Evaluation of modified C-palatal plates on speech articulation using acoustic analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess speech perturbation and adaptation for patients wearing modified C-palatal plates (MCPPs) over time. METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 patients, 20 wearing MCPPs as the experimental group (age: 20.7 ± 5.8 years) and 20 patients wearing a transpalatal arch (TPA) as the control group (age: 21.5 ± 6.4 years). The sounds /t/, /d/, /s/, /n/, /r/, /tʃ/. and /j/ were recorded for each patient at six time points: immediately before (T0) and after (T1) appliance placement; then 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after placement (T2-T5). Acoustic analysis of pitch and voice onset time (VOT) was performed by Praat software. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was used to assess changes in the pitch and VOT over time and the difference between the appliances. RESULTS: With the MCPP appliance, /n/, /r/, /tʃ/ and /j/ decreased in VOT starting in the first week while /t/ and /s/ almost returned to pre-treatment levels after 2 weeks. VOT for the /d/ sound did not change between T0 and T3, but it decreased after 3 weeks. There were no significant differences in pitch and VOT between the two groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Wearing an MCPP device caused patients to initially distort the articulation of several sounds, but the distortion dissipated within 1 to 2 weeks. It is recommended that patients and/or their parents be advised during pre-treatment counselling of the possibility of temporary speech changes with MCPP placement.

A 3-dimensional evaluation of available retromolar space for the application of ramal plates.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the available retromolar space for ramal plates in patients with Class I and III malocclusions and compare that space with and without third molars using cone-beam computed tomography. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 30 patients (17 males, 13 females; mean age, 22.2 ± 4.5 years) with Class III malocclusion and 29 subjects (18 males, 11 females; mean age, 24.3 ± 3.7 years) with Class I malocclusion were analyzed. Available retromolar space at 4 axial levels of the second molar root and the volume of the retromolar bone were evaluated. Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (repeated measures analysis of covariance) was applied to compare the variables between Class I and III malocclusions and the presence of third molars. RESULTS: Patients with Class I and III relationships showed up to 12.7 mm of available retromolar space at 2 mm apical from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). At 8 mm apical from CEJ, patients with Class III malocclusion had 11.1 mm of space, whereas those with a Class I relationship showed 9.8 mm of available space. When patients had third molars, the amount of available retromolar space was significantly greater in patients with a Class I and III relationship. However, patients with Class III malocclusion exhibited greater available retromolar space than those with a Class I relationship (P = 0.028). In addition, the bone volume was significantly greater in patients with Class III malocclusion than in patients with a Class I relationship and those with third molars than in those without them (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Class I and III groups showed the availability of at least 10.0 mm of retromolar space 2 mm apical to the CEJ for molar distalization. Based on this information, it is suggested that clinicians consider available retromolar space for molar distalization in diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with Class I and III malocclusion.

The effects of a corticotomy on space closure by molar protraction using TSADs in patients with missing mandibular first molars.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a triangular-shaped corticotomy on the protraction of second and third molars in patients with missing mandibular first molars. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The corticotomy and non-corticotomy groups consisted of sixteen first molars in fifteen patients (28.6 ± 9.4 years) and nineteen first molars in fifteen patients (26.6 ± 8.4 years), respectively. A triangular-shaped corticotomy was performed between the second premolar and molar. Temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) were placed between the first and second premolars in both groups. Mandibular dentition variables were measured on the pre and post-treatment panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms. Analysis of covariance was performed. RESULTS: The corticotomy group exhibited 2.8 mm more inter-radicular correction between the second molar to second premolar roots (P < .001) and 1.6 mm more inter-radicular distance correction between the third molar to second premolar roots compared to the non-corticotomy group (P < .01). The corticotomy group required 5.5 months less treatment time for space closure (P < .05), but the total treatment time was the same for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-radicular distance between the mandibular second premolar and molar and treatment times for space closure was significantly reduced in the corticotomy group.

Comparison of treatment effects from total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plates versus maxillary premolar extraction in Class II patients with severe overjet.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the skeletodental and soft tissue changes with total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) and maxillary first premolar extraction treatment in Class II malocclusion patients with severe overjet. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: The sample consisted of 46 adult patients who had Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overjet; 25 of them received non-extraction treatment with MCPPs (age, 22.5 ± 7.2 years), and 21 received maxillary first premolar extraction treatment (age 23.4 ± 6.5 years). METHOD: A total of 26 variables were measured on pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms. To evaluate the differences between pretreatment and post-treatment in each group, t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. To compare the amount of change between the two groups, MANOVA test was used. RESULTS: The overjet was significantly reduced in the MCPP and extraction groups by 4.8 mm and 5.4 mm, respectively. However, the two groups had no significant difference in the sagittal, vertical and angular changes of the maxillary incisors. In addition, regarding soft tissue changes, the MCPP and extraction groups showed an increased nasolabial angle of 7.5° and 9.4°, decreased upper lip to the true vertical line of 1.8 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the skeletal changes between the MCPP and extraction groups, and the reduction in overjet was similar in the groups. These results suggest that MCPP might be a viable treatment option for total arch distalization in Class II malocclusion patients with severe overjet.

Correction of an adult Class III malocclusion through regaining of orthodontic space and an implant restoration.

This case report describes the interdisciplinary treatment of a 23-year-old female with Class III malocclusion and a missing maxillary left second premolar. Treatment alternatives were discussed, and the selected treatment plan was presented to illustrate a way to gain space for the premolar implant restoration and correct Class III relationship through maxillary molar retraction followed by maxillary total arch protraction with a palatal temporary skeletal anchorage device. Esthetic anterior alignment and functional occlusal rehabilitation was achieved, and facial balance was maintained at the end of treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Implant restoration in conjunction with regaining orthodontic space by a team of multidisciplinary dental specialists presents an effective treatment solution to permanent tooth agenesis. Class III malocclusion can be treated with a combination of maxillary protraction and mandibular retraction using temporary skeletal anchorage devices. The versatility of modified palatal C-plates presents greater clinical application when related side effects are controlled with solid understanding of their biomechanics.

Development of a maxillomandibular arch form based on the center of resistance of teeth using cone-beam computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION: Controlling transverse discrepancies is necessary to ensure stable and functional occlusion. Altered molar inclinations can camouflage the transverse relationship. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the maxillomandibular relationship of the center of resistance (CR) of the arch form created by the CR of teeth and compare these CR arch forms by their skeletal patterns. METHODS: Sixty patients with minor crowding and normal posterior overjet were divided into 3 groups according to ANB angle: skeletal Class I group had ANB angle between 0° and 4° (n = 20), skeletal Class II group had ANB angle >4° (n = 20), and skeletal Class III group had ANB angle <0° (n = 20). The 3-dimensional coordinates of the CR were estimated using cone-beam computed tomography images and projected on the CR occlusal plane to obtain the 2-dimensional coordinates. The CR arch forms were constructed and evaluated using Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Mass). RESULTS: On comparing maxillomandibular CR arch form widths, the maxilla was significantly larger than the mandible of the canine and first premolar. The mandible was larger in the first molar of the skeletal Class III group. The maxillomandibular CR arch form width ratios were between 0.97 and 1.35. On comparing maxillomandibular CR arch form areas, the maxilla was significantly larger than the mandible in the anterior segment, and the mandible was larger in the posterior segment. The ratios were between 0.86 and 2.25. In between-group comparison, the skeletal Class III group showed significantly greater arch forms in the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: CR arch forms had significant maxillomandibular differences throughout the arch. The maxillomandibular ratios could be a reference for site-specific transverse discrepancy analysis.

Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluate the treatment effects of maxillary protraction using palatal plates and compare them to those with conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion. METHODS: Forty patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of anchorage used: group 1 (n = 20; mean age, 10.5 ± 1.6 years; palatal plates) and group 2 (n = 20; mean age, 10.0 ± 1.2 years; tooth-borne appliances). Lateral cephalograms were taken before and after maxillary protraction. Skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue variables were measured. For statistical analysis, paired and independent t tests were performed. RESULTS: Group 1 showed maxilla advancement by 2.3 ± 1.0 mm compared with group 2 by 0.9 ± 0.6 mm, and group 2 indicated clockwise rotation of the mandible, but there was no such clockwise rotation in group 1 (P <0.001). Group 1 had a less lingual inclination of the mandibular incisors than group 2 (IMPA, -1.0 ± 3.8° vs -3.8 ± 2.8°; P <0.05). There was no difference in soft-tissue changes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A facemask with palatal plate induced maxillary advancement with less mandibular clockwise rotation and dental movement than conventional tooth-borne anchorage. This modality can be used efficiently for maxillary protraction in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.

Cephalometric and model evaluations after molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with severe arch length discrepancy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes after molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with severe maxillomandibular arch length discrepancies. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with Class I and II malocclusion (19.0 ± 7.3 years; 17 females and 8 males), who had severe maxillary crowding of >10 mm, and moderate mandibular crowding of >6 mm, underwent molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates and buccal miniscrews with approximately 300 g of force per side. Models were made, and cephalograms were taken before and after treatment. Cephalometric variables and arch dimensions were measured. Paired t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the maxillary dentition, an average of 12.4 mm of crowding was resolved by molar distalization of 4.4 mm, interproximal stripping of 0.7 mm, and arch expansion. In the mandibular dentition, crowding of 6.7 mm was alleviated by molar distalization of 2.4 mm, an interproximal of 1.5 mm, and additional arch expansion. The incisor positions were maintained (SN-U1, 101.3°; IMPA, 88.8°), and soft-tissue profiles were improved (LL/E-line -1.1 mm; P < 0.001) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary and mandibular tooth-size arch length discrepancy of 12.4 mm and 6.7 mm, respectively, were resolved by molar distalization, interproximal reduction, and arch expansion, whereas incisor positions were maintained, and soft-tissue profiles were improved. This could be a viable treatment option in patients with moderate-to-severe crowding.

Treatment effects after maxillary total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate in patients with Class II malocclusion with sinus pneumatization.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment effects after molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with Class II malocclusion with maxillary sinus pneumatization. METHODS: This study consisted of 70 lateral cephalograms derived from cone-beam computerized tomography images of 35 patients with Class II malocclusion (mean age 22.3 ± 7.4 years) who had undergone bilateral total arch distalization of the maxillary dentition using modified C-palatal plates. The samples were divided into 2 groups according to sinus pneumatization; group 1 (n = 40), cephalograms with sinus pneumatization and group 2 (n = 30) cephalograms without sinus pneumatization. Paired t tests and independent-sample t tests were used to compare the changes in each group and between groups. RESULTS: The distal movement of the maxillary first molars was 4.3 mm for group 1 and 3.5 mm for group 2, with the intrusion of 1.4 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Group 1 showed 3.5° of distal tipping of the maxillary second molars, which was significantly greater than the 0.2° in group 2 (P <0.05). The total treatment period, including distalization, was 2.2 years for group 1 and 1.9 years for group 2, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the amount of distal movement and intrusion of the maxillary first molars between groups 1 and 2. Therefore, these results suggest that regardless of sinus pneumatization, molar distalization using temporary skeletal anchorage devices in Class II patients can be performed as a nonextraction treatment.

Comparison of treatment effects after total mandibular arch distalization with miniscrews vs ramal plates in patients with Class III malocclusion.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare treatment effects after total mandibular arch distalization with buccal interradicular miniscrews vs ramal plates in patients with Class III malocclusion. METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 patients with Class III malocclusion; 20 were treated with distalization via buccal miniscrews (age, 25.8 ± 7.9 years), whereas 20 were treated with ramal plates (age, 26.4 ± 6.1 years). Twenty-three linear and angular measurements were analyzed on pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms. The changes in each group and differences in treatment effects between the 2 groups were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the mandibular first molars and the amount of distal tipping was 1.8 mm, 0.6 mm, and 5.4° in the buccal miniscrew group vs 3.6 mm, 2.0 mm, and 6.8° in the ramal plate group, respectively. In addition, 2.2° of counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane was observed in the buccal miniscrew group after 1.3 mm of molar intrusion (P <0.001). The distal movement of the lower lip was 0.6 mm in the buccal miniscrew group vs 2.3 mm in the ramal plate group. CONCLUSIONS: The buccal miniscrew group showed more molar intrusion and counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane than in the ramal plate group. The ramal plate produced more distalization of the mandibular dentition with clockwise rotation of the mandible. Therefore, these results can be useful when selecting the type of temporary skeletal anchorage devices to treat patients with Class III malocclusion, depending on their vertical pattern.

Distalization of maxillary molars using temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the treatment effects (amount of distalization, distal tipping and vertical movement) of buccally versus palatally placed temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) on maxillary first molars during distalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective cohort studies on maxillary molar distalization using TSADs in patients with Class II malocclusion. After study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, meta-analyses were performed for the amount of distalization, distal tipping and intrusion of first molars. RESULTS: Nine studies (2 RCTs and 7 prospective studies) were included. The risk of bias of the RCTs was low to unclear. The non-randomized studies were of moderate quality. In five studies, the TSADs were placed in the infrazygomatic process while in two studies, they were placed in the buccal inter-radicular spaces, and in two studies, they were placed in the midpalatal region. The first molar distalization was 2.75 mm when buccal inter-radicular TSADs were used, but 4.07 and 4.17 mm with palatal and infrazgomatic TSADs. The palatal appliances were associated with 11.17° of distal tipping of the first molar while infrazygomatic and buccal inter-radicular TSADs resulted in 3.99° and 1.70° of tipping, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-radicular TSADs resulted in less distal tipping but also in less distalization. Palatal TSAD-supported appliances showed the greatest amount of distal tipping. Further RCTs or prospective studies on the effect of various designs of TSAD-supported distalization are warranted.

Factors associated with the maxillary third molar position after total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate in adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term position of erupted third molars after maxillary total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plates (MCPPs) in adolescents and to identify factors associated with these positions. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty-two third molars (male: 20, female: 42) in Class II patients treated with MCPPs and thirty-nine teeth for the Control group (male: 22, female: 17). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were analyzed using panoramic radiographs taken initially (T0), after treatment (T1) and after >3 years retention (T2). Third molars were classified as downward (Group A, N = 31; males: 12, females: 19) and upward (Group B, N = 31; males: 8, females: 23) based on their vertical position after treatment. Analysis of variance and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: The vertical position of the third molars of Group A, Group B, and the Control showed a 2.2, 3.5 and 2.7 mm downward movement at T2. However, there was no difference in the amount of third molar eruption among the groups. Regarding factors affecting the vertical distance of the third molar, Age, C8-OP, ∠8-OP and D7-T at the initial affected vertical position of the third molars after molar distalization (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Group A and B showed no difference in the third molar eruption during retention after total arch distalization. This study suggests that it might be unnecessary to extract the developing third molar before molar distalization in Class II adolescents.

A conservative approach for an adult patient with a fractured tooth and crowding: Autotransplantation at the fracture site.

Autotransplantation of a mature premolar in adults can be a treatment of choice for tooth replacement when combined with well-planned orthodontic treatment. This case report describes the successful treatment of a 39-year-old patient with severe crowding and a hopelessly fractured tooth on the maxillary left side. Maxillary dental crowding was relieved by extraction of a premolar on the right side, and this extracted tooth was autotransplanted to replace the fractured tooth. A mandibular incisor was extracted to correct anterior crossbite. The total treatment period was 20 months. The treatment results showed a good long-term prognosis after transplantation of a mature premolar with normal surrounding alveolar bone level for over 6 years of follow-up. Occlusion and periodontal health were excellent in the long term.

Long-term evaluation of maxillary molar position after distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with and without second molar eruption.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatment effects after molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates with and without second molar eruption and to evaluate the three-dimensional position of the molars during long-term retention using cone-beam computed tomography. METHODS: The study sample comprised 74 third molars in 42 patients. Twenty-seven adolescent patients (mean age, 12.6 years) having 48 maxillary third molars were divided into 2 groups according to the eruption of their second molars: 15 patients with second molar eruption (group 1) and 12 patients without second molar eruption (group 2). Pretreatment, posttreatment, and long-term data (mean, 5.2 years) from cone-beam computed tomography were scanned and compared with control groups. RESULTS: There was less tipping movement of the first and second molars (0.94° and 3.22°) and distal tipping movement of the third molars (8.91°) in group 1 than in group 2 (4.36°, 7.39°, and 3.08°, respectively), but the treatment time was shorter and the positional change of the third molars was insignificant in group 2. In the long-term, the second molars fully erupted after distalization in group 2, and there was no difference in the third molar position between group 1, group 2, and the control group, except for the vertical position of the third molars in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In the long-term, the second molars fully erupted after distalization, and the third molars were in a favorable position. Therefore, these findings suggest that clinicians do not need to extract developing third molars before distalization in adolescents.

Biomechanical analysis for total mesialization of the maxillary dentition: A finite element study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze and clarify tooth movement during mesialization of the whole maxillary dentition with various force angulations (FAs). METHODS: A finite element method was used to simulate the long-term orthodontic movement of the maxillary dentition by accumulating the initial displacement of teeth produced by elastic deformation of the periodontal ligament. A mesial force of 3 N was applied to the maxillary second molar at 5 different FAs (-30°, -15°, 0°, 15°, and 30°) to the occlusal plane. RESULTS: At an FA of 28°, the line of action of the force passed through the center of resistance of the maxillary whole dentition. With all FAs, the central incisors and molars tipped labially and mesially, respectively. The tipping angles gradually decreased as the FAs shifted from -30° to 30°. The molars tipped lingually with FAs of -30° and -15°, whereas they tipped buccally with FAs of 0°, 15°, and 30°. The molars tended to rotate mesiolingually more as the angle of force increased toward an FA of 30°. The occlusal plane rotated counterclockwise with FAs of -30°, -15°, and 0°, whereas it rotated clockwise with FAs of 15° and 30°. With an FA of 30°, buccal tipping and mesiolingual rotation of the molars, and the change in the occlusal plane angle decreased when the transpalatal arch (TPA) was fixed to the first molars and decreased, even more when the TPA was fixed to the second molars rather than the first molars, when a thicker TPA was used, and when the TPA was fixed to both molars rather than a single molar. CONCLUSIONS: There was a correlation between tooth movement during mesialization of the whole maxillary dentition and the angle at which the force was applied.

Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the maxillary dentition: A finite element study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify the tooth movement patterns relative to various force angulations (FAs) when distalizing the total maxillary dentition. METHODS: Long-term orthodontic movement of the maxillary dentition was simulated by accumulating the initial displacement of teeth produced by elastic deflection of the periodontal ligament using a finite element analysis. Distalization forces of 3 N were applied to the archwire between the maxillary canine and first premolar at 5 different FAs (-30°, -15°, 0°, 15°, and 30°) to the occlusal plane. RESULTS: Maxillary incisors and molars showed lingual and distal tipping at all FAs, respectively. At a force angulation of 30°, almost bodily distalization of the total maxillary dentition occurred, but incisors showed considerable lingual tipping because of the effect of clearance gap (0.003-in, 0.022 × 0.025-in bracket slot, 0.019 × 0.025-in archwire) and elastic deflection of the archwire. Medial displacement of the maxillary anterior teeth occurred because of lingual tipping during distalization. The occlusal plane rotated clockwise at all FAs because of extrusion of the maxillary incisors and intrusion of the maxillary second molars, and the amounts decreased as FA increased. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth movement patterns during distalization of the total maxillary dentition were recognized. With an understanding of the mechanics, a proper treatment plan can be established.

Total maxillary arch distalization with modified C-palatal plates in adolescents: A long-term study using cone-beam computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term skeletodental effects, the volume of maxillary tuberosity, and airway space changes after maxillary molar distalization using modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) in adolescents with Class II malocclusion. METHODS: The sample consisted of 20 adolescent patients (MCPP group; mean age, 12.9 ± 1.0 year) who underwent bilateral distalization of their maxillary dentition and 20 subjects as a control group. In the MCPP group, cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before distalization, at the end of the treatment, and during retention with a minimum of a 3-year posttreatment follow up period. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis with the Bonferroni test were used to identify significant differences between time points. RESULTS: After the long-term observation period, sagittal skeletal and dental relationships were maintained (there were no significant changes in ANB, occlusal plane angle, and overjet postretention). The vertical skeletal dimension did not change during treatment and was stable at the long-term follow-up (the mandibular plane angle and ANS-Me were relatively well maintained). The volume of the maxillary tuberosity showed no significant change during long-term retention. However, the volume was significantly smaller in the treatment group than in the control group (P <0.0001). There were no significant airway space changes after distalization and the postretention period. In addition, there was no significant difference between the MCPP and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Improved sagittal skeletal and dental relationships because of treatment were maintained in the long-term evaluation. There was no negative long-term effect on airway space associated with the maxillary arch distalization. Therefore, these findings might be beneficial for clinicians in diagnosis and treatment planning for Class II malocclusion in adolescents.

A Staged Expansion Screw Protocol to Retract the Premaxilla In BCLP Infants with Delayed Nasoalveolar Molding.

Currently, the treatment protocol for cleft palate at several centers around the world involves primary lip repair around 3-4 months of age, using presurgical nasoalveolar molding, which is done soon after birth. Unfortunately, in cases where treatment is delayed, the potential for repositioning the nasoalveolar apparatus is severely limited. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate a novel use of an expansion screw appliance to aid in the faster and more efficient active molding of the premaxillary and lateral maxillary segments in infants for whom the start of PNAM therapy is delayed, without the side effects commonly seen with pin-retained active molding appliances.

Comparison of Treatment Effects with Modified C-Palatal Plates vs Greenfield Molar Distalizer Appliances in Adolescents.

Objectives: The aim of study was to evaluate skeletodental and soft tissue treatment effects and the amount of maxillary molar distalization with modified C-palatal plates vs. Greenfield molar distalizer appliances in adolescents. Study design: The samples consisted of pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms collected from 39 patients with Class II malocclusion. The MCPP group was comprised of 21 patients (mean age: 11.7 ± 1.3 years) treated with MCPP appliances while the GMD group included 18 patients (mean age: 11.2 ± 0.9 years) treated with GMD. Fixed orthodontic treatment started with the distalization process in both groups. From each cephalograpm, twenty-nine variables were measured for analysis and then the two groups were compared. Descriptive statistics, a paired t-test, and multivariate analysis of variance were performed to compare the treatment effects within and between the groups. Results: There was significant treatmentrelated change in the sagittal position of the maxilla and the mandible within each group. However, there were no statistically significant inter-group differences. The mean maxillary first molar distalization was 3.96 mm in the MCPP group vs. 2.85 mm in the GMD group. Both groups showed minimal distal tipping, but the maxillary incisors were significantly extruded by 3.04 ± 0.89 mm (P < .001) in GMD group. There was no significant difference in treatment duration between the groups. Conclusions: The maxillary first molars of both the MCPP and GMD groups were effectively distalized and there were significant skeletal changes in the maxilla. However, the maxillary incisors were significantly extruded in the GMD group.

Displacement of mandibular dentition during total arch distalization according to locations and types of TSADs: 3D Finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) on the mandibular dentition and mandible during total arch distalization according to locations and types of the TSADs using finite element (FE) analysis. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A model of the mandible and teeth was used to build an FE analysis model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four FE models were constructed: Ramal plate (Type A), Sugawara plate (Type B), buccal shelf miniscrew (Type C) and interradicular miniscrew (Type D). A retraction force of 300 g per side was applied to the mandibular archwire. RESULTS: In the sagittal plane, the plates Type A and B showed more distal displacement than the miniscrew Types C and D, especially in the posterior teeth. Type A presented the greatest amount of distal displacement, followed by Types B, C and D. Type A was closest to the line of occlusion, which showed the lowest degree of buccolingual angulations of the molar crowns. Vertically, Type A showed a greater amount of extrusive displacement of the posterior teeth than the other types of TSADs, while Type B showed intrusive displacement of the molars. CONCLUSIONS: The ramal plate showed a greater amount of distal and extrusive displacement of the posterior teeth than the miniscrews. Therefore, clinicians should consider the displacement of mandibular dentition during total arch distalization according to types of the TSADs.