Improved Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Aged 16 and Younger at Two Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Despite Relatively High Rates of Reinjury and Repeat Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in adolescent patients, particularly those aged 16 and under, are increasingly common procedure that lacks robust clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. The purpose of this study was to report 2-year PROs of patients receiving ACLR aged 16 or younger using the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Secondary aims included characterizing treatment characteristics, return to sport (RTS), and clinical outcomes. METHODS: The institutional PRO database was queried for patients receiving ACLR from 2009 to 2020. Patients aged older than 16, revision procedures, concomitant ligament repairs/reconstructions, and patients without full outcome data at 2 years were excluded. Outcomes over 2 years after ACLR included SANE, KOOS, reinjuries, reoperations, and time to RTS. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included with an average age of 15.0 years. Most patients were females (77.6%). Bone-tendon-bone autograft (69.4%) was the most used. Average RTS was 8.7 months (range: 4.8 to 24.0 mo), with 90% of patients eventually returning to sport. A total of 23 patients (23.5%) experienced a reinjury and 24.5% (n = 24) underwent reoperation. Timing to RTS was not associated with reinjury, but patients who returned between 9.5 and 13.7 months did not sustain reinjuries. Mean KOOS and SANE scores at 2 years were 87.1 and 89.1, respectively, with an average improvement of +18.4 and +22.9, respectively. Change in KOOS was negatively impacted by reinjury to the anterior cruciate ligament graft and reoperation (anterior cruciate ligament failure: +10.0 vs 19.3, P = 0.081, respectively; reoperation: +13.2 vs +20.1, P = 0.051, respectively), though these did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Patients experienced improved SANE and KOOS scores after ACLR. Rates of reinjury and reoperation were relatively high and negatively impacted PRO scores but were not associated with the timing of RTS. Adolescent patients should be counseled regarding the risk of subsequent ipsilateral and contralateral knee injury after ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

What Is the Survivorship After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Large-database Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may experience lasting clinical improvement after hip arthroscopy; however, some patients will still eventually undergo early conversion to THA due to unresolved symptoms and progression of arthritis. However, the risk of this has been only incompletely characterized in prior studies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a large healthcare claims database over a 5-year period (2011-2016), we asked: (1) What is the survivorship free from THA after arthroscopic osteoplasty performed for FAI? (2) What identifiable demographic factors and patient characteristics are associated with early conversion to THA after hip arthroscopy performed for FAI? METHODS: We included all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI, between the ages of 12 years and 63 years, with 3 months of claims data before hip arthroscopy and minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 4730 hip arthroscopy patients from 2011 to 2014 were retrieved from a US commercial claims database. Hip arthroscopy incidence doubled over time from 1.2 to 2.1 persons per 100,000. Temporal trends, patient demographics, diagnoses at time of arthroscopy, and patient comorbidities were retrieved and logistic regression performed. Survivorship analysis on 11,323 patients (lifting the 2-year follow-up requirement) was also performed to identify independent variables associated with early risk of conversion to THA. RESULTS: In patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI, the overall proportion of conversion to THA within 2 years after hip arthroscopy was 7% (338 of 4730). After controlling for confounding variables such as sex, obesity, and depression, we found the following were independently associated with increased odds of conversion to THA: older age (odds ratio 1.08 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.10]; p < 0.001), osteoarthritis (OR 2.91 [95% CI 2.27 to 3.77]; p < 0.001), joint inflammation (OR 1.89 [95% CI 1.16 to 3.09]; p = 0.01), and a history of opioid use (OR 2.17 [95% CI 1.69 to 2.79]; p < 0.001). Survivorship analysis similarly revealed that older age (hazard ratio 1.08 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.09]; p < 0.001), osteoarthritis (HR 2.53 [95% CI 2.13 to 3.01]; p < 0.001), joint inflammation (HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.10 to 2.11]; p = 0.01), a history of opioid use (HR 2.02 [95% CI 1.71 to 2.38]; p < 0.001), and smoking (HR 1.55 [95% CI 1.14 to 2.11]; p = 0.005), were independently associated with increased odds of conversion to THA within 2 years after hip arthroscopy for FAI. CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings of this study are limited and should not be taken in isolation, patients with FAI who are older, carry diagnoses of inflammatory or degenerative articular disease, or who use opioids or smoke should be counseled about a potentially increased risk of undergoing early conversion to THA after hip arthroscopy. Future studies to further examine the effect of these diagnoses in prospectively collected cohorts, incorporating radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures, are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

High satisfaction yet decreased activity 4 years after transphyseal ACL reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: ACL injuries in preteens and teens are common occurrences. Reconstruction is believed to be optimum treatment for those wishing to return to running, cutting, and jumping sports. Rates of reoperation, satisfaction, and long-term return to and maintenance of preinjury activity after ACL reconstruction in young athletes are important information for physicians, patients, and parents. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to address the following questions in this skeletally immature patient population undergoing ACL reconstruction: (1) What is the reinjury rate and the need for subsequent surgeries? (2) How do patient satisfaction and function as assessed by patient and physician correlate with return to sport? (3) What factors contribute to failure to return to preinjury activity levels? METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 29 patients who underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction using soft tissue grafts passed through open physes and followed to skeletal maturity, and at least 2 years from their index surgery, who were invited and returned for a study interview and examination. Pre- and postinjury activity levels were assessed via the Tegner activity score, satisfaction was determined using a 10-point Likert scale, function was assessed via the Lysholm score and IKDC grade, and an open-ended questionnaire was used for explanations of changes in activity levels. Reoperations were classified as major or minor, determined from a review of the medical records conducted after interview and examination. RESULTS: At a minimum followup of 2 years (mean, 4 years; range, 2-8 years), four revision reconstructions and seven minor operations were performed for a reoperation rate of 11 of 29 (38%). Eight of 29 patients (28%) sustained contralateral ACL ruptures. The mean satisfaction score was 9 (range, 4-10) and mean Lysholm score was 91 (range, 61-100). Only 12 of 29 (41%) patients returned to and maintained their preinjury level of sport. High satisfaction correlated with return to prior level of sports, although there was no relationship between function and activity level. Reoperation on the index knee or contralateral ACL tear did not correlate with a change in activity level; rather, most patients who were less active indicated a change in interest with advancing age. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high satisfaction and function, less than 50% of patients maintained their preinjury level of play 4 years after ACL reconstruction. Satisfaction correlated significantly with knee function; highly satisfied patients were more likely to return to and maintain their prior level of participation in sports. Contributing factors to decreased activity include changes in lifestyle with increasing age. Reoperation did not correlate with lower activity scores or failure to return to sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Age and Body Mass Index on Time to Advanced Imaging and Surgery in Young Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Background: In young athletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, increased times from injury to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and injury to surgery can lead to the accrual of new injuries over time. Purpose: To determine the patient characteristics associated with differences in timing between injury, MRI, and surgery in young athletes with ACL tears. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients aged 13 to 25 years who underwent isolated primary ACL reconstruction between January 2017 and June 2020 at a single orthopaedic surgery department. The times from injury to MRI, MRI to surgery, and injury to surgery were documented. Patient demographic data (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], race and ethnicity, and insurance type) were recorded. Multivariable analysis was used to determine if any patient characteristic had a significant association with increased time to MRI or surgery. Results: A total of 369 patients (mean age, 18.0 years; 56% female) were included. Both age and BMI were found to be significantly associated with timing of care while holding all other predictors constant. For every 1-year increase in patient age, time from injury to MRI increased by 9.6 days (95% CI, 1.8-17.4 days; P = .02), time from MRI to surgery increased by 7.4 days (95% CI, 4.4-10.5 days; P < .001), and time from injury to surgery increased by 17.0 days (95% CI, 8.4-25.6 days; P < .001). Compared with patients with normal BMI, overweight patients (BMI range, 25-29.9 kg/m2) had an MRI-to-surgery time that was on average 37.2 days (95% CI, 11.7-62.7 days; P < .004) longer and an injury to surgery time that was on average 71.8 days (95% CI, 0.5-143.0 days; P = .048) longer. Obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) did not demonstrate a significant relationship with the studied time intervals. Conclusion: Increasing age and elevated BMI were found to be associated with increased time to MRI and surgical care in young athletes with ACL injuries.

Limited Return to Preinjury Performance in NCAA Division I American Football Players With Hamstring Injuries.

Background: Hamstring strains are common among elite athletes, but their effect on return to the same level of play in American football has been incompletely characterized. Purpose: Data on National Collegiate Athletics Association Division I college football players with acute hamstring strains were gathered to identify the effects these injuries have on both return to play and athletic performance regarding velocity, workload, and acceleration. Study Design: Case Series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Injury data for a single Division I football team were prospectively recorded over a 4-year period. Players wore global navigation satellite system and local positioning system (GNSS/LPS) devices to record movement data in practices and games. The practice and game data were cross-referenced to evaluate players with isolated acute hamstring strains. Comparisons were made regarding players' pre- and postinjury ability to maintain high velocity (>12 mph [19.3 kph]), maximal velocity, triaxial acceleration, and inertial movement analysis (IMA). There were 58 hamstring injuries in 44 players, of which 25 injuries from 20 players had GNSS/LPS data. Results: Players were able to return to play from all 25 injury incidences at a mean of 9.2 days. At the final mean follow-up of 425 days, only 4 players had reached preinjury function in all measurements; 12 players were able to return in 2 of the 4 metrics; and only 8 players reached their preinjury ability to maintain high velocity. For those who did not achieve this metric, there was a significant difference between pre- and postinjury values (722 vs 442 m; P = .016). A total of 14 players were able to regain their IMA. Players who returned to prior velocity or acceleration metrics did so at a mean of 163 days across all metrics. Conclusion: While players may be able to return to play after hamstring strain, many players do not reach preinjury levels of acceleration or velocity, even after 13.5 months. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, assess clinical relevance on imaging performance, and improve hamstring injury prevention and rehabilitation.

Reconstructing a Patellar Tendon Rupture Neglected for 14 Years When Anatomic Restoration Is Not Possible: A Case Report.

CASE: This case highlights the utility and outcomes of an Achilles tendon bone-block allograft in reconstructing the patellar tendon of a 44-year-old man in the setting of a high-riding, irreducible patella after a chronic patellar tendon rupture of 14 years. CONCLUSION: In cases of a neglected patellar tendon rupture with an irreducible high-riding patella, an Achilles tendon bone-block allograft can provide the length and tissue necessary to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Although reconstruction may not be anatomic, patients can still experience great subjective and objective functional improvement with restoration of the extensor mechanism even after delayed reconstruction.

Knee pain and injury: When is a surgical consult needed?

This review identifies clinical scenarios-such as unstable or displaced fractures, major tendon ruptures, and significant mechanical issues-that likely warrant surgical consultation.

Effect of Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Repair of Concomitant Medial Meniscus Tears in Young Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Delayed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with an increased risk of meniscal injury. Limited data are available regarding the relationship between surgical delay and meniscal repairability in the setting of ACLR in young patients. PURPOSE: To determine whether time from ACL injury to primary ACLR was associated with the incidence of medial and/or lateral meniscal repair in young athletes who underwent meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Records were retrospectively reviewed for patients aged 13 to 25 years who underwent primary ACLR between January 2017 and June 2020 by surgeons from a single academic orthopaedic surgery department. Demographic data were collected, and operative reports were reviewed to document all concomitant pathologies and procedures. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with meniscal repair, including time elapsed from ACL injury to surgery. RESULTS: Concomitant meniscal tears were identified and treated in 243 of 427 patients; their mean age was 17.9 ± 3.3 years, and approximately half (47.7%) of patients were female. There were 144 (59.3%) medial tears treated and 164 (67.5%) lateral tears treated; 65 (26.7%) patients had both medial and lateral tears treated. Median time from ACL injury to ACLR was 2.4 months (interquartile range, 1.4-4.7 months). Adjusted univariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between medial meniscal repair and time to surgery, with a 7% decreased incidence of medial meniscal repair per month elapsed between injury and surgery (odds ratio, 0.93 per month; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98; P = .006). No similar relationship was found between lateral meniscal repair and time to surgery (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; P = .24). CONCLUSION: In the setting of concomitant ACL and meniscal injuries, surgical delay decreased the incidence of medial meniscal repair in young athletes by 7% per month from time of injury.

Effect of Increased Time to Surgery on the Ability of MRI to Rule Out Medial Meniscal Tears in Young Athletes With ACL Injury.

Background: The prevalence of meniscal tears in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury increases with extended time between injury and ACL reconstruction. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between time from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ACL reconstruction and the predictive value of MRI to diagnose meniscal tears in the young active population. It was hypothesized that increased time between MRI and ACL reconstruction would lead to a decrease in the negative predictive value of MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears, as more injuries may accrue over time in the ACL-deficient knee. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Included were patients aged 13 to 25 years at the authors' institution who underwent primary ACL reconstruction from January 2017 to June 2020. Time from MRI to surgery as well as descriptions of medial and lateral meniscal tears on both MRI and operative reports were documented. Time from MRI to surgery was divided into 4 intervals: 0 to 6 weeks, >6 weeks to 3 months, >3 to 6 months, and beyond 6 months. Multivariable analysis was used to determine the positive and negative predictive values of MRI in diagnosing a meniscal tear as compared with arthroscopic findings. Results: A total of 432 patients were included with a mean age of 17.9 ± 3.4 years. The mean time from MRI to surgery was 70.5 ± 98 days. There was a significant decrease in the negative predictive value of MRI to identify a medial meniscal tear in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction >6 months after imaging (odds ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.05-0.53]; P = .003). This same relationship was not shown for lateral meniscal tears, nor was any other predictor significant. Conclusion: The utility of MRI to rule out a medial meniscal tear significantly diminished in the young athletic population when >6 months passed between MRI and ACL reconstruction. These data suggest these tears occur between the time of the MRI and surgery and that the medial meniscus is more susceptible than the lateral meniscus to new injury once the ACL has torn.

Autograft patellar bone-tendon-bone use does not increase operative time in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common procedure that has been shown to have relatively good outcomes amongst various graft types. Operative time in ACLR has been found to influence outcomes and cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of operative time in primary arthroscopically performed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and graft type while controlling for confounders that influence time. Methods: All patients who received ACLR between 2018 and 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria consisted of age (≤16 years), revisions, concomitant ligament reconstruction or tendon repairs, or other simultaneously performed procedures that could potentially add substantial variation in operative time. The primary outcome was operative time. Graft types included allograft, bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, hamstring tendon (HS) autograft and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft. Results: A total of 1813 primary ACLRs were included. The average operative time was 98.9 ± 33.0 min. Graft utilization varies considerably among surgeons. The most used graft type was BTB autograft (42.6%) followed by HS autograft (32.3%) and allograft (21.4%). Only 68 cases (3.8%) used a QT autograft. Seven of the 15 included surgeons primarily used BTB autograft. One surgeon predominately used QT autograft. No difference in operative time was observed among the autograft types (p = 0.342). Allograft ACLR was significantly faster by 27-33 min compared to using BTB autograft, HS autograft, or QT autograft (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Operative time did not vary by type of autograft selected. Allograft ACLR was performed approximately 30 min faster than autograft ACLR. Further studies examining the effect on patient outcomes of reduced operative time and minimizing graft harvest morbidity in ACLR is important to more accurately determine the cost-effectiveness of allograft ACLR.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation.

Purpose: To compare stiffness, strain, and load to failure of 4- versus 5-strand hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction human tendon allografts with femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation. Methods: Allograft hamstring tendons were used to create 10 four-strand (4S) and 10 five-strand (5S) grafts. Grafts were fixed to a uniaxial electromechanical load system via a femoral cortical suspensory button and a bioabsorbable interference screw in bone analogue. Grafts were cycled from 100 Newtons (N) to 250 N for 1,000 repetitions at 0.5 hertz before load to failure testing. Cyclic displacement was defined as the difference in graft length from the first 20 to 30 cycles compared with the last 10 cycles. Trials were recorded on a high-definition camera to allow for digital image correlation analysis. Results: Cyclic displacement more than 1,000 cycles was significantly lower in the 4S compared with the 5S group (0.87 vs 1.11 mm, P = .037). Digital image correlation analysis confirmed that the fifth strand elongated more than the other 4 strands in the 5S constructs (6.1% vs 3.9%, P = .032). Load to failure was greater in the 4S compared with the 5S group but not statistically significant (762 vs 707 N, P = .35). Stiffness was similar between constructs (138.5 vs 138.3 N/mm, P = .96). Conclusions: Compared with cyclically loaded 4S hamstring grafts, the 5S grafts had significantly increased displacement over time in a model of femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation. Clinical Relevance: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft is a commonly performed surgery with excellent outcomes. It has been shown that graft diameter influences these outcomes. As surgeons use larger grafts, it is important to investigate how these constructs may affect the outcomes of surgery.

Cost and Cost Driver Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: Bone-Tendon-Bone Autograft Versus Hamstring Autograft.

As health care transitions toward value-based care, orthopaedics has started to implement time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to understand costs and cost drivers. TDABC has not previously been used to study cost drivers in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to use TDABC to (1) calculate bone-tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring ACLR total costs of care and (2) evaluate the impact of graft choice and other factors on ACLR costs. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records for primary ACLR from the institutional patient-reported outcome registry between 2009 and 2016 in 1 ambulatory surgery center. Patients receiving allograft, revision ACLR, or concomitant meniscal repair or ligament reconstruction were excluded. The total cost of care was determined using TDABC. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted between ACLR cost and group characteristics. Results: A total of 328 patients were included; 211 (64.3%) received BTB autograft and 117 (35.7%) received hamstring autograft. The mean cost was $2,865.01 ± $263.45 (95% confidence interval: $2,829.26, $2,900.77) for BTB ACLR versus $3,377.44 ± $320.12 ($3,318.82, $3,436.05) for hamstring ACLR (p < 0.001). Operative time was 103.1 ± 25.1 (99.7, 106.5) minutes for BTB ACLR versus 113.1 ± 27.9 (108.0, 118.2) minutes for hamstring ACLR (p = 0.001). The total implant cost was $270.32 ± $97.08 ($257.15, $283.50) for BTB ACLR versus $587.36 ± $108.78 ($567.44, $607.28) for hamstring ACLR (p < 0.001). Hamstring graft (p = 0.006) and suspensory fixation on the femoral side (p = 0.011) were associated with increased costs. Conclusions: The mean cost of care and operative time for BTB autograft ACLR are less than those for hamstring autograft ACLR. Operative time, implant choice, and graft choice were identified as modifiable cost drivers that can empower surgeons to manage primary ACLR costs while maximizing the value of the procedure. Level of Evidence: Economic and Decision Analysis Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does the Preferred Study Source Impact Orthopedic In-Training Examination Performance?

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the role of electronic learning platforms for medical knowledge acquisition in orthopedic surgery residency training. This study hypothesizes that all methods of medical knowledge acquisition will achieve similar levels of improvement in medical knowledge as measured by change in orthopedic in-training examination (OITE) percentile scores. Our secondary hypothesis is that residents will equally value all study resources for usefulness in acquisition of medical knowledge, preparation for the OITE, and preparation for surgical practice. DESIGN: 9 ACGME accredited orthopedic surgery programs participated with 95% survey completion rate. Survey ranked sources of medical knowledge acquisition and study habits for OITE preparation. Survey results were compared to OITE percentile rank scores. PARTICIPANTS: 386 orthopedic surgery residents SETTING: 9 ACGME accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs RESULTS: 82% of participants were utilizing online learning resources (Orthobullets, ResStudy, or JBJS Clinical Classroom) as primary sources of learning. All primary resources showed a primary positive change in OITE score from 2018 to 2019. No specific primary source improved performance more than any other sources. JBJS clinical classroom rated highest for improved medical knowledge and becoming a better surgeon while journal reading was rated highest for OITE preparation. Orthopedic surgery residents' expectation for OITE performance on the 2019 examination was a statistically significant predictor of their change (decrease, stay the same, improve) in OITE percentile scores (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that no specific preferred study source outperformed other sources. Significantly 82% of residents listed an online learning platform as their primary source which is a significant shift over the last decade. Further investigation into effectiveness of methodologies for electronic learning platforms in medical knowledge acquisition and in improving surgical competency is warranted.

Capsular Closure Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Recent literature has suggested that capsular closure following hip arthroscopy restores native hip-joint kinematics and may lead to better patient-reported outcomes, especially in high-level athletes1-4. Description: Capsular closure of the hip occurs following standard hip arthroscopy, which typically includes labral repair and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and/or acetabulum accessed through an interportal capsulotomy. Viewing through an anterolateral portal with use of a 70° scope, a suture-passing device loaded with a #2 FiberWire (Arthrex) is passed down into the mid-anterior portal. The suture is then passed through the anterior aspect of the proximal leaflet of the capsulotomy. The suture-passing device is then passed through the distal leaflet, and the previously passed suture is grasped and brought out of the cannula. The capsular bites are typically made 1 cm from the edge of the capsule. This process is repeated 1.5 cm posteriorly to the initially placed suture. Typical capsular closure takes 2 to 3 sutures for complete closure. Once the sutures are passed, they are tied with use of half-hitches and excess suture is cut. Alternatives: Alternatives include capsular plication, which is more frequently performed in the setting of capsular laxity preoperatively or connective-tissue disorders5,6. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that leaving the capsulotomy unrepaired may lead to similar results in select populations7. Rationale: This procedure is performed largely secondary to the restoration of native anatomy and kinematics of the hip joint3,8. Arthroscopy of the hip requires a capsulotomy in order to access the joint, unlike other, more superficial joints such as the shoulder. Capsular closure is often technically challenging and adds length to the procedure. However, recent literature has shown improved patient-reported outcomes with routine capsular closure specifically among high-level athletes9,10. Expected Outcomes: Routine capsular closure has been associated with good mid-term patient-reported outcomes10. Patients who undergo hip arthroscopy and routine capsular closure can expect to meet the minimal clinically important difference and the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris hip score and the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living component. Patients who participate in high-level sports activities may experience a quicker return to play and more normal kinematics with routine capsular closure. Important Tips: Clear off the capsule immediately following the capsulotomy.Utilize an over-the-top view to better visualize the capsule.Place the sutures from anterior to posterior.

Biomechanical Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training after ACL Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, returning the knee to previous levels of strength and function is challenging, with the failure to do so associated with an increased risk of reinjury and long-term degenerative problems. Blood flow restriction (BFR) is gaining popularity as a rehabilitation technique; however, its effects on the mechanics of these exercises have not been fully explored. In this study, we aimed to determine the acute effects of BFR on the performance of a step-up exercise protocol and to assess the acceptability of the technique. METHODS: Twenty individuals (12 female/8 male; mean age, 30.6 yr) who had recently undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 20 controls (11 female/9 male, mean age 28.0 yr) performed a step-up exercise protocol with and without BFR. Lower limb kinematics and kinetics were measured and compared between groups and conditions. Testing was completed in June 2019. RESULTS: Participants in both groups had increased external rotation of the tibia of 2° (P < 0.001) and reductions in knee flexion and rotation torques around the joint of around 50% (P < 0.001) when using BFR compared with nonrestricted step-up exercise. The intervention was found to increase the difficulty of the exercise and induce moderate levels of discomfort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study provides cautious support for the use of BFR, showing that there are minimal changes in knee joint mechanics when performing the same exercise without BFR, and that the changes do not increase joint torques at the knee. From an acute biomechanical perspective, the intervention appears safe to use under qualified supervision; however, effects of repetitive use and long-term outcomes should be monitored.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Capsular Management Techniques During Hip Arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Capsular management during hip arthroscopy remains controversial. Studies evaluating this topic consist mostly of retrospective comparative reviews of prospectively gathered data on a large series of patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to perform a prospective randomized trial to comparatively assess 3 commonly performed capsular management techniques. It was hypothesized that capsular closure during hip arthroscopy would result in superior outcomes when compared with unclosed capsulotomy management techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients (N = 150) who had hip arthroscopy with labral repairs and femoral osteoplasties performed by the senior author were randomly assigned into 3 groups at the time of their surgery: T-capsulotomy without closure (TC), interportal capsulotomy without closure (IC), and interportal capsulotomy with closure (CC). All patients underwent labral repair and femoral osteoplasty. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Other outcomes obtained included the need for future hip surgery. RESULTS: Patient demographics, preoperative patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic measurements were similar among all 3 groups. Revision hip arthroscopy was performed in 5 TC cases, 2 IC cases, and 1 CC case (P = .17). Conversion to hip arthroplasty occurred in 4 patients in the TC group and none in the IC and CC groups (P = .02). The CC group showed higher modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) at the 2-year follow-up when compared with the IC group (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). When compared with the TC group, the CC group demonstrated superior mHHS (86.2 vs 76), HOS-ADL (85.6 vs 76.8), and HOS-SSS (Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale; 74.4 vs 65.3) at the final 2-year follow-up (P < .001). At the 2-year follow-up, the IC group had a higher mHHS (81.7 vs 76), HOS-ADL (82 vs 76.8), and HOS-SSS (71.4 vs 65.3; P > .001) as compared with the TC group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing complete capsular closure during hip arthroscopy showed improved patient-reported and surgical outcomes when compared with those with unrepaired T-capsulotomy or interportal capsulotomy. These results suggest that repair after capsulotomy may be a favorable arthroscopic capsular management technique.

Preoperative MRI for the Multiligament Knee Injury: What the Surgeon Needs to Know.

The multiligament knee injury is devastating and potentially limb threatening. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of the multiligament knee injury is an invaluable clinical tool, and when the radiologist is familiar with how certain injury patterns influence management, optimal outcomes can be achieved. We provide a detailed description of the relationship between salient imaging features of the multiligament knee injury, focusing on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and their influence on clinical decision-making.