Safety of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with body mass index less than 50 kg/m2.

INTRODUCTION: Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) has often been reserved for patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2. We aim to assess the safety of BPD-DS in patients with morbid obesity (BMI 335 kg/m2 and < 50 kg/m2) using a 150-cm common channel (CC), 150-cm Roux limb, and 60-fr bougie. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients with a BMI < 50 mg/k2 who underwent a BPD-DS in 2016-2019 at a single institution. Limb lengths were measured with a laparoscopic instrument with minimal tension. Sleeve gastrectomy was created with 60-fr bougie. Variables were compared using paired t test, Chi-square analysis or repeated measures ANOVA where appropriate. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent BPD-DS. CC lengths and Roux limb lengths were 158 ± 20 cm and 154 ± 18 cm, respectively. Preoperative BMI was 44.9 ± 2.3 kg/m2 and follow-up was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. One patient required reoperation for bleeding and died from multiorgan failure and delayed sleeve leak. There was 1 (2.2%) readmission for contained anastomotic leak and 2 ED visits (4.5%) within 30 days. There were no marginal ulcers, limb length revisions, or need for parental nutrition. Percent excess weight loss was 67.2 ± 19.7%. 88.9% (N = 8), 86.6% (N = 13), and 55.5% (N = 5) of patients had resolution or improvement of their diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, respectively. 40% (N = 4) of patients had resolution of their gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and 11.4% (N = 5) developed de novo GERD. 32% (N = 14) of patients had vitamin D deficiency and 25% (N = 11) experienced zinc deficiency. CONCLUSION: BPD-DS may be considered in patients with BMI < 50 kg/m2 with 150-cm CC, 150-cm Roux limb, and a 60-fr bougie sleeve gastrectomy. There was sustained weight loss and no protein calorie malnutrition, but Vitamin D and zinc deficiency remained a challenge. Careful patient selection and proper counseling of the risks and benefits are necessary.

S146-Jejunojejunal intussusception after roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a case series of 34 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Jejunojejunal intussusception (JI) is a serious but rare complication that may occur following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Causes of JI and best management strategy are not clearly defined. METHODS: Electronic health records were queried for ICD 9/10 codes for intussusception after RYGB surgery (2009-2019), and charts retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, operative technique, presentation, radiology, and JI management were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 2,327 RYGB patients identified at our institute, 34 (1.5%) were treated for JI. The mean age was 45.0 ± 8.6 years, mean BMI (RYGB surgery) was 43.1 ± 8.2 kg/m2, mean BMI at JI was 28.3 ± 5.8 kg/m2, and 30/34 were female, The mean time between RYGB and JI was 5.5 ± 4.3 years (range 1-17 years). Of the JI patients identified, 9 had operative notes that did not include jejunojejunostomy linear stapler length (JJ-LSL). Of the remaining 25 JI patients, 9 had a 60-mm JJ-LSL and 16 had a 120-mm JJ-LSL. Rate of intussusception was higher in the 120-mm versus 60-mm JJ-LSL group (p < 0.05). Acute abdominal pain was present in all JI patients and 32/34 had radiologic findings (CT scan) that corroborated for JI. The majority of JI patients were managed operatively (26/34) with 22/26 using laparoscopy (2/22 were converted to open). Intraoperative findings included intussusception (15/26), and 9/26 had other pathologies (internal hernia (2/26), cholecystitis (4/26), marginal ulcer (3/26)). Operative management of JI was either reduction and enteropexy (7/15), reduction only (5/15), or JJ revision (3/15). Recurrence of JI occurred in 7/23 patients, of who 4/7 were managed operatively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, JI appears to be a relatively rare complication after RYGB surgery. However, for patients developing JI, the majority had a JJ length ≥ 120 mm, and most patients required operative management which was associated with a higher rate of conversion to open and risk of JI recurrence. Reduction only technique had the highest risk of JI recurrence and therefore is not recommended.

Male gender is an independent risk factor for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an MBSAQIP® database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Male patients undergoing bariatric surgery have (historically) been considered higher risk than females. The aim of this study was to examine the disparity between genders undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures and assess gender as an independent risk factor. METHODS: The MBSAQIP® Data Registry Participant User Files for 2015-2017 was reviewed for patients having primary SG and RYGB. Patients were divided into groups based on gender and procedure. Variables for major complications were grouped together, including but not limited to PE, stroke, and MI. Univariate and propensity matching analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 429,664 cases, 20.58% were male. Univariate analysis demonstrated males were older (46.48 ± 11.96 vs. 43.71 ± 11.89 years, p < 0.0001), had higher BMI (46.58 ± 8.46 vs. 45.05 ± 7.75 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), and had higher incidence of comorbidities. Males had higher rates of major complications (1.72 vs. 1.05%; p < 0.0001) and 30-day mortality (0.18 vs. 0.07%, p < 0.0001). Significance was maintained after subgroup analysis of SG and RYGB. Propensity matched analysis demonstrated male gender was an independent risk factor for RYGB and SG, major complications [2.21 vs. 1.7%, p < 0.0001 (RYGB), 1.12 vs. 0.89%, p < 0.0001 (SG)], and mortality [0.23 vs. 0.12%, p < 0.0001 (RYGB), 0.10 vs. 0.05%; p < 0.0001 (SG)]. CONCLUSION: Males continue to represent a disproportionately small percentage of bariatric surgery patients despite having no difference in obesity rates compared to females. Male gender is an independent risk factor for major post-operative complications and 30-day mortality, even after controlling for comorbidities.

Correction to: Impact of age on morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery.

This article was updated to correct the spelling of Nicholas Dugan's first name: it is correct as displayed here.

Impact of age on morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective modality to treat obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. This study sought to utilize the MBASQIP® Data Registry to analyze the impact of age at time of surgery on outcomes following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures. METHODS: The MBSAQIP® Data Registry for patients undergoing SG or RYGB procedures between 2015 and 2016 was reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 age groups [18-44; 45-54; 55-64; > 65 years]. Minimal exclusions for revisional and/or emergency surgery were selected and combination variables created to classify complications as major or minor. A comorbidity index was constructed to include diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and prior cardiac surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to compare age stratifications to the young adult (18-45 years) cohort. RESULTS: Of 301,605 cases, 279,419 cases (71.2% SG) remained after applying exclusion criteria (79.2% female, mean BMI 45.5 ± 8.1 kg/m2, 8.9% insulin-dependent diabetics). Mean age was 44.7 ± 12.0 years (51.3% 18-44 years; 26.9% 45-54 years; 16.3% 55-64 years; 5.5% > 65 years). A univariate analysis demonstrated preoperative differences of lower BMI with increasing age concomitant with increasing frequency of RYGB and a higher comorbidity index (p < 0.0001 vs. 18-45 years). At age > 45 years, major complications and 30-day mortality increased independent of procedure type (p < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis controlling for comorbidity indices demonstrated increasing age (> 45 years) increased risk for major complications and mortality. CONCLUSION: Overall, bariatric surgery (SG or RYGB) remains a low mortality risk procedure for all age groups. However, all age group classifications > 45 years had higher incidence of major complications and mortality compared to patients 18-45 years (despite older individuals having lower preoperative BMI) indicating delaying surgery is detrimental.

Transversus abdominis block utilizing liposomal bupivacaine as a non-opioid analgesic for postoperative pain management.

INTRODUCTION: The use of non-narcotic modalities for postoperative analgesia may decrease exposure to opioids, thereby limiting their deleterious effects. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block prior to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB). The primary outcome was total postoperative morphine equivalents. METHODS: A single-surgeon, IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB or LSG from 2010 to 2016. Patients were grouped according to those who received TAP blocks immediately preoperatively with rescue opioids (TAP group) and those who received PCA only (PCA group). Total parenteral morphine equivalents (PME) were calculated. Numerical pain scores were collected immediately following surgery, 12 h postoperatively, and on the day of discharge. Median length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions were also calculated. RESULTS: There were 440 patients who met inclusion criteria. The TAP group had significantly less opioid use (total PME) than the PCA, irrespective of surgical approach (70.4 ± 2.7 PCA LRYGB and 26.5 ± 1.5 TAP block LRYGB, p value ≤ 0.0001; 60.0 ± 3.5 PCA LSG vs. and 24.1 ± 2.0 TAP block LSG, p value < 0.0001). Median LOS was 2.0 days for both PCA groups, whereas LOS decreased to 1.0 day for both groups of patients receiving TAP blocks (p < 0.0001). Pain scores immediately following and 12 h after surgery were significantly elevated in the TAP LRYGB versus PCA LRYGB (p < 0.05) and immediately following surgery for PCA versus TAP block for LSG (p = 0.0109). CONCLUSIONS: TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine lead to significantly less use of parenteral morphine equivalents and decreased LOS compared to PCA alone. Pain scores were higher in the TAP LRYGB group compared to the LRYGB PCA group, with no differences in pain scores noted in the LSG groups.

Robotic gastric bypass may lead to fewer complications compared with laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Robotic technology leads to improved visualization and precision over laparoscopy but also higher cost of care. The benefits of this technology to patient outcomes are controversial. Our objective was to assess whether the application of robotic surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) would lead to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A prospectively collected database at a bariatric center of excellence was reviewed for all RYGB procedures performed by one surgeon between 2007 and 2015. Procedures performed laparoscopically (transoral circular stapling technique) versus robotically (hand-sewn anastomosis) were compared; the transition in technique occurred in 2011. Patient demographics, baseline weight, BMI, operation duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity and mortality, and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. Morbidity up to 1-year postop was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Of 246 patients, 125 underwent robotic and 121 laparoscopic RYGB. Patients in the robotic group were older and heavier but achieved similar  %EWL to the laparoscopic group. The operative duration was longer but the mean patient LOS was shorter with the robotic approach. There were no leaks and no mortality. Based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, fewer overall and fewer severe complications occurred in the robotic compared with the laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the use of robotic technology for the creation of gastric bypass led to longer operative times, similar %EWL but decreased LOS and number and severity of complications compared with the laparoscopic approach. Since our findings may have been influenced by the type of anastomotic technique used with each approach they need confirmation by a controlled trial.

Early discharge in the bariatric population does not increase post-discharge resource utilization.

INTRODUCTION: There is a trend toward shorter-stay bariatric surgery. However, reducing LOS may increase complications and post-discharge resource utilization. Our goal was to compare outcomes before and after implementation of short-stay bariatric surgery. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon series of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB). The two cohorts "target discharge POD 1" and "target discharge POD 2" were analyzed for on time discharges (feasibility) and complications. Patients who were successfully discharged in each cohort were further analyzed for post-discharge resource utilization. RESULTS: Early discharge was initiated in November of 2014 with 107 patients identified in this group. An additional 107 patients from those immediately preceding represented the target DC POD 2 group. The target DC POD 2 patients had a significantly higher percentage of patients who met their target LOS. The SD group (overall and LRYGB) had a significantly higher rate of hospital readmissions; this was the only significant difference in primary outcomes between the two groups. There was no difference in mortality, leaks or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that short-stay bariatric surgery is feasible and safe. Reducing the LOS from 2 to 1 day did not significantly increase the rate of hospital readmissions, ED visits or patient calls to our office. Further research is necessary to determine whether LOS can be further abbreviated to allow outpatient LSG and LRYGB.

African American Patients Experience Worse Outcomes than Hispanic Patients Following Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis Using the MBSAQIP Data Registry.

BACKGROUND: Obesity rates in Hispanics and African Americans (AAs) are higher than in Caucasians in the USA, yet the rate of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) for weight loss remains lower for both Hispanics and AAs. METHODS: Patient demographics and outcomes of adult AA and Hispanic patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures were analyzed using the MBSAQIP dataset [2015-2018] using unmatched and propensity-matched data. RESULTS: In total, 173,157 patients were included, of whom 98,185 were AA [56.7%] [21,163-RYGB; 77,022-SG] and 74,972 were Hispanic [43.3%] [20,282-RYGB; 54,690-SG]). Preoperatively, the AA cohort was older, had more females, and higher BMIs with higher rates of all tracked obesity-related medical conditions except for diabetes, venous stasis, and prior foregut surgery. Intra- and postoperatively, AAs were more likely to experience major complications including unplanned ICU admission, 30-day readmission/reintervention, and mortality. After propensity matching, the differences in ED visits, treatment for dehydration, 30-day readmission, 30-day intervention, and pulmonary embolism remained for both SG and RYGB cohorts. Progressive renal insufficiency and ventilator use lost statistical significance in both cohorts. Conversely, 30-day reoperation, postoperative ventilator requirement, unplanned intubation, unplanned ICU admission, and mortality lost significance in the RYGB cohort, but not SG patients. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for AA patients were worse than for Hispanic patients, even after propensity matching. After matching, differences in major complications and mortality lost significance for RYGB, but not SG. These data suggest that outcomes for RYGB may be driven by the presence and severity of pre-existing patient-related factors.

The role of total alimentary limb length in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an established surgical treatment for obesity. Variations in limb length during RYGB procedures have been investigated for optimizing weight loss while minimizing nutritional deficiencies. The role of the total alimentary limb length (TALL; Roux limb plus common channel [CC]), however, is poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: Compare TALL in RYGB procedures for weight loss outcomes and malnutrition. SETTING: Systematic review. METHODS: Ovid Medline and PubMed databases were searched for entries between 1993 and 2020. Search terms included "gastric bypass" and "TALL." Two independent reviewers screened the results. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies measured TALL in RYGB. Of these, 4 of 6 reported a relationship between TALL and weight loss. Additionally, 11 studies reported that when TALL was ≤400 cm and CC <200 cm, 3.4% to 63.6% of patients required limb lengthening for protein malnutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of studies on RYGB do not report TALL length. There is some evidence that weight loss is affected by shortening TALL, while a TALL ≤400 cm with CC<200 should be avoided due to severe protein malnutrition. More studies on the effect of TALL are needed.

Safety of Primary Versus Revisional Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch in Patients with Super Obesity Using the MBSAQIP database.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with super obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m2), biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (BPD/DS) can be an effective bariatric operation. Technical challenges and patient safety concerns, however, have limited its use as a primary procedure. This study sought to assess the safety of primary versus revisional BPD/DS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MBSAQIP database was queried for primary and revisional BPD/DS (2015-2018). Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18 years of age, BMI > 50 kg/m2, and with no concurrent procedures. Preoperative variables were compared using a chi-square test or Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Multivariate logistic or robust linear regression models were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: There were 3,378 primary BPD/DS and 487 revisional BPD/DS patients. Primary BPD/DS patients had higher BMI (56.5 [IQR4.4] versus 54.8 [IQR4] kg/m2, p < 0.0001) and had more diabetes mellitus type II (29.1% versus 17.2%, p < 0.0001). Intraoperatively, revisional BPD/DS had longer operative time (165 [IQR47] min versus 139 [IQR100] min, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for preoperative characteristics, there was no difference in 30-day readmission or ED visits (primary 12.9% versus revisional 14.6%), reoperation or reintervention (primary 5.7% versus revisional 7.8%), or mortality (primary 0.4% versus revisional 0.6%). In contrast, the revisional BPD/DS patients had higher odds of major morbidity (primary 3.4% versus revisional 5.3%, OR 1.9, CI 1.1-3.2, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Revisional BPD/DS is associated with higher morbidity than primary BPD/DS in patients with super obesity. These patients should thus be counselled appropriately when choosing a primary or revisional bariatric procedure.

Why Size Matters: an Evaluation of Gastric Pouch Size in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using CT Volumetric Analysis and its Effect on Marginal Ulceration.

PURPOSE: Marginal ulceration (MU) is a common long-term complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The causes of MU after RYGB are multifactorial and include surgical technique of constructing the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between gastric pouch size in RYGB and MU using CT volumetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) following RYGB at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Measurement of gastric pouch size was performed using 3-D CT software. Standard statistical methods were used, a univariate comparison was performed between MU and non-MU patients followed by a propensity-matched comparison to control for factors known to affect MU, and a propensity-matched subgroup analysis was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients met criteria, 57 of which had MU on EGD and 65 who did not. The MU group had more smokers and patients with PPI use than the non-MU group, and the mean time from operation to CT scan was 26.6 months (range: 0-108 months). The MU group had a larger gastric pouch size than the non-MU group (34.1 ± 11.8 versus 20.1 ± 6.8 cm3). When analyzed for matched patient cohorts, this difference remained for the MU group that included smokers and PPI use. When stratified for pouch size, for each 5 cm3 increase in pouch size, patients had 2.4 times odds increase of MU formation. CONCLUSIONS: CT volumetric analysis demonstrated that a larger gastric pouch size was associated with MU following RYGB.

Postoperative sepsis after primary bariatric surgery: an analysis of MBSAQIP.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients at higher risk of postoperative sepsis (PS) may help to prevent this life-threatening complication. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the rate and predictors of PS after primary bariatric surgery. SETTING: An analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) 2015-2017. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Exclusion criteria were revisional, endoscopic, and uncommon, or investigational procedures. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of organ/space surgical site infection (OS-SSI), and patients who developed sepsis were compared with patients who did not develop sepsis in each cohort. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PS. RESULTS: In total, 438,752 patients were included (79.4% female, mean age 44.6±12 years). Of those, 661 patients (.2%) developed PS of which 245 (37.1%) developed septic shock. Out of 892 patients with organ/space surgical site infections (OS-SSI), 298 (45.1%) developed sepsis (P <.001). Patients who developed PS had higher mortality (8.8% versus .1%, P < .001), and this was highest in patients without OS-SSI (11.8% versus 5%, P = .002). The main infectious complications associated with PS in patients without OS-SSI were pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Independent predictors of PS in OS-SSI included RYGB versus SG (OR, 1.8), and age ≥50 years (OR, 1.4). Independent predictors of PS in patients without OS-SSI were conversion to other approaches (OR, 6), operation length >2 hours (OR, 5.7), preoperative dialysis (OR, 4.1), preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (OR, 2.8), limited ambulation most or all of the time (OR, 2.4), preoperative venous stasis (OR, 2.4), previous nonbariatric foregut surgery (OR, 2), RYGB versus SG (OR, 2), hypertension on medication (OR, 1.5), body mass index ≥50 kg/m2(OR, 1.4), age ≥50 years (OR, 1.3), obstructive sleep apnea (OR, 1.3). CONCLUSION: Development of OS-SSI after primary bariatric surgery is associated with sepsis and increased 30-day mortality. Patients without OS-SSI who develop PS have a significantly higher mortality rate compared with patients with OS-SSI who develop PS. Early identification and intervention in patients with PS, including those without OS-SSI, may improve survival in this high-risk group.

Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Stricture Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: an Analysis of Anastomotic Technique at a Single Institution.

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are at risk of developing strictures of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). Several variables can affect this, one of which may be the method of anastomosis. Between 2010 and 2014, our institution utilized three different anastomotic techniques for creating the GJA (25 mm end-to-end circular-stapled (CS), linear-stapled (LS), and robotic hand sewn (HS)). Our objectives were to compare the method of GJA relative to the subsequent development of anastomotic stricture. METHODS: We queried our electronic health record for all patients who underwent an upper endoscopy (EGD) after RYGB (2010-2014). Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for type of GJA, weight loss, complications, interventions, and revisions of the GJA. RESULTS: In total, 1112 RYGB were performed at our institute, and 17.4% of patients (194/1112) had an upper endoscopy (EGD). Overall, 3.1% (34/1112) were found to have a stricture of the GJA. Patients undergoing a CS, LS, and HS anastomosis had GJA stricture rates of 4.9%, 0.5%, and 1.2% respectively (CS to LS (p < 0.05), p = NS among CS vs. HS, and LS vs. HS). The rate of GJA revision was 1.5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (p = NS). In patients who had an EGD, excess BMI loss was 57.4%, 64.6%, and 59.2% (p = NS). In patients symptomatic from strictures, excess BMI loss was 69.4%, 83%, and 63.5% respectively (p = NS). CONCLUSION: The anastomotic technique for creating of the GJA may impact the formation of strictures. Based on our experience, gastrojejunostomies created with a 2-mm EEA-stapling technique are at higher risk of strictures.

Impacts of Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique on Rates of Marginal Ulcer Formation and Anastomotic Bleeding Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Marginal ulceration (MU) and bleeding are possible complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Our institution utilizes three techniques for performing the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA), providing a means to compare postoperative MU and bleeding as it relates to GJA technique. OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze the incidence of MU and bleeding between the 25-mm end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler, linear stapler (LS), and robotic hand-sewn (RHS) GJA techniques. METHODS: Electronic health records for all patients who had an upper endoscopy (EGD) after RYGB were queried (2010-2014). Charts were retrospectively reviewed for type of GJA, complications, endoscopic interventions, and smoking and NSAID use. RESULTS: Out of 1112 RYGBs, the GJA was created using an EEA, LS, or RHS approach in 58.6%, 33.6%, and 7.7% of patients, respectively. 17.4% had an EGD (19.9% EEA, 13.9% LS, and 14.0% RHS). Incidence of MU was 7.3% (9.3% EEA, 4.8% LS, and 5.8% RHS). Rates of EGD and MU were significantly higher after EEA vs. LS GJA (p<0.05). The bleeding rate was 1.5%, [1.1% EEA, 2.1% LS, and 2.3% RHS (p=NS)]. MU within 90 days of RYGB occurred in 4.1%, 0.8%, and 4.7%, respectively (p<0.05 for EEA vs LS only). NSAID and cigarette use were identified in 29.3%, 38.9%, and 60% and 17.2%, 22.2%, and 20%, respectively, for the EEA, LS, and RHS GJA (p=NS). CONCLUSION: The method of GJA has an impact on rate of MU formation. A GJA fashioned with a 25-mm EEA stapler tends to have higher rates of EGD and MU.

Open-label, sham-controlled trial of an endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner for preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgery candidates.

BACKGROUND: The duodenojejunal bypass liner (DJBL) (EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner) is an endoscopically placed and removable intestinal liner that creates a duodenojejunal bypass resulting in weight loss and improvement in type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: Weight loss before bariatric surgery to decrease perioperative complications. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: Multicenter, tertiary care, teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Twenty-one obese subjects in the DJBL arm and 26 obese subjects in the sham arm composed the intent-to-treat population. INTERVENTIONS: The subjects in the sham arm underwent an EGD and mock implantation. Both groups received identical nutritional counseling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the difference in the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) at week 12 between the 2 groups. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of subjects achieving 10% EWL, total weight change, and device safety. RESULTS: Thirteen DJBL arm subjects and 24 sham arm subjects completed the 12-week study. EWL was 11.9% +/- 1.4% and 2.7% +/- 2.0% for the DJBL and sham arms, respectively (P < .05). In the DJBL arm, 62% achieved 10% or more EWL compared with 17% of the subjects in the sham arm (P < .05). Total weight change in the DJBL arm was -8.2 +/- 1.3 kg compared with -2.1 +/- 1.1 kg in the sham arm (P < .05). Eight DJBL subjects terminated early because of GI bleeding (n = 3), abdominal pain (n = 2), nausea and vomiting (n = 2), and an unrelated preexisting illness (n = 1). None had further clinical symptoms after DJBL explantation. LIMITATIONS: Study personnel were not blinded. There was a lack of data on caloric intake. CONCLUSIONS: The DJBL achieved endoscopic duodenal exclusion and promoted significant weight loss beyond a minimal sham effect in candidates for bariatric surgery. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NPT00469391.).

Failure of mesenteric defect closure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bowel obstructions following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are a significant issue often caused by internal herniation. Controversy continues as to whether mesenteric defect closure is necessary to decrease the incidence of internal hernias after RYGB. Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of closing the mesenteric defect at the jejunojejunostomy in patients who underwent RYGB by examining this potential space at reoperation for any reason. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients undergoing surgery after RYGB from August 1999 to October 2008 to determine the status of the mesentery at the jejunojejunostomy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent surgery 2 to 19 months after open (n=8) or laparoscopic (n=10) RYGB. All patients had documented suture closure of their jejunojejunostomy at the time of RYGB. Permanent (n=12) or absorbable (n=6) sutures were used for closures. Patients lost 23.6 kg to 62.1 kg before a reoperation was required for a ventral hernia (n=8), cholecystectomy (n=4), abdominal pain (n=4), or small bowel obstruction (n=2). Fifteen of the 18 patients had open mesenteric defects at the jejunojejunostomy despite previous closure; none were the cause for reoperation. CONCLUSION: Routine suture closure of mesenteric defects after RYGB may not be an effective permanent closure likely due to the extensive fat loss and weight loss within the mesentery.

Ambulatory bariatric surgery: does it really lead to higher rates of adverse events?

BACKGROUND: Correlating patient outcomes with length of stay (LoS) is an important consideration in metabolic and bariatric surgery. At present, conflicting data exists regarding patient safety for ambulatory (AMB) metabolic and bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVE: Outcomes for AMB-metabolic and bariatric surgery patients (LoS <1 d) undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were compared with matched patients with LoS ≥1 day (non-AMB) using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) registry. SETTING: MBSAQIP national database. METHODS: The MBSAQIP registry was queried for patients undergoing SG or RYGB (2015-2017) and patients grouped as AMB/non-AMB. Exclusion criteria included LoS >4 days, age <18 or >75 years, revision surgery, gastric banding, body mass index <35 kg/m2, and day of surgery mortality. Variables were combined into major/minor complications and 30-day mortality. Analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and propensity matching. RESULTS: After exclusions were applied 408,895 patients remained (9973 AMB). Overall, 111,279 patients underwent RYGB (1032 AMB) and 297,616 underwent SG (8941 AMB), with similar demographic characteristics and co-morbidities between groups. For AMB patients, there was no increase in 30-day mortality, reoperation, or readmission, and fewer drains were placed versus matched non-AMB patients. In AMB-SG patients more surgical site infections were reported versus non-AMB-SG, although AMB-SG patients had fewer intensive care unit admissions. For AMB-RYGB, no differences in complications were detected versus non-AMB-RYGB. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis of the MBSAQIP database, patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB or SG procedures can be safely discharged on the day of their procedure without increased incidence of mortality, reoperation, or readmission.

Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in African Americans: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Data Registry.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity is disproportionally high in African Americans (AA) in the United States. This study compared outcomes for AA patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with non-AA patients. METHODS: The MBSAQIP database was reviewed for RYGB and SG patients (2015-2017). Patients were identified as AA or non-AA and grouped to RYGB or SG. Combined and univariate analyses were performed on unmatched/propensity matched populations to assess outcomes. RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, 75,409 AA and 354,305 non-AA patients remained. Univariate analysis identified AA-RYGB and AA-SG patients were heavier and younger than non-AA patients. Overall, AA patients tended to have fewer preoperative comorbidities than non-AA patients with the majority of AA comorbidities related to hypertension and renal disease. Analysis of propensity matched data confirmed AA bariatric surgery patients had increased cardiovascular-related disease incidence compared with non-AA patients. Perioperatively, AA-RYGB patients had longer operative times, increased rates of major complications/ICU admission, and increased incidence of 30-day readmission, re-intervention, and reoperation, concomitant with lower rates of minor complications/superficial surgical site infection (SSI) compared with non-AA patients. For SG, AA patients had longer operative times and higher rates of major complications and 30-day readmission, re-intervention, and mortality, coupled with fewer minor complications, superficial/organ space SSI, and leak. CONCLUSION: African American patients undergoing bariatric surgery are younger and heavier than non-AA patients and present with different comorbidity profiles. Overall, AAs exhibit worse outcomes following RYGB or SG than non-AA patients, including increased mortality rates in AA-SG patients.

Does liver appearance predict histopathologic findings: prospective analysis of routine liver biopsies during bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with morbid obesity. Liver biopsy is the reference standard for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. It is unclear whether the macroscopic liver appearance correlates with the histopathologic findings. Our objective was to determine the relationship between the intraoperative liver appearance and the histopathologic findings during laparoscopic bariatric surgery at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 108 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with routine intraoperative liver biopsy. An intraoperative liver visual score was recorded according to the size, tan-speckling, and contour. The liver histologic findings were categorized into 3 groups: (1) normal; (2) bland steatosis; and (3) nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The liver visual score was compared with the liver histologic findings. A recorded video of the liver was regraded at a later date to determine observer agreement. RESULTS: The prevalence of NASH was 23% (n = 25). Of the 108 patients, 48% with NASH had normal-appearing livers and accounted for 24% (n = 12) of the 50 normal-appearing livers. A similar proportion of NASH cases was found in all 3 visual categories. Furthermore, no relationship was found between the number of abnormal visual cues and the liver histologic findings (P = .23). No complications were directly attributable to liver biopsy. The kappa values for intraobserver and interobserver agreement ranged from fair to almost perfect. CONCLUSION: NASH is common in the morbidly obese population. There does not appear to be a relationship between liver appearance and the histopathologic findings. Intraoperative liver biopsy is a safe and accurate method of diagnosing liver disease and should be considered in all morbidly obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery.