Cardiac sarcoidosis with extensive and heterogeneous left ventricular FDG uptake in absence of guidelines indication for an implantable defibrillator: Ventricular tachycardia precipitated by immunosuppressive therapy, should we have done differently?

A 40-year-old man, newly diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) presented with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia three days after starting steroid-based immunosuppressive therapy (IT). There was no clear guideline indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) before the initiation of IT. Shortly after ICD implantation and the initiation of anti-arrhythmic drugs, recurring ventricular arrhythmias required titration of the anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. One-year follow-up assessment showed no significant arrhythmias and complete PET scan FDG uptake suppression. This case, along with recent publications, suggests transient pro-arrhythmic effects of steroids in patients with CS, which are not appropriately addressed in the current guidelines. We believe ICD implantation should be considered in clinically manifest CS before initiating IT, particularly in cases with heterogeneous and/or extensive FDG uptake on PET scans.

Clinical and echocardiographic evolution of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy before heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrofatty myocardial replacement, and accurate diagnosis can be challenging. The clinical course of patients expressing a severe phenotype of the disease needing heart transplantation (HTx) is not well described in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to describe the clinical and echocardiographic evolution of patients with ACM necessitating HTx. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent HTx in our institution between 1998 and 2019 with a definite diagnosis of ACM according to the explanted heart examination. RESULTS: Ten patients with confirmed ACM underwent HTx. Only four of them had a diagnosis of ACM before HTx. These patients were 28 ± 15 years old at the time of their first symptoms. Patients received a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) after 5.9 ± 8.7 years of symptom evolution. The mean age at transplantation was 40 ± 17 years old. All the patients experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) at least once before their HTx and 50% were resuscitated after sudden death. The mean left ventricular ejection at diagnosis and before transplantation was similar (32% ± 21% vs. 35.0% ± 19.3%, p = NS). Right ventricular dysfunction was present in all patients at the time of transplantation. CONCLUSION: Patients with ACM necessitating HTx show a high burden of ventricular arrhythmias and frequently present a biventricular involvement phenotype, making early diagnosis challenging. HF symptoms are the most frequent reason leading to the decision to transplant.

What cardiologists should know about cardiac sarcoidosis in 2022?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially fatal condition when unrecognized or not treated adequately. The purpose of this review is to provide new strategies to increase clinical recognition of CS and to present an updated overview of the immunosuppressive treatments using most recent data published in the last 18 months. RECENT FINDINGS: CS is an increasingly recognized pathology, and its diagnostic is made 20 times more often in the last two decades. Recent studies have shown that imaging alone usually lacks specificity to distinguish CS from other inflammatory cardiomyopathies. However, imaging can be used to increase significantly diagnostic yield of extracardiac and cardiac biopsy. Recent reviews have also demonstrated that nearly 25% of patients will be refractory to standard treatment with prednisone and that combined treatment with a corticosteroid-sparing agent is often necessary for a period that remains undetermined. SUMMARY: CS is a complex pathology that should always require a biopsy attempt to have a histological proven diagnosis before starting immunosuppressive therapy consisting of corticosteroids with or without a corticosteroid-sparing agent.

Severity of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy: Impacts on Remodeling After Atrial Flutter Ablation.

Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy is defined as a reversible left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (SeD) resulting from a sustained fast heart rate. LV remodeling in patients with severe LV dysfunction at diagnosis remains poorly understood. In this retrospective cohort study, we described LV remodeling in 50 patients who underwent atrial flutter ablation. These patients were divided into severe LV SeD (LV ejection fraction [EF] ≤30%) and LV nonsevere SeD (LVEF 31% to 50%) at baseline. All continuous variables are expressed as median and interquartile range. LVEF was 18% (13 to 25) and 38% (34 to 41) in the SeD (n = 29) and LV nonsevere SeD (n = 21) groups, respectively. At baseline, patients with SeD had higher LV end-diastolic diameter (56 [54 to 59] vs 49 mm [47 to 52], p <0.01), LV end-systolic diameter (48 [43 to 51] vs 36 mm [34 to 41], p <0.01), LV end-diastolic volume (71 [64 to 85] vs 56 ml/m2 [46 to 68], p <0.01), LV end-systolic volume (56 [53 to 70] vs 36 ml/m2 [27 to 42], p <0.01), and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (12 [10 to 13] vs 16 mm [13 to 19], p <0.01). At last follow-up, LVEF was not statistically significantly different between groups. However, LV end-systolic diameter (36 [34 to 39] vs 32 mm [32 to 34], p = 0.01) and LV end-systolic volume (29 [26 to 35] vs 25 ml/m2 [20 to 29], p = 0.02) remained larger in the SeD group. Seven patients (14%), all from the SeD group, had a LVEF ≤35% 2 months after rhythm control, and reverse remodeling was observed up to 9 months. In conclusion, more than half of patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy and atrial flutter had LVEF ≤30% at baseline. LVEF recovery and LV remodeling were observed beyond 2 months, highlighting the importance of rhythm control and early guideline-directed medical therapy in these patients.

Concomitant symptomatic cardiac sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis with cardiac involvement: a case report.

Sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis are two inflammatory multisystemic disorders of unknown etiology that may be life-threatening especially when there is cardiac involvement. Both diseases may coexist, however, there are very few case reports of patients with both cardiac sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis in the literature. We report the case of a 72-year-old female who was initially referred for dyspnea. A chest computed tomography scan showed multiple hilar and mediastinal adenopathy with a non-specific opacity in the middle pulmonary lobe. FDG-PET-scan showed increased FDG uptake in the adenopathy, the middle lobe and the right ventricular free wall. Sarcoidosis was confirmed with a lung biopsy. Both electrocardiogram and echocardiogram were normal. Four months later, the patient developed a high-grade atrioventricular block deemed secondary to her cardiac sarcoidosis. Two years later, the patient was referred to a rheumatologist for severe Raynaud's symptoms, sclerodactyly and acrocyanosis. After thorough investigations, a diagnosis of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis with systemic and cardiac sarcoidosis was made. This case demonstrates that both cardiac sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis may coexist. In the literature, either disease may come first. In cases where cardiac symptoms appear after the diagnosis of concomitant sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis, it might be difficult for clinicians to confirm which disease is responsible for the heart involvement. This is important since early cardiac sarcoidosis treatment should be done to prevent major complications and may well differ from systemic sclerosis treatment. In this review, we discuss the main clinical manifestations and imaging findings seen with cardiac disease secondary to sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis.

Ten Questions Cardiologists Should Be Able to Answer About Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Case-Based Approach and Contemporary Review.

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory multisystemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Cardiac sarcoidosis might be life-threatening and its diagnosis and treatment remain a challenge nowadays. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of cardiac sarcoidosis and, through 10 practical clinical questions and real-life challenging case scenarios, summarize the main clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, imaging findings, and contemporary treatment.

La sarcoïdose est une maladie inflammatoire multisystémique de cause inconnue, caractérisée par la formation de granulomes non caséeux composés de cellules épithélioïdes. La sarcoïdose cardiaque est une pathologie potentiellement mortelle qui demeure, à ce jour, difficile à diagnostiquer et à traiter. L'objectif de cet article est de présenter les données les plus à jour concernant la sarcoïdose cardiaque et de résumer, à l'aide de 10 questions cliniques et de cas réels, la présentation clinique, les critères diagnostiques, les trouvailles à l'imagerie et le traitement contemporain.