Long-term outcome of radical radiation therapy for prostatic carcinoma: 1967-1987.

PURPOSE: This study was done to review long-term results of radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 674 patients with Stage T1a, T1b, T2a, T2b, T3, and any T,N1,M0 disease, treated with external beam radiotherapy between January 1, 1967 and December 1987, were reviewed. These patients were treated to an average total dose of 66 Gy, with an average fractional dose of 2.05 Gy, using megavoltage. The duration of follow-up for surviving patients ranged from a minimum of 7 years to more than 20 years. RESULTS: The survival for 151 Stage T1a,T1b patients was 98.5% at 5 years, 93.6% at 10 years, and 75.2% at 15 years. Survival for 346 Stage T2a,b patients was 94.4% at 5 years, 67.9% at 10 years, and 41.5% at 15 years. Survival for 92 Stage T3 patients was 87.3% at 5 years, 54% at 10 years, and 26.6% at 15 years. The survival for 85 any T,N1,M0 patients was 73.9% at 5 years, 34.4% at 10 years, and 8.5% at 15 years. At 15 years, 75.2% of Stage T1a,b patients, 41.5% of Stage T2a,b patients, 21.7% of Stage T3 patients, and 8.5% of Stage T,N1,M0 patients remained free of local recurrence and distant metastases. The elevation of prostatic acid phosphatase prior to radiotherapy was an unfavorable prognostic factor, with impact on both loco-regional recurrences and survival. CONCLUSIONS: The external beam radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate produced a good loco-regional control, NED, and overall survival. Patients with smaller tumors and low grade fared better than the ones with more aggressive and/or bulky tumors. The weakness of this study is the absence of serial prostate-specific measurements, which were not available during the period under study. The complication rate requiring surgical intervention was low, i.e. 0.4%.

[Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm]. / Zapalny tetniak aorty brzusznej.

The reported incidence of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA) is from 2% to 14% of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and the etiology of this disease is still discussed--according to the literature several pathogenic theories have been proposed. From 1992 to 1997 32 patients with IAAA were operated on. The patients were mostly symptomatic--abdominal pain was present in 68.75% cases, back pain in 31.25%, fever in 12.5% and weight loss in 6.25% of the operated patients. In all the patients ultrasound examination was performed, in 4 patients CT and in 3 cases urography. All the patients were operated on and characteristic signs of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm like: thickened aortic wall, perianeurysmal infiltration or retroperitoneal fibrosis with involvement of retroperitoneal structures were found. In all cases surgery was performed using transperitoneal approach; in three cases intraoperatively contiguous abdominal organs were injured, which was connected with their involvement into periaortic inflammation. In 4 cases clamping of the aorta was done at the level of the diaphragmatic hiatus. 3 patients (9.37%) died (one patient with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm). Authors present diagnostic procedures and the differences in the surgical tactic, emphasizing the necessity of the surgical therapy in patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm.

[Analysis of mortality risk factors in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm]. / Analiza czynników ryzyka zgonu u chorych z peknietym tetniakiem aorty brzusznej.

The purpose of the study was to estimate which factors could have effect on successful outcome of surgery in patients operated on for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). The analysis referred to 66 patients operated upon from 1992 to 1995. The specification of all factors which could bring the influence on the successful result of the surgical treatment, was done. The statistical analysis was taken using the Yule-Kendall test and according to it for each factor the risk coefficient Q (from 0.8 to 1.0) was suggested. The group of factors conditioning in each case the failure of surgical procedure was noticed. There were differences in mortality after surgical treatment of RAAA -from 41.2% to 83.3%, mean 63.6%. The mortality of 100% was ascertained in patients with Q above 3.5. The correlation between number of patients with expected risk factors and increasing mortality rate was done. This method is useful for explaining divergences in results of surgical treatment in patients with RAAA and may be helpful for qualification of patients for surgical procedure.