A 13.2 mg epinephrine intranasal spray demonstrates comparable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety to a 0.3 mg epinephrine autoinjector.

Background: Recent acute anaphylaxis guideline updates have identified remaining unmet needs based on currently available therapeutic options as a critical focus. Objective: We compared the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and tolerability profiles of intranasal epinephrine with intramuscular epinephrine administered by autoinjector and manual syringe. Methods: An open-label, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 116 healthy adult volunteers to assess the bioavailability of a single 13.2 mg intranasal dose of epinephrine compared to a 0.3 mg intramuscular autoinjector and a 0.5 mg manual syringe. Patients with epinephrine concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 pg/mL at 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes after dosing were also evaluated. Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters for the 13.2 mg intranasal dose exceeded those of the 0.3 mg autoinjector with a rapid and higher maximum observed concentration (intranasal, 429.4 pg/mL; autoinjector, 328.6 pg/mL) and greater systemic exposure (AUC0-360; intranasal, 39,060 pg∙min/mL; autoinjector, 17,440 pg∙min/mL). Similar results were observed compared to the 0.5 mg manual syringe. Pharmacokinetic parameters for opposite-nostril and same-nostril dosing were higher than both intramuscular doses, except time to reach maximum observed concentration, which was bracketed between the 2 intramuscular doses (intranasal opposite and same nostril, 20 minutes; autoinjector, 14.9 minutes; manual syringe, 45 minutes). Similar effects on blood pressure and heart rate were observed for intranasal and autoinjector administration. Intranasal epinephrine was safe and well tolerated. No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported, confirming results from earlier clinical studies. Conclusions: Bidose epinephrine spray addresses the unmet medical and patient needs for a needle-free, convenient, and effective dose-delivery system for self-administration of epinephrine that is as good as or better than the 0.3 mg autoinjector.

Effects of concurrent intravenous morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride on end-tidal carbon dioxide.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory depression, a potentially fatal side-effect of opioid-overdose, may be reversed by timely administration of an opioid antagonist, such as naloxone or naltrexone. Tampering with a formulation of morphine sulfate and sequestered naltrexone hydrochloride extended release capsules (MS-sNT) releases both the opioid morphine and the antagonist naltrexone. A study in recreational opioid-users indicated that morphine and naltrexone injected in the 25:1 ratio (duplicating the ratio of the formulation) found MS-sNT reduced morphine-induced euphoric effects vs intravenous (IV) morphine alone. In the same study, the effects of morphine + naltrexone on end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), a measure of respiratory-depression, were evaluated and these data are reported here. METHODS: Single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Non-dependent male opioid users were randomized to receive single IV doses of placebo, 30 mg morphine alone, and 30 mg morphine + 1.2 mg naltrexone. EtCO2 was measured by noninvasive capnography. RESULTS: Significant differences in EtCO2 least-squares means across all treatments for maximal effect (Emax) and area under the effect curve (AUE0-2, AUE0-8, AUE0-24) were detected (all p ≤ 0.0011). EtCO2 Emax values for morphine + naltrexone were significantly reduced vs morphine alone (42.9 mm Hg vs 47.1 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) and were not significantly different vs placebo (41.9 mm Hg). Median time to reach maximal effect (TEmax) was delayed for morphine + naltrexone vs morphine alone (5.0 h vs 1.0 h). CONCLUSIONS: Results provide preliminary evidence that the naltrexone:morphine ratio within MS-sNT is sufficient to significantly reduce EtCO2 when administered intravenously to non-dependent male recreational opioid-users. Further studies with multiple measures of respiratory-function are warranted to determine if risk of respiratory depression is also reduced by naltrexone in the tampered formulation.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation of TV-46000: A Long-Acting Injectable Formulation of Risperidone.

TV-46000 is a long-acting subcutaneous antipsychotic that uses a novel copolymer drug delivery technology in combination with a well-characterized molecule, risperidone, that is in clinical development as a treatment for schizophrenia. A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) modeling and simulation approach was implemented to identify TV-46000 doses and dosing schedules for clinical development that would provide the best balance between clinical efficacy and safety. The PPK model was created by applying pharmacokinetic data from a phase 1 study of 97 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who received either single or repeated doses of TV-46000. The PPK model was used to characterize the complex release profile of the total active moiety (TAM; the sum of the risperidone and 9-OH risperidone concentrations) concentration following subcutaneous injections of TV-46000. The PK profile was best described by a double Weibull function of the in vivo release rate and by a 2-compartment disposition and elimination model. Simulations were performed to determine TV-46000 doses and dosing schedules that maintained a median profile of TAM concentrations similar to published TAM exposure following oral risperidone doses that have been correlated to a 40% to 80% dopamine-D2 receptor occupancy therapeutic window. The simulations showed that therapeutic dose ranges for TV-46000 are 50 to 125 mg for once-monthly and 100 to 250 mg for the once every 2 months regimens. This PPK model provided a basis for prediction of patient-specific exposure and dopamine-D2 receptor occupancy estimates to support further clinical development and dose selection for the phase 3 studies.

Multicenter Phase IB Trial of Carboxyamidotriazole Orotate and Temozolomide for Recurrent and Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Other Anaplastic Gliomas.

Purpose Carboxyamidotriazole orotate (CTO) is a novel oral inhibitor of non-voltage-dependent calcium channels with modulatory effects in multiple cell-signaling pathways and synergistic effects with temozolomide (TMZ) in glioblastoma (GBM) models. We conducted a phase IB study combining CTO with two standard TMZ schedules in GBM. Methods In cohort 1, patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas or GBM received escalating doses of CTO (219 to 812.5 mg/m2 once daily or 600 mg fixed once-daily dose) combined with TMZ (150 mg/m2 5 days during each 28-day cycle). In cohort 2, patients with newly diagnosed GBM received escalating doses of CTO (219 to 481 mg/m2/d once daily) with radiotherapy and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d, followed by TMZ 150 mg to 200 mg/m2 5 days during each 28-day cycle. Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Treatment was well tolerated; toxicities included fatigue, constipation, nausea, and hypophosphatemia. Pharmacokinetics showed that CTO did not alter TMZ levels; therapeutic concentrations were achieved in tumor and brain. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; the recommended phase II dose was 600 mg/d flat dose. Signals of activity in cohort 1 (n = 27) included partial (n = 6) and complete (n = 1) response, including in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase unmethylated and bevacizumab-refractory tumors. In cohort 2 (n = 15), median progression-free survival was 15 months and median overall survival was not reached (median follow-up, 28 months; 2-year overall survival, 62%). Gene sequencing disclosed a high rate of responses among EGFR-amplified tumors ( P = .005), with mechanisms of acquired resistance possibly involving mutations in mismatch-repair genes and/or downstream components TSC2, NF1, NF2, PTEN, and PIK3CA. Conclusion CTO can be combined safely with TMZ or chemoradiation in GBM and anaplastic gliomas, displaying favorable brain penetration and promising signals of activity in this difficult-to-treat population.

A pharmacokinetic study of lipegfilgrastim in children with Ewing family of tumors or rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Neutropenia is a common complication from chemotherapy, limiting optimal dosing and treatment. Lipegfilgrastim is a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor developed for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The objectives of this phase 1, multinational, open-label, single-arm study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a single body weight-adjusted dose of lipegfilgrastim and to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the drug in children with Ewing family of tumors or rhabdomyosarcoma treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: Enrolled patients received lipegfilgrastim (100 µg/kg) 24 h after the last chemotherapy treatment in week 1. Patients were stratified into three age groups: 2 to <6, 6 to <12, and 12 to <18 years. Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at baseline and at 3, 8, 24, 30, 48, 72, 96, 144, and 240 h postdose for the two oldest groups and up to 144 h in the youngest group. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled and received lipegfilgrastim, seven in each age group. Lipegfilgrastim exposure levels were comparable across age groups, with concentrations maintained over a prolonged period after a single injection. Differences in PD were mainly associated with chemotherapy type. Most investigator-reported adverse events were attributed to chemotherapy and not to lipegfilgrastim. Severe adverse events were noted in 57% of patients; febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were more frequent among the oldest patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the use of a body weight-adjusted dose to achieve equivalent initial peak exposure levels of lipegfilgrastim in children of various ages.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone and naltrexone from ALO-02, an extended release formulation of oxycodone with sequestered naltrexone.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: ALO-02 is being developed as an abuse-deterrent formulation of extended-release oxycodone hydrochloride with naltrexone hydrochloride sequestered in the core of pellets contained in capsules. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effects of administration of ALO-02 capsule whole under fed conditions or sprinkling the pellets from ALO-02 capsule on applesauce under fasting conditions on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oxycodone, naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol compared with ALO-02 capsule administered whole under fasting conditions. The plasma naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol concentrations were used to assess the sequestration of naltrexone in the ALO-02 formulation. The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single 40 mg doses of ALO-02 in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, open-label, single-dose, randomized, 3-period crossover study in 24 healthy adult volunteers, aged 18-55 years. Each subject was assigned to receive single 40 mg doses of ALO-02 administered whole (intact capsule) under fasting conditions, administered whole under fed conditions (high-fat breakfast ∼ 950 calories), or sprinkling the contents of the ALO-02 capsule (pellets) over applesauce and swallowing the dose without chewing under fasting conditions. Each treatment was separated by a 7-day washout interval. Plasma samples were analyzed just before dosing through 48 hours postdose for oxycodone, and through 120 hours postdose for naltrexone and its major metabolite, 6-ß-naltrexol. Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ], area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to infinity [AUCinf ] and to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast ], time to Cmax [Tmax ], and terminal half life [t1/2 ]. Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were monitored for safety assessment. RESULTS: The t1/2 and Tmax values for oxycodone were similar for all 3 treatments. There was a lack of effect of food (whole capsule, fed vs. fasted) or of sprinkling on applesauce (pellets vs. whole capsule, fasted) on oxycodone bioavailability. The Test/Reference ratios of adjusted geometric means for oxycodone AUCinf , AUClast , and Cmax were 99.2%, 100%, and 107%, respectively, for the effect of food; and 101%, 101%, and 97.5%, respectively, for the effect of sprinkling on applesauce. The 90% confidence intervals contained entirely within the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125% for each comparison. Naltrexone remained sequestered during each treatment, based on the sporadic and low measurable plasma concentrations of naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol. Single doses of ALO-02 40 mg were well tolerated, and adverse events were mild, with no apparent difference in frequency for all 3 treatments. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Results indicate that ALO-02 can be administered without regard to food. Also, the contents of ALO-02 can be sprinkled over applesauce and consumed without chewing as an alternative treatment option by subjects with difficulty swallowing. Naltrexone remained sequestered in the ALO-02 formulation under all 3 treatments.

Pharmacokinetics of diazepam administered intramuscularly by autoinjector versus rectal gel in healthy subjects: a phase I, randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover, single-centre study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Acute repetitive seizures (ARS) are a debilitating part of episodic seizure activity that can sometimes progress to status epilepticus. Currently approved treatment that can be administered by non-medical personnel to patients with ARS is a diazepam rectal gel. While effective, rectal administration can be difficult, inconvenient and objectionable. A diazepam autoinjector has been developed to deliver diazepam via an intramuscular (IM) injection. This study evaluated the dose proportionality of the diazepam autoinjector and the consequent diazepam bioavailability relative to an equivalent dose of diazepam administered rectally as a commercial gel. METHODS: This was a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-part, single-dose, crossover, single-centre pharmacokinetic study in 48 healthy young adult (aged 18-40 years) male and female subjects. Part I of the study (n = 24) evaluated the dose proportionality of three strengths of the diazepam autoinjector (5, 10 and 15 mg) administered into the mid-outer thigh via a deep IM injection. Part II (n = 24) assessed the relative bioavailability of the diazepam 10 mg autoinjector versus the diazepam 10 mg rectal gel. Parts I and II were run concurrently. Each subject completed screening up to 30 days prior to three (Part I) or two (Part II) dosing periods. Serial blood sampling for plasma diazepam and desmethyldiazepam (metabolite) concentrations, vital signs and adverse event (AE) assessments were performed at prespecified times. Treatments were separated by a 14-day washout period. RESULTS: In Part I, dose proportionality was demonstrated for the diazepam autoinjector at 5, 10 and 15 mg doses by increases in mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)), and mean AUC from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUC(last)). The median time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was consistent at 1 hour for each dose. In Part II of the study, IM administration via diazepam autoinjector (10 mg) resulted in plasma concentrations of both diazepam and desmethyldiazepam that were slightly higher and less variable than those observed following administration of diazepam rectal gel (10 mg). The geometric mean ratio (diazepam autoinjector/diazepam rectal gel) and 90% confidence intervals for diazepam C(max) and AUC(last) were 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) and 1.14 (1.08, 1.21), respectively, indicating that the overall bioavailability of the diazepam autoinjector was approximately 14% higher than that of diazepam rectal gel. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Although the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was higher with diazepam autoinjector compared with diazepam rectal gel (21.7% vs 13.6%), the difference can be attributed to injection site pain. Injection site pain also correlated with the diazepam autoinjector dose administered in Part I: 5 mg (4.3%), 10 mg (21.7%) and 15 mg (27.3%). However, no patients discontinued the trial due to injection site pain. No other AEs correlated with dose, and there was no evidence of respiratory depression with either administration. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study indicated that diazepam can be safely and reliably administered IM using a diazepam autoinjector.

A clinical trial demonstration of a web-based test for alcohol and drug effects.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of a Web-installed test of skills essential to driving: target detection and divided attention. The Attention Assessment (TAA) was designed for use in global clinical trials to document the effects of alcohol and other drugs. METHOD: Scoring algorithms and data-storage tools were installed on servers in bicoastal U.S. locations. IBM PC-compatible test units with encrypted Web access and 19-inch monitors were installed at a Canadian site. A single-center, crossover design was used to compare the pharmacodynamic properties of a pharmaceutical compound under development with those of alcohol (blood alcohol concentration [BAC]=.10%) over time. For this study, 33 subjects completed four 36-hour testing periods. Blood samples and pharmacodynamic assessments were performed at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 24 hours. Analysis of covariance was conducted on six composite TAA scores as change from baseline. RESULTS: Five of the six composite scores showed significant ethanol effects (p<.02) over a BAC range of. 1% to .05%. Within-session test-retest reliability was r=.86 and between periods was r=.51 (between Periods 1 and 2), .83 (between Periods 2 and 3), and .81 (between Periods 3 and 4). Individual impairment was evident at .05%. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to conduct sensitive alcohol/other drug testing from a central database with secure scoring. Test installation, data monitoring, and norms assembly were performed at a remote location. TAA gives researchers the ability to immediately and normatively evaluate alcohol and drug effects in diverse global locations. Secondary applications include clinical or worksite testing. The data show improved precision over previous test versions to map the effect of drugs on visual/cognitive skills involved in driving.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of binodenoson after intravenous dose escalation in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Binodenoson, a highly selective agonist of the adenosine A 2A receptor, is being developed as a short-acting coronary vasodilator as an adjunct to radiotracers for use in myocardial stress imaging. This study was designed to assess the single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of intravenous binodenoson. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single-center, open-label, nonrandomized, dose-escalation study in 24 healthy volunteers. Each subject received 3 successive intravenous doses of binodenoson (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 microg/kg), each infused over a period of 10 minutes and separated by washout periods of at least 120 minutes. Generally, binodenoson was well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events. However, there was a dose-related increase in adverse events (e.g., headache, nausea, vasodilation, chest pain), consistent with the pharmacology of the drug. Binodenoson exhibited linear pharmacokinetics as indicated by a dose-proportional increase in peak concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Systemic clearance was independent of dose but was correlated with body weight. The mean terminal half-life of binodenoson across all doses was 10 +/- 4 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, binodenoson was well tolerated and exhibited linear pharmacokinetics when administered intravenously over a 60-fold dose range from 0.1 to 6 microg/kg.

Pharmacokinetics of lovastatin extended-release dosage form (Lovastatin XL) in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of lovastatin extended-release dosage form (ER-lovastatin) in the dosage levels of 10, 20 and 40 mg in 9 healthy male subjects. Each subject was randomized to receive a single oral dose of ER-lovastatin either 10, 20 or 40 mg in a three-way crossover design with a washout period of 7 days between the treatments. Subjects were served dinner at approximately 5:30 PM followed by dosing at approximately 10:00 PM in each study period. Serial plasma samples were collected up to 48 h after dosing and assayed for lovastatin and its active metabolite lovastatin acid using an LC/MS/MS method. The plasma concentration-time profiles of lovastatin and its active metabolite lovastatin acid exhibited delayed- and extended-release characteristics at each dose. Mean (+/-) values for the C(max) of lovastatin were 1.04+/-0.43, 2.03+/-0.65 and 4.03+/-3.02 ng/ml for the 10, 20 and 40 mg dosage, respectively. The corresponding values for the AUC(0-48 h) of lovastatin were 14.6+/-7.8, 34.1 +/-13.7, and 53.9+/-35.6 ng h/ml. The same tendency was also found for C(max) and AUC(0-48 h) values of lovastatin acid. Results from this study demonstrated as the dose of ER-lovastatin increased from 10 to 40 mg, the C(max) and AUC(0-48 h) values of lovastatin as well as lovastatin acid appeared to increase linearly.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between nevirapine and ethinyl estradiol/norethindrone when administered concurrently to HIV-infected women.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of nevirapine (NVP), a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1 and P450 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinyl estradiol (EE)/norethindrone (NET), a widely used oral contraceptive, and to assess the effects of EE/NET on the steady-state PK of NVP. METHODS: Ten HIV-1-infected women underwent intensive PK sampling after single-dose administration of EE/NET (days 0-1). Oral NVP 200 mg once daily (days 2-15), followed by 200 mg twice daily (days 16-29), was added to background potent antiretroviral therapy. On day 30, intensive PK sampling was performed after concurrent administration of NVP 200 mg and a single dose of EE/NET. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of NVP at steady state with EE/NET resulted in a significant (29%) median reduction in the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC(infinity)) and a significant reduction in mean residence time (MRT) and half-life (t(1/2)) of EE. There was a significant (18%) median reduction in the AUC(infinity) for NET that was not associated with a detectable change in NET C(max), MRT, or t(1/2). CONCLUSION: Oral contraceptives should not be the primary method of birth control in women of child-bearing potential who are treated with NVP.