RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine which components from a multidomain assessment best predict protracted recovery in pediatric patients with a concussion. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of patients aged 5-9 years who presented within 21 days of concussion to a specialty clinic were categorized into normal (≤30 days) and protracted (>30 days) recovery. Participants provided demographic and medical history information, and completed the Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 symptom report and balance assessment, the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen-Child (VOMS-C), and the Pediatric Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing. Univariate logistic regressions (LR) were used to inform a follow-up forward stepwise LR to identify the best predictors of protracted recovery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify which predictors retained from the LR model best discriminated recovery. RESULTS: The final sample included 68 patients (7.52 ± 2.3 years; 56% male), 36 (52.9%) with normal and 32 (47.1%) with protracted recovery. Results of the LR to identify protracted recovery were significant (P < .001) and accounted for 39% of the variance. The model accurately classified 78% of patients, with days to first clinic visit (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P = .003) and positive VOMS-C findings (OR, 8.32; 95% CI, 2.4-28.8; P < .001) as significant predictors. A receiver operating characteristic analysis of the AUC of this 2-factor model discriminated protracted from normal recovery (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Days to first clinic visit and positive findings on the VOMS-C were the most robust predictors of protracted recovery after concussion in young pediatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Recuperación de la Función , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Preescolar , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Curva ROC , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool-5 Child (Child SCAT5) in an outpatient specialty clinic sample of children aged 5-9 years. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-six children within 30 days of a concussion (mean = 8.90 ± 5.78 days) and 43 age- and sex-matched healthy controls completed the Child SCAT5, including balance items, cognitive screening, parent and child symptom severity reports, as well as each individual parent- and child-rated symptom severity (0-3). A series of receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) analysis were performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the Child SCAT5 components to discriminate concussion. RESULTS: The AUC values were nondiscriminate for cognitive screening (0.32) and poor for balance (0.61) items. The AUC values were acceptable for parent-reported symptoms worsening after physical activity (0.73) and mental activity (0.72). The AUCs for symptom severity items were excellent for parent (0.89) and child-reported (0.81) headaches, and were acceptable for parent-reported tired a lot (0.75) and both parent- (0.72) and child-reported (0.72) tired easily. CONCLUSION: With the exception of parent- and child-reported symptoms, the Child SCAT5 provides limited clinical utility for evaluating concussion in children aged 5-9 years seen at an outpatient concussion specialty clinic. The cognitive screening and balance testing items were not useful in discriminating concussion. Parent- and child-reported headache were the only Child SCAT5 items with excellent ability to differentiate concussion from controls in the age group.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Deportes , Humanos , Preescolar , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , CefaleaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency and association of neck pain symptoms in patients with a concussion. STUDY SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three-hundred and thirty-one consecutively enrolled patients aged 9 to 68 years with a diagnosed concussion 1 to 384 days post-injury were enrolled at a concussion clinic from a single integrated healthcare system in Western Pennsylvania between 2019 and 2021. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected concussion screening tool intake survey responses and clinical outcomes data. The primary outcome was self-reported neck pain or difficulty with neck movement on the Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening (CP Screen) tool, recovery time, and incidence of treatment referral. Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) composite scores, Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) item scores, type and severity of neck symptoms, mechanism of injury, time from injury to clinic presentation, medical history, and concussion symptom profile were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 306 consecutively enrolled eligible patients in the registry, 145 (47%) reported neck pain, 68 (22.2%) reported difficulty moving their neck, and 146 (47.7%) reported either symptom. A total of 47 (15.4%) participants reported more severe neck symptoms, and this group took longer to recover (40 ± 27 days) than those not reporting neck symptoms (30 ± 28 days; U = 8316, P < .001). Stepwise logistic regression predicting more severe neck symptoms was significant (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.174, χ 2 = 9.315, P = .316) with older age ( P = .019) and mechanism of injury including motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) ( P = .047) and falls ( P = .044) as risk factors. MVCs and falls were associated with over 4 times and 2 times greater risk, respectively, for reporting more severe neck symptoms. CONCLUSION: Neck pain and stiffness symptoms are common in patients with a concussion following high-energy mechanisms of injury including MVCs or falls from height. These symptoms are associated with prolonged recovery. Providers should evaluate neck symptoms and consider targeted treatment strategies to limit their effects in patients with a concussion.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Síndrome Posconmocional , Humanos , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cuello/epidemiología , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Síndrome Posconmocional/epidemiología , Síndrome Posconmocional/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to (1) collate the experiences of university students with concussion history and academic stakeholders through interviews and (2) develop concussion management recommendations for institutions of higher learning using a multidisciplinary Delphi procedure. SETTING: Remote semistructured interviews and online surveys. PARTICIPANTS: The first aim of this study included undergraduate university students with concussion history who did not participate in varsity athletics ( n = 21; 57.1% female), as well as academic faculty/staff with experience assisting university students with their postconcussion academic needs ( n = 7; 71.4% female). The second aim enrolled 22 participants (54.5% female) to serve on the Delphi panel including 9 clinicians, 8 researchers, and 5 academic faculty/staff. DESIGN: An exploratory-sequential mixed-methods approach. MAIN MEASURES: Semistructured interviews were conducted to unveil barriers regarding the return-to-learn (RTL) process after concussion, with emergent themes serving as a general framework for the Delphi procedure. Panelists participated in 3 stages of a modified Delphi process beginning with a series of open-ended questions regarding postconcussion management in higher education. The second stage included anonymous ratings of the recommendations, followed by an opportunity to review and/or modify responses based on the group's consensus. RESULTS: The results from the semistructured interviews indicated students felt supported by their instructors; however, academic faculty/staff lacked information on appropriate academic supports and/or pathways to facilitate the RTL process. Of the original 67 statements, 39 achieved consensus (58.2%) upon cessation of the Delphi procedure across 3 main categories: recommendations for discharge documentation (21 statements), guidelines to facilitate a multidisciplinary RTL approach (10 statements), and processes to obtain academic supports for students who require them after concussion (8 statements). CONCLUSIONS: These findings serve as a basis for future policy in higher education to standardize RTL processes for students who may need academic supports following concussion.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Deportes , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Universidades , Alta del Paciente , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , EstudiantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sport-related concussion (SRC) management may be poor in community sports such as Ladies Gaelic Football (LGF). This study examined factors associated with SRC management behavior in adult LGF players. METHODS: Participants (n = 657) answered an online survey on demographic factors, concussion knowledge, attitudes, and education, and SRC management behavior. Data from participants who reported sustaining an LGF-related SRC during the previous year (n = 115) were further analyzed. RESULTS: Being diagnosed with SRC was the main factor influencing subacute management behavior. Players with diagnosed SRCs had increased odds of following a graded return-to-play (RTP) programme (OR = 4.89), following a medically supervised graded RTP programme (OR = 10.16), and being medically cleared before full RTP (OR = 13.45) compared with those with suspected SRCs. Concussion history was associated with increased odds of informing a coach of a possible SRC (OR = 2.86). Demographic factors, previous use of Ladies Gaelic Football Association concussion education resources, and concussion knowledge and attitudes had minimal or no influence on management behaviors. CONCLUSION: Greater access to medical personnel at LGF training and matches is recommended. Due to limited medical resources in community sport, a clear referral pathway for players with SRC and comprehensive SRC education should be introduced to ensure players receive adequate medical care.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adulto , Humanos , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Escolaridad , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Deportes de EquipoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics and clinical outcomes of adolescent athletes with immediate and delayed onset of symptoms following sport-related concussion (SRC). A secondary objective was to describe the symptoms that are delayed and the timing of symptom onset. DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures study. SETTING: Concussion Specialty Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-two participants (63.3% men) aged 11 to 24 (15.78 ± 3.47) evaluated within 7 days (3.47 ± 1.66) of sustaining an SRC. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Group classification of immediate (IMMEDIATE) or delayed onset of symptoms (DELAYED; >60 seconds following mechanism of injury) through structured clinical interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group comparisons on demographic and medical history factors, concussion and clinical profile symptom scores, computerized neurocognitive test scores, vestibular/oculomotor screening scores, and days to medical clearance. RESULTS: 24.3% of athletes in the sample were DELAYED. The groups did not differ on demographics and medical history. The DELAYED group had increased likelihood of posttraumatic migraine (PTM) as a primary/secondary clinical profile ( P = 0.03). Groups did not differ on any other clinical profiles ( P > 0.05). Groups did not differ on recovery time ( P = 0.47), the IMMEDIATE group higher dizziness on vestibular/ocular motor screening ( P = 0.016) and increased likelihood of dizziness being the initial symptom experienced ( P < 0 .001). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that delayed onset of symptoms in athletes were relatively common following SRC, supporting continued evaluation of athletes for several days following suspected injuries. Delayed onset of symptoms was associated with PTM, whereas immediate onset was associated with more pronounced vestibular dysfunction, suggesting that clinicians should consider the timing of symptom onset when assessing and treating athletes following SRC.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Masculino , Adolescente , Humanos , Femenino , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Mareo , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/psicología , AtletasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and management behavior of self-reported sport-related concussion (SRC) in Ladies Gaelic Football (LGF) players. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online survey distributed to LGF clubs throughout Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Elite and nonelite adult LGF players (n = 657). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and answered an online survey. Questions on demographic characteristics, SRC history, symptoms, injury characteristics, and management behavior after SRCs that occurred while playing LGF during the previous season were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall concussion history, occurrence of an SRC during the previous LGF season, clinical profile scores, characteristics (eg mechanism and setting), and management behavior (eg following a graded RTP program) after SRCs that occurred during the previous season. RESULTS: Approximately one-fifth (17.5%) of participants sustained a suspected or diagnosed SRC during the previous season, which was higher among elite (26.1%) than nonelite (15.3%) players ( P < 0.01). The highest scoring clinical profiles were the ocular and migraine profiles. Only 3.5% of respondents adhered to all SRC management recommendations. Although players who reported a medically diagnosed versus a suspected SRC more often followed these guidelines, SRC management beyond the initial phase of injury remained inadequate. CONCLUSION: SRC is common in LGF; however, adherence to recommended management guidelines is poor, even among players who receive medical assistance. In particular, few LGF athletes receive clinical concussion care beyond the initial diagnosis and acute management phase. Further research is needed to examine the underlying reasons for poor SRC management in LGF, which will guide the development of future sport-specific interventions.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Deportes de Equipo , Adulto , Humanos , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Autoinforme , FemeninoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine test-retest reliability of individual Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-Third Edition (SCAT-3) symptom scores and symptom severity scores, (2) to examine the specificity/sensitivity of individual SCAT-3 symptom severity scores acutely (24-48 hours) postconcussion, and (3) to develop a model of symptoms best able to differentiate concussed from nonconcussed student athletes and cadets. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, and cross-sectional. SETTING: Twenty-six civilian schools and 3 US service academies. PARTICIPANTS: Collegiate student athletes (n = 5519) and cadets (n = 5359) from the National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Grand Alliance: Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium, including 290 student athletes and 205 cadets, assessed 24 to 48 hours postconcussion. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Concussed and nonconcussed student athlete and cadet groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-Third Edition individual symptom severity scores, total symptom scores, and symptom severity scores. RESULTS: Results indicated poor test-retest reliability across all symptom scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.029-0.331), but several individual symptoms had excellent predictive capability in discriminating concussed from nonconcussed participants (eg, headache, pressure in the head, and don't feel right had area under the curve >0.8, sensitivity >70%, and specificity >85%) regardless of baseline testing. These symptoms were consistent with Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector classification trees with the highest mean probability. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the excellent diagnostic accuracy of honest symptom reporting, notwithstanding the known limitations in symptom underreporting, and suggest that there may be added value in examining individual symptoms rather than total symptom scores and symptom severity scores alone. Finally, findings suggest that baseline testing is not necessary for interpreting postconcussion symptom scores.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Humanos , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Transversales , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Atletas , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal differences in concussion symptoms up to 30 days following a sports-related concussion. STUDY DESIGN: Adolescent and young adult athletes (n = 782) were separated based on time since injury at presentation as Early (0-7 days; n = 321, age: 15.4 ± 1.9 years, 51.7% female), Middle (8-14 days; n = 281, age: 15.8 ± 2.2 years, 54.8% female), and Late (15-30 days; n = 180, age: 15.6 ± 1.8 years, 52.8% female). All participants completed the 22-item Post-Concussion Symptom Scale at first visit. A confirmatory factor analysis was completed separately for each time since injury cohort using a 4-component model reported previously. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis model fit was acceptable for Early, Middle, and Late (using cognitive-migraine-fatigue, affective, sleep, and somatic factors). Both affective (change = 0.30; P = .01; Cohen d = 0.30) and sleep (change = 0.51; P ≤ .001; Cohen d = 0.47) factors were significantly greater in the Late group compared with the Early, but not Middle, groups. The previously reported 4-factor symptom model, including cognitive-migraine-fatigue, affective, somatic, and sleep factors, was appropriate for adolescents up to 30 days' postinjury. However, adolescents who presented between 15 and 30 days' postinjury reported greater affective and sleep symptoms than those who presented within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider these temporal differences when evaluating concussion symptoms in adolescents, as greater affective and sleep symptoms can be predictive of prolonged recovery/persistent complications.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Trastornos Migrañosos , Síndrome Posconmocional , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Fatiga/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Síndrome Posconmocional/complicaciones , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot study of caregiver ratings of therapeutic alliance and patient satisfaction outcomes between telehealth and in-person concussion clinical care in male and female adolescent athletes. SETTING: Outpatient neuropsychology concussion clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients (aged 15.40 ± 1.35 years; 33% female) with a concussion and their accompanying caregivers ( n = 15; 87% female) were randomly assigned to an in-person clinic visit and 15 patients (aged 15.13 ± 1.25 years; 40% female) with a concussion and their accompanying caregivers ( n = 15; 73% female) were randomly assigned to a telehealth clinic visit. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized design. MAIN MEASURES: Therapeutic alliance and patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Therapeutic alliance scores were not significantly different for patients in the in-person or telehealth setting, and caregiver therapeutic alliance scores were significantly higher for the in-person condition than for the telehealth condition. There were no significant differences between in-person and telehealth session satisfaction scores for patients on depth, smoothness, positivity, arousal, and bad-good outcomes. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with the clinical setting was high (ie, General Endorsement). CONCLUSION: Telehealth is feasible for assessing and interpreting clinical concussion examination, interview, and neurocognitive findings, which are perceived by patients and their caregivers to be comparable with in-person care. Positive satisfaction scores also serve to reinforce the need for healthcare providers to seek ways to actively engage with patients and their caregivers through elements of communicative skills such as active listening, building patient rapport, encouraging patient autonomy, and providing an adequate amount of time for interaction and questions. Telehealth for concussion care is increasing in implementation across health systems, and demand is likely to grow in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic and advances in telehealth delivery.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Alianza Terapéutica , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Satisfacción del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has substantially altered the delivery of healthcare for providers and their patients. Patients have been reticent to seek care for many diseases and injuries including concussion due to fears of potential exposure to COVID-19. Moreover, because of social distancing recommendations and stay-at-home orders, patient screening, evaluation, and delivery of care have become less efficient or impossible to perform via in-person clinic visits. Consequently, there was a sudden need to shift healthcare delivery from primarily in-person visits to telehealth. This sudden shift in healthcare delivery brings with it both challenges and opportunities for clinical concussion care. This article is designed to discuss these challenges and opportunities and provide an experiential-based framework for providing concussion care via telehealth. We first provide an overview of a clinical concussion model utilized at concussion specialty clinics from 3 geographically disparate healthcare systems for in-person service delivery prior to COVID-19. We then discuss the creation of new clinical workflows to facilitate the continued provision of concussion specialty care using telehealth. Finally, we examine lessons learned during this healthcare delivery shift including limitations and potential barriers for telehealth for concussion care, as well as opportunities for expansion of concussion care in rural and underserved areas. We also discuss the need to empirically evaluate the comparative efficacy of telehealth and in-person concussion care moving forward.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The dynamic exertion test (EXiT) was developed to help inform return to play after sport-related concussion, but some factors may threaten the internal validity of EXiT and affect clinical interpretation. OBJECTIVE: To compare age, sex, BMI, and sport types across EXiT physiological [pre-EXiT and post-EXiT percentage of maximum heart rate (HR %max) and blood pressure (BP)], performance (change-of-direction task completion time and committed errors), and clinical [symptoms and rating of perceived exertion (RPE)] outcomes among healthy adolescents and adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Eighty-seven participants ( F = 55, 37.4%) reported symptoms and RPE during the EXiT, which consists of a 12-minute treadmill running protocol, and the dynamic circuit, ball toss, box shuffle (SHUF) and carioca (CAR), zig zag (ZZ), proagility (PA), and arrow agility (AA) tasks. Independent samples t tests were conducted for pre-EXiT and post-EXiT HR %max and BP and change-of-direction task completion time and Mann-Whitney U tests for errors, symptoms, and RPE. A series of 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVAs) and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were conducted to compare collision, contact, and noncontact sport types. RESULTS: Adolescents had lower completion time across AA ( P = 0.01) and male athletes lower than female athletes on CAR, ZZ, PA, and AA ( P < 0.04). Male athletes reported greater RPE after the SHUF, CAR, and AA ( P < 0.03). HR %max , errors, and symptoms were equivocal across all subgroups ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Age and sex should be considered in the interpretation of performance and clinical, but not physiological, EXiT outcomes. The EXiT is a standardized exercise assessment and generalizable to healthy athletes.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Deportes , Adolescente , Adulto , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Índice de Masa Corporal , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esfuerzo FísicoRESUMEN
Overparenting (O-P), or "helicopter" parenting, has warranted increased attention across the past decade. It is characterized as being overly involved, protective, and low on granting autonomy, and is associated with deleterious psychosocial outcomes outside of the concussion literature. This study examined the association of overparenting and patient emotional distress and clinical outcomes (i.e., symptoms, neurocognitive test scores, recovery time) post-concussion. Adolescents/young adult concussion patients (injury < 30 days) and parents (N = 101 child-parent dyads) participated. Patient participants completed measures of depression, anxiety, stress, and concussion clinical outcomes while parents concurrently completed an overparenting measure. Results of a general linear model found that overparenting was associated with higher anxiety and stress report of the child. Overparenting had a significant positive correlation with concussion recovery, although of a small magnitude. Emotional distress level, but not overparenting, was moderately associated with worse performance on clinical outcomes, including neurocognitive testing, vestibular/ocular motor dysfunction, and concussion symptom severity.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adolescente , Ansiedad , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Emociones , Humanos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Responsabilidad Parental , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a 4-week precision vestibular rehabilitation intervention compared with a behavioral management control intervention for adolescents with vestibular symptoms/impairment within 21 days of a concussion. STUDY DESIGN: This study used double-blind, randomized controlled trial design involving adolescent (12-18 years) patients with a diagnosed sport/recreation-related concussion with vestibular symptoms/impairment from a concussion-specialty clinic between October 2018 and February 2020. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 to either a 4-week vestibular intervention group (VESTIB) or a behavioral management control group (CONTROL). CONTROLS (n = 25) were prescribed behavioral management strategies (eg, physical activity, sleep, hydration, nutrition, stress management) and instructed to perform stretching/physical activity (eg, walking, stationary cycle) 30 minutes/day. VESTIB (n = 25) were prescribed precision vestibular rehabilitation exercises and instructed to perform at-home exercises for 30 minutes/day. Primary outcomes were improvement in Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening vestibular items (ie, horizontal/vertical vestibular-ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity) at 4 weeks postenrollment. RESULTS: We screened 310 and enrolled a total of 55 (18%) adolescent patients who were randomized to one of the interventions. Fifty of fifty-five (91%) participants completed all aspects of the study protocol. Participants in VESTIB improved significantly across the intervention period in horizontal (mean difference-1.628; 95% CI [-3.20, -0.06]; P = .04) and vertical (mean difference-2.24; 95% CI [-4.01, -0.48]; P = .01) vestibular-ocular reflex, but not visual motion sensitivity (mean difference-2.03; 95% CI [-4.26, 0.19]) of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening score compared with CONTROLS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the vestibular intervention group experienced greater clinical improvements in vestibular symptoms/impairment than controls across the 4-week intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03555370.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Enfermedades Vestibulares/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vestibulares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vestibulares/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the difference between an individual's first and second concussion using a comprehensive, multidomain assessment including symptoms, neurocognitive, vestibular, ocular, and individual demographic and medical history risk factors associated with protracted recovery. SETTING: Concussion Specialty Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-three patients (aged 13-21 years; 57% female) diagnosed with 2 separate concussions (380.5 ± 278.7 days between injuries) from August 2016 to August 2018. DESIGN: Retrospective within-subjects cohort study. MAIN MEASURES: ImPACT, PCSS, and Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) at each visit. Patients were divided into "normal" (≤30 days) and "protracted" recovery (>30 days) for χ2 analyses. RESULTS: There were no differences between the first and second injuries in recovery time, VOMS, visual and verbal memory, or reaction time. Visual motor speed scores were higher at the second injury time point and reported sleep symptoms were higher at the first injury time point. In addition, participants reported to the clinic on average 3 days earlier for an evaluation for their second injury. Results from χ2 analyses indicated that female sex predicted protracted recovery (>30 days) from concussion at the first injury time point (OR = 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.6; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide preliminary evidence that there is no clinical difference between patients' first and second concussions when both injuries were treated through a concussion specialty clinic.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tiempo de Reacción , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in the extant literature on mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in military service members and veterans using network analysis based on a comprehensive search of original, peer-reviewed research articles involving human participants published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Specifically, we employed network analysis to evaluate associations in the following areas: (1) peer-reviewed journals, (2) authors, (3) organizations/institutions, and (4) relevant key words. PARTICIPANTS: Included studies were published in peer-reviewed journals available on Web of Science database, using US military service members or veterans. DESIGN: Bibliometric network analytical review. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes for each analysis included number of articles, citations, total link strength, and clusters. RESULTS: The top publishing journals were (1) Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, (2) Military Medicine, (3) Brain Injury, (4) Journal of Neurotrauma, and (5) Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. The top publishing authors were (1) French, (2) Lange, (3) Cooper, (4) Vanderploeg, and (5) Brickell. The top research institutions were (1) Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, (2) Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, (3) University of California San Diego, (4) Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, and (5) Boston University. The top co-occurring key words in this analysis were (1) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), (2) persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS), (3) blast injury, (4) postconcussion syndrome (PCS), and (5) Alzheimer's disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this network analysis indicate a clear focus on veteran health, as well as investigations on chronic effects of mTBI. Research in civilian mTBI indicates that delaying treatment for symptoms and impairments related to mTBI may not be the most precise treatment strategy. Increasing the number of early, active, and targeted treatment trials in military personnel could translate to meaningful improvements in clinical practices for managing mTBI in this population.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Personal Militar , Síndrome Posconmocional , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To derive minimum detectable change (MDC) across individual Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) items and VOMS overall score in 17-25 years old collegiate athletes and to examine false positive rates. METHOD: Participants (n = 378) completed VOMS pre-season for two consecutive years. MDC was identified for individual VOMS symptom items and NPC distance (cm). Both total and change methods of VOMS scoring were included in analysis. RESULTS: Regarding total scoring, MDC for ocular VOMS symptom items was 1 and MDC for vestibular VOMS symptoms items was 2. MDC for NPC was 4 cm and for VOMS overall score was 10. Regarding change scoring, MDC for each VOMS symptom item was 1, and for VOMS overall score was 8. False positives ranged from 5.3% to 15.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents MDCs for each VOMS item and overall VOMS score, using total and change scoring. These values can be considered true change outside measurement error with 95% confidence in a 17-25 year old collegiate athlete population.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Vestíbulo del Laberinto , Adolescente , Adulto , Atletas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sleep dysfunction (SD) is associated with a high symptom burden and lower neurocognitive performance after concussion and on baseline testing without injury. However, few studies have compared concussed athletes and controls with and without SD on clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in clinical outcomes among both concussed athletes and matched controls with and without SD. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged 12 to 20 years were recruited from a concussion clinic (n = 50 patients) and research registry/flyers (n = 50 healthy age-/sex-matched controls). Participants were categorized by self-reported SD into one of 4 groups: sport-related concussion (SRC) + SD, SRC only, SD only, and controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Vestibular/Oculomotor Screening (VOMS), and neurocognitive testing (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment Cognitive Test). RESULTS: Compared with the SRC only group, the SRC + SD group performed worse on all neurocognitive domains, had a higher total symptom score, and endorsed more symptoms on most VOMS items. In addition, the SRC + SD group was at an increased likelihood of having at least 1 abnormal VOMS item compared with SRC only group. The SRC only group had neurocognitive test scores and symptom reports statistically similar to the SD only group. CONCLUSION: Sleep dysfunction after concussion is related to worse neurocognitive performance and higher concussion symptom reporting. This study extended findings to suggest vestibular symptomology is worse among athletes with SD after injury compared to injured athletes without SD. Similar performances on concussion assessments for the SRC only and SD only groups suggest SD may appear similar to clinical presentation of concussion, even at baseline in the absence of SRC.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adolescente , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , SueñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After a concussion, athletes may be at increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries. Altered perception of action boundaries (ABP), or the limits of one's action capabilities, is one possible mechanism for this increase in injury risk after concussion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in symptoms, neurocognitive, vestibular/oculomotor, and action boundary function between subjects with no concussion history (NoHx) and concussion history (ConcHX). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh. PARTICIPANTS: ConcHx (n = 22; age: 21.8 ± 3.0 years, height: 174.0 ± 8.3 cm, and mass: 77.8 ± 14.8 kg) and NoHx athletes (n = 24; age: 21.6 ± 2.0 years, height: 176.0 ± 10.0 cm, and mass: 72.0 ± 15.3 kg). INTERVENTION: Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool, and the Perception-Action Coupling Task (PACT). The PACT measures the accuracy of ABP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurocognitive domain scores, PCSS, VOMS subdomain symptom gain, ABP accuracy, and actualization. RESULTS: ConcHx reported 2.7 ± 1.5 previous concussions occurring on average 263.8 ± 228.9 days prior. ConcHx was higher on several VOMS items including vertical/horizontal saccades (P = 0.001; P = 0.05), vertical/horizontal vestibular-ocular reflex (P < 0.001; P = 0.04), and visual motion sensitivity (P < 0.001). Average PACT movement time (P = 0.01) and reaction time (P = 0.01) were longer in ConcHx. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary support for impaired vestibular/oculomotor function and ABP in ConcHx compared with NoHx. The current results may enhance our understanding of the mechanisms for increased musculoskeletal injury risk after concussion.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Percepción , Adulto , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine which assessments best identify athletes with sport-related concussion (SRC) from healthy controls in the acute/early subacute phase (within 10 days of SRC) of injury. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Specialty concussion clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four athletes with SRC (52% male) and 59 matched (age and sex), healthy controls (56% male) aged 12 to 20 years (Mean [M] = 15.07, Standard Deviation [SD] = 2.23). ASSESSMENT: Participants completed symptom, cognitive, vestibular/oculomotor, near point of convergence (NPC), and balance assessments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariate analyses were conducted to compare athletes with SRC to healthy controls across all assessments. Assessments that significantly differed between the SRC group and healthy controls were used as predictors in an enter method logistic regression (LR) model and subsequent forward stepwise LR. RESULTS: Results of LR analyses indicated that symptom inventory and symptom provocation on vestibular/oculomotor assessments significantly predicted athletes with SRC versus controls. The forward stepwise LR accurately classified 84.6% of the overall sample (78.3% of athletes with SRC and 91.2% of controls were accurately predicted) and accounted for 60.5% of the variance in predicting athletes with SRC versus controls. Total symptom inventory score (P = 0.003) and vestibular/oculomotor symptom provocation (P < 0.01) were the most sensitive and specific measures in a comprehensive, multimodal assessment for distinguishing athletes with SRC from healthy controls within 10 days of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Elements within a multimodal evaluation that are the most robust at discriminating athletes with SRC from healthy controls in the acute/early subacute phase of injury include symptom report and provocation of symptoms on vestibular/oculomotor assessment. These assessments should be considered in conjunction with other objective assessments (ie, NPC measurement and cognitive testing) as part of a comprehensive evaluation of SRC.