Morbidity, mortality and temporal trends in the surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcoma: An ACS-NSQIP follow up analysis.

BACKGROUND: Calls for multivisceral resection (MVR) of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) are increasing, although the risks and benefits remain controversial. We sought to analyze current 30-day morbidity and mortality rates, and trends in utilization of MVR in a national database. METHODS: Overall morbidity, severe morbidity, mortality rates, and temporal trends were analyzed utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). RESULTS: From 2012 to 2015, a total of 564 patients underwent RPS resection with 233 patients (41%) undergoing MVR. The MVR group had a higher rate of preoperative weight loss and larger tumors overall. When comparing MVR to non-MVR, there was no significant difference in overall morbidity (22% vs 17%, P = .13), severe morbidity (11% vs 8%, P = .18), or mortality (<1% vs 2%, P = .25). On multivariate analysis, MVR was not associated with increased overall morbidity or severe morbidity. Mortality rates were too low for meaningful statistical analysis. Annual rates of MVR ranged from 37% to 46% with no significant change over time (P = .47). RESULTS: Short-term morbidity and mortality rates after MVR for RPS remain acceptable, but rates of MVR show little change over time in NSQIP hospitals. Concerns about increased morbidity and mortality should not be viewed as a contraindication to wider implementation of MVR for RPS.

Isolated adrenal metastectomy has a low morbidity rate irrespective of performing surgical sub-specialty.

INTRODUCTION: There has been growing use of adrenalectomy as a potentially curative treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease to the adrenal gland. We sought to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing isolated adrenalectomy in the setting of disseminated cancer using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Furthermore, we examined the impact of performing surgical sub-specialty on outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the ACS-NSQIP database was obtained for patients between 2011 and 2016 who underwent adrenalectomy. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of disseminated cancer. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to test for an association between the presence or absence of disseminated cancer and perioperative outcomes. The relationship between performing specialist and outcomes was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 4,207 patients were identified, with 270 (6.4%) in the disseminated cancer group. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes between patients with disseminated cancer and without disseminated cancer. On multivariate analysis, neither the presence of disseminated cancer (p = 0.47) nor the surgical sub-specialty performing adrenalectomy (p = 0.52) were associated with an increased risk postoperative morbidity or mortality. Of note, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of adrenalectomies performed by urologists in the setting of disseminated cancer (19.3% versus 10.4%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing adrenalectomy in the setting of disseminated cancer did not have significantly worse perioperative outcomes compared to patients undergoing adrenalectomy for other indications. The adverse perioperative event rate was similar whether the operation was performed by a urologist or a general surgeon.

A Contemporary Analysis of the 30-day Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Cytoreductive Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of adverse surgical outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) compared to patients undergoing radical nephrectomy in the nonmetastatic setting using a large administrative database. METHODS: Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) who underwent a radical nephrectomy between 2011 and 2016 were included. Patients were stratified by the preoperative variable of presence or absence of metastatic cancer. Perioperative outcomes were compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between patients with metastatic cancer and perioperative morbidity and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: There were 15,869 total patients included in this analysis of whom 1322 (8%) patients had metastatic cancer. Of the entire cohort, the majority of patients were over 60 years old (58%) and 9621 (61%) were male. Seventy-three of the patients were Caucasian. Patients with metastatic cancer had more minor (P< .01) and major (P< .01) complications, a higher rate of reoperation (P< .01), and a higher rate of unplanned readmissions (P< .01). Finally, the cohort with metastatic cancer had a higher rate of postoperative 30-day mortality (P< .01) than patients without metastatic cancer. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing a CN have significantly worse perioperative outcomes than patients undergoing a radical nephrectomy without evidence of metastases. Careful surgical risk stratification and appropriate patient counseling should be undertaken when selecting candidates for CN.

A Nurse-Driven Protocol for Foley Catheter Utilization Decreases the Incidence of Traumatic Foley Catheterization.

Background: Traumatic urethral catheterization is a common reason for urologic consultation in hospitalized patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if a protocol designed to decrease Foley catheter use was effective and if implementation of the protocol decreased the incidence of Foley catheter-associated trauma. Methods: In an effort to decrease catheter use, our institution adopted a nurse-driven Foley catheter protocol in May 2015 that allowed nurses to remove Foley catheters that did not meet criteria. We conducted a retrospective medical records review of patients who had Foley catheter-associated trauma occurring between February 2013 and March 2018 and compiled data concerning Foley catheter use. Using t test statistical analysis, we compared rates of Foley catheter use and Foley catheter-associated trauma before and after protocol implementation. Results: During the 62-month study period, we documented 83 cases of Foley catheter-associated trauma. Prior to protocol implementation, our institution had mean of 2,903 patient-catheterization days per month. Following protocol implementation, the mean decreased to 2,604 patient-catheterization days per month (P<0.01). Prior to protocol implementation, the mean incidence of Foley catheter-associated trauma was 1.81 traumas per month. Following protocol implementation, the mean incidence decreased to 0.97 trauma per month (P<0.05). Conclusion: Implementation of the protocol was successful in decreasing Foley catheter use as well as Foley catheter-associated trauma.

Effect of the Need for Preoperative Dialysis on Perioperative Outcomes on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients requiring dialysis are a higher risk surgical population and would experience more perioperative adverse events even when undergoing a perceived less invasive operation as a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). LRN is generally a well-tolerated surgical procedure with minimal morbidity and mortality. Prior to transplantation, dialysis patients will often have to undergo a LRN to remove a native kidney with a suspicious mass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent a LRN between 2011 and 2016 were included. Patients were stratified by the need for preoperative dialysis 2 weeks prior to surgery, and perioperative outcomes were compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between the need for preoperative dialysis and perioperative risk. RESULTS: There were 8315 patients included in this analysis of which 445 (5.4%) patients required preoperative dialysis. Patients who required preoperative dialysis had more minor (P <.0001) and major (P = .0025) complications, a higher rate of return to the operating room (P = .002), and a longer length of stay (P <.0001) than those patients not requiring preoperative dialysis. In a multivariate analysis, the need for preoperative dialysis was independently associated with adverse perioperative outcomes (OR= 1.45, CI = 1.08-1.95, P = .015). CONCLUSION: Patients requiring preoperative dialysis were more likely to experience a perioperative complication and have a longer length of stay. For LRNs performed prior to transplantation, further risk stratification is needed, and treatment sequencing may need to be reconsidered.