RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) interpretation of Crohn's disease (CD) is subjective and uses 2D analysis. We evaluated the feasibility of volumetric measurement of terminal ileal CD on MRE compared to endoscopy and sMARIA, and the responsiveness of volumetric changes to biologics. METHODS: CD patients with MRE and contemporaneous CD endoscopic index of severity-scored ileocolonoscopy were included. A centreline was placed through the terminal ileum (TI) lumen defining the diseased bowel length on the T2-weighted non-fat saturated sequence, used by two radiologists to independently segment the bowel wall to measure volume (phase 1). In phase 2, we measured disease volume in patients treated with biologics, who had undergone pre- and post-treatment MRE, with treatment response classified via global physician assessment. RESULTS: Phase 1 comprised 30 patients (median age 29 (IQR 24, 34) years). Phase 2 included 12 patients (25 years (22, 38)). In phase 1, the mean of the radiologist-measured volumes was used for analysis. The median disease volume in those with endoscopically active CD was 20.9 cm3 (IQR 11.3, 44.0) compared to 5.7 cm3 (2.9, 9.8) with normal endoscopy. The mean difference in disease volume between the radiologists was 3.0 cm3 (limits of agreement -21.8, 15.9). The median disease volume of patients with active CD by sMARIA was 15.0 cm3 (8.7, 44.0) compared to 2.85 cm3 (2.6, 3.1) for those with inactive CD. Pre- and post-treatment median disease volumes were 28.5 cm3 (26.4, 31.2), 11 cm3 (4.8, 16.6), respectively in biological responders, vs 26.8 cm3 (12.3, 48.7), 40.1 cm3 (10, 56.7) in non-responders. CONCLUSION: Volumetric measurement of terminal ileal CD by MRE is feasible, related to endoscopy and sMARIA activity, and responsive to biologics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Measuring the whole volume of diseased bowel on MRE in CD is feasible, related to how biologically active the disease is when assessed by endoscopy and by existing MRE activity scores, and is sensitive to treatment response. KEY POINTS: MRE reporting for CD is subjective and uses 2D images rather than assessing the full disease volume. Volumetric measurement of CD relates to endoscopic activity and shows reduced disease volumes in treatment responders. This technique is an objective biomarker that can assess disease activity and treatment response, warranting validation.
RESUMEN
Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) have developed rapidly in the last few decades, emerging as the primary non-invasive options for both diagnosing and monitoring Crohn's disease (CD). In this review, we evaluate the pertinent data relating to the use of MRE and IUS in CD. We summarise the key imaging features of CD activity, highlight their increasing role in both the clinical and research settings, and discuss how these modalities fit within the diagnostic pathway. We discuss how they can be used to assess disease activity and treatment responsiveness, including the emergence of activity scores for standardised reporting. Additionally, we address areas of controversy such as the use of contrast agents, the role of diffusion-weighted imaging, and discuss point-of-care ultrasound. We also highlight exciting new developments including the applications of artificial intelligence. Finally, we provide suggestions for future research priorities.
RESUMEN
To compare the pain scores in closed reduction of nasal bone fractures under local anaesthesia (LA) and general anaesthesia (GA), and to outline the blocks that should be used for the same based on their nerve supply. A prospective study was conducted with 40 patients with Class 1 and 2 nasal bone and septal fracture. 20 patients underwent the procedure under LA and 20 under GA. The local blocks that should be used based on the complete nerve supply of the nose has been tabulated. Pain scores were recorded immediately after the procedure and 6 h later. Additionally, all the patients undergoing reduction under LA were asked, if given the choice again, if they would prefer to undergo the procedure under LA or GA. The overall difference in the pain scores calculated by T-test showed a p-value of 0.08807 (the result was not significant at p < .05) in the immediate post operative period. At the 6 h post operative period, overall difference in the pain scores showed a p-value of 0.384972 (not significant at p < .05). Of the patients who underwent the procedure under LA, 18 of 20 (90%) said that if given a choice again, they would undergo the procedure under LA, while 2 said they would prefer GA. Based on the pain score in the La vs. GA groups, there is no significant difference in the pain scores whether closed reduction is done under local or general anaesthesia. If all the blocks are given keeping the nerve supplies in mind, and both externally, and with pledgets, the entire nerve supply of the nose can be blocked.