Not all polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acids (Poly I:C) are equivalent for inducing maturation of dendritic cells: implication for alpha-type-1 polarized DCs.

This study compares the behavior of 2 commercially available polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acids (poly I:C1 and poly I:C2) and the structural analog poly I:C12U in regard to dendritic cell (DC) maturation. When the Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) agonists are tested in combination with interferon-alpha, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta, and interferon-gamma (the so-called alpha-type-1 DC), the 3 different cocktails generate phenotypically mature DCs, but with different functional properties. Higher migratory capacity is observed with poly I:C1, the only poly I:C allowing spontaneous release of IL-12p70 by DCs. However, upon CD40 triggering, cocktails containing poly I:C2 or poly I:C12U allow a far higher production of IL-12p70 compared with those containing poly I:C1. Using a TLR signaling pathway reverse transcription profiler polymerase chain reaction to analyze changes in gene expression after treatment of DCs with the agonists alone, we show that 39% of the 84 tested genes are differentially regulated between the 3 conditions. Poly I:C12U induces far fewer regulated genes than the 2 other poly I:Cs. These different behaviors could be due to alternative ways of sensing double-stranded RNA, which do not rely solely on TLR3 but also on other types of receptors, depending on the size of poly I:Cs. As the 2 poly I:Cs tested here have very different molecular weights, this could partly explain the observed differences. In conclusion, neither the poly I:Cs nor their structural analog poly I:C12U have an equivalent behavior. This should be taken into an account not only when they are used in cocktails for DC maturation but also when analyzing signaling pathways with synthetic double-stranded RNA analogs.

Prokineticin 1 induces CCL4, CXCL1 and CXCL8 in human monocytes but not in macrophages and dendritic cells.

Prokineticin 1 and 2 (PROK1 and PROK2) are two small proteins largely expressed in inflammatory tissues and involved in monocyte activation and differentiation. The focus of this study was to evaluate whether PROK1 was able to induce chemokine secretion in human monocytes, in monocyte-derived macrophages and in monocyte-derived dendritic cells, an aspect not addressed thus far. Here, we show for the first time, using flow cytometry, that PROK receptors 1 and 2 are present on the surface of human monocytes. Subsequently, monocytes were selected to investigate the chemokine response after stimulation by PROK1. Our results show that only three chemokines (CCL4, CXCL1 and CXCL8) were significantly induced at both the transcript and protein level, and that PROK1 induces most potently CXCL8, in a dose-dependent manner. From a mechanistic point of view, by blocking independently Galphai protein or intracellular calcium, monocytes lose the ability to secrete CXCL8 in response to PROK1. Finally, we observed that CCL4, CXCL1 and CXCL8 secretion, following PROK1 induction, is only observed in monocytes and not in monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells. Our results demonstrate that, in vitro, the differentiation status of monocytes influences chemokine production after stimulation by PROK1, and that this chemokine production is geared toward a pro-inflammatory response. This could represent a novel amplification loop of leukocyte recruitment, extravasation and tissue invasion.

Biodistribution of radiolabelled human dendritic cells injected by various routes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodistribution of mature dendritic cells (DCs) injected by various routes, during a cell therapy protocol. METHODS: In the context of a vaccine therapy protocol for melanoma, DCs matured with Ribomunyl and interferon-gamma were labelled with( 111)In-oxine and injected into eight patients along various routes: afferent lymphatic vessel (IL) (4 times), lymph node (IN) (5 times) and intradermally (ID) (6 times). RESULTS: Scintigraphic investigations showed that the IL route allowed localisation of 80% of injected radioactivity in eight to ten nodes. In three cases of IN injection, the entire radioactivity stagnated in the injected nodes, while in two cases, migration to adjacent nodes was observed. This migration was detected rapidly after injection, as with IL injections, suggesting that passive transport occurred along the physiological lymphatic pathways. In two of the six ID injections, 1-2% of injected radioactivity reached a proximal lymph node. Migration was detectable in the first hour, but increased considerably after 24 h, suggesting an active migration mechanism. In both of the aforementioned cases, DCs were strongly CCR7-positive, but this feature was not a sufficient condition for effective migration. In comparison with DCs matured with TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6 and PGE2, our DCs showed a weaker in vitro migratory response to CCL21, despite comparable CCR7 expression, and higher allostimulatory and TH1 polarisation capacities. CONCLUSION: The IL route allowed reproducible administration of specified numbers of DCs. The IN route sometimes yielded fairly similar results, but not reproducibly. Lastly, we showed that DCs matured without PGE2 that have in vitro TH1 polarisation capacities can migrate to lymph nodes after ID injection.

Injection by various routes of melanoma antigen-associated macrophages: biodistribution and clinical effects.

Patients' autologous macrophages (AM) were used as antigen-presenting cells (APC) in a vaccination protocol against malignant melanoma. AM were administered by various routes, including intralymphatic, since these cells did not express CCR7, a molecule required for APC migration to lymph nodes. Seven HLA-A2 patients with metastatic melanoma-two classified as M1 and five as M3-were included in the study. AM were produced from leukapheresis-separated mononuclear cells by 7-day culture with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. After separation by elutriation, AM were frozen in aliquots and subsequently thawed at monthly intervals, exposed to MAGE-3(271-279) peptide and injected subcutaneously into lymph nodes or into one peripheral lymph vessel. Intradermal tests were performed before and after treatment to determine peptide reactivity. No acute toxicity was observed following injection. One M1 patient had a 7-mm induration intradermal reaction response and was stabilized for 64 weeks. The M3 patients did not show any immunological or clinical response. In 11 patients, the biodistribution of 111In-labeled AM was investigated. There was no clear evidence that AM injected intradermally or subcutaneously left the site of injection. After injection into a lymph vessel of the foot region, scintigraphs showed five to ten popliteal and inguinocrural lymph nodes. This appeared to be the most efficient way to administer rapidly and safely large amounts of peptide-loaded APC into lymph nodes.