Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 27(3): 299-306, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26663443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scarce information is available about the relationships between indoor air quality (IAQ) at day care centers (DCC), the estimated predisposition for asthma, and the actual wheezing susceptibility. METHODS: In the Phase II of ENVIRH study, 19 DCC were recruited after cluster analysis. Children were evaluated firstly using the ISAAC questionnaire and later by a follow-up questionnaire about recent wheezing. A positive asthma predictive index (API) was considered as predisposition for asthma. Every DCC was audited for IAQ and monitored for chemical and biologic contaminants. RESULTS: We included 1191 children, with a median age of 43 (P25 -P75 : 25-58) months. Considering the overall sample, in the first questionnaire, associations were found between CO2 concentration (increments of 200 ppm) and diagnosis of asthma (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.00-1.20). Each increment of 100 µg/m(3) of total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) and 1 µg of Der p1/g of dust were associated with wheezing in the previous 12 months (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 and OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.99-1.12, respectively). In the follow-up questionnaire, TVOC were again associated with wheezing (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.11). Children exposed to fungal concentration above the 75th percentile had also higher odds of wheezing at follow-up. TVOC were associated with wheezing in children with either negative or positive API. CONCLUSIONS: IAQ in DCC seems to be associated with wheezing, in children with and without predisposition for asthma.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Asma/etiología , Guarderías Infantiles , Ruidos Respiratorios/etiología , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Preescolar , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Chron Respir Dis ; 13(3): 211-9, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26965222

RESUMEN

Few studies have assessed the quality of life (QOL) related to chronic respiratory diseases in the elderly. In the framework of the geriatric study on the health effects of air quality in elderly care centers (GERIA) study, a questionnaire was completed by elderly subjects from 53 selected nursing homes. It included various sections in order to assess respiratory complaints, QOL (World Health Organization QOL (WHOQOL)-BREF), and the cognitive and depression status. The outcome variables were the presence of a score lower than 50 (<50) in each of the WHOQOL-BREF domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health). Chronic bronchitis, frequent cough, current wheezing, asthma, and allergic rhinitis were considered as potential risk factors. The surveyed sample was (n = 887) 79% female, with a mean age of 84 years (SD: 7 years). In the multivariable analysis, a score of <50 in the physical domain was associated with wheezing in the previous 12 months (odds ratio (OR): 2.03, confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.31) and asthma (OR: 1.95, CI: 1.12-3.38). The psychological domain was related with a frequent cough (OR: 1.43, CI: 0.95-2.91). A score of <50 in the environmental domain was associated with chronic bronchitis (OR: 2.89, CI: 1.34-6.23) and emphysema (OR: 3.89, CI: 1.27-11.88). In view of these findings, the presence of respiratory diseases seems to be an important risk factor for a low QOL among elderly nursing home residents.


Asunto(s)
Casas de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades Respiratorias/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Portugal/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Eur J Pediatr ; 173(8): 1041-9, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24590656

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Poor ventilation at day care centres (DCCs) was already reported, although its effects on attending children are not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between wheezing in children and indoor CO2 (a ventilation surrogate marker) in DCC and to identify behaviours and building characteristics potentially related to CO2. In phase I, 45 DCCs from Lisbon and Oporto (Portugal) were selected through a proportional stratified random sampling. In phase II, 3 months later, 19 DCCs were further reassessed after cluster analysis for the greatest difference comparison. In both phases, children's respiratory health was assessed by ISAAC-derived questionnaires. Indoor CO2 concentrations and building characteristics of the DCC were evaluated in both phases, using complementary methods. Mixed effect models were used to analyze the data. In phase I, which included 3,186 children (mean age 3.1 ± 1.5 years), indoor CO2 concentration in the DCC rooms was associated with reported wheezing in the past 12 months (27.5 %) (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for each increase of 200 ppm 1.04, 95 % CI 1:01 to 1:07). In phase II, the association in the subsample of 1,196 children seen in 19 out of the initial 45 DCCs was not significant (adjusted OR 1.02, 95 % CI 0.96 to 1.08). Indoor CO2 concentration was inversely associated with the practices of opening windows and internal doors and with higher wind velocity. A positive trend was observed between CO2 and prevalence of reported asthma (4.7 %). CONCLUSION: Improved ventilation is needed to achieve a healthier indoor environment in DCC.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Asma/etiología , Dióxido de Carbono/efectos adversos , Guarderías Infantiles , Asma/epidemiología , Preescolar , Salud Ambiental , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Ruidos Respiratorios , Factores de Riesgo , Ventilación/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Sci Prog ; 104(2): 368504211013171, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33929910

RESUMEN

Though the approach used to classify chronic respiratory diseases is changing to a treatable-traits (TT) approach, data regarding very elderly patients is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess TT frequency in very elderly patients and to study the link between extrapulmonary TT and ventilatory defects. Individuals (≥75 years) residing in elderly care centres answered a standardised questionnaire, underwent spirometry, atopy and fractional exhaled nitric oxide assessments and had their blood pressure and peripheral pulse oximetry measured. Pulmonary, extrapulmonary and behavioural TT were evaluated. Outcome variables were an airflow limitation (post-bronchodilator z-score FEV1/FVC<-1.64) and a restrictive spirometry pattern (z-score FEV1/FVC ≥ +1.64 and z-score FVC<-1.64). Seventy-two percent of the individuals who took part in the study (n = 234) were women, and the median age of participants was 86 (IQR: 7.4). At least one pulmonary TT was identified in 105 (44.9%) individuals. The most frequent extrapulmonary TTs were: persistent systemic inflammation (47.0%), anaemia (34.4%), depression (32.5%) and obesity (27.4). Airflow limitation was exclusively associated with smoking (OR 5.03; 95% CI 1.56-16.22). A restrictive spirometry pattern was associated with cognitive impairment (OR: 3.89; 95% CI: 1.55-9.79). A high frequency of various TTs was found. The novel association between a restrictive spirometry pattern and cognitive impairment highlights the urgency of clinical research on this vulnerable age group.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Trastornos Respiratorios , Anciano , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Trastornos Respiratorios/complicaciones , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Espirometría , Capacidad Vital
6.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 9(5): e26442, 2021 05 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34032576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Poor medication adherence is a major challenge in asthma, and objective assessment of inhaler adherence is needed. The InspirerMundi app aims to monitor adherence while providing a positive experience through gamification and social support. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the InspirerMundi app to monitor medication adherence in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma (treated with daily inhaled medication). METHODS: A 1-month mixed method multicenter observational study was conducted in 26 secondary care centers from Portugal and Spain. During an initial face-to-face visit, physicians reported patients' asthma therapeutic plan in a structured questionnaire. During the visits, patients were invited to use the app daily to register their asthma medication intakes. A scheduled intake was considered taken when patients registered the intake (inhaler, blister, or other drug formulation) by using the image-based medication detection tool. At 1 month, patients were interviewed by phone, and app satisfaction was assessed on a 1 (low) to 5 (high) scale. Patients were also asked to point out the most and least preferred app features and make suggestions for future app improvements. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients (median 27 [P25-P75 14-40] years) were invited, 92.5% (99/107) installed the app, and 73.8% (79/107) completed the 1-month interview. Patients interacted with the app a median of 9 (P25-P75 1-24) days. At least one medication was registered in the app by 78% (77/99) of patients. A total of 53% (52/99) of participants registered all prescribed inhalers, and 34% (34/99) registered the complete asthma therapeutic plan. Median medication adherence was 75% (P25-P75 25%-90%) for inhalers and 82% (P25-P75 50%-94%) for other drug formulations. Patients were globally satisfied with the app, with 75% (59/79) scoring ≥4,; adherence monitoring, symptom monitoring, and gamification features being the most highly scored components; and the medication detection tool among the lowest scored. A total of 53% (42/79) of the patients stated that the app had motivated them to improve adherence to inhaled medication and 77% (61/79) would recommend the app to other patients. Patient feedback was reflected in 4 major themes: medication-related features (67/79, 85%), gamification and social network (33/79, 42%), symptom monitoring and physician communication (21/79, 27%), and other aspects (16/79, 20%). CONCLUSIONS: The InspirerMundi app was feasible and acceptable to monitor medication adherence in patients with asthma. Based on patient feedback and to increase the registering of medications, the therapeutic plan registration and medication detection tool were redesigned. Our results highlight the importance of patient participation to produce a patient-centered and engaging mHealth asthma app.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Aplicaciones Móviles , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , España
7.
BMJ Open ; 9(11): e031732, 2019 11 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31699737

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. DESIGN: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. SETTING: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. RESULTS: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). CONCLUSION: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement.


Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
8.
Biomed Res Int ; 2018: 1495039, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584531

RESUMEN

The Portuguese Severe Asthma Registry (Registo de Asma Grave Portugal, RAG) was developed by an open collaborative network of asthma specialists. RAG collects data from adults and pediatric severe asthma patients that despite treatment optimization and adequate management of comorbidities require step 4/5 treatment according to GINA recommendations. In this paper, we describe the development and implementation of RAG, its features, and data sharing policies. The contents and structure of RAG were defined in a multistep consensus process. A pilot version was pretested and iteratively improved. The selection of data elements for RAG considered other severe asthma registries, aiming at characterizing the patient's clinical status whilst avoiding overloading the standard workflow of the clinical appointment. Features of RAG include automatic assessment of eligibility, easy data input, and exportable data in natural language that can be pasted directly in patients' electronic health record and security features to enable data sharing (among researchers and with other international databases) without compromising patients' confidentiality. RAG is a national web-based disease registry of severe asthma patients, available at asmagrave.pt. It allows prospective clinical data collection, promotes standardized care and collaborative clinical research, and may contribute to inform evidence-based healthcare policies for severe asthma.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Consenso , Recolección de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Masculino , Portugal/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida
10.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 53(7): 652-7, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24647697

RESUMEN

Food allergy (FA) prevalence data in infants and preschool-age children are sparse, and proposed risk factors lack confirmation. In this study, 19 children's day care centers (DCC) from 2 main Portuguese cities were selected after stratification and cluster analysis. An ISAAC's (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood) derived health questionnaire was applied to a sample of children attending DCCs. Outcomes were FA parental report and anaphylaxis. Logistic regression was used to explore potential risk factors for reported FA. From the 2228 distributed questionnaires, 1217 were included in the analysis (54.6%). Children's median age was 3.5 years, and 10.8% were described as ever having had FA. Current FA was reported in 5.7%. Three (0.2%) reports compatible with anaphylaxis were identified. Reported parental history of FA, personal history of atopic dermatitis, and preterm birth increased the odds for reported current FA. A high prevalence of parental-perceived FA in preschool-age children was identified. Risk factor identification may enhance better prevention.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Niño , Guarderías Infantiles , Preescolar , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Portugal/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Acta Med Port ; 27(4): 444-9, 2014.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25203952

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Data about drug allergy prevalence in the general population, particularly in children, are lacking. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of parent-reported drug allergy, in children attending day care centers in Lisbon and Oporto. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In Phase II of the "ENVIRH study - Environment and Health in Children Day Care Centers", a health questionnaire which included questions about drug allergies was administered to children by stratified, random sampling of day care centers. RESULTS: The final analysis included 1,169 questionnaires, 52.5% from boys. The mean age was 3.5 ± 1.5 years. The prevalence of reported drug allergy was 4.1% (95% CI: 3.0 - 5.2%). The most frequently reported drugs were antibiotics (27 cases) and NSAIDs (in 6 cases). In the multivariate analysis, reported drug allergy was directly associated with age (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.41) and reported food allergy (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.41 - 7.19). It was inversely associated with the level of parental education (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.10 - 0.59). DISCUSSION: Even though the limitations of the study our results are in accordance with those reported by previous authors and suggest that there is a high prevalence of reported drug allergy in the considered age group. CONCLUSION: A correct assessment of these situations is needed in order to avoid unnecessary drug evictions.


Introdução: A prevalência de alergia a fármacos na população geral não se encontra devidamente caraterizada, existindo poucos estudos publicados que tenham abordado esta situação em crianças com idades inferior a seis anos de idade. Este estudo tem como objetivo principal estimar a prevalência de alergia a medicamentos reportada pelos pais de crianças de infantários de Lisboa e do Porto. Material e Métodos: No âmbito da Fase II do projeto "ENVIRH ­ Ambiente e Saúde em Creches e Infantários" foi aplicado um questionário sobre alergia a medicamentos aos pais das crianças, recrutadas por amostragem aleatória estratificada dos infantários. Resultados: Foram analisados 1 169 questionários, 52,5% de rapazes. A idade média foi de 3,5 ± 1,5 anos. A prevalência de alergia a medicamentos reportada foi de 4,1% (IC 95%: 3,0 - 5,2%). Os fármacos mais referidos foram os antibióticos (em 27 reações) e os AINEs (em seis reações). Na análise multivariável, a alergia a medicamentos reportada associou-se diretamente com a idade da criança (OR 1,19; IC 95% 1,01 - 1,41) e com a referência a alergia alimentar (OR 3,19; IC95% 1,41 - 7,19) e inversamente com o nível de escolaridade dos pais (OR 0,25; IC95% 0,10 - 0,59). Discussão: Apesar das limitações do estudo, os resultados encontram-se de acordo com o reportado por outros autores e sugerem que a prevalência reportada de alergia a medicamentos seja elevada no grupo etário estudado. Conclusão: Torna-se necessário que situações de alergia a medicamentos reportadas pelos pais sejam devidamente estudadas, no sentido de evitar evicções desnecessárias que possam condicionar opções terapêuticas em futuras situações de doença.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Guarderías Infantiles , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia
12.
Arch Dis Child ; 98(2): 112-7, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292523

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess repeatability and reproducibility of spirometry measurements, and bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), in healthy 3-6-year-old preschool children and those with asthma. DESIGN: Spirometry was performed before and 20 minutes after administering either inhaled placebo (for repeatability) or 400 µg salbutamol (for BDR) on two separate occasions (reproducibility) 3-23 days apart in asthmatic preschoolers and healthy controls. SETTINGS: Lung Function Laboratory, Hospital de Dona Estefania, Lisbon. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy preschool children and those with physician-diagnosed asthma, recruited from local Health Clinics and Outpatient Clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Paired measurements of forced expired volume in 0.75 s (FEV(0.75)) and forced mid-expiratory flows (FEF(25-75)). RESULTS: Technically successful baseline results were obtained in 86% of children assessed. Paired data were obtained in 43 asthmatic and 22 controls (median (range) age: 5.1 (3.4-6.8) years). Baseline FEV(0.75) was significantly lower in asthmatic children (mean (SD): 90 (15)% predicted) than in controls (102 (13) % predicted; p<0.001). Within-occasion coefficient of repeatability following placebo was similar in both groups, being 10.4% in asthma and 13.2% in controls for FEV(0.75). Following bronchodilator, FEV(0.75) increased significantly more in asthmatic preschoolers (mean (SD): 15.0 (12) %) than in controls (4.5 (5) %; p<0.001), with no significant difference between groups post-bronchodilator. Between-occasion variability was similar to within-day repeatability in controls, but almost twice as high in asthmatic children. CONCLUSIONS: BDR can be assessed reliably using FEV(0.75) in wheezy preschoolers, provided within-subject variability and responsiveness in health are taken into consideration.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Espirometría/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Portugal , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA