Primary Graft Function and 5 Year Insulin Independence After Pancreas and Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Parallel Cohort Study.

In islet transplantation (ITx), primary graft function (PGF) or beta cell function measured early after last infusion is closely associated with long term clinical outcomes. We investigated the association between PGF and 5 year insulin independence rate in ITx and pancreas transplantation (PTx) recipients. This retrospective multicenter study included type 1 diabetes patients who underwent ITx in Lille and PTx in Nantes from 2000 to 2022. PGF was assessed using the validated Beta2-score and compared to normoglycemic control subjects. Subsequently, the 5 year insulin independence rates, as predicted by a validated PGF-based model, were compared to the actual rates observed in ITx and PTx patients. The study enrolled 39 ITx (23 ITA, 16 IAK), 209 PTx recipients (23 PTA, 14 PAK, 172 SPK), and 56 normoglycemic controls. Mean[SD] PGF was lower after ITx (ITA 22.3[5.2], IAK 24.8[6.4], than after PTx (PTA 38.9[15.3], PAK 36.8[9.0], SPK 38.7[10.5]), and lower than mean beta-cell function measured in normoglycemic control: 36.6[4.3]. The insulin independence rates observed at 5 years after PTA and PAK aligned with PGF predictions, and was higher after SPK. Our results indicate a similar relation between PGF and 5 year insulin independence in ITx and solitary PTx, shedding new light on long-term transplantation outcomes.

Cognitive Outcome After Islet Transplantation.

Severe or repeated hypoglycemia events may favor memory complaints in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Pancreatic islet transplantation (IT) is an alternative option to exogenous insulin therapy in case of labile T1D, implying a maintenance immunosuppression regimen based on sirolimus or mycophenolate, associated with tacrolimus, that may also have neurological toxicity. The objective of this study was to compare a cognitive rating scale Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) between T1D patients with or without IT and to identify parameters influencing MMSE. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study compared MMSE and cognitive function tests between islet-transplanted T1D patients and nontransplanted T1D controls who were transplant candidates. Patients were excluded if they refused. Results: Forty-three T1D patients were included: 9 T1D patients before IT and 34 islet-transplanted patients (14 treated with mycophenolate and 20 treated with sirolimus). Neither MMSE score (P = 0.70) nor higher cognitive function differed between islet versus non-islet-transplanted patients, whatever the type of immunosuppression. In the whole population (N = 43), MMSE score was negatively correlated to glycated hemoglobin (r = -0.30; P = 0.048) and the time spent in hypoglycemia on the continuous glucose monitoring (r = -0.32; P = 0.041). MMSE score was not correlated to fasting C-peptide level, time spent in hyperglycemia, average blood glucose, time under immunosuppression, duration of diabetes, or beta-score (success score of IT). Conclusions: This first study evaluating cognitive disorders in islet-transplanted T1D patients argues for the importance of glucose balance on cognitive function rather than of immunosuppressive treatment, with a favorable effect of glucose balance improvement on MMSE score after IT.

The challenge of HLA donor specific antibodies in the management of pancreatic islet transplantation: an illustrative case-series.

Islet transplantation is a unique paradigm in organ transplantation, since multiple donors are required to achieve complete insulin-independence. Preformed or de novo Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) may target one or several donor islets, which adds complexity to the analysis of their impact. Adult patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted with pancreatic islets between 2005 and 2018 were included in a single-center observational study. Thirty-two recipients with available sera tested by solid-phase assays for anti-HLA antibodies during their whole follow-up were analyzed. Twenty-five recipients were islet-transplantation-alone recipients, and 7 islet-after-kidney recipients. Seven recipients presented with DSA at any time during follow-up (two with preformed DSA only, one with preformed and de novo DSA, 4 with de novo DSA only). Only islet-transplantation-alone recipients presented with de novo DSA. Three clinical trajectories were identified according to: 1/the presence of preformed DSA, 2/early de novo DSA or 3/late de novo DSA. Only late de novo DSA were associated with unfavorable outcomes, depicted by a decrease of the ß-score. Islet transplantation with preformed DSA, even with high MFI values, is associated with favorable outcomes in our experience. On the contrary, de novo DSA, and especially late de novo DSA, may be associated with allograft loss.

Metabolic and immunological phenotype of rare lipomatoses: Dercum's disease and Roch-Leri mesosomatic lipomatosis.

CONTEXT: Dercum's disease (DD) and Roch-Leri mesosomatic lipomatosis (LMS) are rare and poorly characterized diseases. The clinical presentation combines multiple lipomas, painful in DD in contrast with LMS, without lipoatrophy. OBJECTIVE: To identify any specific metabolic and immune phenotype of DD and LMS. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This monocentric retrospective study included 46 patients: 9 DD, 11 LMS, 18 lean and 8 obese controls. Metabolic and immunohematological characteristics of each group were compared. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was similar in the 3 groups (31 years). The number of women, and of basophils, and CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly higher in the DD versus the LMS group, without any difference of the metabolic parameters. Weight, BMI, blood pressure, gamma-GT, leptin, fasting insulin and C-peptide levels, fat mass percentage, and intra/total abdominal fat ratio were significantly higher in each lipomatosis group compared with the lean group. Compared with the lean group, the DD group had significantly higher fasting blood glucose, LDL-cholesterol, platelets, leukocytes, basophils, and a lower NK cell count, whereas the LMS group had a significantly lower rate of CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes. Compared with the obese controls, basophils remained higher in DD and T lymphocytes subpopulations lower in LMS groups. CONCLUSION: DD and LMS show a common background of obesity and metabolic phenotype, but a distinct immunohematological profile characterized by a higher number of basophils in DD patients, an inflammatory profile that could contribute to pain. T lymphocyte depletion was present in LMS. These findings could offer specific therapeutic opportunities, especially for painful DD.

Ten-Year Outcome of Islet Alone or Islet After Kidney Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Parallel-Arm Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term outcome of allogenic islet transplantation is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 10-year outcome of islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness and/or a functioning kidney graft. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We enrolled in this prospective parallel-arm cohort study 28 subjects with type 1 diabetes who received islet transplantation either alone (ITA) or after a kidney graft (IAK). Islet transplantation consisted of two or three intraportal infusions of allogenic islets administered within (median [interquartile range]) 68 days (43-92). Immunosuppression was induced with interleukin-2 receptor antibodies and maintained with sirolimus and tacrolimus. The primary outcome was insulin independence with A1C ≤6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Secondary outcomes were patient and graft survival, severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs), metabolic control, and renal function. RESULTS: The primary outcome was met by (Kaplan-Meier estimates [95% CI]) 39% (22-57) and 28% (13-45) of patients 5 and 10 years after islet transplantation, respectively. Graft function persisted in 82% (62-92) and 78% (57-89) of case subjects after 5 and 10 years, respectively, and was associated with improved glucose control, reduced need for exogenous insulin, and a marked decrease of SHEs. ITA and IAK had similar outcomes. Primary graft function, evaluated 1 month after the last islet infusion, was significantly associated with the duration of graft function and insulin independence. CONCLUSIONS: Islet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol can provide 10-year markedly improved metabolic control without SHEs in three-quarters of patients with type 1 diabetes, kidney transplanted or not.

Immunosuppressive drugs and fertility.

Immunosuppressive drugs are used in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, as well as in transplantation. Frequently prescribed in young people, these treatments may have deleterious effects on fertility, pregnancy outcomes and the unborn child. This review aims to summarize the main gonadal side effects of immunosuppressants, to detail the effects on fertility and pregnancy of each class of drug, and to provide recommendations on the management of patients who are seen prior to starting or who are already receiving immunosuppressive treatment, allowing them in due course to bear children. The recommendations for use are established with a rather low level of proof, which needs to be taken into account in the patient management. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, and le- and teri-flunomide, cyclophosphamide, mitoxanthrone are contraindicated if pregnancy is desired due to their teratogenic effects, as well as gonadotoxic effects in the case of cyclophosphamide. Anti-TNF-alpha and mTOR-inhibitors are to be used cautiously if pregnancy is desired, since experience using these drugs is still relatively scarce. Azathioprine, glucocorticoids, mesalazine, anticalcineurins such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus, ß-interferon, glatiramer-acetate and chloroquine can be used during pregnancy, bearing in mind however that side effects may still occur. Experience is limited concerning natalizumab, fingolimod, dimethyl-fumarate and induction treatments. Conclusion: At the time of prescription, patients must be informed of the possible consequences of immunosuppressants on fertility and of the need for contraception. Pregnancy must be planned and the treatment modified if necessary in a pre-conception time period adapted to the half-life of the drug, imperatively in relation with the prescriber of the immunosuppressive drugs.

Management of endocrino-metabolic dysfunctions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is mainly indicated in bone marrow dysfunction related to blood diseases, but also in some rare diseases (adrenoleucodystrophy, mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy or MNGIE...). After decades, this treatment has proven to be efficient at the cost of numerous early and delayed side effects such as infection, graft-versus-host disease, cardiovascular complications and secondary malignancies. These complications are mainly related to the conditioning, which requires a powerful chemotherapy associated to total body irradiation (myelo-ablation) or immunosuppression (non myelo-ablation). Among side effects, the endocrine complications may be classified as 1) hormonal endocrine deficiencies (particularly gonado- and somatotropic) related to delayed consequences of chemo- and above all radiotherapy, with their consequences on growth, puberty, bone and fertility); 2) auto-immune diseases, particularly dysthyroidism; 3) secondary tumors involving either endocrine glands (thyroid carcinoma) or dependent on hormonal status (breast cancer, meningioma), favored by immune dysregulation and radiotherapy; 4) metabolic complications, especially steroid-induced diabetes and dyslipidemia with their increased cardio-vascular risk. These complications are intricate. Moreover, hormone replacement therapy can modulate the cardio-vascular or the tumoral risk of patients, already increased by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, especially steroids and anthracyclins... Therefore, patients and families should be informed of these side effects and of the importance of a long-term follow-up requiring a multidisciplinary approach.