TAAR1 agonist ulotaront delays gastric emptying of solids in patients with schizophrenia and concurrent metabolic syndrome with prediabetes.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), which can be induced or exacerbated by the current class of antipsychotic drugs, is highly prevalent in patients with schizophrenia and presents significant challenges to lifetime disease management. Supported by initial clinical results, trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonists have emerged as potential novel treatments for schizophrenia. Notably, non-clinical studies have also shown weight-lowering and glucoregulatory effects of TAAR1 agonists, including the investigational agent ulotaront. However, the translatability of these findings to humans has not been adequately assessed. Given that delayed gastric emptying (GE) was identified as a potential mechanism contributing to the metabolic benefits of TAAR1 agonists in rodents, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ulotaront on GE in patients with schizophrenia and concurrent MetS with prediabetes. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia were randomized to receive a single oral dose of ulotaront (150 mg) and their previous antipsychotic (PA) in an open-label, crossover, two-sequence design (NCT05402111). Eligible participants fulfilled at least three of five MetS criteria and had prediabetes defined by elevated glycated haemoglobin (5.7-6.4%) and/or fasting homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (i.e. ≥2.22). Following an overnight fast and 4 h post-dose, participants ingested a 99mTc-sulphur colloid radiolabelled egg meal (320 kcal, 30% fat). GE was measured by scintigraphy over 4 h. Endpoints included GE of solids half-time (T1/2) and percentage gastric retention at 1, 2 and 4 h. RESULTS: Thirty-one adults were randomized and 27 completed the study. Ulotaront significantly delayed GE of solids [median GE T1/2 ulotaront at 139 min (119, 182) vs. the participant's PA of 124 min (109, 132), p = .006]. A significant increase in gastric retention was seen in the ulotaront versus the PA group at 1 h (80% vs. 75%, p = .015), 2 h (61% vs. 50%, p = .023) and 4 h (17% vs. 7%, p = .002) post-meal. CONCLUSION: Ulotaront delayed the GE of solids in patients with schizophrenia and concurrent MetS with prediabetes. Additional studies are needed to assess whether treatment with TAAR1 agonists is associated with weight loss and glucoregulatory improvement.

A Non-D2-Receptor-Binding Drug for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: An oral compound, SEP-363856, that does not act on dopamine D2 receptors but has agonist activity at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT1A) receptors, may represent a new class of psychotropic agent for the treatment of psychosis in schizophrenia. METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-363856 in adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily treatment with SEP-363856 (50 mg or 75 mg) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the total score on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS; range, 30 to 210; higher scores indicate more severe psychotic symptoms) at week 4. There were eight secondary end points, including the changes from baseline in the scores on the Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were assigned to the SEP-363856 group and 125 to the placebo group. The mean total score on the PANSS at baseline was 101.4 in the SEP-363856 group and 99.7 in the placebo group, and the mean change at week 4 was -17.2 points and -9.7 points, respectively (least-squares mean difference, -7.5 points; 95% confidence interval, -11.9 to -3.0; P = 0.001). The reductions in the CGI-S and BNSS scores at week 4 were generally in the same direction as those for the primary outcome, but the results were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Adverse events with SEP-363856 included somnolence and gastrointestinal symptoms; one sudden cardiac death occurred in the SEP-363856 group. The incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and changes in the levels of lipids, glycated hemoglobin, and prolactin were similar in the trial groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this 4-week trial involving patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, SEP-363856, a non-D2-receptor-binding antipsychotic drug, resulted in a greater reduction from baseline in the PANSS total score than placebo. Longer and larger trials are necessary to confirm the effects and side effects of SEP-363856, as well as its efficacy relative to existing drug treatments for patients with schizophrenia. (Funded by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02969382.).

Ulotaront: review of preliminary evidence for the efficacy and safety of a TAAR1 agonist in schizophrenia.

Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront was discovered through a unique, target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates lacking D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism, while demonstrating an antipsychotic-like phenotypic profile in vivo. The mechanism of action (MOA) of ulotaront is thought to be mediated by agonism at TAAR1 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. Ulotaront has completed two Phase 2 trials (4-week acute study and 26-week open-label extension) which led to Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled, acute study, ulotaront was associated with significant (p < 0.001) improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (effect size [ES]: 0.45), with improvements vs. placebo also observed across secondary endpoints. Post-hoc analyses of the acute trial revealed additional evidence to support the effect of ulotaront on negative symptoms. In the 4-week study, ulotaront was well-tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events (AEs) numerically lower compared to placebo (45.8% vs. 50.4%; with a number needed to harm [NNH] for individual ulotaront AEs all > 40). The open-label extension demonstrated further improvement across schizophrenia symptoms and confirmed the tolerability of ulotaront, with a 6-month completion rate of 67%. Based on current data, ulotaront shows potential to be a first-in-class TAAR1 agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia with a safety and efficacy profile distinct from current antipsychotics.

In Vitro ADME and Preclinical Pharmacokinetics of Ulotaront, a TAAR1/5-HT1A Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

PURPOSE: Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a TAAR1 agonist with 5-HT1A agonist activity currently in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. The objectives of the current study were to characterize the in vitro ADME properties, preclinical PK, and to evaluate the DDI potential of ulotaront and its major metabolite SEP-383103. METHODS: Solubility, permeability, plasma protein binding, CYP inhibition and induction, transporter inhibition and uptake studies were conducted in vitro. Phenotyping studies were conducted using recombinant human CYPs and FMOs, human liver microsomes and human liver homogenates. Preclinical plasma and brain pharmacokinetics were determined after a single intraperitoneal, intravenous, and oral administration of ulotaront. RESULTS: Ulotaront is a compound of high solubility, high permeability, and low binding to plasma proteins. Ulotaront metabolism is mediated via both NADPH-dependent and NADPH-independent pathways, with CYP2D6 as the major metabolizing enzyme. Ulotaront is an inducer of CYP2B6, and an inhibitor of CYP2D6, OCT1 and OCT2, while SEP-383103 is neither a CYP inducer nor a potent inhibitor of CYPs and human transporters. Ulotaront exhibits rapid absorption, greater than 70% bioavailability, approximately 3.5 L/kg volume of distribution, 1.5-4 h half-life, 12-43 ml/min/kg clearance, and good penetration across the blood-brain barrier in preclinical species. CONCLUSIONS: Ulotaront has been designated as a BCS1 compound by US FDA. The ability of ulotaront to penetrate the blood-brain barrier for CNS targeting has been demonstrated in mice and rats. The potential for ulotaront and SEP-383103 to act as perpetrators of CYP and transporter-mediated DDIs is predicted to be remote.

SEP-363856, a Novel Psychotropic Agent with a Unique, Non-D2 Receptor Mechanism of Action.

For the past 50 years, the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic medications has relied on blockade of dopamine D2 receptors. Drug development of non-D2 compounds, seeking to avoid the limiting side effects of dopamine receptor blockade, has failed to date to yield new medicines for patients. In this work, we report the discovery of SEP-363856 (SEP-856), a novel psychotropic agent with a unique mechanism of action. SEP-856 was discovered in a medicinal chemistry effort utilizing a high throughput, high content, mouse-behavior phenotyping platform, in combination with in vitro screening, aimed at developing non-D2 (anti-target) compounds that could nevertheless retain efficacy across multiple animal models sensitive to D2-based pharmacological mechanisms. SEP-856 demonstrated broad efficacy in putative rodent models relating to aspects of schizophrenia, including phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperactivity, prepulse inhibition, and PCP-induced deficits in social interaction. In addition to its favorable pharmacokinetic properties, lack of D2 receptor occupancy, and the absence of catalepsy, SEP-856's broad profile was further highlighted by its robust suppression of rapid eye movement sleep in rats. Although the mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, in vitro and in vivo pharmacology data as well as slice and in vivo electrophysiology recordings suggest that agonism at both trace amine-associated receptor 1 and 5-HT1A receptors is integral to its efficacy. Based on the preclinical data and its unique mechanism of action, SEP-856 is a promising new agent for the treatment of schizophrenia and represents a new pharmacological class expected to lack the side effects stemming from blockade of D2 signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Since the discovery of chlorpromazine in the 1950s, the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic medications has relied on blockade of dopamine D2 receptors, which is associated with substantial side effects and little to no efficacy in treating the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. In this study, we describe the discovery and pharmacology of SEP-363856, a novel psychotropic agent that does not exert its antipsychotic-like effects through direct interaction with D2 receptors. Although the mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, our data suggest that agonism at both trace amine-associated receptor 1 and 5-HT1A receptors is integral to its efficacy. Based on its unique profile in preclinical species, SEP-363856 represents a promising candidate for the treatment of schizophrenia and potentially other neuropsychiatric disorders.

C-reactive protein and response to lurasidone in patients with bipolar depression.

Prior studies suggest that the inflammatory biomarker c-reactive protein (CRP) holds promise for predicting antidepressant response in patients with major depressive disorder. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether CRP might similarly predict antidepressant responses to lurasidone in patients with bipolar I depression. Serum CRP concentration was measured prior to, and following, 6 weeks of treatment in 485 outpatients with bipolar I depression. Patients were randomized to receive monotherapy with lurasidone 20-60 mg/day (N = 161), lurasidone 80-120 mg/day (N = 162) or placebo (N = 162). CRP was assessed using the wide-range CRP assay (wr-CRP). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Mixed models and statistical interaction tests were applied to investigate the moderating effects of pre-treatment wr-CRP on clinical endpoints. CRP was evaluated as a log-transformed continuous variable and by clinically-relevant cut-points. Increasing pre-treatment wr-CRP level predicted a larger overall antidepressant response to lurasidone, as well as an increased response for a number of individual depressive symptoms. These moderating effects of pre-treatment wr-CRP remained significant after adjustment for potential confounds (e.g. baseline BMI and weight change). Treatment with lurasidone did not affect serum concentrations of CRP compared to placebo during the study. Elevated CRP level prior to treatment was associated with an enhanced clinical response to lurasidone in patients with bipolar I depression. If confirmed in future studies, CRP may represent a clinically useful diagnostic and predictive biomarker supporting a precision medicine approach to the treatment of bipolar depression.

Differences in memory function between 5-HT1A receptor genotypes in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: While extensive literature on the role of the serotonin receptor 1A (5-HT1A-R) in cognition exists, the findings are largely from animal studies. There has been little research conducted into 5-HT1A-R genotypes and cognitive function in humans. This article evaluates the role of 5-HT1A-R genotypes on the profile of cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: The study sample was 455 MDD patients aged between 18 and 55 years. They had enrolled into a clinical trial and were tested prior to dosing on the baseline study day using the CDR System, an integrated set of 3 attention tests, 2 working memory tests, and 4 episodic memory tests. 5-HT1A-R genotyping for (SNP ID rs6295) had been conducted during the study screening period. RESULTS: Validated factor scores were derived from the 9 tests. It was found that patients with the C/C genotype for the C(1019)G polymorphism of the 5-HT1A-R were significantly superior in retaining and retrieving information, in both working and episodic memory, than those with either the C/G or the G/G genotypes. No differences were found in measures of attention or in the speed of retrieval of information from memory. CONCLUSIONS: This is, to our knowledge, the first relationship found between objective tests of cognitive function and 5-HT1A-R genotypes in MDD.

A Novel Method for Deriving Adverse Event Prevalence in Randomized Controlled Trials: Potential for Improved Understanding of Benefit-Risk Ratio and Application to Drug Labels.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse event (AE) data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) allow quantification of a drug's safety risk relative to placebo and comparison across medications. The standard US label for Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs typically lists AEs by MedDRA Preferred Term that occur at ≥ 2% in drug and with greater incidence than in placebo. We suggest that the drug label can be more informative for both patients and physicians if it includes, in addition to AE incidence (percent of subjects who reported the AE out of the total subjects in treatment), the absolute prevalence (percent of subject-days spent with an AE out of the total subject-days spent in treatment) and expected duration (days required for AE incidence to be reduced by half). We also propose a new method to analyze AEs in RCTs using drug-placebo difference in AE prevalence to improve safety signal detection. METHODS: AE data from six RCTs in schizophrenia were analyzed (five RCTs of the dopamine D2 receptor-based antipsychotic lurasidone and one RCT of the novel trace amine-associated receptor 1 [TAAR1] agonist ulotaront). We determined incidence, absolute prevalence, and expected duration of AEs for lurasidone and ulotaront vs respective placebo. We also calculated areas under the curve of drug-placebo difference in AE prevalence and mean percent contribution of each AE to this difference. RESULTS: A number of AEs with the same incidence had different absolute prevalence and expected duration. When accounting for these two parameters, AEs that did not appear in the 2% incidence tables of the drug label turned out to contribute substantially to drug tolerability. The percent contribution of a drug-related AE to the overall side effect burden increased the drug-placebo difference in AE prevalence, whereas the percent contribution of a placebo-related AE decreased such difference, revealing a continuum of risk between drug and placebo. AE prevalence curves for drug were generally greater than those for placebo. Ulotaront exhibited a small drug-placebo difference in AE prevalence curves due to a relatively low incidence and short duration of AEs in the ulotaront treatment arm as well as the emergence of disease-related AEs in the placebo arm. CONCLUSION: Reporting AE absolute prevalence and expected duration for each RCT and incorporating them in the drug label is possible, is clinically relevant, and allows standardized comparison of medications. Our new metric, the drug-placebo difference in AE prevalence, facilitates signal detection in RCTs. We piloted this metric in RCTs of several neuropsychiatric indications and drugs, offering a new way to compare AE burden and tolerability among treatments using existing clinical trial information.

Estimating heterogeneity of treatment effect in psychiatric clinical trials.

Currently, placebo-controlled clinical trials report mean change and effect sizes, which masks information about heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE). Here, we present a method to estimate HTE and evaluate the null hypothesis (H0) that a drug has equal benefit for all participants (HTE=0). We developed measure termed 'estimated heterogeneity of treatment effect' or eHTE, which estimates variability in drug response by comparing distributions between study arms. This approach was tested across numerous large placebo-controlled clinical trials. In contrast with variance-based methods which have not identified heterogeneity in psychiatric trials, reproducible instances of treatment heterogeneity were found. For example, heterogeneous response was found in a trial of venlafaxine for depression (peHTE=0.034), and two trials of dasotraline for binge eating disorder (Phase 2, peHTE=0.002; Phase 3, 4mg peHTE=0.011; Phase 3, 6mg peHTE=0.003). Significant response heterogeneity was detected in other datasets as well, often despite no difference in variance between placebo and drug arms. The implications of eHTE as a clinical trial outcomes independent from central tendency of the group is considered and the important of the eHTE method and results for drug developers, providers, and patients is discussed.

TAAR1 agonists improve glycemic control, reduce body weight and modulate neurocircuits governing energy balance and feeding.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic Syndrome, which can be induced or exacerbated by current antipsychotic drugs (APDs), is highly prevalent in schizophrenia patients. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that agonists at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) have potential as a new treatment option for schizophrenia. Intriguingly, preclinical tudies have also identified TAAR1 as a novel regulator of metabolic control. Here we evaluated the effects of three TAAR1 agonists, including the clinical development candidate ulotaront, on body weight, metabolic parameters and modulation of neurocircuits implicated in homeostatic and hedonic feeding. METHODS: Effects of TAAR1 agonists (ulotaront, RO5166017 and/or RO5263397) on body weight, food intake and/or metabolic parameters were investigated in rats fed a high-fat diet (HFD) and in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity (DIO). Body weight effects were also determined in a rat and mouse model of olanzapine-, and corticosterone-induced body weight gain, respectively. Glucose tolerance was assessed in lean and diabetic db/db mice and fasting plasma glucose and insulin examined in DIO mice. Effects on gastric emptying were evaluated in lean mice and rats. Drug-induced neurocircuit modulation was evaluated in mice using whole-brain imaging of c-fos protein expression. RESULTS: TAAR1 agonists improved oral glucose tolerance by inhibiting gastric emptying. Sub-chronic administration of ulotaront in rats fed a HFD produced a dose-dependent reduction in body weight, food intake and liver triglycerides compared to vehicle controls. In addition, a more rapid reversal of olanzapine-induced weight gain and food intake was observed in HFD rats switched to ulotaront or RO5263397 treatment compared to those switched to vehicle. Chronic ulotaront administration also reduced body weight and improved glycemic control in DIO mice, and normalized corticosterone-induced body weight gain in mice. TAAR1 activation increased neuronal activity in discrete homeostatic and hedonic feeding centers located in the dorsal vagal complex and hypothalamus with concurrent activation of several limbic structures. CONCLUSION: The current data demonstrate that TAAR1 agonists, as a class, not only lack APD-induced metabolic liabilities but can reduce body weight and improve glycemic control in rodent models. The underlying mechanisms likely include TAAR1-mediated peripheral effects on glucose homeostasis and gastric emptying as well as central regulation of energy balance and food intake.

TAAR1 agonist ulotaront modulates striatal and hippocampal glutamate function in a state-dependent manner.

Aberrant dopaminergic and glutamatergic function, particularly within the striatum and hippocampus, has repeatedly been associated with the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Supported by preclinical and recent clinical data, trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism has emerged as a potential new treatment approach for schizophrenia. While current evidence implicates TAAR1-mediated regulation of dopaminergic tone as the primary circuit mechanism, little is known about the effects of TAAR1 agonists on the glutamatergic system and excitation-inhibition balance. Here we assessed the impact of ulotaront (SEP-363856), a TAAR1 agonist in Phase III clinical development for schizophrenia, on glutamate function in the mouse striatum and hippocampus. Ulotaront reduced spontaneous glutamatergic synaptic transmission and neuronal firing in striatal and hippocampal brain slices, respectively. Interestingly, ulotaront potentiated electrically-evoked excitatory synaptic transmission in both brain regions, suggesting the ability to modulate glutamatergic signaling in a state-dependent manner. Similar striatal effects were also observed with the TAAR1 agonist, RO5166017. Furthermore, we show that ulotaront regulates excitation-inhibition balance in the striatum by specifically modulating glutamatergic, but not GABAergic, spontaneous synaptic events. These findings expand the mechanistic circuit hypothesis of ulotaront and TAAR1 agonists, which may be uniquely positioned to normalize both the excessive dopaminergic tone and regulate abnormal glutamatergic function associated with schizophrenia.

Mesostriatal Dopaminergic Circuit Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: A Multimodal Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI and [18F]-DOPA PET Study.

BACKGROUND: Striatal hyperdopaminergia is implicated in the pathoetiology of schizophrenia, but how this relates to dopaminergic midbrain activity is unclear. Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI (NM-MRI) provides a marker of long-term dopamine function. We examined if midbrain NM-MRI contrast-to-noise ratio (NM-CNR) was higher in people with schizophrenia relative to controls and if this correlated with dopamine synthesis capacity. METHODS: N=154 participants (n=74 individuals with schizophrenia and n=80 healthy controls) underwent NM-MRI of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN-VTA). A subset of the schizophrenia group (n=38) also received [18F]-DOPA PET to measure dopamine synthesis capacity (Kicer) in the SN-VTA and striatum. RESULTS: SN-VTA NM-CNR was significantly higher in patients with schizophrenia relative to controls (effect size=0.38, p=0.019). This effect was greatest for voxels in the medial and ventral SN-VTA. In patients, SN-VTA Kicer positively correlated with SN-VTA NM-CNR (r=0.44, p=0.005) and striatal Kicer (r=0.71, p<0.001). Voxelwise analysis demonstrated that SN-VTA NM-CNR was positively associated with striatal Kicer (r=0.53, p=0.005) and that this relationship appeared strongest between the ventral SN-VTA and associative striatum in schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that neuromelanin levels are higher in patients with schizophrenia relative to controls, particularly in midbrain regions that project to parts of the striatum which receive innervation from the limbic and association cortices. The direct relationship between measures of neuromelanin and dopamine synthesis suggests that these aspects of schizophrenia pathophysiology are linked. Our findings highlight specific mesostriatal circuits as the loci of dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia and, thus, potential therapeutic targets.

Discovery and Model-Informed Drug Development of a Controlled-Release Formulation of Nonracemic Amisulpride that Reduces Plasma Exposure but Achieves Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence in the Brain.

Nonracemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) is an investigational 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride to esamisulpride and currently in clinical trials for the treatment of bipolar depression. During testing of SEP-4199, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) disconnect was discovered that prompted the development of a controlled-release (CR) formulation with improved therapeutic index for QT prolongation. Observations that supported the development of a CR formulation included (i) plasma concentrations of amisulpride enantiomers were cleared within 24-hours, but brain dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) occupancies, although achieving stable levels during this time, required 5 days to return to baseline; (ii) nonracemic amisulpride administered to non-human primates produced significantly greater D2R occupancies during a gradual 6-hour administration compared with a single bolus; (iii) concentration-occupancy curves were left-shifted in humans when nonracemic amisulpride was gradually administered over 3 and 6 hours compared with immediate delivery; (iv) CR solid oral dose formulations of nonracemic amisulpride were able to slow drug dissolution in vitro and reduce peak plasma exposures in vivo in human subjects. By mathematically solving for a drug distribution step into an effect compartment, and for binding to target receptors, the discovery of a novel PK/PD model (termed here as Distribution Model) accounted for hysteresis between plasma and brain, a lack of receptor saturation, and an absence of accumulation of drug occupancy with daily doses. The PK/PD disconnect solved by the Distribution Model provided model-informed drug development to continue in Phase III using the non-bioequivalent CR formulation with diminished QT prolongation as dose-equivalent to the immediate release (IR) formulation utilized in Phase II.

Challenges in the clinical development of non-D2 compounds for schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is a chronic, heterogeneous, severe psychiatric disorder characterized by a spectrum of symptomology and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. For the last 70 years, available treatments have shared blockade of dopamine D2 receptors as their primary mechanism of action (MOA), the efficacy of which has been limited by incomplete resolution of all symptoms as well as treatment non-response in a select subset of patients. In addition, antipsychotics are associated with class-related side effects attributed to this primary MOA, including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The need for non-D2 treatment options for patients which offer a novel risk/benefit profile is therefore apparent. There has been substantial investment in the research and development of non-D2 drug candidates. However, none of these programs have received successful regulatory approval by the FDA (as of Oct 2022). In this article, the scale of industry-sponsored clinical trials for D2-based investigational pharmacological treatments in schizophrenia was quantified and compared with investigational compounds with non-D2 MOAs. In a dataset of 545 clinical trials identified in ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2002 to July 2022, total enrollments in trials of non-D2-based compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia summed to approximately 34,000 patients, compared with 27,144 patients for D2-based compounds. These data indicate that there remains substantial and ongoing investment in the development of novel non-D2 options for schizophrenia, with a success rate measured by regulatory approval that is well-below recent benchmarks for the broader category of CNS drugs. Improved trial design, conduct, endpoints, and analyses/methods may influence signal detection and reliability to support development and registration of non-D2 compounds.

A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, Phase 1b crossover trial comparing two doses of ulotaront with placebo in the treatment of narcolepsy-cataplexy.

BACKGROUND: Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a novel agonist at trace amine-associated receptor 1 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Previous studies demonstrated ulotaront suppresses rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in both rodents and healthy volunteers. We assessed acute and sustained treatments of ulotaront on REM sleep and symptoms of cataplexy and alertness in subjects with narcolepsy-cataplexy. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-way crossover study, ulotaront was evaluated in 16 adults with narcolepsy-cataplexy. Two oral doses of ulotaront (25 mg and 50 mg) were administered daily for 2 weeks and compared with matching placebo (6-treatment sequence, 3-period, 3-treatment). RESULTS: Acute treatment with both 25 mg and 50 mg of ulotaront reduced minutes spent in nighttime REM compared to placebo. A sustained 2-week administration of both doses of ulotaront reduced the mean number of short-onset REM periods (SOREMPs) during daytime multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) compared to placebo. Although cataplexy events decreased from the overall mean baseline during the 2-week treatment period, neither dose of ulotaront statistically separated from placebo (p = 0.76, 25 mg; p = 0.82, 50 mg), and no significant improvement in patient and clinician measures of sleepiness from baseline to end of the 2-week treatment period occurred in any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Acute and sustained treatment with ulotaront reduced nighttime REM duration and daytime SOREMPs, respectively. The effect of ulotaront on suppression of REM did not demonstrate a statistical or clinically meaningful effect in narcolepsy-cataplexy. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05015673.

Comparative Bioequivalence of Tablet and Capsule Formulations of Ulotaront and the Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of the Tablet Form in Humans.

INTRODUCTION: Ulotaront (SEP-363856), a dual trace animeassociated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptor agonist, is in phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. This study evaluated the comparative bioequivalence (BE) between tablet and capsule formulations of ulotaront and the food effect (FE) on pharmacokinetics (PK) of tablet form in healthy adult human subjects. METHODS: The BE study applied an open-label two-period crossover design in 24 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned (1:1) to dosing sequence AB or BA (A, 25 mg ulotaront tablet; B, 25 mg ulotaront capsule). The FE study also used an open-label randomized two-period crossover design in 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects were fasted overnight then randomly assigned (1:1) to dosing sequence AB or BA (A, fasted condition; B, fed condition). Dosing periods were separated by 1 week for both studies. Serial plasma samples from each period were collected and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. PK parameters were calculated using Phoenix WinNonlin® software. RESULTS: For the BE study, geometric mean ulotaront Cmax values were 93.28 and 86.98 ng/mL for tablet and capsule, respectively. Cmax ratio was 107.25% (90% CI 101.84-112.94%). Geometric mean ulotaront area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) values were 868.8 and 829.3 ng·h/mL for tablet and capsule, respectively. AUC0-∞ ratio was 104.76% (90% CI 100.68109.01%). For the FE study, geometric mean ulotaront Cmax was 157.89 and 157.95 ng/mL under fed and fasted conditions, respectively. Geometric mean ratio of Cmax was 99.96% (90% CI 94.48-105.77%). Geometric mean ulotaront AUC0-∞ was 1584.2 ng·h/mL fed and 1589.2 ng·h/mL fasted. Geometric mean ratio for AUC0-∞ was 99.69% (90% CI 95.02-104.58%). There was a delay in tmax (median difference 1.47 h) in the fed condition. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs for both Cmax and AUC0-∞ for ulotaront were well within typical bioequivalence criteria of 80-125% for both the BE and FE studies, thereby confirming the bioequivalence of the two dosage forms and no significant food effect.

Ulotaront, a Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1/Serotonin 5-HT1A Agonist, in Patients With Parkinson Disease Psychosis: A Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonist with 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity currently in phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. In this exploratory, flexibly dosed study, ulotaront was evaluated for the treatment of Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP). Methods: Patients with PDP requiring antipsychotic therapy were randomized, double-blind to ulotaront (25, 50, or 75 mg/d) or placebo. Mixed Model for Repeated Measures was used to assess change from baseline in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson Disease (SAPS-PD) at 6 weeks (primary end point). Results: The efficacy analysis sample comprised 38 patients (ulotaront, n = 24; placebo, n = 14). SAPS-PD total scores were numerically reduced in ulotaront-treated vs placebo-treated patients from week 1 to week 6: Least squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference in change from baseline at week 6 was -1.1 (-6.5, 4.3, p = 0.681). PDP symptom complete remission (≥100% improvement [reduction] from baseline in SAPS-PD total score) was observed in 25% of ulotaront-treated vs 0% of placebo-treated patients. SAPS-PD and Neuropsychiatric Inventory hallucinations subscales were numerically reduced vs placebo, and SAPS-PD total scores were reduced in patients with greater cognitive impairment (baseline Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] scores ≤24). Ulotaront improved Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson Disease Sleep Scale - Daytime Sleepiness scores (p = 0.022). There was no worsening of Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III motor score, MMSE, or vital signs. Adverse events (≥10%) with ulotaront vs placebo included hallucinations (24% vs 14%), confusional state (20% vs 14%), dizziness (16% vs 7%), nausea (12% vs 7%), and falls (12% vs 21%). Discussion: In this exploratory pilot study, ulotaront may decrease PDP symptoms without worsening motor function, particularly in patients with cognitive impairment. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02969369; submitted: November 17, 2016; study start date: December 31, 2016. Classification of Evidence: This Class II study was an exploratory pilot study that was underpowered to detect a statistically significant difference between ulotaront and placebo in the treatment of patients with Parkinson disease psychosis without worsening motor function.

Treatment with the novel TAAR1 agonist ulotaront is associated with reductions in quantitative polysomnographic REM sleep without atonia in healthy human subjects: Results of a post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a potentially injurious parasomnia lacking an established treatment. Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity that has demonstrated efficacy in patients with schizophrenia. In a single dose challenge study in humans, ulotaront 50 mg demonstrated significant REM suppressant effects. We now report post-hoc exploratory analyses designed to evaluate the effect of ulotaront on quantitative REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). METHODS: Young healthy adult men (ages 19-35) were randomized to double-blind, cross-over treatment (after 7-day wash-out) with single doses of ulotaront (50 mg or 10 mg) versus placebo followed by polysomnography (PSG) on each of the nights following treatment. Quantitative RSWA was analyzed in a blinded fashion using established visual and automated methods. RESULTS: Subjects received 50 mg (n = 11) or 10 mg (n = 9) of ulotaront. Treatment with ulotaront 50 mg was associated with lower RSWA (p < 0.05), with greatest RSWA reduction (vs. placebo) observed in subjects with RSWA levels above the mean on the baseline night. RSWA levels were similar between treatment with ulotaront 10 mg and placebo. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ulotaront 50 mg (but not 10 mg) was associated with reductions in RSWA levels in healthy subjects, especially in subjects with higher baseline RSWA levels, providing proof-of-concept for ulotaront efficacy in reducing RSWA levels. However, whether ulotaront might have efficacy as a treatment for human RBD awaits double-blind trials with ulotaront in clinical RBD populations.

Effects of ulotaront on brain circuits of reward, working memory, and emotion processing in healthy volunteers with high or low schizotypy.

Ulotaront, a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist without antagonist activity at dopamine D2 or the serotonin 5-HT2A receptors, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we report the phase 1 translational studies that profiled the effect of ulotaront on brain responses to reward, working memory, and resting state connectivity (RSC) in individuals with low or high schizotypy (LS or HS). Participants were randomized to placebo (n = 32), ulotaront (50 mg; n = 30), or the D2 receptor antagonist amisulpride (400 mg; n = 34) 2 h prior to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses to task performance. Ulotaront increased subjective drowsiness, but reaction times were impaired by less than 10% and did not correlate with BOLD responses. In the Monetary Incentive Delay task (reward processing), ulotaront significantly modulated striatal responses to incentive cues, induced medial orbitofrontal responses, and prevented insula activation seen in HS subjects. In the N-Back working memory task, ulotaront modulated BOLD signals in brain regions associated with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Ulotaront did not show antidepressant-like biases in an emotion processing task. HS had significantly reduced connectivity in default, salience, and executive networks compared to LS participants and both drugs reduced this difference. Although performance impairment may have weakened or contributed to the fMRI findings, the profile of ulotaront on BOLD activations elicited by reward, memory, and resting state is compatible with an indirect modulation of dopaminergic function as indicated by preclinical studies. This phase 1 study supported the subsequent clinical proof of concept trial in people with schizophrenia.Clinical trial registration: Registry# and URL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01972711, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01972711.

Depicting Risperidone Safety Profiles in Clinical Trials Across Different Diagnoses Using a Dopamine D2-Based Pharmacological Class Effect Query Defined by FAERS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Current methods are not designed to relate the incidence of individual adverse events reported in clinical trials to the plurality of adverse events accumulated in spontaneous reporting databases during real-world use. We have previously reported on a pharmacological class-effect query of clinical trial data defined by a disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) post-marketing data. The aim of the current analysis was to apply a dopamine D2-based pharmacological class-effect query to clinical trial safety data of an atypical antipsychotic tested across different patient populations. METHODS: Patient-level adverse event data (n = 4400) from controlled clinical trials of the antipsychotic risperidone in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Alzheimer's disease psychosis, and autism were obtained through the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) project. An Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean analysis was performed, and a three-fold threshold incidence level was applied to determine if a preferred term met criteria for being an antipsychotic class-related adverse event. RESULTS: In pooled data from seven trials of adult schizophrenia, class-specific adverse events were identified in 49% of patients treated with risperidone; in 49% of risperidone-treated patients in two trials in adolescent schizophrenia; in 65% of risperidone-treated patients in four trials in adult bipolar disorder; in 50% of risperidone-treated patients in two trials in adolescent schizophrenia; in 36% of risperidone-treated patients in one trial in Alzheimer's disease; and in 94% of risperidone-treated patients in one trial in autism. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative curves of class-specific adverse events in risperidone clinical trials of schizophrenia were similar to those first reported for other atypical antipsychotic drugs. However, the class-specific adverse event curves were notably lower for Alzheimer's disease and higher for autism, suggesting that the diagnostic indication may have an important effect on the cumulative class-specific side-effect burden.