The Potential Role of Social Media Platforms in Community Awareness of Antibiotic Use in the Gulf Cooperation Council States: Luxury or Necessity?

The increasing emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious public health issue. Increasing the awareness of the general public about appropriate antibiotic use is a key factor for combating this issue. Several public media campaigns worldwide have been launched; however, such campaigns can be costly and the outcomes are variable and difficult to assess. Social media platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, are now frequently utilized to address health-related issues. In many geographical locations, such as the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) States (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Bahrain), these platforms are becoming increasingly popular. The socioeconomic status of the GCC states and their reliable communication and networking infrastructure has allowed the penetration and scalability of these platforms in the region. This might explain why the Saudi Ministry of Health is using social media platforms alongside various other media platforms in a large-scale public awareness campaign to educate at-risk communities about the recently emerged Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). This paper discusses the potential for using social media tools as cost-efficient and mass education platforms to raise awareness of appropriate antibiotic use in the general public and in the medical communities of the Arabian Peninsula.

Molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the countries of the Gulf cooperation council: dominance of OXA-48 and NDM producers.

The molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) were determined in hospitals in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), namely, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait. Isolates were subjected to PCR-based detection of antibiotic-resistant genes and repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) assessments of clonality. Sixty-two isolates which screened positive for potential carbapenemase production were assessed, and 45 were found to produce carbapenemase. The most common carbapenemases were of the OXA-48 (35 isolates) and NDM (16 isolates) types; 6 isolates were found to coproduce the OXA-48 and NDM types. No KPC-type, VIM-type, or IMP-type producers were detected. Multiple clones were detected with seven clusters of clonally related Klebsiella pneumoniae. Awareness of CRE in GCC countries has important implications for controlling the spread of CRE in the Middle East and in hospitals accommodating patients transferred from the region.

The Effect of Using Ofloxacin Ear Drops in Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of ofloxacin ear drops versus no intervention in the repair of traumatic tympanic membrane (TM) perforations from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data Sources: Medline/PubMed, CENTRAL, Clinical Trials.Gov, and Google Scholar. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria: (1) English language; (2) RCT studies; (3) reported the outcomes on the application of ofloxacin and outcomes of spontaneous healing. Exclusion criteria: (1) studies without a control group; (2) patient with severe otologic disease such as chronic suppurative otitis media or ossicular disruption or patients with craniocerebral injury; (3) studies with no pretreatment values or single-arm clinical studies. Data Extraction: Country, year of publication, number of participants in each arm, patient characteristics such as age, sex, intervention details, laterality, cause of TM perforation, position of perforation, follow-up time, hearing gain, rate of TM closure, and closure time. Results: A total of 6 RCTs studies were analyzed. A total of 502 participants were included; the relative risk for closure rate of ofloxacin treatment was 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08 to 1.28, P < .001] and the mean difference (MD) for healing time was -18.4 (95% CI, -19.96 to -16.82, P < .001), suggesting ofloxacin has a significant effect on closure of TM perforations. However, no clinically significant effect in hearing (SMD: 0.21, 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.40, P = .03) was seen in ofloxacin group. Also, patients in the ofloxacin group were associated with a 13% reduction in the risk of infections compared to their observation-assigned counterparts, but this estimate was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Ofloxacin use in patients with traumatic TM perforation is effective in reducing healing time and increasing rate of TM perforation closure. No evidence of increased risk of hearing loss or infection rates are encountered when ofloxacin is prescribed to patients with traumatic TM perforation.