables in the nomogram and arm lymphedema were collected. The nomogram was validated externally using C-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) with 1000 bootstrap samples and by calibration plots. RESULTS: Overall, 1377 patients (15.6%) developed lymphedema. The median time from surgery to lymphedema development was 11.4 months. Lymphedema rates at 2, 3, and 5 years were 11.2%, 13.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. Patients with lymphedema had significantly higher body mass index (median, 24.1 kg/m2 vs. 23.4 kg/m2) and a greater number of removed nodes (median, 17 vs. 6) and more frequently underwent taxane-based chemotherapy (85.7% vs. 41.9%), total mastectomy (73.1% vs. 52.1%), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (71.9% vs. 54.2%), and regional nodal irradiation (70.7% vs 22.4%) than those who did not develop lymphedema (all P < 0.001). The C-index of the nomogram was 0.7887, and iAUC was 0.7628, indicating good predictive accuracy. Calibration plots confirmed that the predicted lymphedema risks were well correlated with the actual lymphedema rates. CONCLUSION: This nomogram, which was developed using factors related to multimodal breast cancer treatment and was validated in a large multi-institutional cohort, can well predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Immediate breast reconstruction has no impact on the oncologic outcomes of patients treated with post-mastectomy radiation therapy: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction (iBR) on patients treated with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: After a retrospective review of patients treated with PMRT between 2008 and 2017, we included 153 patients who underwent iBR and 872 patients who did not undergo iBR. Among the 153 patients who underwent iBR, 34 received one-stage iBR with autologous tissue and 119 received two-stage iBR. Conventional fractionated PMRT with a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions was performed in all patients. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients who underwent iBR were younger, had early stage disease, and had more frequent hormone receptor-positive tumor than those who did not undergo iBR. After PSM, 127 patients from each group with well-balanced characteristics were selected. With a median follow-up of 67.5 months, iBR led to better 6-year disease-free survival rates compared to no iBR before PSM (84.8% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.003); after PSM, there was no significant difference (84.8% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.130). On multivariable analysis in the matched cohort, iBR was not associated with inferior disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.67; p = 0.175). In the sensitivity analysis, iBR was not associated with a lower disease-free survival across all prognostic groups. The 5-year cumulative incidence of iBR failure was 15.0%. CONCLUSION: In patients with adverse pathologic factors planning to receive PMRT, iBR did not compromise oncologic outcomes. In addition, iBR can be considered in patients treated with PMRT with several clinicopathologic risk factors.

Selective salvage radiotherapy could provide favorable outcomes in patients with refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no relevant data supporting the role of salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in patients with refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Herein, we aimed to investigate the impact of sRT in patients with refractory or relapsed PCNSL following upfront HD-MTX. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 89 patients who had refractory (n = 16) or recurrent disease after an initial favorable response (n = 73); among them, 41 were treated with sRT and 48 were treated without sRT (nRT). Event-free survival (rEFS) and overall survival (rOS) after first recurrence were considered from the date of recurrence to date of each event. RESULTS: Overall, the first failure was diagnosed at a median of 11.0 months [interquartile range (IQR), 5.6-26.4] after first treatment. More than half of the patients had recurrent disease involving initial tumor bed (n = 47), deep structure (n = 67), and multiple lesions (n = 58). Among 19 patients who were initially treated with 23.4 Gy of whole brain RT, 10 patients received sRT as a re-irradiation; other 31 patients in sRT group were RT naïve patients. There was no significant difference in tumor characteristics between sRT and nRT group. Overall and complete response after salvage treatment were 80% and 48%, respectively; sRT provided higher overall response rate than nRT (93% vs. 69%, p = 0.011). With a median follow-up of 14.3 months (IQR, 7.9-31.4), 2-year rEFS and rOS rates were 27% and 57%, respectively. There were no differences in rEFS and rOS according to sRT (sRT vs. nRT, 26% vs. 28%, p = 0.730; 63% vs. 50%, p = 0.690). Poor performance, recurrence interval < 8 months, and unfavorable response following salvage treatment were associated with inferior rEFS and rOS. Additionally, sRT and stem cell transplantation improved response rate independently after multivariate analysis for complete/partial response. CONCLUSIONS: We found favorable response rate and comparable survival outcomes following sRT compared with non-local treatments for patients with refractory/relapsed PCNSL. Further studies of patient selection could stratify patients who can benefit from sRT.

Hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity-score-weighted comparison of radiation-related toxicity.

We assessed the clinical benefit of combining volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) considering the incidence of radiation-related toxicities. After a retrospective review for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between 2005 and 2017, a total of 4209 patients treated with three-dimensional conventional fractionation (CF-3D, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and 1540 patients treated with HF-RT (768 received HF-3D; 772, HF-VMAT; 40 Gy/15 fractions) were included. A total of 2229 patients (38.8%) received regional node irradiation (RNI): 1642 (39.0%), 167 (21.7%) and 420 (54.4%) received RNI via CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively. Acute/subacute and late toxicities were evaluated. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities was the highest in CF-3D group (15.0%, 2.6% and 1.6% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). HF-VMAT reduced Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities significantly compared to CF-3D (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, P < .001) and HF-3D (OR 0.45, P = .010). The 3-year cumulative rate of late toxicities was 18.0% (20.1%, 10.9% and 13.4% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). On sensitivity analysis, the benefit of HF-VMAT was high in the RNI group. Acute and late toxicities were fewer after HF-VMAT than after HF-3D or CF-3D, especially in women who underwent RNI.

Incorporating sarcopenia and inflammation with radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the combined effects of sarcopenia and inflammation on outcomes in patients with HCC treated with nivolumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 102 patients treated with nivolumab between 2017 and 2018. Sarcopenia was diagnosed when the L3 skeletal muscle indices were < 42 cm2/m2 and < 38 cm2/m2 in men and women, respectively. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and absolute lymphocyte count were used as surrogate markers of inflammation and immune cell reservoir. High NLR (hNLR) was defined as NLR ≥ 3, and severe lymphopenia (sLP) was defined as lymphocyte < 800/µL. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 21.9 (interquartile range, 8.3-58.3) months, patients with sarcopenia showed shorter OS than those without sarcopenia (median, 2.9 vs. 7.5 months, respectively). Patients with either hNLR or sLP exhibited inferior survival than those without risk factor (median OS, 2.8 vs. 14.5 months; median PFS, 1.3 vs. 3.7 months, respectively). Among 70 patients treated with RT, benefit of RT was observed in patients with sarcopenia or those without hNLR/sLP (all p < 0.05). After multivariable analysis, RT, hNLR/sLP, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and alpha-fetoprotein were significantly associated with OS (all p < 0.05), and hNLR/sLP was also associated with decreased PFS together with ALBI grade, alpha-fetoprotein, and RT (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The current study hypothetically demonstrated that the risk group stratified by hNLR/sLP outweighs the significance of sarcopenia in predicting outcomes after nivolumab. Furthermore, patients with sarcopenia might benefit from RT, especially those without risk factors of hNLR/sLP.

Dynamics of circulating tumor DNA during postoperative radiotherapy in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) kinetics during postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Stage II/III patients with post-NAC residual TNBC who required PORT were prospectively included in this study between March 2019 and July 2020. For 11 TNBC patients, next-generation sequencing targeting 38 genes was conducted in 55 samples, including tumor tissue, three plasma samples, and leukocytes from each patient. The plasma samples were collected at three-time points; pre-PORT (T0), after 3 weeks of PORT (T1), and 1 month after PORT (T2). Serial changes in ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) were analyzed. RESULTS: Somatic variants were found in the tumor specimens in 9 out of 11 (81.8%) patients. Mutated genes included TP53 (n = 7); PIK3CA (n = 2); and AKT1, APC, CSMD3, MYC, PTEN, and RB1 (n = 1). These tumor mutations were not found in plasma samples. Plasma ctDNA variants were detected in three (27.3%) patients at T0. Mutations in EGFR (n = 1), CTNNB1 (n = 1), and MAP2K (n = 1) was identified with ctDNA analysis. In two (18.2%) patients, the ctDNA VAF decreased through T1 and T2 while increasing at T2 in one (9.1%) patient. After a median follow-up of 22 months, no patient showed cancer recurrence. CONCLUSION: Among patients with post-NAC residual TNBC, more than a quarter exhibited a detectable amount of ctDNA after curative surgery. The ctDNA VAF changed variably during the course of PORT. Therefore, ctDNA kinetics can serve as a biomarker for optimizing adjuvant treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecologic and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system in patients who underwent diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced cervix cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 677 patients who were diagnosed with pelvic MRI and treated with definitive (chemo-)RT for locally advanced cervix cancer (stage IB2/IIA2-IVA or N+) between 1992 and 2018. Patients were classified according to 2009 and 2018 FIGO staging, and survival outcomes were compared. We developed a nomogram to improve prediction of progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were positive in 331 (48.9%) and 78 (11.5%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 77.9 months, the 5-year PFS was 83.5%, 65.2%, 71.0%, 60.6%, 37.6% and 38.9% for IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA according to FIGO 2009 and 88.9%, 60.0%, 73.8%, 66.7%, 36.3%, 68.9%, 43.6%, and 38.9% for IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC1, IIIC2, and IVA according to FIGO 2018, respectively. Survival of stage IIIC cervix cancer depended on the local extent of the tumor: the 5-year PFS of T1, T2, and T3 stages were 80.3%, 73.9%, and 45.5% for IIIC1 and 100%, 44.9%, and 23.4% for IIIC2. Histology, tumor size, node metastasis, FIGO 2009, and treatment modality were independent prognostic factors in the Cox regression analysis, and the nomogram incorporating these factors outperformed FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018 (AUC 0.718 vs. 0.616 vs. 0.594). CONCLUSIONS: FIGO 2018 revision was associated with heterogenous outcomes among stage III cervix cancer patients. Our nomogram can assist the FIGO system in predicting PFS after definitive RT.

Role of 23.4 Gy upfront whole-brain radiation therapy following high-dose methotrexate for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparative analysis of whole-brain radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate the role of upfront whole-brain radiation therapy (RT), with a reduced dose of 23.4 Gy, following high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 185 patients with PCNSL treated with HD-MTX between January 2013 and January 2020; 145 patients underwent no RT and 40 patients underwent upfront RT. Using propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for clinical factors, 40 patients were selected from each treatment group. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: At baseline, patients in the upfront RT group were younger, had higher LDH levels, received less frequent rituximab and stem cell transplantation than those in the no-RT group. Patients in the upfront RT group also showed a lower response rate after initial HD-MTX than those in the no-RT group (73% vs. 88%, p = 0.038). The median follow-up was 25.1 (interquartile range 13.7-43.0) months. Comparable 2-year EFS and OS rates were observed between the upfront RT and no-RT groups (56.6% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.170; and 81.7% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.097, respectively). Upfront RT was related to improved EFS and OS in patients with stable disease or progressive disease after HD-MTX, but not in patients with complete or partial response after HD-MTX. Upfront RT was also an independent predictor of EFS and OS in the PSM cohort. The cumulative incidences of treatment-related neurotoxicity at 3 years were 20.2% and 21.2% in the upfront RT and no-RT groups, respectively (p = 0.630). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront RT with a reduced dose of 23.4 Gy, showed favorable outcomes in patients with stable disease or progressive disease after initial HD-MTX. In addition, upfront RT appears to be an effective treatment for PCNSL when rituximab or stem cell transplantation is not feasible.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for cervical cancer in South Korea: a radiation oncology survey of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG 20-06).

OBJECTIVE: Radiation therapy plays an important role in adjuvant treatment for surgically treated cervical cancer with adverse pathological findings. This was the first study to evaluate current practices of adjuvant radiation therapy among centres affiliated with the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. METHODS: A survey containing specific questions on the demographics in 2019, indications of adjuvant treatment, radiation therapy field, prescription radiation therapy dose, boost radiation therapy and chemotherapy was sent out by e-mail to 93 centres. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 62.4%. Regarding radiation therapy techniques, intensity-modulated radiation therapy was adopted in most institutions (41/58, 70.7%). Various risk group criteria were selected for adjuvant radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy. One or two risk factors among tumour size, depth of invasion and lymphovascular invasion were considered for adjuvant radiation therapy by 20.7 and 60.3% of the respondents, respectively. The following criteria for concurrent chemoradiation therapy were considered by 60.3% of the respondents: parametrial extension, positive resection margin or lymph node metastasis. Various upper borders were preferred for pelvic radiation therapy by the institutions, and a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was the most prescribed dose scheme (37/58, 63.8%). Lymph node bed boost radiation therapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy were considered for selected patients by 22.4% (13/58) and 60.3% (35/58) of the institutions. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated the practice patterns of adjuvant treatment that are prevalent in the field of radiation oncology among members of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. These findings warrant further consensus on radiation therapy guidelines in the context of adjuvant treatment for cervical cancer.

Use of bevacizumab before or after radiotherapy increases the risk of fistula formation in patients with cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Several reports have documented the risk of fistula formation after bevacizumab in patients previously treated with radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of fistula formation with bevacizumab and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage I-IV cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients who had a history of pelvic radiotherapy, who were treated with intracavitary brachytherapy alone, received radiotherapy at another hospital, received concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy, or had missing follow-up data or a short follow-up period (<6 months) were excluded. The fistula rates were compared between the groups using the Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were included in the study: 249 patients were treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy, and 53 patients were treated with radiotherapy before or after bevacizumab. With a median follow-up of 35.9 (IQR 22.8-53.5) months, the 3 year cumulative fistula incidence rate was significantly higher in the radiotherapy + bevacizumab group than in the radiotherapy group (27.0% vs 3.0%, p<0.001). Bevacizumab administration was significantly associated with fistula formation in the multivariable adjusted model (HR 4.76, 95% CI 1.71 to 13.23) and three propensity score adjusted model (all p<0.05). Biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for 2 cc of the rectum more than 76 Gy was also associated with fistula formation (HR 4.30, 95% CI 1.52 to 12.18). Additionally, a 10 month interval between radiotherapy and bevacizumab reduced the incidence of fistula formation in the radiotherapy + bevacizumab group (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical cancer treated with pelvic radiotherapy, the addition of bevacizumab substantially increased the risk of fistula formation. Physicians should perform pelvic radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab with caution; moreover, close monitoring for fistula formation is warranted in these patients.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Few studies have been conducted to compare the efficacies of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Thus, in this multinational study, we compared the effectiveness of SBRT and RFA in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS: The retrospective study cohort included 2,064 patients treated in 7 hospitals: 1,568 and 496 in the RFA and SBRT groups, respectively. More than half of the patients (56.5%) developed recurrent tumors, mainly after transarterial chemoembolization (44.8%). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for clinical factors (n = 313 in each group). RESULTS: At baseline, the SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features compared to the RFA group, including BCLC stage (B-C 65% vs. 16%), tumor size (median 3.0 cm vs. 1.9 cm), and frequent history of liver-directed treatment (81% vs. 49%, all p <0.001). With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, the 3-year cumulative local recurrence rates in the SBRT and RFA groups were 21.2% and 27.9%, respectively (p <0.001). After adjusting for clinical factors, SBRT was related to a significantly lower risk of local recurrence than RFA in both the entire (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, p <0.001) and matched (HR 0.36, p <0.001) cohorts. In subgroup analysis, SBRT was associated with superior local control in small tumors (≤3 cm) irrespective of location, large tumors located in the subphrenic region, and those that progressed after transarterial chemoembolization. Acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 1.6% and 2.6% of the SBRT and RFA patients, respectively (p = 0.268). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT could be an effective alternative to RFA for unresectable HCC, particularly for larger tumors (>3 cm) in a subphrenic location and tumors that have progressed after transarterial chemoembolization. LAY SUMMARY: It is currently not known what the best treatment option is for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we show that stereotactic body radiation therapy provides better local control than radiofrequency ablation, with comparable toxicities. Stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to be an effective alternative to radiofrequency ablation that should be considered when there is a higher risk of local recurrence or toxicity after radiofrequency ablation.

Validation and optimization of a web-based nomogram for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: To optimize and validate a current (NRG [a newly constituted National Clinical Trials Network group through National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP], the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] and the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)]) nomogram for glioblastoma patients as part of continuous validation. METHODS: We identified patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma who were treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy between 2006 and 2016 at three large-volume hospitals. The extent of resection was determined via postoperative MRI. The discrimination and calibration abilities of the prediction algorithm were assessed; if additional factors were identified as independent prognostic factors, updated models were developed using the data from two hospitals and were externally validated using the third hospital. Models were internally validated using cross-validation and bootstrapping. RESULTS: A total of 837 patients met the eligibility criteria. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (95% CI 18.5-21.5) months. The original nomogram was able to estimate the 6­, 12-, and 24-month OS probabilities, but it slightly underestimated the OS values. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, MRI-defined total resection had a greater impact on OS than that shown by the original nomogram, and two additional factors-IDH1 mutation and tumor contacting subventricular zone-were newly identified as independent prognostic values. An updated nomogram incorporating these new variables outperformed the original nomogram (C-index at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months: 0.728, 0.688, 0.688, and 0.685, respectively) and was well calibrated. External validation using an independent cohort showed C­indices of 0.787, 0.751, 0.719, and 0.702 at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, and was well calibrated. CONCLUSION: An updated and validated nomogram incorporating the contemporary parameters can estimate individual survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma with better accuracy.

Simple calculation using anatomical features on pre-treatment verification CT for bladder volume estimation during radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite detailed instruction for full bladder, patients are unable to maintain consistent bladder filling during a 5-week pelvic radiation therapy (RT) course. We investigated the best bladder volume estimation procedure for verifying consistent bladder volume. METHODS: We reviewed 462 patients who underwent pelvic RT. Biofeedback using a bladder scanner was conducted before simulation and during treatment. Exact bladder volume was calculated by bladder inner wall contour based on CT images (Vctsim). Bladder volume was estimated either by bladder scanner (Vscan) or anatomical features from the presacral promontory to the bladder base and dome in the sagittal plane of CT (Vratio). The feasibility of Vratio was validated using daily megavoltage or kV cone-beam CT before treatment. RESULTS: Mean Vctsim was 335.6 ± 147.5 cc. Despite a positive correlation between Vctsim and Vscan (R2 = 0.278) and between Vctsim and Vratio (R2 = 0.424), Vratio yielded more consistent results than Vscan, with a mean percentage error of 26.3 (SD 19.6, p < 0.001). The correlation between Vratio and Vctsim was stronger than that between Vscan and Vctsim (Z-score: - 7.782, p < 0.001). An accuracy of Vratio was consistent in megavoltage or kV cone-beam CT during treatment. In a representative case, we can dichotomize for clinical scenarios with or without bowel displacement, using a ratio of 0.8 resulting in significant changes in bowel volume exposed to low radiation doses. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder volume estimation using personalized anatomical features based on pre-treatment verification CT images was useful and more accurate than physician-dependent bladder scanners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Correction to: Chemoradiation in elderly patients with glioblastoma from the multi­institutional GBM­molRPA cohort: is short­course radiotherapy enough or is it a matter of selection?

The name of author Do Hoon Lim was incorrect in the initial online publication. The original article has been corrected.