Incidence and Risk Factors of Orthostasis After Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative orthostatic intolerance can limit mobilization after hip and knee arthroplasty. The literature is lacking on the incidence and risk factors associated with orthostatic intolerance after elective arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of primary total hip, total knee, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients was conducted. Patients with orthostatic events were identified, and potential demographic and perioperative risk factors were recorded. Orthostatic intolerance was defined as postoperative syncope, lightheadedness, or dizziness, limiting ambulation and/or requiring medical treatment. Statistical analysis was completed using Pearson's chi-square test for categorical data and t-tests for continuous data. Binary logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 500 consecutive patients were included. The overall incidence of orthostatic intolerance was 18%; 25% in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 11% in total knee arthroplasty. On univariate analysis, significant risk factors for developing postoperative orthostatic intolerance include older age, female gender, THA surgery, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class, absence of recreational drug use, lower estimated blood volume, lower preoperative diastolic blood pressure, spinal with monitored anesthesia care (MAC), posterior approach for THA, bupivacaine use in spinal, percent of blood loss, postoperative oxycodone or tramadol use, higher postoperative intravenous fluid volume, and lower postoperative hemoglobin. Multivariate analysis demonstrated persistent significance of female gender, THA surgery, spinal with MAC, bupivacaine use in spinal, and more intravenous fluid administered postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Orthostatic intolerance affects a significant number of arthroplasty patients. Awareness of risk factors and modification of perioperative variables linked to orthostatic intolerance may assist the surgeon in choosing the appropriate surgical setting, educating patients, and improving early postoperative recovery.

Anterior Revision Hip Arthroplasty is Associated With Higher Wound Complications but Fewer Dislocations Compared to Posterior Revision Hip Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Wound complication after primary direct anterior (DAA) hip arthroplasty has been reported in the literature but there has been no comparison regarding revision anterior vs revision posterior (PA) hip arthroplasty. The authors hypothesize that anterior approach revision surgery may have increased wound complications compared with posterior hip revisions and also report on secondary outcome metrics. METHODS: Ninety-nine DAA and 191 PA revisions were included for analysis. Preoperative demographic characteristics, indication for revision, operative details, type of revision performed, components utilized, and postoperative complications were compared between DAA and PA groups including multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The DAA cohort demonstrated an increased risk of superficial wound complications (7.1% vs 0.5%, P = .003) and a decreased dislocation rate (2.0% vs 13.1%, P = .002). There was a trend toward increased overall complications in the PA group (OR 1.71, P = .078). CONCLUSION: Revision DAA THA is associated with an increased risk of superficial wound complications, but may impart a decreased dislocation rate.

Preoperative Diagnosis of Depression Leads to Increased Opioid Tablets Taken After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Balancing postoperative analgesia with minimizing opioid consumption remains a challenge. We aim to document trends in opioid consumption for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hypothesize that preoperative patient education will decrease postoperative opioid consumption. This is a prospective study of patients undergoing elective primary THA. Preoperatively, patients completed a survey regarding opioid-use history, surgical history, and pain tolerance. Patients were randomized to receive preoperative education on opioid use or no formal education. Six weeks postoperatively, patients completed a questionnaire regarding opioid use, disposal, and pain control. Ninety-five patients were included. Preoperative education was not associated with taking fewer narcotic medications (p = 0.790) and did not significantly alter disposal practices (p = 0.255). Depression was correlated with increased opioid use (mean difference 24 tabs, p = 0.001) and linked to longer duration of opioid use postoperatively (20.3 +/- 15.6 versus 7.2 +/- 7.3 days, p < 0.001). History of prior surgical procedure was associated with fewer narcotics taken (mean difference 26 tabs, p = 0.01). Depression is correlated with increased opioid use. Preoperative education did not affect opioid use or disposal frequency. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):144-149, 2021).

Bariatric Surgery Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Fewer Postoperative Complications.

This study used a national database to compare 90-day postoperative complication rates between three groups of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA): (1) non-obese patients (n=66,523), (2) morbidly obese patients who did not have bariatric surgery (n=11,294) and (3) morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery prior to TKA (n=219). Morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery prior to TKA had reduced rates of major (OR 0.45, P=0.001) and minor (OR 0.61, P=0.01) complications compared to morbidly obese patients who did not have bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery prior to TKA appears to be associated with less risk of postoperative complications, although not to the same level as non-obese patients.

The Trend of Medicare Reimbursement for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Using Mathematical Models to Predict Possible Per-Hour Rate Out to 2030.

Background: While multiple studies have assessed the trends of Medicare reimbursement for orthopedic total joint arthroplasty (TJA) surgeries, none have forecasted reimbursement in relatable per-hour figures. The purposes of this study are to examine trends of reimbursement for primary and revision TJA and translate forecasted primary TJA reimbursement to relatable per-hour compensation. Methods: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement data from 1992 to 2024 were used to create a historical view of reimbursement for primary and revision TJA. All monetary values were converted to 2023 USD to account for inflation. Polynomial and linear forecast equations were used to predict the future of the TJA reimbursement to 2030. Relative Value Scale Update Committee standard times for procedures were used with the forecasts to establish per-hour rates. Results: Total reimbursement for primary total hip arthroplasty/total knee arthroplasty is forecasted to decrease 85.36%/86.14% by 2030. Using prior trends in reimbursement, TJA procedures are predicted to reimburse at or less than $100.00 2023 USD per Medicare case by 2030. Moreover, TJA surgeons are forecasted to earn $13.93/h per primary total hip arthroplasty and $14.97/h per primary total knee arthroplasty by 2030. Conclusions: This study highlights the concerning trends for both primary and revision arthroplasties as TJA surgeons are on a path to earn below minimum wage for primary TJAs by 2030. Mathematical models forecast a bleak future for orthopedic TJA reimbursement. This downward trajectory poses a risk to access and quality of care.

Hip-spine parameters change with increasing age.

Aims: Spinopelvic pathology increases the risk for instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet few studies have evaluated how pathology varies with age or sex. The aims of this study were: 1) to report differences in spinopelvic parameters with advancing age and between the sexes; and 2) to determine variation in the prevalence of THA instability risk factors with advancing age. Methods: A multicentre database with preoperative imaging for 15,830 THA patients was reviewed. Spinopelvic parameter measurements were made by experienced engineers, including anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI). Lumbar flexion (LF), sagittal spinal deformity, and hip user index (HUI) were calculated using parameter measurements. Results: With advancing age, patients demonstrate increased posterior APPT, decreased standing LL, decreased LF, higher pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, higher prevalence of abnormal spinopelvic mobility, and higher HUI percentage. With each decade, APPT progressed posteriorly 2.1°, LF declined 6.0°, PI-LL mismatch increased 2.9°, and spinopelvic mobility increased 3.8°. Significant differences were found between the sexes for APPT, SPT, SS, LL, and LF, but were not felt to be clinically relevant. Conclusion: With advancing age, spinopelvic biomechanics demonstrate decreased spinal mobility and increased pelvic/hip mobility. Surgeons should consider the higher prevalence of instability risk factors in elderly patients and anticipate changes evolving in spinopelvic biomechanics for young patients.

Total Hip Revision with a Custom Acetabular Component and Femoral Allograft-Prosthetic Composite as Salvage for Failed Unstable Megaprosthesis in an Adolescent Patient: A Case Report at 19-Year Follow-up Duration.

CASE: A 13-year-old girl presented after a right proximal femur replacement after proximal femoral resection for treatment of an Ewing sarcoma. She presented after multiple episodes of recurrent instability with her hip endoprosthesis chronically dislocated. Her hip was revised to a custom, constrained metal-on-metal acetabular component with a small iliac flange. The femoral component was revised to an allograft-prosthetic composite. She has been free of malignancy recurrence, implant failure, or dislocation at 19-year follow-up duration. CONCLUSION: Dislocation of the prosthetic hip can be a challenging postoperative complication, particularly when associated with a tumor megaprosthesis in a pediatric age group. This is further compounded in the presence of deficient pelvic bone stock. Restoration of bone stock is optimal, but when impossible, custom components may be necessary to establish hip stability.

Mobility Limitation After Surgery for Degenerative Pathology of the Ankle, Hindfoot, and Midfoot vs Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for degenerative foot and ankle conditions often results in a lengthy recovery. Current outcome measures do not accurately assess postoperative mobility, especially in older patients. The Life-Space Assessment (LSA), a questionnaire quantifying patients' mobility after a medical event, was used in this study to assess perioperative mobility in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and foot and ankle surgery patients. We hypothesized that patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery would have greater postoperative mobility limitation than THA patients. METHODS: Preoperative, 3-month, and 6-month postoperative LSA data were collected from THA and foot and ankle cohorts. Twelve-month postoperative data were obtained for the foot and ankle group as well. Patient demographics were recorded, and data were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Twenty-eight degenerative foot and ankle operative patients and 38 THA patients met inclusion criteria. Only patients aged ≥60 years were included in this study. The mean preoperative LSA score was lower in the foot and ankle group (68.8) compared with THA (74.0), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .602). THA patients showed a significant increase in LSA score from preoperative (74) to 6 months postoperation (95.9) (P = .003); however, foot and ankle patients showed no significant difference between preoperative (68.8) and 6-month (61.2) scores (P = .468). Twelve months postoperatively, foot and ankle patients showed improvement in LSA score (88.3) compared with preoperation (P = .065). CONCLUSION: Compared with THA, recovery of mobility after foot and ankle surgery was slower. THA patients exhibited improved mobility as early as 3 months after surgery, whereas foot and ankle patients did not show full improvement until 12 months. This work will assist the foot and ankle specialist in educating patients about challenges in mobility during their recovery from surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration Does Not Reduce the Recurrence Rate of Ganglion Cysts of the Wrist.

Background Ganglion cysts are the most frequent soft tissue tumor encountered in the upper extremity and are commonly treated by aspiration or by surgical excision. Ultrasound is a promising addition to traditional aspiration, as it allows for visualization of the needle within the ganglion before aspiration. Questions Are ganglion cysts of the wrist less likely to reoccur if they are aspirated under ultrasound guidance versus "blind" aspiration without the use of ultrasound guidance? Does patient functionality change based on whether or not the cyst recurred? Patients and Methods In total, 52 patients were successfully contacted and recurrence rates were compared between those whose cyst was treated with ultrasound-guided (13 patients) with those whose cyst was treated with blind aspiration (39 patients). Mean follow-up time was 2.9 years. Results Recurrence rates were 69% (9 patients) and 74% (29 patients) for the ultrasound-guided and blind aspiration groups, respectively ( p -value: 0.73), showing no significant difference in recurrences of wrist ganglion between the two groups. A metric of functionality (Quick-DASH [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand]) revealed worse outcomes in patients who experienced return of ganglion cyst after aspiration versus those who did not. Conclusion Additional studies with improved sample sizes are needed to demonstrate the superiority of ultrasound-guided aspiration versus blind aspiration. Due to a high recurrence rate following aspiration (both ultrasound-guided and blinded), a lower threshold for surgical intervention is likely reasonable. Level of Evidence This is a Level IIIb study.

Patient Perceptions and Current Trends in Internet Use by Orthopedic Outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have highlighted concerns about the completeness and quality of information found online and how this may affect patients' education about their medical problems. One aspect of internet usage that has received less attention in the literature, however, is patient perception of the information that is gathered online, and how patients use it related to their musculoskeletal care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The objective of the study is to utilize a cross-sectional study design to describe internet usage and patient perceptions of orthopedic online information and to identify differences in usage patterns. METHODS: One thousand two hundred ninety-six questionnaires were distributed to consecutive patients at orthopedic outpatient clinics which consisted of questions pertaining to patients' internet use. Basic demographic data were collected, and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the effect of three variables (age, gender, and clinic type) on various outcomes. RESULTS: 84.9% of patients reported access to the internet. Of patients with internet access, 64.7% reported using the internet for obtaining orthopedic information. 43.1% of the respondents who searched for orthopedic information rated it as "very useful," 56.3% found it "somewhat useful," and 0.6% found it "not at all useful". Younger patients were more likely to have used the internet for health and orthopedic information and to have found this information either very or somewhat useful. Males were more likely to have found the internet information very useful. Overall, only 33.7% of patients who researched their current orthopedic complaint accessed the institutional website for information. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients use the internet to research orthopedic information and most patients, especially younger males, find the information useful.