Synergy between Laminin-Derived Elastin-like Polypeptides (LELPs) Optimizes Cell Spreading.

A major component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), laminins, modulates cells via diverse receptors. Their fragments have emerging utility as components of "ECM-mimetics" optimized to promote cell-based therapies. Recently, we reported that a bioactive laminin peptide known as A99 enhanced cell binding and spreading via fusion to an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP). The ELP "handle" serves as a rapid, noncovalent strategy to concentrate bioactive peptide mixtures onto a surface. We now report that this strategy can be further generalized across an expanded panel of additional laminin-derived elastin-like polypeptides (LELPs). A99 (AGTFALRGDNPQG), A2G80 (VQLRNGFPYFSY), AG73 (RKRLQVQLSIRT), and EF1m (LQLQEGRLHFMFD) all promote cell spreading while showing morphologically distinct F-actin formation. Equimolar mixtures of A99:A2G80-LELPs have synergistic effects on adhesion and spreading. Finally, three of these ECM-mimetics promote the neurite outgrowth of PC-12 cells. The evidence presented here demonstrates the potential of ELPs to deposit ECM-mimetics with applications in regenerative medicine, cell therapy, and tissue engineering.

Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cross-sectional study using a nationwide inpatient database.

BACKGROUND: Fasudil and ozagrel are drugs with the same indications for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Japan. However, there have been no definitive conclusions on the clinical efficacy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium monotherapy or their combination. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the combined administration of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium in Japanese patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: This cross-sectional study used Diagnosis Procedure Combination data to assess patients who were hospitalized with SAH and received fasudil hydrochloride or ozagrel sodium between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 17,346). The participants were divided into three groups based on the treatment received: fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy (F group, n = 10,484), ozagrel sodium monotherapy (O group, n = 465), and fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy (FO group, n = 6,397). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis (significance level, 5%) was used for data analyses. RESULTS: The results of the multivariable analysis, adjusted for factors considered to impact prognosis, showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with the F group as the reference for in-hospital mortality was 0.94 in the FO group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.08, p = 0.355), with no differences compared to the F group. CONCLUSION: Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium had different mechanisms of action, suggesting a synergistic effect of combination therapy. However, a comparison of fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy and combination therapy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium showed no difference in the prognostic effect. Therefore, it was suggested that fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy may be sufficient.