Imbalance in the vWF - ADAMTS13 axis exists early in acute pancreatitis and predicts persistent organ failure and pancreatic necrosis-a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of Acute Pancreatitis (AP) may be complicated by endothelial activation. von Willebrand Factor (vWF)- ADAMTS13 axis is a marker of endothelial activation. The study aimed to investigate the axis in AP, comparing it in patients with and without persistent organ failure (OF), with and without pancreatic necrosis, and correlating it with the standard severity scores (CRP, APACHE II, BISAP, SOFA, and qSOFA) METHODS: vWF-Antigen (vWF:Ag), vWF-Collagen-Binding-Assay (vWF:CBA), and ADAMTS13 activity (ADAMTS13:act) levels were measured within 5 days of symptom onset in consecutive patients (n = 98), who were admitted with a first episode of AP (Dec 2021-May 2023). RESULTS: Of the 98 patients admitted with AP, 78(79.6 %) had no or transient OF; 20(20.4 %) had persistent OF. Age was comparable (43.73 ± 15.36 vs 38.65 ± 13.69) [mean ± SD](years), and males were predominant in both groups (70.5 % vs 80 %). Patientswith persistent OF had higher vWF:CBA(%)[323(279-486.5) vs 199.5(159.1-295.75)] and lower ADAMTS13:act(%)[35.4(23.8-56.85) vs 56.35(44.1-71.9)][median (25th - 75th percentile)](P = 0.001) than those with no or transient OF. Patients with pancreatic necrosis (n = 19) had lower ADAMTS13:act(%)[42.79 ± 18.69] than those without pancreatic necrosis (n = 18) [62.49 ± 22.64] (P < 0.01). ADAMTS13:act had a negative correlation(r = -0.2), whereas vWF:Ag and vWF:CBA had a positive correlation (r = 0.2) with the standard severity scores (P < 0.05). ADAMTS13:act could predict pancreatic necrosis [AUROC-0.737, P < 0.05] and persistent OF [AUROC-0.746, P < 0.001], while vWF:CBA could predict persistent OF [AUROC- 0.73, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: vWF-ADAMTS13 axis helps to predict severe disease and is associated with poor outcomes in acute pancreatitis.

Bile Culture May Guide Antibiotic Stewardship in Acute Bacterial Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Bile cultures are often sent with blood cultures in patients with acute bacterial cholangitis. AIMS: To assess the yield of blood and bile cultures in patients with cholangitis and the clinical utility of bile cultures in guiding therapy. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with cholangitis, based on the Tokyo 2013/2018 guidelines were recruited retrospectively over ten years. The clinical and investigation details were recorded. The results of bile and blood cultures including antibiotic sensitivity patterns were noted. The concordance of microorganisms grown in blood and bile cultures and their sensitivity pattern were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1063 patients with cholangitis were included. Their mean age was 52.7 ± 14 years and 65.4% were males. Blood cultures were positive in 372 (35%) patients. Bile culture was performed in 384 patients with 84.4% being positive, which was significantly higher than the yield of blood culture (p < 0.001). Polymicrobial growth was more in bile (59.3%) than in blood cultures (13.5%, p < 0.001). E.coli, Klebsiella, Enterococcus and Pseudomonas were the four most common organisms isolated from both blood and bile. Extended spectrum betalactamase producing organisms were isolated in 57.7% and 58.8% of positive blood and bile cultures, respectively. Among 127 patients with both blood and bile cultures positive, complete or partial concordance of organisms was noted in about 90%. CONCLUSION: Bile and blood cultures have a similar microbial profile in most patients with cholangitis. As bile cultures have a significantly higher yield than blood cultures, they could effectively guide antimicrobial therapy, especially in those with negative blood cultures.

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of rapid versus non-rapid onsite evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solid pancreatic lesions.

Background: The role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions is debatable. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of ROSE vs. non-ROSE in solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients undergoing EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions from 2019-2021. Patients with cystic lesions, those undergoing fine-needle core biopsy, those undergoing repeat procedures, and patients with non-diagnostic smears with less than 6-month follow up were excluded. The diagnostic yield, need for repeat procedures and number of passes required with and without ROSE were analyzed in these patients. Results: Of the 111 patients included, 56 underwent ROSE. The majority of lesions were malignant in both groups (79.6% ROSE vs. 75% non-ROSE). The diagnostic yield was 96.4% in the ROSE group and 94.5% in the non-ROSE group. Repeat samples were needed in 1 ROSE and 2 non-ROSE patients. The median number of passes made was significantly fewer in the ROSE group (3.5, interquartile range - 3,4) compared with the non-ROSE group (4, interquartile range - 3,5) P=0.01. However, the frequency of procedure-related complications was similar in both groups. Conclusion: The utilization of ROSE during EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions does not affect the diagnostic yield or the need for repeat samples, but reduces the number of passes needed for acquiring samples.