Effect of aromatase inhibitors on background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue at breast MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) influences background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) or amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) at breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in postmenopausal women with prior history of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A waiver of authorization and patient consent was granted by the institutional review board for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Postmenopausal women with breast cancer and MR imaging findings of the contralateral unaffected breast, before and during 6-12 months of AI treatment (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane), between August 1999 and June 2010 were retrospectively identified (n = 149). Two readers performed blinded side-by-side comparison of BPE and MR imaging-depicted FGT before and during treatment. BPE and FGT were classified as the same or greater on one of the two MR studies and by using categorical scales: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked for BPE and fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, or dense for FGT. Consensus was reached in cases of disagreement. The sign test was used to conduct a side-by-side comparison of BPE and FGT before and during AI treatment. RESULTS: A decrease in BPE occurred in 33.9% (37 of 109) of women during anastrozole treatment, while an increase occurred in only one (P < .0001); 28 of 37 decreases resulted in a category change of BPE. A decrease in MR imaging-depicted FGT occurred in 5.5% (six of 109) of women, while no increases occurred (P = .031). During letrozole treatment, a decrease in BPE occurred in 46% (15 of 33), while an increase occurred in one woman (P = .0003); a decrease in FGT occurred in only one woman, and no increases occurred. Similar results were seen when women also undergoing chemotherapy were excluded. Only seven women were treated with exemestane. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 6-12 months of anastrozole or letrozole was associated with decreases in BPE, which occurred in a greater proportion of women than decreases in FGT.

Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of menopausal status on the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) on breast MRI. METHODS: Retrospective review identified 1,130 women who underwent screening breast MRI between July and November 2010. In 28 of these women, breast MRI was performed both at one time point while pre- and one time point while post-menopausal (median interval 49 months). Two independent readers blinded to menopausal status used categorical scales to rate BPE (minimal/mild/moderate/marked) and FGT (fatty/scattered/heterogeneously dense/dense). Consensus was reached when there was disagreement. The sign test was used to assess changes in rating categories, and the Spearman rank and Fisher's exact tests were used to measure correlations and associations between variables. RESULTS: Significant proportions of women demonstrated decreases in BPE and FGT on post-menopausal breast MRI (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0009). BPE category was unchanged in 39 % (11/28) and decreased in 61 % (17/28) of women. FGT category was unchanged in 61 % (17/28) and decreased in 39 % (11/28) of women. Age, reason for menopause, or interval between MRIs had no significant impact on changes in BPE and FGT. CONCLUSION: On MRI, BPE, and FGT decrease after menopause in significant proportions of women; BPE decreases more than FGT. KEY POINTS: On MRI, background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue both decrease after menopause. The reduced postmenopausal enhancement is more marked in parenchyma than fibroglandular tissue. Background enhancement and fibroglandular tissue seen on MRI are under hormonal influence.

Impact of tamoxifen on amount of fibroglandular tissue, background parenchymal enhancement, and cysts on breast magnetic resonance imaging.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of tamoxifen treatment on amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT), background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and cysts on breast MRI. Retrospective search identified 96 women with breast cancer who had a breast MRI both before and during adjuvant tamoxifen therapy between 2002 and 2008. After exclusion of all irradiated breasts, 88 women were eligible. Two readers blinded to tamoxifen treatment status independently rated level of BPE, amount of FGT, and cysts using a 4-point categorical scale: BPE--Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked; FGT--Fatty, Scattered, Heterogeneously Dense (HD), Dense; Cysts--Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked. A consensus interpretation was reached in cases of disagreement. During tamoxifen, there was a significant shift from higher to lower degree BPE, cysts, and FGT compared with before tamoxifen. BPE, cysts and FGT decreased in 68% (60/88), 38% (33/88), and 40% (35/88) of women during tamoxifen (p<0.001 for all measures). After the exclusion of all cases with minimal BPE, cysts, or FGT on the pre-tamoxifen MRI, the percentage of women demonstrating a decrease in these factors increased to 81% (60/74), 77% (33/43), and 41% (35/86), respectively. Exclusion of patients treated with chemotherapy did not substantially change these results. The percentage of women with decreases in FGT and cysts increased with greater duration on tamoxifen, whereas decreases in BPE were detected early in treatment (<90 days) and did not change substantially with longer duration on tamoxifen. A significant association exists between treatment with tamoxifen and decreases in BPE, cysts, and FGT on breast MRI.

Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationships between breast cancer and both amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and level of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A waiver of authorization was granted by the institutional review board for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. Among 1275 women who underwent breast MR imaging screening between December 2002 and February 2008, 39 breast carcinoma cases were identified. Two comparisons were performed: In one comparison, two normal controls--those of the women with negative (benign) findings at breast MR imaging--were matched to each breast cancer case on the basis of age and date of MR imaging. In the second comparison, one false-positive control--that of a woman with suspicious but nonmalignant findings at MR imaging--was similarly matched to each breast cancer case. Two readers independently rated the level of MR imaging-depicted BPE and the amount of MR imaging-depicted FGT by using a categorical scale: BPE was categorized as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked, and FGT was categorized as fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, or dense. RESULTS: Compared with the odds ratio (OR) for a normal control, the OR for breast cancer increased significantly with increasing BPE: The ORs for moderate or marked BPE versus minimal or mild BPE were 10.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9, 35.3; P < .001) and 3.3 (95% CI: 1.3, 8.3; P = .006) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Similar odds were seen when the false-positive controls were compared with the breast cancer cases: The ORs for moderate or marked BPE versus minimal or mild BPE were 5.1 (95% CI: 1.4, 19.1; P = .005) and 3.7 (95% CI: 1.2, 11.2; P = .013) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The breast cancer odds also increased with increasing FGT, but the BPE findings remained significant after adjustment for FGT. CONCLUSION: Increased BPE is strongly predictive of breast cancer odds.

D-dimer assay to exclude pulmonary embolism in high-risk oncologic population: correlation with CT pulmonary angiography in an urgent care setting.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate (a) the diagnostic performance of D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism (PE) in an oncologic population by using computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography as the reference standard, (b) the association between PE location and assay sensitivity, and (c) the association between assay results and clinical factors that raise suspicion of PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained. Five hundred thirty-one consecutive patients were clinically suspected of having PE; 201 were enrolled (72 men, 129 women; median age, 61 years) and underwent CT pulmonary angiography and D-dimer assay. Relevant clinical history, symptoms, and signs were recorded. CT images were interpreted, and the location of emboli was recorded. The negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios of the D-dimer assay results were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (21%) had pulmonary emboli at CT. D-Dimer results were positive in 171 patents (85%). The NPV and sensitivity were 97% and 98%, respectively. The specificity and PPV were 18% and 25%, respectively. No association was shown between clinical history, symptoms, or signs and NPV, PPV, sensitivity, or specificity or between location of PE and sensitivity. CONCLUSION: D-Dimer results have high NPV and sensitivity for PE in oncologic patients and, if negative, can be used to exclude PE in this population. Combining the assay with clinical symptoms and signs did not substantially change NPV, PPV, sensitivity, or specificity.

Radioactive seed localization with 125I for nonpalpable lesions prior to breast lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy: methodology, safety, and experience of initial year.

The use of radioactive seed localization (RSL) as an alternative to wire localizations (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions is rapidly gaining acceptance because of its advantages for both the patient and the surgical staff. This paper examines the initial experience with over 1,200 patients seen at a comprehensive cancer center. Radiation safety procedures for radiology, surgery, and pathology were implemented, and radioactive material inventory control was maintained using an intranet-based program. Surgical probes allowed for discrimination between 125I seed photon energies from 99mTc administered for sentinel node testing. A total of 1,127 patients (median age of 57.2 y) underwent RSL procedures with 1,223 seeds implanted. Implanted seed depth ranged from 10.3-107.8 mm. The median length of time from RSL implant to surgical excision was 2 d. The median 125I activity at time of implant was 3.1 MBq (1.9 to 4.6). The median dose rate from patients with a single seed was 9.5 µSv h-1 and 0.5 µSv h-1 at contact and 1 m, respectively. The maximum contact dose rate was 187 µSv h-1 from a superficially placed seed. RSL performed greater than 1 d before surgery is a viable alternative to WL, allowing flexibility in scheduling, minimizing day of surgery procedures, and improving workflow in breast imaging and surgery. RSL has been shown to be a safe and effective procedure for preoperative localization under mammographic and ultrasound guidance, which can be managed with the use of customized radiation protection controls.

Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pre-operative I-125 radioactive seed localization (RSL) as an alternative to wire localization (WL). METHODS: A waiver was granted by the institutional review board for this HIPAA compliant study. Review of 356 consecutive single site nonpalpable mammographic and ultrasound guided I-125 RSLs done between November 2011 and April 2012 was conducted. Preoperative mammograms and specimen radiographs were reviewed for seed-target distance, lesion location, and target/seed removal. During a brief surgical training period, 35 of 356 women had both RSL and wire localization (WL) of the same lesion. Chi-square and single sample t-tests were used to compare margin status and duration of procedures. RESULTS: Of the 356 RSLs, 303 (85.1%) were performed ≥ 1 day before surgery. Mammographic guidance was used in 330 (93%) and ultrasound in 26 (7%). Mean seed to target distance was 1mm (range 0-20mm); all targeted lesions were retrieved. In 31 women in whom mammographic guidance was used for both RSL and WL, median procedure time was not significantly different (RSL 9.0 min; WL 7.0 min; p=0.91), and median seed migration distance was <1mm (range 0-15 mm). No difference was detected between margin status with RSL alone versus WL (p=0.40 and p=0.65 for positive and <1mm margins, respectively). Two adverse events occurred requiring an additional wire/surgery. CONCLUSION: RSL ≥ 1 day before surgery is a safe effective procedure for pre-operative localization, with few adverse events and surgical outcomes comparable to those achieved with wire localization.

Comparison of interpretations of CT angiograms in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism by on-call radiology fellows and subsequently by radiology faculty.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate interobserver variability in interpretations performed by on-call radiology fellows and subsequently by attending radiologists of CT angiograms obtained for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and to evaluate factors contributing to discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Written interpretations made by on-call fellows were compared with reports approved by attending radiologists for all CT angiograms obtained for suspected pulmonary embolism after work hours and on weekends in a recent 19-month period. Interpretations were stratified as positive, negative, or equivocal for pulmonary embolism. In cases of discordant interpretations, those CT angiograms were rereviewed by two thoracic radiologists; then patient medical records were reviewed for evidence of clinical effect. Technical and patient-related reasons for discordant interpretations of CT angiograms were recorded. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight oncology patients were examined on CT angiography; five were examined twice. The fellows reported 137 CT angiograms (21%) as positive, 498 (75%) as negative, and 28 (4%) as equivocal for pulmonary embolism. Interpretations of the fellows and attending radiologists agreed in 93% (615/663) of CT angiograms (kappa = 0.80). The concordance rates for CT angiograms interpreted by fellows as positive (89%, 122/137), negative (96%, 479/498), and equivocal (50%, 14/28) were significantly different from each other (p < 0.001 for each). A significantly greater proportion of CT angiograms with discordant interpretations was reported to be technically limited (p < 0.01). No clear adverse clinical events were attributed to discordant interpretations of CT angiograms, although the death of one patient in that subgroup was of indeterminate cause. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of CT angiograms obtained for suspected pulmonary embolism, on-call fellows showed good agreement with attending radiologists. CT angiograms with discordant interpretations often were limited by technical or patient-related factors.

Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved?

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), which involves the resection of the nipple/areolar complex with the breast parenchyma, improves the aesthetic outcome for breast cancer patients. Most patients undergoing SSM desire reconstruction of the nipple/areolar complex for symmetry. These data explore the possibility of preserving the areola in selected mastectomy patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 217 mastectomy patients was conducted to determine the frequency of malignant nipple and/or areola involvement. The association between nipple and/or areola involvement and prognostic factors, including tumor size, stage, nuclear grade, axillary nodal status, and tumor location, was evaluated. RESULTS: The overall frequency of malignant nipple involvement was 23 of 217 (10.6%). In a subgroup of patients with tumors <2 cm, peripheral tumors, and with two positive nodes or less, the incidence of nipple involvement was 6.7%. When the nipple and areolar involvement were analyzed separately, only 2 of 217 patients had involvement of the areola (0.9%). All patients with areolar involvement had stage 3 breast cancer and were located centrally in the breast. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from these data that nipple preservation is not a reasonable option for mastectomy patients. However, preservation of the areola with mastectomy in selected patients warrants further study.