Organization of psychosocial factors associated with worry about acquiring SARS-CoV-2 among women undergoing cancer treatment: an empirical network comparison approach.

OBJECTIVES: Pandemic-induced anxiety can have adverse mental and somatic health consequences on cancer patients (CP). This study aimed to (1) explore the intricate relationships between worry related to potential SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 perception, sociodemographic factors, and the perceived effectiveness of lockdown measures and (2) investigate if these relationships differ between cancer patients and individuals without a history of cancer (IWHC). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative study in France between December 1 and 14, 2020. Network analysis was employed on a sample of 1889 women, including 282 cancer patients and 1607 noncancer individuals. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that CP were 20% more likely to express worry than IWHC. Anxiety is embedded within a complex network involving sociodemographic, cognitive, and emotional factors. The emotional components related to COVID-19 perception were found to play a crucial role. The networks for both groups were observed to be identical. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the heightened vulnerability of cancer patients to pandemic-induced anxiety, emphasizing the crucial role of emotional components related to COVID-19 perception. The observed similarities in the anxiety network between cancer patients and those without a history of cancer suggest that universal approaches might be effective across groups. IMPLICATIONS: Utilizing the Causal Attitude Network Model, we propose potential methods for managing and reducing individual anxiety levels.

Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT).

BACKGROUND: Most of the individuals concerned by colorectal cancer screening recognize the importance of screening participation. However, the screening rates for this cancer remain low in most countries, including France. Based on the action control framework, the present study aimed to (i) explore the distribution of intentions-behavior profiles toward colorectal cancer screening and (ii) to determine to what extent the profiles could be differentiated on theory of planned behavior (TPB) (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control [PBC]) and self-regulation variables (i.e., action planning, coping planning). METHOD: A total of 149 participants from the general French population (M = 60 years, SD = 7.04) completed a questionnaire measuring TPB and self-regulation variables. Subsequent screening behavior was determined from medical records. Participants were notably categorized as non-intenders, unsuccessful intenders, or successful intenders. Data were analyzed using discriminant function analysis and analyses of covariance. RESULTS: Main findings revealed that 71% of the intenders were unsuccessful intenders. TPB and self-regulation variables were significantly correlated with the discriminant function (rs ≥ .40). Successful and unsuccessful intenders reported significantly higher levels of subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning than non-intenders (ps < .01). Successful intenders reported a significantly higher level of coping planning than unsuccessful intenders (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Further research appears necessary to empirically test to what extent interventions targeting subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning could enhance the proportion of successful intenders toward colorectal cancer screening.

Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions.

Screening is an essential prevention practice for a number of health conditions. However, screening coverage remains generally low. Studies that investigate determinants of screening participation are becoming more common, but oftentimes investigate screening for health conditions in an individualized rather than integrated fashion. In routine clinical practice, however, healthcare professionals are often confronted with situations in which several screening procedures are recommended for the same patient. The consideration of their common determinants may support a more integrated screening approach. The objectives of this umbrella review were therefore to examine: 1) the determinants (barriers and facilitators) that have been identified in relation to recommended health screening procedures; and 2) the modifiable determinants (in primary care) common across health conditions or specific to individual procedures. Results were presented through a narrative synthesis. PubMed, PsycInfo and Cochrane were searched up to January 2022. Systematic reviews reporting determinants of participation in health screening procedures with grade A or B recommendation according to the US Preventive Services Task Force were included. A total of 85 systematic reviews were included, most which contained both qualitative and quantitative studies on determinants that describe individual factors (961 occurrences), social factors (113 occurrences, healthcare professional factors (149 occurrences), health system factors (105 occurrences) and screening procedure factors (99 occurrences). The most studied screening procedures concerned cervical cancer/human papillomavirus (n = 33), breast cancer (n = 28), colorectal cancer (n = 25) and the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 12). Other conditions have been under-studied (e.g. cardiovascular problems, lung cancer, syphilis). The individual domain, including determinants such as knowledge, beliefs and emotions, was the most covered across health conditions. Healthcare professional's recommendations and the quality of patient-provider communication were identified to have a strong influence on screening participation in most conditions. The other three domains included determinants which were more specific to a condition or a population. Various determinants modifiable in primary care were found in the individual domain and in the health system, healthcare professional and screening procedure domains. Quality was assessed as low for most systematic reviews included. The identification of various modifiable determinants common across conditions highlights the potential of an integrated screening participation approach. Interventions may address common determinants in a broader person-centred framework within which tailoring to specific procedures or populations can be considered. This approach needs to be explored in intervention studies. The systematic review registration is PROSPERO CRD42019126709.

Représentations du dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal : le point de vue des médecins généralistes.

OBJECTIVES: Various studies have shown that general practitioners (GPs) have a strong influence on adherence to organized screening for colorectal cancer. Faced with very low screening rates (29.8%), this study aims to apprehend the context of screening, the representations of GPs and the context of the arrival of new screening test in how to consider medical practice. METHODS: On the basis of a qualitative methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 general practitioners in 2014-2015. A thematic content analysis was then performed. RESULTS: The doctors interviewed said that they discussed colorectal cancer screening quickly at the end of the consultation, along with other screening tests (mammography), due to lack of time and management of several reasons for consultation. GPs had very little information about the new test, so they had no specific expectations for the new test. The analysis revealed an inconsistency between the role that GPs feel they should play with patients in prevention and screening and the reality of their practice that leaves them little time to devote to it. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of information regarding the arrival of the new test and the difficulties associated with the organization of care has an impact on the representations of screening management. Setting up a consultation dedicated to prevention could be a prospect of improvement.

[Representations of colorectal cancer screening: the GPs point of view] / Représentations du dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal : le point de vue des médecins généralistes.

OBJECTIVES: Various studies have shown that general practitioners (GPs) have a strong influence on adherence to organized screening for colorectal cancer. Faced with very low screening rates (29.8%), this study aims to apprehend the context of screening, the representations of GPs and the context of the arrival of new screening test in how to consider medical practice. METHODS: On the basis of a qualitative methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 general practitioners in 2014-2015. A thematic content analysis was then performed. RESULTS: The doctors interviewed said that they discussed colorectal cancer screening quickly at the end of the consultation, along with other screening tests (mammography), due to lack of time and management of several reasons for consultation. GPs had very little information about the new test, so they had no specific expectations for the new test. The analysis revealed an inconsistency between the role that GPs feel they should play with patients in prevention and screening and the reality of their practice that leaves them little time to devote to it. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of information regarding the arrival of the new test and the difficulties associated with the organization of care has an impact on the representations of screening management. Setting up a consultation dedicated to prevention could be a prospect of improvement.

Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, colorectal cancer is a major public health issue. Despite the existence of screening programmes in many countries, global uptake remains low. This meta-ethnography aimed to analyse qualitative literature to explore attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening and reasons for non-participation in eligible people that do not participate when invited. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in five databases in May 2021. Critical appraisal of included studies was performed using the CASP checklist for qualitative studies. FINDINGS: Thirteen studies were included. Three main themes and eight sub-themes were developed across studies: (1) Differences in motivation, with non-participants expressing a lack of knowledge and varying levels of intention to participate but not feeling screening was personally necessary; (2) Active aversion to screening expressed by fear, discomfort, disgust or not wanting to know; and (3) Contextual barriers of the healthcare system such as practical constraints or poor relationships with healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest multiple pathways to non-participation including ambivalence, aversion to the process and consequences of screening or lack of support. Persuasive messages and prompts to action to target ambivalence, reassurance regarding the screening procedures to target negative reactions, and increased support from healthcare professionals may be beneficial in increasing screening uptake.

Understanding barriers and facilitators to participation in colorectal cancer screening: A French qualitative study.

Based on the theory of social representations, this study aims to identify the main determinants to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Six focus groups (N = 29 participants belonging to the general population) were conducted, followed by a theoretical thematic analysis. Screening obstacles are a lack of test's accessibility, a low preoccupation for prevention and the negative image of colorectal cancer. Conversely, screening facilitators are the ease of the new test, being encouraged to get screened and appointment reminder. This study advances understanding of adherence to screening by addressing the beliefs and knowledge surrounding it.

Factors influencing adherence to continuous positive airway pressure devices in individuals with spinal cord injury and sleep apnea: Results of a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: In individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and sleep apnea (SA), adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy seems unsatisfactory despite technical and educational support implemented when starting treatment. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to design comprehensive model of adherence to CPAP therapy in individuals with SCI and SA. METHODS: This was a prospective qualitative study based on semi-directed interviews and using the grounded theory as an analytic method. The theoretical framework was the social cognitive theory of Bandura. Participants were recruited from an SCI referral centre. Individuals with SCI using or having used a CPAP device for SA were included. Data were collected by semi-directed interviews on the experience of individuals with SCI regarding SA and being fitted with a CPAP device and were coded and organized into categories of experience and category relationships. RESULTS: Among the 17 individuals included; 9 had tetraplegia; the median age was 62 (Q1-Q3 47-66) years and median time since injury was 16 (Q1-Q3 1.75-21) years. Four categories of data were identified: 1) from symptoms to validation of SA diagnosis, 2) CPAP device fitting process, 3) representations of SA, and 4) level of adherence to the treatment. In addition to the factors already observed in the general population, the proposed model identified specific adherence factors in individuals with SCI, such as physical and relational dependence on a third party, increased daily care burden and increased presence of medical devices in the daily environment. CONCLUSION: SA and its management present certain specificities in individuals with SCI that the physician must take into account to optimize therapeutic proposals, follow-up modalities and device adherence.

Why do women fast during breast cancer chemotherapy? A qualitative study of the patient experience.

BACKGROUND: Why do patients practice fasting? The effects of fasting before treatment with chemotherapy for cancer in humans are currently unknown. However, there is an apparent enthusiasm for fasting among cancer patients. This qualitative study provides data on the motivations to fast and the experience of fasting among a population of women with breast cancer. METHOD: Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, and two researchers independently performed a thematic analysis. To ensure the internal validity of the study, patients had the possibility to rate their agreement with the study results through a satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Six main themes were identified in this study: main reasons to fast, alternative authorities to the oncologist, adapting the fast to social and lifestyle constraints, fasting effects felt during chemotherapy, barriers and facilitators of fasting during chemotherapy, and seeking for a more integrative medicine. Patients' primary motivation to fast was to lower the negative side effects of chemotherapy. Fasting was also reported as a coping strategy to give them a greater sense of control over their treatment and to reduce their anxiety. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Results from the study suggest that, if discouraged from fasting, patients may turn to complementary health care practitioners for support. Medical professionals may thus not know of patients' fasting practice. Health psychologists could play a key role fostering the dialogue between different health professionals and the patient. They could also help to meet patients' needs during cancer treatment to reduce treatment anxiety. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Fasting diet in cancer treatment has become an important topic since Raffaghello et al. published their study on mice in 2008. While the (positive) effects of fasting in humans remain to be proven, there has been a significant enthusiasm for this practice among patients in the last few years. However, patients' motivations to fast remain unclear to the scientific community and clinicians. What does this study add? This study is the first to investigate patients' motivations to fast and patients' experience of fasting in a cancer population. Patients' primary motivation to fast was to lower the side effects of chemotherapy. Fasting acts as an active coping strategy that helps to reduce anxiety. Unsupported patients may turn to complementary health care practitioners.

Why Patients Delay Their First Contact with Health Services After Stroke? A Qualitative Focus Group-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite national and local French information campaigns, when acute stroke occurs, waiting times before calling mobile emergency medical services (EMS) to receive appropriate treatment (i.e. thrombolysis) and decrease the risk of physical disability, remain long. We aimed to identify the representations of stroke in the general population and to determine barriers to and facilitators for rapidly contacting EMS. METHOD: We conducted a qualitative study among the general population with 10 focus groups, 5 comprising employed people (N = 29) and 5 comprising retirees (N = 32). The themes discussed were general knowledge about stroke and its risk factors, symptoms, appropriate management and the awareness that stroke is an emergency issue. RESULTS: In addition to a lack of knowledge about stroke, other barriers to rapidly contacting the EMS were difficulties in recognizing symptoms and understanding that these symptoms constitute an emergency. Furthermore, when faced with stroke, a feeling of inevitability and fatalism about the consequences of a stroke was highlighted. Participants were unaware of the existence of an effective treatment and they mistrusted medical competences. Finally, we found a strong presence and participant appreciation of common knowledge, resulting in the sharing of experiences of stroke. This could partly compensate for the lack of specific knowledge about symptom recognition and appropriate action. CONCLUSION: Information campaigns should not only inform the public about stroke symptoms in order to ensure people act appropriately, but should also focus on increasing public awareness about the fact that an effective treatment exists.