[Reform of emergency physician training in Austria : Finally up to date?] / Reform der Notarztausbildung in Österreich : Endlich zeitgemäß?

During the last 20 years Austrian prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) have significantly improved. The structure and organization of Austrian EMS comply with European standards but training requirements for prehospital EMS physicians are insufficient when compared with other countries. Although some EMS systems follow the German or Swiss postgraduate training concepts, the legal requirements in Austria defining the scope of mandatory training for physicians in the prehospital setting are only minimal. Thus, besides board certification as a general practitioner or specialist of any discipline, the only formal requirement is a 1-week theoretical course comprising some manikin simulations. Experience in anesthesia or intensive care medicine is still not mandatory. The Austrian Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGARI) drafted a reform paper in 2009, which was adapted by the Austrian Chamber of Physicians, section of emergency medicine, and subsequently presented to the Austrian Ministry of Health. Due to the slowness of the legislation process, the relevant § 40 of the Austrian Physician 's Act is still unchanged. In the meantime, Austrian specialist training regulations were restructured in 2015 with significant consequences. Due to changes in the residency programs, board certification and subsequent full working permit becomes more difficult to obtain, thus further aggravating the shortage of emergency physicians in Austria. In order to counteract the threatening shortage of prehospital EMS physicians, the ÖGARI section of emergency medicine was requested by the Ministry of Health to develop a reasonable model for how physicians could be qualified and subsequently employed in EMS prior to full board certification. Presently, the Austrian Ministry of Health, the Chamber of Physicians and medical societies are in discussion on whether this approach might fit into the legal framework. This manuscript details the development and present status as well as key points of an ongoing discussion on how high-quality EMS care in Austria can be safeguarded in the future or could even make it impossible.

Neurophysiological effects of needle trauma and intraneural injection in a porcine model: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Neurophysiological data are lacking in the research of nerve injury during regional anaesthesia. The aim of this pilot study was to establish a large animal model in order to test the hypothesis that needle trauma alone or in combination with intraneural injection would result in measurable nerve injury. METHODS: The experimental set-up was elaborated in four pre-test animals. In the remaining animals (n = 11), 22 sciatic nerves were randomly assigned to one of four groups: needle trauma (n = 5) generated by ultrasound-guided forced needle advancement; intraneural injection of 2.5 ml saline (n = 6); intraneural injection of 5 ml saline (n = 6); extraneural injection of 5 ml saline (n = 5) as control group. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes as well as latencies were taken as outcome parameter and monitored over 180 min. Sonographic assessments were performed simultaneously. RESULTS: Following needle trauma and intraneural injection, CMAP amplitudes declined significantly over 180 min (P < 0.001). The control group showed no electrophysiological alterations. At 60 min, decreases in amplitude were significant after needle trauma (P = 0.04) and intraneural injection of 2.5 ml (P = 0.045), and highly significant after injection of 5 ml (P = 0.006) when compared to controls. Sustained nerve swelling was observed after intraneural injection, but not after needle trauma and perineural injection. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated mechanical trauma caused by forced needle advancement alone or in combination with intraneural injection of saline was followed by a significant decline in CMAP amplitudes indicating conduction block due to disruption of myelin or axon loss (pseudo-conduction block).

[Anesthesia for medical students : A brief guide to practical anesthesia in adults with a web-based video illustration]. / Anästhesie für Medizinstudierende : Kurzanleitung zur praktischen Anästhesie bei Erwachsenen mit webbasierter Videoillustrierung.

In Germany, Austria and Switzerland, anesthesiologists are the second largest group of physicians in hospitals, but this does not correspond to the amount of anesthesiology teaching that medical students receive in medical schools. Accordingly, the chances of medical students recognizing anesthesiology as a promising personal professional career are smaller than in other disciplines with large teaching components. Subsequent difficulties to recruit anesthesiology residents are likely, although many reasons support anesthesiology as a professional career.Traditional strategies to teach medical students in anesthesiology in medical school consist of airway management or cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts in manikins. Anesthesiology is a complex interaction consisting of anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, clinical evaluation, experience, knowledge, and manual skills. While some medical schools offer teaching in high fidelity simulators, clinical teaching in the operating room is often limited. When medical students opt for a clinical rotation in anesthesiology, there is a chance to demonstrate the fascinating world of anesthesiology, but this chance has to be utilized carefully by anesthesiologists, as young talents have to be discovered, supported, and challenged.We have put together a short guide for medical students for a clinical rotation in anesthesiology in adults in order to generate basic knowledge and interest in anesthesiology as well as a sense of achievement. Basic knowledge about premedication, induction, maintenance and strategies for anesthesia is discussed. Further, the most important anesthesia drugs are discussed and manual skills, such as intravenous cannulation, mask ventilation, intubation, and regional anesthesia are featured with QR-code based video illustrations on a smartphone or personal computer. We did not discuss possible local mannerism and special patient groups (e. g., children, special medical history), local guidelines, or standard operating procedures.Medical students can be inspired by anesthesiology when not simply told about the tools of the trade and strategies, but instead by gaining knowledge and clinical skills that render a sense of achievement, likely during a clinical rotation into anesthesiology. A short theoretical instruction of anesthesiology enables rapid and targeted orientation even before a clinical rotation. Whether this subsequently results in a higher recruiting chance is currently unknown.

[Out-of-hospital emergency medicine in Germany, Austria and Switzerland : randomized prospective studies from 1990 to 2012]. / Außerklinische Notfallmedizin in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz : Randomisierte, prospektive Studien von 1990 bis 2012.

BACKGROUND: Only randomized clinical trials can improve the outcome of life-threatening injuries or diseases but observations from England and North America suggest that the number of such randomized clinical trials is decreasing. In this study contributions from German speaking countries with regards to randomized clinical trials in emergency medicine over the last 22 years were investigated. METHODS: The Medline database was searched from January 1990 to December 2012 for prospective randomized clinical trials in the prehospital setting using the criteria "cardiac arrest", "cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "multiple trauma", "hemorrhagic shock", "head trauma", "stroke" as well as myocardial infarction and emergency medical service. Only studies originating from Germany, Austria or Switzerland were included. RESULTS: A total of 474 studies were found and 25 studies (5.3 %) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the last 22 years German speaking countries have published approximately one prospective, randomized, clinical trial per year on prehospital emergency medicine. The median number of patients included in the trials was 159 (minimum 16, maximum 1,219). Most (80 %) studies originated from Germany and most (64 %) studies were conducted by anesthesiology departments. Cardiac arrest was the most frequent subject of the investigated studies. Approximately 50 % of the studies had financial support from industrial companies. CONCLUSION: A significant increase or decrease in the number of prospective randomized clinical trials in the out-of-hospital setting could not be found in German speaking countries despite the fact that the absolute numbers of studies had increased. Only about one prospective, randomized clinical trial with an emergency medicine core tracer diagnosis originated from Germany, Austria and Switzerland per year.

[Modified McPeek score in multiple trauma patients. Prospective evaluation of a points system for recording follow-up factors]. / Modifiziertes McPeek-Punkte-System bei Polytraumapatienten. Prospektive Evaluierung eines Punktesystems zur Erfassung von Verlaufsfaktoren.

BACKGROUND: Many commonly available trauma scores predict mortality, but to evaluate the success of a certain therapy or for difficult scientific and epidemiological purposes this may be insufficient in the face of improved survival rates. For outcome analysis of multiple trauma patients, the extent of medical resources needed could be an additional outcome measurement. McPeek et al. developed a potential scoring system for elective surgery patients, which was recently modified for multiple trauma patients. AIM: The current study investigated if the McPeek score could be prospectively used in multiple trauma patients and whether it could become an additional helpful tool in outcome assessment. Applicability was assessed by practical examples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective single-centre study at the University Hospital of Innsbruck, Austria, between December 2008 and November 2010 multiple trauma patients (≥ 18 years) with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 17 were enrolled. Besides demographic data, prehospital vital parameters and diagnoses, all diagnoses from the trauma, mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital were recorded. The commonly used trauma scores ISS, revised trauma score (RTS), a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) and trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) were applied and an observed McPeek score was allocated following end of hospitalization. The McPeek scoring system was used according to the latest modifications. A correlation between trauma scores and the McPeek score was performed. The McPeek score was then predicted by a common trauma score using ordinal regression with the polytomous universal model (PLUM method). By subtracting the predicted from the observed McPeek scores the residual McPeek value was calculated and used for practical examples of outcome analysis with the McPeek scoring system. RESULTS: Out of 406 identified multiple trauma patients during the study phase, 183 had to be excluded due to missing data (mainly prehospital or following transfer). A total of 223 patients (mean ISS 31.2, mean age 47.2 years) were enrolled and assigned to the population-based observed McPeek score (median 4.0). Correlation coefficients were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) 0.59, ISS 0.62, RTS 0.65, TRISS 0.74 and ASCOT 0.77 (p < 0.0001). The TRISS predicted the McPeek score best in ordinal regression (pseudo-R(2) = 0.944, p < 0.0001). The residual McPeek score (observed minus predicted) was used to illustrate the influence of the blood glucose level on admission and the influence of head injury on outcome of multiple injury patients in detail. CONCLUSION: The modified McPeek score is applicable to multiple trauma patients to assess outcome for scientific or epidemiological purposes. Its main advantage is that it quantifies outcome independently of regional or national circumstances.

[Anesthetist's briefing check. Tool to improve patient safety in the operating room]. / "Briefing-Check" anästhesie. Werkzeug zur verbesserung der patientensicherheit im OP.

Adverse events are not unusual in a more and more complex anesthesiological environment. The main reasons for this are an increasing workload, economic pressure, growing expectations of patients and deficits in planning and communication. However, these incidents mostly do not refer to medical deficits but to flaws in non-technical skills (team organisation, task orientation, decision making and communication). The introduction of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist depicted that a structural approach can improve the situation. However, it is still questionable if this measure is strong enough and recent publications revealed initial criticisms. Furthermore, remaining security gaps could be found even though the checklist was implemented in the anesthesiological practice of a big teaching hospital. Therefore, an additional checklist was developed to implement an anesthesia briefing in the daily routine. The main objective was to establish a security check before induction similar to the aeronautical pre-flight check. Additionally, this measure should improve coordination of the anesthesiology team. Working through the checklist, doctors and nurses are guided to focus on conjoint patient care prior to induction of anesthesia. In a web-based survey the general attitude of coworkers towards patient safety, as well as the acceptability of the new briefing check was scrutinised at two times: directly before implementation of the checklist and 1 year after. The results (84 % of medical and 97 % of healthcare staff answered the questionnaires) showed improvements with high relevance to parameters associated with awareness concerning safety issues and team coordination. In conclusion, it appears that patient safety can be significantly improved with little time effort of 3-5 min per patient. A prospective trial will be conducted to confirm the impact of this measure on improvements in patient safety.

Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter?

The influence of the mode of anaesthesia on outcome of geriatric patients with hip fractures is a controversial issue in the medical literature. In the light of an ageing society, a conclusive answer to this question is of growing importance. The purpose of this review was to assess the effect of neuroaxial and general anaesthesia on mortality and morbidity in geriatric patients sustaining a hip fracture. Following a current literature search within the Pubmed and Cochrane database (1967-2010), 34 randomised controlled trials, 14 observational studies and eight reviews/meta-analysis publications were included. Potentially outcome-influencing factors such as mortality, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, postoperative confusion and other anaesthesia-related outcomes were evaluated. After analysing the current literature with 56 references, covering 18,715 patients with hip fracture, it can be concluded that spinal anaesthesia is associated with significantly reduced early mortality, fewer incidents of deep vein thrombosis, less acute postoperative confusion, a tendency to fewer myocardial infarctions, fewer cases of pneumonia, fatal pulmonary embolism and postoperative hypoxia. General anaesthesia has the advantages of having a lower incidence of hypotension and a tendency towards fewer cerebrovascular accidents compared to neuroaxial anaesthesia. Otherwise, general anaesthesia and respiratory diseases were significant predictors of morbidity in hip fracture patients. These data suggest that regional anaesthesia is the preferred technique, but the limited evidence available does not permit a definitive conclusion to be drawn for mortality or other outcomes. For hip fracture surgery, the choice of anaesthesia (general or neuroaxial) is made by the anaesthesiologist and is based on the patient's preference, comorbidities, potential general postoperative complications and the clinical experience of the anaesthesiologist. The overall therapeutic approach in hip fracture care should be determined jointly by the orthopaedic surgeon, the geriatrician and the anaesthesiologist (multidisciplinary approach).

Urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% in an ambulatory setting.

BACKGROUND: Hyperbaric prilocaine 2% is a medium long-acting spinal anaesthetic. There are few data on time to recovery and rate of urinary retention after spinal administration of hyperbaric prilocaine 2%. This prospective study was carried out to evaluate the time to spontaneous micturition, quantify the rate of necessary bladder catheterizations, and identify the risk factors for urinary retention after intrathecal prilocaine administration. METHODS: ASA I/II patients (16-80 yr) undergoing ambulatory lower limb surgery were enrolled and received spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (60 mg). Ringer's lactate was administered for peroperative volume replacement. Bladder ultrasound was performed hourly until spontaneous micturition or catheterization, when bladder filling reached 600 ml, and they were unable to urinate spontaneously. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients completed the study (49 males and 37 females). Mean (sd) fluid administration was 1200 (499) ml until either micturition or catheterization; 37.8% of the women and 12.2% of the men required catheterization (P=0.009). Mean (sd) time between spinal anaesthesia and catheterization was 190 (88) min, and 260 (61) min to micturition (P<0.0001). Age <40 or >60 yr and female gender were predisposing factors for urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: After spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (60 mg) for ambulatory lower limb surgery, 23% of patients required postoperative urinary catheterization. Postoperative bladder ultrasound and early catheterization are essential to avoid bladder distension and facilitate discharge in patients after intrathecal prilocaine 2% administration in ambulatory surgery.

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of predefined diagnostic levels in high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel syndrome - a validation study on healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: High-resolution ultrasound is becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Most studies define cut-off values of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve in different locations. The individual range of nerve swelling, the size of the nerve, and its CSA are not addressed. The aim of the study is to define the intra- and interobserver reliability of diagnostic ultrasound using two different cross-sectional areas of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel in predefined locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two observers using high-resolution ultrasound examined 50 wrists of healthy volunteers independently. The CSA of the median nerve was measured at the entrance of the carpal tunnel and 2 cm proximal to the palmar wrist crease. The height and width of the carpal tunnel were determined using anatomical landmarks. The intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: Depending on the observer, the mean width of the carpal tunnel ranged from 3.37 to 3.43 cm with the height ranging from 1.18 and 1.19 cm. The CSA of the nerve was measured with values of 8.43 and 9.05 mm (2) on the pisiform level and 9.37 and 9.68 mm (2) on the proximal level. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.754 to 0.940 for the interobserver reliability and from 0.924 to 0.996 for the intraobserver reliability. CONCLUSION: To use high-resolution ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, the reproducibility of this method has to be evaluated. Our study confirms examiner-independent reproducibility of two predefined diagnostic cross-sectional areas resulting in good alpha values.

[Ultrasonic and radiographic quantification of palmar angulation in metacarpal IV and V neck fractures]. / Sonografische und röntgenologische Quantifizierung der Palmarabkippung von subkapitalen Frakturen der Metakarpalia IV und V.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Therapy of metacarpal neck fractures depending on radiographically measured palmar angulation is discussed controversially in the literature. Some authors describe normal hand function of malunited metacarpal neck fractures with a palmar angulation up to 70°; others define 30° as the uppermost limit to maintain normal hand function. However, the methods of measuring palmar angulation are not clearly defined. Here, we present a new method to measure palmar angulation using ultrasound. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the radiographic methods of measuring palmar angulation with the ultrasound method. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHOD: 20 patients with a neck fracture of the metacarpals IV or V were treated either conservatively or operatively. 2 weeks after trauma or operation, an x-ray was performed. 2 examiners measured the palmar angulation on the oblique and lateral projections using 2 different methods (medullary canal and dorsal cortex methods). At the same time, the 2 examiners performed measurements of palmar angulation using ultrasound. The measurements obtained with the different methods as well as by the 2 examiners at 2 different terms were compared. Intra- and interobserver reliability of each method was calculated, and for the ultrasound method a test for accuracy of the measured angles was performed. RESULTS: Depending on the method of radiographic measurement and different x-ray projections, an average of up to 20.3° higher angles were determined as compared with the ultrasound method. The average deviation in angles measured within and between the 2 examiners was lower for the ultrasound method than for the radiographic methods, corresponding to a higher degree of intra- and interobserver reliability. CONCLUSION: The ultrasound method for measuring palmar angulation in metacarpal neck fractures is simple, and appears to be more precise in comparison to radiographic methods. An exactly lateral projection of the fractured metacarpal bone can be imaged without superposition and exposure to radiation. The question arises whether previous studies that suggested normal hand function with palmar angulation up to 70° might have been based on too high angle-readings due to the use of radiographic methods.