RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CREST-2 (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial) consists of 2 parallel randomized stroke prevention trials in patients with asymptomatic high-grade stenosis of the cervical carotid artery. The purpose of this report is to detail the outcomes of a health screening effort to increase trial enrollment of women and minorities. METHODS: Life Line screening (LLS) conducts nationwide screening for vascular disease. Screenings within a 50-mile radius of each CREST-2 center were identified for participation in a joint CREST-LLS program over the course of one year (November 2018 to October 2019) whereby patients with an abnormal carotid ultrasound were referred to the local CREST-2 center for further workup, management, and potential consideration for trial enrollment. RESULTS: LLS completed the screening of 588 198 individuals in 29 732 zip codes across the United States. Of those, 230 021 individuals were screened at events occurring near a CREST-2 clinical center and 646 (0.3%) were found to have abnormal carotid ultrasound findings. Each of the 646 individuals was contacted by CREST-LLS program staff for permission to be referred to their local CREST-2 center; 200 (31%) consented to be contacted by CREST-2. Of those, 39 (19.5%) agreed to be, and were, evaluated at their local CREST-2 center. High-grade stenosis was confirmed in 27 patients. A total of 3 patients were eligible for the trial and were enrolled, one woman but no racial/ethnic minorities. CONCLUSIONS: The LLS program appears to identify community-living individuals with high-grade carotid stenosis through ultrasonography. However, the prevalence of abnormal carotid findings was low. In addition, screening and offering participation into the CREST-2 trial had no substantial impact on the proportion of women and minorities enrolled in the trial. Additional innovative strategies are needed to promote enrollment of diverse patients with carotid stenosis into stroke prevention trials.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/tratamiento farmacológico , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Salud de las Minorías/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Mujeres , Adulto , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Background and Purpose: Despite a higher incidence of stroke and a more adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile in Blacks and Hispanics compared with Whites, carotid artery revascularization is performed less frequently among these subpopulations. We assessed racial differences in high-grade (≥70% diameter-reducing) carotid stenosis. Methods: Consecutive clients in a Nationwide Life Line for-Profit Service to screen for vascular disease, 2005 to 2019 were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. The prevalence of high-grade stenosis, defined by a carotid ultrasound peak systolic velocity of ≥230 cm/s, was assessed. Participants self-identified as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or other. Race/ethnic differences were assessed using Poisson regression. The number of individuals in the United States with high-grade stenosis was estimated by applying prevalence estimates to 2015 US Census population estimates. Results: The prevalence of high-grade carotid stenosis was estimated in 6 130 481 individuals. The prevalence of high-grade stenosis was higher with increasing age in all race-sex strata. Generally, Blacks and Hispanics had a lower prevalence of high-grade stenosis compared with Whites, while Native Americans had a higher prevalence. For example, for men aged 55 to 65, the relative risk of stenosis compared with Whites was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.290.55) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.460.81) for Blacks and Hispanics, respectively; and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.122.10) for Native Americans. When these prevalence estimates were applied to the Census estimates of the US population, an estimated 327 721 individuals have high-grade stenosis, of whom 7% are Black, 7% Hispanic, and 43% women. Conclusions: Despite their having a more adverse cardiovascular risk profile, there was a lower prevalence of high-grade carotid artery stenosis for both the Black and Hispanic relative to the White clients. This lower prevalence of high-grade stenosis is a potential contributor to the lower use of carotid revascularization procedures in these minority populations.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Grupos Raciales , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/etnología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Raciales , Factores Sexuales , Emiratos Árabes Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a novel hybrid procedure that reverses carotid flow and places a stent using surgical access of the carotid artery in the neck under local anesthesia. We discuss the indications for carotid revascularization, the clinical rationale for TCAR, and evidence for its potential role in the management of carotid stenosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Results from pre-clinical studies, prospective single-arm studies, and comparative analyses of registry data indicate that TCAR results in low amounts of periprocedural microembolization, cerebral lesions detectable on magnetic resonance imaging, and neurologic events, myocardial infarctions (MIs), and death. Non-randomized comparisons suggest that TCAR may offer a novel solution to reducing periprocedural stroke, death, and MI in patients with carotid stenosis. A state of equipoise appears to have been reached with TCAR versus the traditional carotid revascularization procedures and a well-controlled randomized trial with careful oversight should be prioritized to obtain level 1 evidence.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current strategies for obesity management in primary care leave many patients inadequately treated or unable to access treatment entirely. We aimed to evaluate a comprehensive, primary care clinic-based weight management program's clinical effectiveness in a community practice setting. Methods: This was an 18-month pre/postintervention study. We collected demographic and anthropometric data on patients enrolled in a primary care-based weight management program. The primary outcomes were percent weight loss postintervention and the proportion of patients who achieved a clinically significant total body weight loss (TBWL) of 5% or greater. Results: Our program served 550 patients over 1,952 visits from March 2019 through October 2020. A total of 209 patients had adequate program exposure, defined as four or more completed visits. Among these, all received targeted lifestyle counseling and 78% received antiobesity medication. Patients who attended at least four visits had an average TBWL of 5.7% compared to an average gain of 1.5% total body weight for those with only one visit. Fifty-three percent of patients (n=111) achieved greater than 5% TBWL, and 20% (n=43) achieved greater than 10% TBWL. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that a community-based weight management program delivered by obesity medicine-trained primary care providers effectively produces clinically significant weight loss. Future work will include wider implementation of this model to increase patient access to evidence-based obesity treatments in their communities.
Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Programas de Reducción de Peso , Humanos , Obesidad/terapia , Obesidad/psicología , North Carolina , Pérdida de Peso , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
Fine-tuning ketogenic diets to achieve better seizure control may influence families to seek second opinions. Since 2009, Johns Hopkins Hospital has provided second opinions for children followed at other ketogenic diet centers. We retrospectively reviewed 65 consecutive children seen in this clinic; parents were also sent a 2-page survey. The mean age was 6.6 years and dietary therapy had been used a median 9 months. Seizure reduction >50% was achieved in 65%, including 35% with >90% reduction. Parent questions included how to improve seizure control (65%), ideal diet duration (18%), and confirmation of the plan (11%). The most common recommendations were anticonvulsant reduction (43%), adding oral citrates/calcium/vitamins (38%), and carnitine supplementation (31%). Diet discontinuation was more frequently suggested in those children with <50% seizure reduction (60% vs 20%, P = .001). Recommendations were successful in 78%, and the visit was reported as useful by 88%.