LncRNA H19 Promotes Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Angiogenesis of Glioma by Regulating Wnt5a/ß-Catenin Pathway via Targeting miR-342.

Glioma is the most common malignant brain tumor and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play an important role in the growth and angiogenesis of glioma. However, the potential mechanisms of lncRNA H19 in glioma remain unclear. In the present study, the effects of lncRNA H19 on glioma cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis were evaluated. The expression levels of H19, miR-342, and Wnt5a in glioma tissues and cells were detected by RT-qPCR or Western blotting. Dual luciferase reporter assay confirmed the interaction between H19, miR-342, and Wnt5a. Cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis were analyzed by colony formation, transwell, and tube formation assays, respectively. IHC was performed to test the angiogenesis-related factor CD31. H19 and Wnt5a expression were remarkably upregulated in glioma tissues and cells, whereas miR-342 expression was downregulated. Moreover, functional analysis confirmed that knockdown of H19 or overexpression of miR-342 suppressed glioma cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in vitro. Besides, H19 was found to directly target miR-342 to promote Wnt5a expression and activate ß-catenin pathway in glioma cells. Moreover, suppression of miR-342 or overexpression of Wnt5a reversed the inhibitory effect of sh-H19 on glioma growth and metastasis. Additionally, we verified that H19 promoted glioma cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis via miR-342/Wnt5a/ß-catenin axis in vivo. H19 regulates glioma cell growth and metastasis through miR-342 to mediate Wnt5a/ß-catenin signaling pathway, which provides new therapeutic targets for glioma treatment.

Downregulation of iASPP Expression Suppresses Proliferation, Invasion and Increases Chemosensitivity to Paclitaxel of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma In Vitro.

Objective Our previous study has revealed that iASPP is elevated in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and iASPP overexpression signifcantly correlates with tumor malignant progression and poor survival of HNSCC. This study investigated the function of iASPP playing in proliferation and invasion of HNSCC in vitro. Methods HNSCC cell line Tu686 transfected with Lentiviral vector-mediated iASPP-specific shRNA and control shRNA were named the shRNA-iASPP group and shRNA-NC group, respectively. The non-infected Tu686 cells were named the CON group. CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry, transwell invasion assay were performed to detect the effects of iASPP inhibition in vitro. Results Our results demonstrated that the proliferation of shRNA-iASPP cells at the time of 72 h (F=32.459, P=0.000), 96 h (F=51.407, P=0.000), 120 h (F=35.125, P=0.000) post-transfection, was significantly lower than that of shRNA-NC cells and CON cells. The apoptosis ratio of shRNA-iASPP cells was 9.42% ± 0.39% (F=299.490, P=0.000), which was significantly higher than that of CON cells (2.80% ± 0.42%) and shRNA-NC cells (3.18% ± 0.28%). The percentage of shRNA-iASPP cells in G0/G1 phase was 74.65% ± 1.09% (F=388.901, P=0.000), which was strikingly increased, compared with that of CON cells (55.19% ± 1.02%) and shRNA-NC cells (54.62% ± 0.88%). The number of invading cells was 56 ± 4 in the shRNA-iASPP group (F=84.965, P=0.000), which decreased significantly, compared with the CON group (111 ± 3) and the shRNA-NC group (105 ± 8). The survival rate of shRNA-iASPP cells administrated with paclitaxel was highly decreased, compared with CON cells and shRNA-NC cells (F=634.841, P=0.000). Conclusion These results suggest iASPP may play an important role in progression and aggressive behavior of HNSCC and may be an efficient chemotherapeutic target for the treatment of HNSCC.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study retrospectively compared outcomes and prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment records of 182 patients treated with IMRT and 198 patients treated with CRT from April 2005 to December 2007 in our hospital were reviewed. The clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes (including survival analysis and acute and late toxicity), and prognostic factors of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The 4-year local-regional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of the IMRT and CRT groups were 93.6 and 85.3 %, 79.1 and 73.6 %, 74.7 and 65.0 %, and 83.5 and 72.1 %, respectively. The acute radiation dermatitis and xerostomia of the two groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). In the IMRT group, OS between different T stages could not be well separated. Multivariate analysis revealed that, in the CRT group, the clinical stage and T and N stages were significant prognostic factors for OS, DMFS, and DFS and that T stage was a significant prognostic factor for LRC. In the IMRT group, T and N stages had no predictive value for outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CRT, IMRT has a better prognosis and less adverse effects. For IMRT, T stage was not a significant prognostic factor for LRC, DMFS, DFS, or OS. An effective treatment strategy is needed for distant control. With the increasing use of IMRT and continued modulation of treatment strategies for NPC, the current staging system faces great challenges.