Differences in kinematic parameters and plantarflexor reflex responses between manual (Ashworth) and isokinetic mobilisations in spasticity assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was first to compare the kinematic parameters of imposed ankle mobilizations measured during Ashworth or isokinetic tests and, second, to better understand why the stretch reflex was more or less easily elicited by one method or the other. METHODS: Passive dorsiflexions were applied on eight adult patients with plantarflexor spasticity in two conditions: (i) manually, using the Ashworth test where passive dorsiflexions were performed freely by seven rehabilitation clinicians, and (ii) instrumentally, using an isokinetic device (Cybex Norm) and a dorsiflexion velocity at 300 degrees /s. Mean values of initial ankle position, maximal angular velocity (theta;'(max)), maximal angular acceleration (theta;''(max)) and plantarflexor reflex responses obtained with each method were compared. RESULTS: During the Ashworth test, all the patients presented reflex activities in the triceps surae while, during the isokinetic mobilization, only three out of the eight patients tested shown reflex responses. theta;'(max) values were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the manual test (308+/-80 degrees /s vs 216+/-5.5 degrees /s for the isokinetic test). The most marked difference concerned the theta;''(max) values (5046+/-2181 degrees /s(2) for the Ashworth test vs 819+/-18 degrees /s(2) for the isokinetic test, P<0.001). This parameter was significantly correlated with the mean rms-EMG values of the gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and the soleus (SOL). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that passive dorsiflexions imposed during Ashworth and isokinetic tests largely differ in velocity and acceleration, and the higher dynamic parameters evaluated during the Ashworth test could mainly explain that the stretch reflex was more easily elicited during this manual testing. SIGNIFICANCE: If isokinetic devices offer numerous advantages in the assessment of passive resistance to spastic muscle stretch, they cannot be used to simulate the manual test.

Quantitative assessment of the velocity-dependent increase in resistance to passive stretch in spastic plantarflexors.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies revealed that isokinetic dynamometers were valuable tools for assessing spastic hypertonia, no standard methodology using such devices is currently widespread in clinical setting. The aim of this study was to standardize a protocol to assess spastic hypertonia in the triceps surae. METHODS: The passive resistance during dorsiflexions imposed from 10 to 300 degrees /s with an isokinetic dynamometer was measured at the neutral position in 15 patients with spastic hypertonia and 12 healthy subjects. The normalized passive resistance was obtained by expressing raw passive resistance as a percent of the values measured at the lowest velocity (10 degrees /s). EMG signals from plantar and dorsiflexors were also recorded. FINDINGS: While no significant difference between spastic patients and control subjects was observed in raw passive resistance values, the difference was significant for each tested velocity when considering the normalized values. Furthermore, the Ashworth score was significantly correlated with the normalized passive resistance for each velocity whereas no correlation was observed with the raw passive resistance. For the patients, except at the highest velocity, the normalized passive resistance was not affected by the fact that reflex responses in the triceps surae were elicited or not. INTERPRETATION: The normalized passive resistance, expressed with respect to the initial one, i.e., measured at very low velocity, seems a very effective parameter to quantify the velocity-dependent increase in resistance to passive stretch in spastic plantarflexors. However, while the simplicity of the isokinetic tests and the reduced time of data treatment seems to support the clinical use of this methodology, further investigations are required to definitely standardize the protocol.