Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 18(10): 1305-12, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20151162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain relief is an important treatment goal for breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease and treatment should be associated with a low rate of side effects. This interim analysis of a prospective non-interventional study documents the efficacy and safety of the amino-bisphosphonate ibandronate in the treatment of metastatic bone disease under real-life conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For up to 24 weeks 913 breast cancer patients received IV infusions of 6 mg ibandronate every 3-4 weeks or 50 mg of oral ibandronate once daily. Efficacy variables included pain severity, analgesic use, and skeletal-related events; the major safety parameter was renal function, assessed by serum creatinine levels. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pretreatment with bisphosphonates (none, ibandronate, or other bisphosphonates). RESULTS: At baseline, patients with ibandronate pretreatment tended to have lower mean pain scores and lower serum creatinine levels than those pre-treated with other bisphosphonates. Over the observation period, analgesic use did not increase. Among the 712 patients reporting pain at baseline, 70% achieved an improvement in pain severity during treatment with ibandronate, and there was no evidence to suggest relevant differences in mean pain reductions with IV or oral administration of ibandronate or according to prior bisphosphonate treatment. Skeletal-related events were rare (7%). Changes in serum creatinine levels during ibandronate treatment were small and both formulations of ibandronate were rated as well tolerated by physicians and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this non-interventional study confirm the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of IV and oral ibandronate under real-life conditions.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Creatinina/sangre , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Ibandrónico , Infusiones Intravenosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
J Orthop Sci ; 12(1): 61-6, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17260119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that bisphosphonates can improve fixation of cementless metal implants by enhancing the extent of osseointegration. The current preclinical study examined whether the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate ibandronate can accelerate this process, resulting in early achievement of secondary stability and sealing of the bone-implant interface to prevent wear debris migration. METHODS: The study was conducted on 88 female Sprague-Dawley rats in which uncoated titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants were surgically inserted into the medullary canal of each femur. The animals were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous treatment with 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 microg/kg per day ibandronate or saline solution as a control. The extent of osseointegration expressed by the osseointegrated implant surface was quantified by histomorphometry at eleven time points during the study period. To determine the time course of osseointegration, the data were expressed using third-order polynomial regression analysis. RESULTS: For hydroxyapatite-coated implants, the highest dose of ibandronate (5 microg) reduced the time for a sufficient implant fixation of 60% osseointegrated implant surface to 18 days compared to 38 days in the control group. This reduction of 20 days (52.6%) represents a halving in the time required for sufficient osseointegration of the implant. For hydroxyapatite-coated implants and low-dose ibandronate application (1 microg, 2.5 microg) and for uncoated titanium implants, acceleration of osseointegration was not observed in any of the study arms. CONCLUSION: Continuous treatment with 5 microg/kg per day ibandronate is potent in accelerating osseointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated implants. As a result, improved early secondary stability and prevention of wear debris migration by the sealing of the implant-bone interface can be expected, therefore prolonging the long-term survival of the implant.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Durapatita , Fracturas del Fémur , Oseointegración/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas del Fémur/patología , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Ácido Ibandrónico , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA