Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) Study: Design and Report on the Inaugural Cohort.

Background: Conflicting research on retinal biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) is likely related to limited sample sizes, study design, and protocol differences. Objective: The prospective Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) seeks to address these gaps. Methods: Eye ACT participants are recruited from ACT, an ongoing cohort of dementia-free, older adults followed biennially until AD/ADRD, and undergo visual function and retinal imaging assessment either in clinic or at home. Results: 330 participants were recruited as of 03/2023. Compared to ACT participants not in Eye ACT (N = 1868), Eye ACT participants (N = 330) are younger (mean age: 70.3 versus 71.2, p = 0.014), newer to ACT (median ACT visits since baseline: 3 versus 4, p < 0.001), have more years of education (17.7 versus 16.2, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of visual impairment (12% versus 22%, p < 0.001). Compared to those seen in clinic (N = 300), Eye ACT participants seen at home (N = 30) are older (77.2 versus 74.9, p = 0.015), more frequently female (60% versus 49%, p = 0.026), and have significantly worse visual acuity (71.1 versus 78.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, p < 0.001) and contrast sensitivity (-1.9 versus -2.1 mean log units at 3 cycles per degree, p = 0.002). Cognitive scores and retinal imaging measurements are similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Participants assessed at home had significantly worse visual function than those seen in clinic. By including these participants, Eye ACT provides a unique longitudinal cohort for evaluating potential retinal biomarkers of dementia.

Traffic-related air pollution and dementia incidence in the Adult Changes in Thought Study.

BACKGROUND: While epidemiologic evidence links higher levels of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) to decreased cognitive function, fewer studies have investigated links with traffic-related air pollution (TRAP), and none have examined ultrafine particles (UFP, ≤100 nm) and late-life dementia incidence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between TRAP exposures (UFP, black carbon [BC], and nitrogen dioxide [NO2]) and late-life dementia incidence. METHODS: We ascertained dementia incidence in the Seattle-based Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) prospective cohort study (beginning in 1994) and assessed ten-year average TRAP exposures for each participant based on prediction models derived from an extensive mobile monitoring campaign. We applied Cox proportional hazards models to investigate TRAP exposure and dementia incidence using age as the time axis and further adjusting for sex, self-reported race, calendar year, education, socioeconomic status, PM2.5, and APOE genotype. We ran sensitivity analyses where we did not adjust for PM2.5 and other sensitivity and secondary analyses where we adjusted for multiple pollutants, applied alternative exposure models (including total and size-specific UFP), modified the adjustment covariates, used calendar year as the time axis, assessed different exposure periods, dementia subtypes, and others. RESULTS: We identified 1,041 incident all-cause dementia cases in 4,283 participants over 37,102 person-years of follow-up. We did not find evidence of a greater hazard of late-life dementia incidence with elevated levels of long-term TRAP exposures. The estimated hazard ratio of all-cause dementia was 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.92-1.05) for every 2000 pt/cm3 increment in UFP, 0.95 (0.89-1.01) for every 100 ng/m3 increment in BC, and 0.96 (0.91-1.02) for every 2 ppb increment in NO2. These findings were consistent across sensitivity and secondary analyses. DISCUSSION: We did not find evidence of a greater hazard of late-life dementia risk with elevated long-term TRAP exposures in this population-based prospective cohort study.

Neuropathologic Burden and Dementia in Nonagenarians and Centenarians: Comparison of 2 Community-Based Cohorts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare 2 large clinicopathologic cohorts of participants aged 90+ and to determine whether the association between neuropathologic burden and dementia in these older groups differs substantially from those seen in younger-old adults. METHODS: Autopsied participants from The 90+ Study and Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Study community-based cohort studies were evaluated for dementia-associated neuropathologic changes. Associations between neuropathologic variables and dementia were assessed using logistic or linear regression, and the weighted population attributable fraction (PAF) per type of neuropathologic change was estimated. RESULTS: The 90+ Study participants (n = 414) were older (mean age at death = 97.7 years) and had higher amyloid/tau burden than ACT <90 (n = 418) (mean age at death = 83.5 years) and ACT 90+ (n = 401) (mean age at death = 94.2 years) participants. The ACT 90+ cohort had significantly higher rates of limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE-NC), microvascular brain injury (µVBI), and total neuropathologic burden. Independent associations between individual neuropathologic lesions and odds of dementia were similar between all 3 groups, with the exception of µVBI, which was associated with increased dementia risk in the ACT <90 group only (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8, p < 0.001). Weighted PAF scores indicated that eliminating µVBI, although more prevalent in ACT 90+ participants, would have little effect on dementia. Conversely, eliminating µVBI in ACT <90 could theoretically reduce dementia at a similar rate to that of AD neuropathologic change (weighted PAF = 6.1%, 95% CI 3.8-8.4, p = 0.001). Furthermore, reducing LATE-NC in The 90+ Study could potentially reduce dementia to a greater degree (weighted PAF = 5.1%, 95% CI 3.0-7.3, p = 0.001) than either ACT cohort (weighted PAFs = 1.69, 95% CI 0.4-2.7). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that specific neuropathologic features may differ in their effect on dementia among nonagenarians and centenarians from cohorts with different selection criteria and study design. Furthermore, microvascular lesions seem to have a more significant effect on dementia in younger compared with older participants. The results from this study demonstrate that different populations may require distinct dementia interventions, underscoring the need for disease-specific biomarkers.