Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Invest ; 37(9): 501-505, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31583922

RESUMEN

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in solid tumors are rare, even more in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date there is a lack of consensual treatment modalities of leptomeningeal metastasis. Furthermore, with the improvement of outcomes and more effective systemic targeted therapies, the management of leptomeningeal metastasis becomes a real challenge. We here report two cases of RCC with leptomeningeal metastasis at initial diagnosis. Both patients had concurrent adjacent skull bone metastasis. Therapeutic management of both patients consisted in surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy in one case. Systemic treatment was delayed according to current recommendations for the management of metastatic RCC. The aim of this work is to report the therapeutic approach and related outcomes and also provide a review of the currently available literature on leptomeningeal disease in renal cell carcinoma. Indeed, local treatment with curative outcome of meningeal location in RCC should be performed specially in LM at initial diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Meníngeas/secundario , Neoplasias Craneales/secundario , Anciano , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/radioterapia , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Craneales/radioterapia , Neoplasias Craneales/cirugía , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Oncology ; 97(3): 125-134, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and compare prognostic factors, management strategies, and outcomes of very locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) (i.e., stage IVA) and metastatic CC (i.e., stage IVB). METHOD: A retrospective review was conducted based on all consecutive patients treatedfor stage IV CC in a comprehensive cancer care centre between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included. Performance status (PS) was ≥2 for 35.9%. Median age at diagnosis was 60.5. There were 24 stage IVA CC (35.3%) and 44 stage IVB CC (64.7%). Seventeen patients with stage IVB CC had only para-aortic lymph node metastases (38.6%), 13 had only distant metastases (29.5%), and 14 had both (31.8%). Patients with stage IVA CC experienced a radiotherapy with curative intent (n = 14, 58.3%) +/- concomitant chemotherapy, or a palliative treatment (n = 10, 41.7%). Twenty-three patients with stage IVB CC received a prior chemotherapy (52.3%), 11 a primary concomitant chemoradiation (25%), and 10 a palliative treatment (22.7%). The mean follow-up was 18.0 months. The 5-year overall survival was 5.1% for stage IVA (95% CI = 0.7-33.9), and 10.5% for stage IVB (95% CI = 3.7-29.7). In multivariate analysis, PS >1 was identified as a poor prognostic factor of disease-specific survival for stage IVA CC. PS >1 and pelvic lymph node involvement were identified as poor prognostic factors of overall survival and disease-specific survival for stage IVB CC. CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, outcomes of stages IV CC are poor. Treatment of advanced and metastatic CC remains challenging. New management strategies are needed, as well as efficient preventive strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia
3.
Acta Oncol ; 58(8): 1158-1162, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074314

RESUMEN

Background: Phase II trials are designed to assess the efficacy/toxicity ratio of experimental treatments and select those worth being tested in phase III trials. Although crucial limitations were identified when concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) phase III trials characteristics were assessed, features of cCRT phase II trials have never been reported. The objective was to describe features of all cCRT phase II trials. Methods and material: Requests were performed in the Medline database (via PubMed). The latest update was performed in April 2016, using the following MESH terms: 'clinical trials: phase II as topic', 'chemoradiotherapy'. Results: Four hundred and fifty-eight cCRT phase II trials were identified. They were mainly multicenter (51.5%), single arm studies (77.7%) published after 2011 (55.0%). The median number of included patients was 52. Primary endpoints were mainly response rate (20.5%), pathological complete response (14.4%) and overall survival (12.6%). The primary endpoint was not defined in 22% of studies. Tumors were mostly lung (23.1%), head and neck (20.3%), colorectal (16.6%) and esophagogastric cancer (14.6%) treated at a locally advanced setting (81.7%). 55.2% of trials used 3D-conformal radiotherapy and 9.1% intensity-modulated radiotherapy, mainly with normo-fractionation (82.0% of the 573 arms with radiotherapy). Radiation technique was not reported in 19.9% of studies. Associated anticancer drugs (563 arms) were mainly conventional chemotherapies (559 arms): cisplatin (46.2%) and 5-fluorouracil (28.3%). Non cytotoxic agents (targeted therapies, immunotherapies) were tested in 97 arms (17%). With a median follow-up of 31 months, acute grades 3-5 were reported in 98.5% of studies and late toxicities in 44.5%. Follow-up was not reported in 17% of studies. Conclusions: cCRT phase II trials featured severe limitations, with outdated radiation techniques, insufficient reporting of crucial data and a small number of included patients. This certainly limited the impact of conclusions and hindered the development of successful phase III trials.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Neoplasias/terapia , Terapias en Investigación/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Terapias en Investigación/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Anticancer Drugs ; 27(5): 427-32, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27045782

RESUMEN

Molecular targeted therapies (TT) are the cornerstone of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment. There is a paucity of data on the safety of the radiotherapy (RT)-TT association in a sequential or a concomitant setting. The aim of the present study is to retrospectively assess the safety of the RT-TT association. From 2006 to 2014, data from 84 consecutive patients treated with RT and TT for metastatic RCC were retrospectively collected. RT-TT sequential and concomitant associations were, respectively, defined by a time interval of more than five TT half-lives and less than or equal to five TT half-lives between the last TT administration and RT initiation. Toxicities in the fields of RT were assessed systematically. As many patients received several TT and RT courses, 136 RT-TT associations were analyzed, with 66 sequential and 70 concomitant schemes. RT was mainly delivered on bone (75%) and brain metastases (14.7%). TT were tyrosine kinase inhibitors (73.5%), mTOR inhibitors (19.8%), and monoclonal antibodies (6.7%). With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, whatever the sequence, no grade≥4 toxicity was reported. Two grade 3 toxicities were reported with sequential (3%) and concomitant (2.9%) RT-TT, respectively. Sequential or concomitant RT-TT associations in metastatic RCC do not seem to cause major toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores
5.
Chemotherapy ; 61(2): 65-71, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26550834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The elderly population in Western countries is growing and constitutes a public health issue. Concomitantly, age-related diseases such as cancer increase. There are few data on the efficacy, tolerability and toxicity of specific anticancer therapy in the very elderly patients; therefore, their management is not standardized. METHODS: In this bi-institutional study, we reviewed medical records of patients who received or continued specific anticancer therapy beyond the age of 90 years. Geriatric assessment was not reported for our patients. Twelve patients were enrolled. Their general health condition was good, and half of them were living in elderly institutions. Ten patients had a solid tumor and 2 were treated for hematological malignancies. Most were diagnosed with a locally advanced or metastatic disease, and the goal of treatment was curative for only 1 patient. Six patients received chemotherapy as first-line treatment, 4 patients received targeted therapy and 2 received concomitant chemoradiation. Four patients received a second-line treatment. RESULTS: Despite a significant reduction in treatment posology in half of the patients, 8 acute grade 3/4 toxicities were reported and 2 patients died of treatment-related septic shock. Median duration of first-line treatment was 3.2 months, and progression-free survival ranged from 18 to 311 days. Overall survival ranged from 18 days to 11 years. CONCLUSION: Aging is a heterogeneous process, and management of elderly patients is a multidisciplinary approach. Geriatric assessment helps to identify older patients with a higher risk of morbidity/mortality and allows to assess the risks and benefits of specific anticancer therapy. The choice of treatment should be based primarily on the expected symptomatic benefit, and treatment should not compromise the quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hogares para Ancianos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos
6.
Chemotherapy ; 61(5): 269-74, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27057742

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Glioblastoma is one of the most frequent primitive brain tumors. Patients who experience tumor relapse after surgery and concomitant radiochemotherapy have a dismal prognosis. The objective of this study is to analyze efficacy data in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression- free survival (PFS) following combination therapy with bevacizumab (BVZ) and irinotecan among patients with relapsed glioblastoma. Safety data will also be reviewed and all results will be compared with data of the literature. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, all records of patients treated with BVZ and irinotecan for a relapsed glioblastoma were analyzed. Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 15 days until progression. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurologic examination were repeated every 6 weeks during treatment. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were analyzed. The median number of BVZ-irinotecan cycles was 8 (range 1-38). Median PFS was 26 weeks and median OS was 28 weeks. Eighteen of the 45 patients (40% of cases) had an objective response 6 months after initiation of treatment. Two patients had to discontinue treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the SV1 study are consistent with those found in phase II studies evaluating the same treatment. The irinotecan-BVZ combination is effective in relapsed glioblastoma with acceptable toxicity. Biomarkers predictive of response to BVZ should help in the selection of patients who could benefit from treatment.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/patología , Enfermedades Hematológicas/etiología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
Oncology ; 89(5): 262-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26303109

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have demonstrated that daily physical activity (PA) prevents the development of breast cancer. Our objective was to examine the relationship between PA and clinical and biological tumor characteristics in breast cancer patients in order to determine the impact of energy expenditure (EE) on tumor prognosis. METHODS: We pooled data from two prospective studies, including a total of 121 breast cancer patients. The measure of PA was done using the self-completion Population Physical Activity Questionnaire, which was answered by each patient. RESULTS: Ten patients harbored triple negative (TN) tumors. The mean body mass index (BMI) in the general population and in patients with TN tumors was 24.3 and 25.6, respectively. The mean daily EE (DEE) was 10,266 kJ×24 h(-1) in the general population and 11,212 kJ×24 h(-1) in patients with TN tumors. In the whole population, there was an inverse statistical correlation between BMI and DEE, rest, low PA, and high PA (p=0.0002, p=0.003, p<0001, and p=0.03, respectively). There was a positive correlation between negative estrogen receptor status and intensive PA (p=0.041) and DEE (p=0.007). For TN tumors, there was no significant correlation between BMI and categories of EE. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle (weight regulation, PA) should be adapted and personalized according to biological, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics of the tumors.


Asunto(s)
Actividad Motora/fisiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/metabolismo
8.
Anticancer Drugs ; 26(4): 443-7, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25569704

RESUMEN

We retrospectively assessed the outcome of patients receiving emergency spinal radiation therapy (RT) concurrently with bevacizumab. Clinical records of 18 consecutive patients receiving emergency spinal RT for symptomatic vertebral metastases during the course of bevacizumab-based therapy were examined. Patients were receiving biweekly bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel (n=17) or with docetaxel/carboplatin (n=1) or as a single agent (n=1) for advanced metastatic carcinoma. RT was delivered at doses of 30 Gy in 10 fractions (n=8), 20 Gy in five fractions (n=9) or 18 Gy in nine fractions (n=1). In 10 patients (56%), irradiation field encompassed the thoracic vertebrae. The median time interval between the bevacizumab infusion and the RT course was 1.5 days (0-8 days). The median follow-up was 8.3 months (2 days-42 months). A clinical benefit of RT was reported in 13 patients (72%), including four patients with complete pain relief. Two of the three patients with neurological impairment at the time of RT experienced a partial improvement in their symptoms. No pain recrudescence was reported within the irradiated field after RT completion. All toxicities were mild to moderate, with no acute toxicity reported in 13 patients (72%). No RT disruption was necessary because of acute toxicity. No delayed toxicity was reported within RT fields among 11 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up. Spinal RT during the course of bevacizumab-based therapy was not associated with the occurrence of unexpected adverse effects. This suggests that emergency RT should not be contraindicated in these patients, provided that doses and treatment volumes are defined carefully.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Docetaxel , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/secundario , Columna Vertebral/efectos de los fármacos , Columna Vertebral/patología , Columna Vertebral/efectos de la radiación , Taxoides/administración & dosificación
9.
Med Dosim ; 47(3): 301-305, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35697637

RESUMEN

Preserving the quality of life and sexual function of patients with a localized prostate cancer remains a challenge for physicians and a major issue for patients. The present study aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of a dosimetric preservation of the sexual organs during prostate stereotactic radiotherapy planning. Patients from a single centre were retrospectively included in the RPAH-2 trial and randomized in Arm B if they presented with either a low- or intermediate- risk prostate cancer. A 37.5Gy in 5 fractions stereotactic body radiotherapy was delivered on the prostate gland. The corpus cavernosum, penile bulb and internal pudental arteries were retrospectively delineated before a re-optimization process. During this process, RPAH-2 trial dose constraints were respected on Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), Planning Target Volume and usual organs at risk. Pre-defined dose setting delivered to corpus cavernosum, penile bulb and internal pudental arteries were collected and compared before and after the re-optimization process. Nine patients were included in the study. A decrease of the median of each investigated dose setting (except D90% for corpus cavernosum) was reported after the re-optimization for corpus cavernosum, penile bulb and internal pudental arteries. Our study demonstrated the feasibility of a dosimetric preservation of structures considered as relevant to preserve sexual function after prostate stereotactic radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Contemp Brachytherapy ; 14(2): 183-188, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35494178

RESUMEN

Purpose: The present study aimed to assess the correlation between dose to pelvic lymph nodes and to point B with tandem-ring (TR) applicators for intra-cavitary brachytherapy treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Material and methods: Cervical cancer patients treated at brachytherapy department of Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Center, from 2015 to 2018, were included. Target delineation was performed in compliance with GEC-ESTRO guidelines. Revised American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) point A was determined (ARN (right) and ALN (left)) as well as Manchester point B. Prescription dose was 25-35 Gy in 5 fractions. Pelvic lymph nodes were delineated, then dose to points A and B, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of delineated lymph nodes were extracted. Significant relationships or correlations between lymph nodes reference points, dosage to points B, and their DVH parameters were investigated. Results: The mean dose and mean percentage of the prescription dose to the left and right points B were 4.6 ±0.18 Gy and 82.08 ±0.72%, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.81 (p-value = 0.00) between dose to ARN and ALN points and prescription dose was obtained. Negative correlation between CTVHR volume and difference between French and ABS prescription points was found. Conclusions: Dose to point B can be a moderate surrogate for maximum, minimum, and median dose to the internal iliac and presacral lymph node, but cannot be for maximum dose to the obturator lymph node. Points B cannot be a reliable substitute for common and external iliac chains.

11.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1121): 20200115, 2021 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33861141

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed at describing and assessing the quality of reporting in all published prospective trials about radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: The Medline database was searched for. The reporting of study design, patients' and radiotherapy characteristics, previous and concurrent cancer treatments, acute and late toxicities and assessment of quality of life were collected. RESULTS: 114 articles - published between 1989 and 2019 - were analysed. 21 trials were randomised (18.4%). Randomisation information was unavailable in 59.6% of the publications. Data about randomisation, ITT analysis and whether the study was multicentre or not, had been significantly less reported during the 2010-2019 publication period than before (respectively 29.4% vs 57.4% (p < 0.001), 20.6% vs 57.4% (p < 0.001), 48.5% vs 68.1% (p < 0.001). 89.5% of the articles reported the number of included patients. Information about radiation total dose was available in 86% of cases and dose per fraction in 78.1%. Regarding the method of dose prescription, the prescription isodose was the most reported information (58.8%). The reporting of radiotherapy characteristics did not improve during the 2010 s-2019s. Acute and late high-grade toxicity was reported in 37.7 and 30.7%, respectively. Their reporting decreased in recent period, especially for all-grade late toxicities (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: It seems necessary to meet stricter specifications to improve the quality of reporting. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our work results in one of the rare analyses of radiosurgery and SBRT publications. Literature must include necessary information to first, ensure treatments can be compared and reproduced and secondly, to permit to decide on new standards of care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Edición/normas , Radiocirugia/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/tendencias , Calidad de Vida , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/estadística & datos numéricos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 151: w30034, 2021 12 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34964579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study was conducted to: (1) provide more modern data on real-life local management of metastatic rectal cancer; (2) compare therapeutic strategies; and (3) identify prognostic factors of local failure, overall survival and progression-free survival. METHODS: Data about efficacy and acute toxicity were collected. Patients were diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer between 2004 and 2015, and were treated at least with radiotherapy. Local failure, overall survival and progression-free survival were correlated with patient, tumour and treatment characteristics using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Data of 148 consecutive patients with metastatic rectal cancer were analysed. Median follow-up was 19 months. Median overall survival was 16 months. All patients received local radiotherapy, with a median equivalent 2 Gy per fraction dose of 47.7 Gy. Rectal surgery was performed in 97 patients (65.6%). The majority of patients (86/97, 88.7%) received pre-operative chemoradiation. In multivariate analysis, rectal surgery was found to be the only independent predictor of increased overall survival (24.6 vs 7.1 months, p <0.001). Of the patients undergoing surgical treatment, 22.8% presented with significant complications that required a delay of systemic treatment. Grade 3-4 acute radiation therapy-related toxicities were observed in 6.1% of patients, mainly gastrointestinal toxicities (5.4%). CONCLUSION: Rectal surgery was a key predictive factor of increased progression-free survival and overall survival in patients receiving at least local radiotherapy. In our series of real-life patients, local surgery and radiation seemed as well tolerated as reported in selected phase III non-metastatic rectal cancer patients. These data suggested that local management could be beneficial for metastatic rectal cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Neoplasias del Recto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Radiat Oncol ; 15(1): 85, 2020 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32307017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In most clinical trials, gold fiducial markers are implanted in the prostate to tune the table position before each radiation beam. Yet, it is unclear if a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) should be performed before each beam to monitor a possible variation of the organs at risk (OARs) fullness, especially in case of recto-prostatic spacer implantation. The present study aimed at assessing the inter- and intra-fraction movements of prostate, bladder and rectum in patients implanted with a hyaluronic acid spacer and undergoing prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Data about consecutive patients undergoing prostate SBRT were prospectively collected between 2015 and 2019. Inter-and intra-fraction prostate displacements and volume variation of organs at risk (OARs) were assessed with CBCTs. RESULTS: Eight patients were included. They underwent prostate SBRT (37.5Gy, 5 fractions of 7.5Gy) guided by prostate gold fiducial markers. Inter-fraction variation of the bladder volume was insignificant. Intra-fraction mean increase of the bladder volume was modest (29 cc) but significant (p < 0.001). Both inter- and intra-fraction variations of the rectum volume were insignificant but for one patient. He had no rectal toxicity. The magnitude of table displacement necessary to match the prostate gold fiducial marker frequently exceeded the CTV/PTV margins (0.4 cm) before the first (35%) and the second arc (15%). Inter- and intra-fraction bladder and rectum volume variations did not correlate with prostate displacement. CONCLUSION: Major prostate position variations were reported. In-room kV fiducial imaging before each arc seems mandatory. Intra-fraction imaging of the OARs appears unnecessary. We suggest that only one CBCT is needed before the first arc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02361515, February 11th, 2015.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Marcadores Fiduciales , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Órganos en Riesgo/diagnóstico por imagen , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radiocirugia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Bull Cancer ; 106(6): 584-589, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31084914

RESUMEN

Brachytherapy has the unique characteristic of being able to deliver high doses to a very localized volume, and remains one of the radiotherapy techniques that has an unparalleled therapeutic index. However, its use has been declining in the past years. Globally, only 55 to 88 % of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer benefit from utero-vaginal brachytherapy, despite the fact that it is proven to enhance both progression-free and overall survival. A decline in the use of low dose rate brachytherapy has likewise been described in the treatment of low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancers. Several factors could explain this. First, the radiation oncologists who have the proficiency to perform brachytherapy seems to be inadequate, as it is a technique that requires training and expertise for optimal applications. In many cancer care centers, the caseload is insufficient to provide this experience. Second, the increasing use of technically advanced external beam radiation therapy, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, offers an easier substitute with more lucrative benefits, resulting in decreased utilization of brachytherapy. However, when brachytherapy is not delivered, a poorer survival rate is reported in locally advanced cervical cancer, and is suggested in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. The increasing level of evidence of treatment with brachytherapy necessitates an improvement in its accessibility by having more radiation oncologists as well as cancer centers equipped to perform the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Braquiterapia/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía
15.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 83(5): 881-892, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30806760

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the safety of the association of radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (mMM). METHODS: A retrospective analysis included consecutive patients treated with palliative RT, and at least one line of systemic therapy for mMM between 2001 and 2016. Treatments were defined as sequential or concomitant when RT and the systemic drug were administered, respectively, at more or less than five half-lives from each other. RESULTS: 92 patients were included. They had 110 palliative RT treatments. RT was delivered with a "conventional" chemotherapy (mainly fotemustine and/or dacarbazine) and a "modern" systemic therapy (BRAF inhibitors, association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, immunotherapy), respectively, in 88 (80%) and 22 (20%) cases. Systemic treatments and RT were mainly concurrently performed (n = 61, 55.5%). Regarding acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity, no difference was reported between sequential and concomitant groups either in the whole cohort (p = 1) or in the subgroup of patients receiving "modern" systemic therapies (p = 1). Acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities only occurred with vemurafenib. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced more severe infield adverse events than other associations (p = 0.001) with two deaths. CONCLUSION: In our series, compared to sequential administration, concomitant association of systemic anticancer drugs and palliative RT did not increase toxicity in mMM patients. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced severe infield toxicities. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize the toxicity of each association.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Melanoma/secundario , Melanoma/terapia , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia
16.
Bull Cancer ; 106(12): 1086-1093, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31582176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (TGCTs) represent the most frequent malignant tumour among young male adults. Orchiectomy alone cure 80% of stage I. Standard options after orchiectomy include radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) by 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC 7 or active surveillance (SV) for seminomatous GCTs (SGCT) and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND), CT by 1 or 2 cycles of Bleomycine Etoposide Cisplatine (BEP) or active surveillance for nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCT). Adjuvant treatments decrease the relapse rate after orchiectomy with substantial toxicities without any benefit on overall survival. Recent guidelines accorded utmost importance on SV rather than adjuvants strategies. The main objective of this study was to describe our current practice over the 10 past years in regard of these recommendations. METHODS: Data of 50 patients with stage I GCT treated in our institute were collected between 2006 and 2016. Demographic and anatomopathologic data were reported. Clinical practice in our center was analyzed during two periods [2006-2011] and [2012-2016] according to the European Association of Urology Guidelines in 2011. RESULTS: Patient's median age was 35.3 years. The analysis of clinical practice during the last 10 years showed that in SGCT, main treatment was RT than SV and CT. This option declined over the years (89% between 2006-2010 versus 53% between 2011-2016) whereas SV was more often employed (27% between 2011-2016 versus none between 2006-2010). Surveillance was used for 64% of NSGCT. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, RT was less used over the years for the benefit of SV which is recommended by guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Instituciones Oncológicas , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Francia , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Orquiectomía/métodos , Vigilancia de la Población , Radioterapia/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 125: 78-83, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29650280

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current state of knowledge concerning the quality of reporting in phase II clinical trials in oncology and to describe the various methods published allowing this quality evaluation. METHODS: databases including MEDLINE and COCHRANE were searched. Reviews and meta-analyses analyzing the quality of the reporting of phase II trials in oncology were included. Descriptive analysis of the results was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen publications were retained. Only 2 publications adopted a systematic approach of evaluation of the quality of reporting by overall scores. The Key Methodological Score (KMS), proposed by Grellety et al., gathering 3 items, seemed adapted for such an evaluation. A score of 3/3 was found in 16.1% of the 156 phase II trials analysed by this score. The other reviews used a qualitative analysis to evaluate the reporting, via an analysis of a single criterion, generally the statistical plan of the study. This item was considered as having been correctly reported in less than 50% of the analysed articles. CONCLUSION: The quality of reporting in phase II trials in oncology is a field that has been investigated very little (13 publications). When it is studied, the estimated level of quality is not satisfactory, whatever the method employed. The use of an overall score of evaluation is a path which should be pursued, in order to get reliable results. It also seems necessary to propose strong recommendations, which would create a consensus for the methodology and the reporting of these studies.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto/normas , Exactitud de los Datos , Oncología Médica/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Oncología Médica/métodos
18.
Dig Liver Dis ; 50(6): 608-616, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is paucity of data on the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in rectal cancer (RC) elderly patients. The objective was to identify management strategies and resulting outcomes in RC patients ≥70 years undergoing radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study included consecutive RC patients ≥70 years undergoing rectal radiotherapy. RESULTS: From 2004-2015, 340 RC patients underwent pre-operative (n = 238; 70%), post-operative (n = 41, 12%), or exclusive (n = 61, 18%) radiotherapy, with a median age of 78.5 years old (range: 70-96). Radiotherapy protocols were tailored, with 54 different radiotherapy programs (alteration of the total dose, and/or fractionation, and/or volume). Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Acute and late grade 3-4 radio-induced toxicities were reported in 3.5% and 0.9% of patients. Metastatic setting (OR = 6.60, CI95% 1.47-46.03, p = 0.02), exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 5.08, CI95% 1.48-18.21, p = 0.009), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 6.42, CI95% 1.31-24.73, p = 0.01) were associated with grade ≥3 acute toxicities in univariate analysis. Exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 9.79, CI95% 2.49-43.18, p = 0.001) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 12.62, CI95% 2.05-71.26, p = 0.003) were independent predictive factors of grade ≥3 acute toxicities in multivariate analysis. A complete pathological response was achieved in 12 out of 221 pre-operative patients (5.4%). Age, tumor stage, and surgery were independent predictive factors of survival in multivariate analysis. At end of follow-up, 7.1% of patients experienced local relapse. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy for RC in elderly patients appeared safe and manageable, perhaps due to the tailoring of radiotherapy protocols. Tailored management resulted in acceptable rate of local tumor control.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Recto/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 10708, 2018 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30013090

RESUMEN

This retrospective study was undertaken to provide more modern data of real-life management of non-metastatic rectal cancer, to compare therapeutic strategies, and to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in a large cohort of patients. Data on efficacy and on acute/late toxicity were retrospectively collected. Patients were diagnosed a non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2004 and 2015, and were treated at least with radiotherapy. OS was correlated with patient, tumor and treatment characteristics with univariate and multivariate analyses. Data of 593 consecutive non-metastatic rectal cancer patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 41 months. Median OS was 9 years. Radiotherapy was delivered in pre-operative (n = 477, 80.5%), post-operative (n = 75, 12.6%) or exclusive (n = 41, 6.9%) setting. In the whole set of patients, age, nutritional condition, tumor stage, tumor differentiation, and surgery independently influenced OS. For patients experiencing surgery, OS was influenced by age, tumor differentiation and nodal status. Surgical resection is the cornerstone treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Poor tumor differentiation and node involvement were identified as major predictive factor of poor OS. The research in treatment intensification and in identification of radioresistance biomarkers should therefore probably be focused on this particular subset of patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Proctectomía , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Tolerancia a Radiación , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
20.
Oncotarget ; 9(32): 22368-22382, 2018 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29854285

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Leukocytes are hypothesized to reflect the inflammatory tumor microenvironment. We aimed to validate their prognostic significance in a large cohort of patients treated with pre-operative radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (RC). RESULTS: From 2004 to 2015, 257 RC patients with available biological data underwent a pre-operative radiotherapy, with a median age of 66 years. The median rectal EQD2 was 49.2Gy. Most of patients experienced concurrent chemotherapy (n = 245, 95.4%), mainly with 5-FU (83.3%). Clear surgical margins (i.e. complete resection) were achieved in 234 patients (91.1%). A complete (Mandard TRG1: n = 35, 13.6%) or almost complete pathological response (Mandard TRG2: n = 56, 21.8%) were achieved in 91 patients (35.4%). With a median follow-up of 46.1 months, 8 patients (3.1%) experienced local relapse, 38 (14.8%) experienced metastases and 45 (17.5%) died. Elevated pre-radiation neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR > 2.8) was identified as an independent predictive factor of increased local relapse, of decreased progression-free survival and overall survival in multivariate analysis. Elevated NLR was marginally associated with incomplete pathological response in multivariate analysis, suggesting a possible value as a biomarker of radio-sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-radiation NLR is a simple and robust biomarker for risk stratification in locally advanced RC patients undergoing pre-operative radiotherapy, and might select the subpopulation eligible to treatment intensification or to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical records from consecutive patients treated in a single institution between 2004 and 2015 with curative-intent radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Classical prognosis factors of RC and peripheral immune markers based on lymphocytes and neutrophil counts were studied.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA