Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 173: 81-87, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37105061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for adjuvant treatment of stage III endometrial cancer includes chemotherapy and radiation. In addition to stage, tumor molecular profiles may predict treatment outcomes, and prospective clinical trials are ongoing. However, tumor molecular testing is costly and time-consuming. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tumor molecular testing in stage III endometrial cancer. METHODS: A Markov decision model compared two strategies for stage III endometrial cancer: Tumor Molecular Testing (TMT) versus No TMT. TMT included sequential POLE next generation sequencing, mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (IHC), and p53 IHC. POLE-mutated patients were assigned to adjuvant radiation therapy; all others including controls were assigned to adjuvant chemoradiation. First recurrences were treated with 6 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Second recurrences were treated with pembrolizumab alone for mismatch repair deficient patients and both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for other patients. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness. RESULTS: Compared to No TMT, TMT was cost saving with equivalent effectiveness. On one-way sensitivity analysis, TMT remained cost saving over all parameter ranges. TMT was also favored on probabilistic sensitivity analysis in 80% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. However, when TMT was compared to mismatch repair IHC alone, TMT cost $182,798/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of patients with stage III endometrial cancer, TMT was cost saving compared to No TMT. However, when compared to mismatch repair IHC alone, TMT was economically unfavorable.


Asunto(s)
Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Neoplasias Endometriales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Carboplatino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(1): 136-145, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954540

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate survival disparities and prognostic factors in vulvar cancer by age at diagnosis. METHODS: Women who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with stage I-IV vulvar cancer from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database were eligible. Proportions were compared using Chi-Square test. Survival was evaluated using Cox analysis. RESULTS: There were 18,207 eligible women. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years, and 31% diagnosed ≥75 years old were categorized as elderly. Most vulvar cancers were diagnosed at stage I and with squamous histology. Diagnosis with higher stage or non-squamous histology was more common in elderly vs. non-elderly patients (P < 0.001). Survival was 3.5 times worse in the elderly than the non-elderly (P < 0.0001). Risk of death for each 5-year increment in age increased by 22% for non-elderly and 43% for elderly patients (P < 0.0001). The prognostic value of comorbidity score, stage, regional node assessment and histology was smaller in elderly vs. non-elderly women (each P < 0.05). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) use in the elderly vs. non-elderly was rare for stage I-II disease (3% vs. 2%) and more common for stage III-IV disease (6% vs. 43%), respectively (P < 0.0001). The survival disadvantage for elderly patients persisted following no adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, or CTRT (P < 0.0001). In stage III-IV disease, survival was superior following CTRT vs. radiotherapy when diagnosed <75 years (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69-0.93) but not in the elderly (HR = 0.99, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Age-associated risk of death increased at different rates in vulvar cancer and was larger in elderly vs. non-elderly patients. The impact of other prognostic factors was smaller in elderly vs. non-elderly women. The survival benefit of CTRT over radiotherapy in stage III-IV did not extend to the elderly.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vulva/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patología , Neoplasias de la Vulva/terapia , Adulto Joven
3.
Cancer Causes Control ; 30(10): 1087-1100, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31435875

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study examined targeted genomic variants of transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling in Appalachian women. Appalachian women with cervical cancer were compared to healthy Appalachian counterparts to determine whether these polymorphic alleles were over-represented within this high-risk cancer population, and whether lifestyle or environmental factors modified the aggregate genetic risk in these Appalachian women. METHODS: Appalachian women's survey data and blood samples from the Community Awareness, Resources, and Education (CARE) CARE I and CARE II studies (n = 163 invasive cervical cancer cases, 842 controls) were used to assess gene-environment interactions and cancer risk. Polymorphic allele frequencies and socio-behavioral demographic measurements were compared using t tests and χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate interaction effects between genomic variance and demographic, behavioral, and environmental characteristics. RESULTS: Several alleles demonstrated significant interaction with smoking (TP53 rs1042522, TGFB1 rs1800469), alcohol consumption (NQO1 rs1800566), and sexual intercourse before the age of 18 (TGFBR1 rs11466445, TGFBR1 rs7034462, TGFBR1 rs11568785). Interestingly, we noted a significant interaction between "Appalachian self-identity" variables and NQO1 rs1800566. Multivariable logistic regression of cancer status in an over-dominant TGFB1 rs1800469/TGFBR1 rs11568785 model demonstrated a 3.03-fold reduction in cervical cancer odds. Similar decreased odds (2.78-fold) were observed in an over-dominant TGFB1 rs1800469/TGFBR1 rs7034462 model in subjects who had no sexual intercourse before age 18. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports novel associations between common low-penetrance alleles in the TGFB signaling cascade and modified risk of cervical cancer in Appalachian women. Furthermore, our unexpected findings associating Appalachian identity and NQO1 rs1800566 suggests that the complex environmental exposures that contribute to Appalachian self-identity in Appalachian cervical cancer patients represent an emerging avenue of scientific exploration.


Asunto(s)
Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta1/genética , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Alelos , Femenino , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , NAD(P)H Deshidrogenasa (Quinona)/genética , Ohio/epidemiología , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Transducción de Señal , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , West Virginia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 26(4): 626-31, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27051048

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Only 3% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have a longer treatment-free interval (TFI) after second-line intravenous (IV) platinum chemotherapy than with frontline IV therapy. We sought to examine what impact second-line combination IV/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) platinum therapy might have on the ratio of second-line to first-line TFI in patients treated with second-line IP platinum chemotherapy for first recurrence after front-line IV therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of women who received combination platinum-based IV/IP chemotherapy for recurrent EOC between January 2005 and March 2011 was conducted. Patients were identified from the tumor registry, and office records from a large gynecologic oncology practice and patient records were reviewed. The first and second TFIs were defined as the time from the end of previous platinum-based therapy to the start of next therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-five women received IV/IP chemotherapy for their first EOC recurrence after IV chemotherapy. In 10 patients (40%), we observed a longer TFI after IV/IP chemotherapy than after primary IV chemotherapy. For these 10 patients, the median TFI for primary response was 22 months (range, 15-28), whereas median TFI after IV/IP chemotherapy for recurrent disease was 37 months (range, 12-61). CONCLUSIONS: For EOC patients with limited peritoneal recurrence, 40% of patients had a second-line IP-platinum TFI that exceeded their frontline IV-platinum TFI compared to published data. These data support the use of IV/IP chemotherapy as a treatment for recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/mortalidad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 212(6): 763.e1-8, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25644442

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Treatment for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) includes primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A randomized controlled trial comparing these treatments resulted in comparable overall survival (OS). Studies report more complications and lower chemotherapy completion rates in patients 65 years old or older receiving PDS. We sought to evaluate the cost implications of NACT relative to PDS in AEOC patients 65 years old or older. STUDY DESIGN: A 5 year Markov model was created. Arm 1 modeled PDS followed by 6 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT). Arm 2 modeled 3 cycles of CT, followed by interval debulking surgery and then 3 additional cycles of CT. Parameters included OS, surgical complications, probability of treatment initiation, treatment cost, and quality of life (QOL). OS was assumed to be equal based on the findings of the international randomized control trial. Differences in surgical complexity were accounted for in base surgical cost plus add-on procedure costs weighted by occurrence rates. Hospital cost was a weighted average of diagnosis-related group costs weighted by composite estimates of complication rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Assuming equal survival, NACT produces a cost savings of $5616. If PDS improved median OS by 1.5 months or longer, PDS would be cost effective (CE) at a $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold. If PDS improved OS by 3.2 months or longer, it would be CE at a $50,000 threshold. The model was robust to variation in costs and complication rates. Moderate decreases in the QOL with NACT would result in PDS being CE. CONCLUSION: A model based on the RCT comparing NACT and PDS showed NACT is a cost-saving treatment compared with PDS for AEOC in patients 65 years old or older. Small increases in OS with PDS or moderate declines in QOL with NACT would result in PDS being CE at the $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold. Our results support further evaluation of the effects of PDS on OS, QOL and complications in AEOC patients 65 years old or older.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/economía , Terapia Neoadyuvante/economía , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/economía , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología
6.
Gynecol Oncol ; 129(3): 574-9, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23500086

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Radiation can be delivered via four-field box (BOX-RT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (C/E) of IMRT relative to BOX-RT for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: A three-year Markov model with eight-week cycles was developed to compare IMRT to BOX-RT. A proportion (25%) received extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT) to include para-aortic nodes. The model assumed equal overall survival (OS). The model captured costs and utility estimates for BOX-RT, IMRT, and each complication. Modeled complications included acute and chronic toxicities. Baseline model assumptions were obtained by literature review and supplemented by expert opinion. Costs were based on Medicare reimbursement rates and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Database. Treatment strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way, probabilistic and structural sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty in assumptions. The C/E of each strategy was evaluated from the perspective of the health care system. RESULTS: C/E analysis revealed an ICER for IMRT of $182,777/quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Although this value was higher than the willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, sensitivity analysis revealed several modifications that would make IMRT a C/E option relative to BOX-RT. For patients requiring EFRT, IMRT was C/E with an ICER of $91,580/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Although IMRT was not C/E at the $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold, in those requiring EFRT, IMRT was C/E relative to BOX-RT. A randomized trial comparing IMRT to BOX-RT for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/economía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/economía , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estados Unidos
7.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 47(7): 835-843, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226842

RESUMEN

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common extraintestinal cancer in Lynch syndrome (LS). Recent studies have demonstrated mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency can be detected in benign endometrial glands in LS. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry in benign endometrium from endometrial biopsies and curettings (EMCs) from a study group of 34 confirmed LS patients and a control group of 38 patients without LS who subsequently developed sporadic MLH1-deficient or MMR-proficient endometrial carcinoma. MMR-deficient benign glands were only identified in patients with LS (19/34, 56%) and were not identified in any control group patient (0/38, 0%) ( P < 0.001). MMR-deficient benign glands were identified as large, contiguous groups in 18 of 19 cases (95%). MMR-deficient benign glands were identified in patients with germline pathogenic variants in MLH1 (6/8, 75%), MSH6 (7/10, 70%), and MSH2 (6/11, 55%) but not in patients with variants in PMS2 (0/4). MMR-deficient benign glands were seen in all EMC samples (100%) but in only 46% of endometrial biopsy samples ( P =0.02). Patients with MMR-deficient benign glands were significantly more likely to have endometrial carcinoma (53%) compared with LS patients with only MMR-proficient glands (13%) ( P =0.03). In conclusion, we demonstrated that MMR-deficient benign endometrial glands are frequently identified in EMB/EMC in women with LS and are a specific marker for LS. Women with LS with MMR-deficient benign glands were more likely to have endometrial carcinoma suggesting that MMR-deficient benign glands may be a biomarker of increased risk of endometrial carcinoma development in LS.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis , Neoplasias Endometriales , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/patología , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL/genética , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL/metabolismo , Endonucleasa PMS2 de Reparación del Emparejamiento Incorrecto/genética , Endonucleasa PMS2 de Reparación del Emparejamiento Incorrecto/metabolismo , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Endometrio/patología , Biopsia , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites
8.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 22(2): 232-7, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080886

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Three large randomized clinical trials have shown a survival benefit for patients treated with intraperitoneal (IP) compared with intravenous chemotherapy for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, the use of IP chemotherapy in recurrent EOC is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, completion rates, and frequency of complications in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC treated with IP chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis of women who received IP chemotherapy for recurrent EOC from January 2003 to April 2010 was conducted. Study patients were identified from the Tumor Registry and office records. Demographic factors, stage, histology, surgical findings, cytoreduction status, and subsequent therapies were abstracted. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Fifty-six women who received IP chemotherapy for their first EOC recurrence were identified. The mean age of patients was 56.7 years (range, 40-79 y). Fifty-five patients (98.3%) had previously completed at least 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Of all patients, 87.5% were initially diagnosed with advanced stage disease (stage IIA-IV). All patients underwent secondary cytoreduction at the time of IP port placement. Moreover, 67.9% of patients were considered optimally cytoreduced (<1 cm residual disease) at the end of the secondary debulking surgery. Forty-two patients (75%) were able to successfully complete at least 6 cycles of IP chemotherapy. Reasons for noncompletion were disease progression, allergic reaction, renal failure, pain, severe nausea and vomiting, death, and patient refusal. Six patients (10.7%) developed port complications including pain around port site, port malfunction, and port erosion into small bowel. Median PFS since the initiation of IP chemotherapy was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval, 7.5-16.4 months) and median OS was 51 months (95% confidence interval, 40.8-61.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a feasible option for patients with recurrent EOC, with high completion rates, low frequency of complications, and acceptable PFS and OS.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Papilar/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma Papilar/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma Papilar/patología , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel , Pennsylvania , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 122(3): 473-8, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21665250

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Randomized trials have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) with consolidation paclitaxel (P) and bevacizumab (B) following cytoreduction and adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (C/E) of these consolidation strategies. METHODS: A decision model was developed based on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols #178 and #218. Arm 1 is 6 cycles of CP. Arm 2 is 6 cycles of CP followed by 12 cycles of P (CP+P). Arm 3 is 1 cycle of CP, 5 cycles of CPB, and 16 cycles of B (CPB+B). Parameters include PFS, overall survival (OS), cost, complications (neuropathy for P and bowel perforation for B), and quality-of-life utility values. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for CT+T is $13,402/quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared to CP. For CPB+B compared to CP, the ICER is $326,530/QALY. When compared simultaneously, CPB+B is dominated, i.e. is more costly and less effective than CP+P. Results were robust to parameter variation. At a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, CP+P was the preferred option throughout most of the decision space. Sensitivity analyses suggest that CPB+B would become the preferred option if it were to improve OS by 6.1 years over CP+P. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, B consolidation for advanced EOC was associated with a modest improvement in effectiveness that is less than that with P consolidation and more costly. A statistically significant improvement in survival may improve the value of B consolidation.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Paclitaxel/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Terapia Combinada , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos
10.
Brachytherapy ; 20(3): 512-518, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33384254

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of air gaps at the cylinder surface on the rate of vaginal cuff failure (VCF) after image-guided adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCBT) in the treatment of high-intermediate risk (HIR) FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics)) Stage I endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of patients treated with image-guided VCBT from 2009 to 2016 for HIR FIGO Stage I endometrial cancer was performed. Air gaps present at the applicator surface on the first postinsertion CT were contoured. Vaginal cuff failure-free survival (VCFFS) was measured from the first fraction of VCBT to VCF. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were identified. Air gaps were present on the first postinsertion CT scan in 82% of patients. The median number of air gaps was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3), median depth of the largest air gap was 2.7 mm (IQR 2.1-3.4 mm), and the median cumulative volume of air gaps was less than 0.1 cm3 (range < 0.1-0.7 cm3). At a median followup of 56 months (IQR 41-69), 12 patients (5%) experienced VCF, of which 4 had isolated VCF and 8 had synchronous pelvic or distant failure. Five-year VCFFS and isolated VCFFS were 96% (95% confidence interval 93-98%) and 98% (95% confidence interval 96-100%), respectively. On univariate analysis, no factors, including the presence, number, maximum depth, or cumulative volume of air gaps, were predictive for VCFFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, VCFFS remained high despite most patients having air gaps present on postinsertion CT scan.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias Endometriales , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/radioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 116(3): 345-50, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19959211

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Combination intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy has been shown in three randomized trials to be superior to IV therapy alone in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with respect to overall survival (OS). We sought to evaluate the effect of dose modification of IP therapy on completion rates. METHODS: From November 1999 until August 2008, all optimally debulked, advanced stage ovarian cancer patients who received adjuvant IP chemotherapy at a single institution were reviewed. The primary endpoint was completion of 6 cycles of IP chemotherapy. This rate was compared to published results from GOG 172. A secondary analysis evaluated completion of chemotherapy based on IP catheter type. Statistical analysis was performed with a chi square test with a significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients received IP chemotherapy during this period. Seventy-five patients received the modified IV/IP chemotherapy regimen. Sixty-two patients (83%) completed all 6 cycles in our cohort compared to 119 patients (42%) reported in GOG 172 (p=0.0001). Fifty-five patients had a fenestrated catheter (F) and 48 had a non-fenestrated (NF) catheter. Eight patients in each cohort discontinued treatment, for a completion rate of 85.5% in NF and 82.3% in F (p=0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The dose modifications utilized in this study allowed for completion of 6 cycles of adjuvant IP chemotherapy in 83% of patients. Choice of catheter type did not affect completion rates. Continued monitoring of outcomes is planned to compare PFS and OS. The high completion rate may increase acceptance of IP chemotherapy in the community setting.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/administración & dosificación
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 203(2): 113.e1-6, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20522409

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify the prognostic indicators associated with postpartum regression of cervical dysplasia diagnosed in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women referred for colposcopy from 2004-2007 at four academic centers. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-nine patients were identified. Colposcopic impression by cervical cytology is detailed later in the text. Of patients who underwent biopsy, results correlated with or were less severe than colposcopic impression in 83% with CIN 1 and 56% with CIN 2/3. Fifty-seven percent had follow-up postpartum, with 61% reverting to normal. Resolution of cervical dysplasia was inversely associated with smoking (P = .002). No progression to cancer occurred during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Colposcopic impression in pregnancy correlated with cervical biopsy results and postpartum colposcopic findings when performed by expert colposcopists. A high proportion of cervical dysplasia regressed postpartum. Cervical biopsies in pregnancy may not be necessary unless invasive cancer is suspected.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/epidemiología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patología , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Biopsia con Aguja , Estudios de Cohortes , Colposcopía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Incidencia , Análisis Multivariante , Lesiones Precancerosas/epidemiología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/patología , Atención Prenatal , Probabilidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Frotis Vaginal , Adulto Joven
13.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 20(6): 932-5, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20683398

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The intraperitoneal (IP) catheter has the potential to cause peritoneal irritation, which may contribute to an elevated CA125 level. We hypothesize that patients undergoing IP chemotherapy may have elevated CA125 values when compared with patients receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. METHODS: From February 2006 to July 2007, optimally debulked patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian carcinoma from a single institution were offered an outpatient IV/IP chemotherapy regimen modified from Gynecologic Oncology Group 172. They were matched to a cohort of similar patients who received IV paclitaxel and carboplatin. Demographic data and CA125 levels were collected before each cycle of chemotherapy and after the removal of the IP catheter. Statistical analysis was completed using a chi2 test with a significance level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Fifty patients received the standard IV regimen, and 38 patients completed the modified IV/IP regimen. There was no statistical difference in the median CA125 values between the 2 groups during the treatment. After 6 cycles of therapy, 68.4% (26/38) of the IP cohort had a normal CA125 level before IP catheter removal compared with 78% (39/50) in the IV chemotherapy cohort (P = 0.44). After removal of the IP catheter, 86.8% (33/38) of the patients had a normal CA125 value (68.4% vs 86.8%, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: After removal of the IP catheter, an additional 18.2% (7/38) of patients in the IP group had normalized their CA125 level. Because CA125 levels at the end of the treatment have prognostic significance, the role of the IP catheter in an elevated CA125 level must be considered.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígeno Ca-125/análisis , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Remoción de Dispositivos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 35(4): 645-58; x, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19061823

RESUMEN

Cervical cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed during pregnancy. Nearly 3% of cases of newly diagnosed cervical cancer occur in pregnant women, probably because it is one of the few cancers for which screening is part of routine prenatal care. The prevalence of abnormal Pap test results in pregnancy does not differ from the age-matched nonpregnant population. In some populations, up to 20% of pregnant women have an abnormal Pap result during pregnancy. This article reviews the literature regarding diagnosis and management of cervical dysplasia and cancer in pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Colposcopía , Conización , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología
15.
Cell Cycle ; 14(12): 1884-92, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25927284

RESUMEN

Functional loss of expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1(BRCA1) has been implicated in genomic instability and cancer progression. There is emerging evidence that BRCA1 gene product (BRCA1) also plays a role in cancer cell migration. We performed a quantitative proteomics study of EOC patient tumor tissues and identified changes in expression of several key regulators of actin cytoskeleton/cell adhesion and cell migration (CAPN1, 14-3-3, CAPG, PFN1, SPTBN1, CFN1) associated with loss of BRCA1 function. Gene expression analyses demonstrate that several of these proteomic hits are differentially expressed between early and advanced stage EOC thus suggesting clinical relevance of these proteins to disease progression. By immunohistochemistry of ovarian tumors with BRCA1(+/+) and BRCA1(null) status, we further verified our proteomic-based finding of elevated PFN1 expression associated with BRCA1 deficiency. Finally, we established a causal link between PFN1 and BRCA1-induced changes in cell migration thus uncovering a novel mechanistic basis for BRCA1-dependent regulation of ovarian cancer cell migration. Overall, findings of this study open up multiple avenues by which BRCA1 can potentially regulate migration and metastatic phenotype of EOC cells.


Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Proteínas 14-3-3/metabolismo , Citoesqueleto de Actina/metabolismo , Calpaína/metabolismo , Adhesión Celular , Movimiento Celular , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Proteínas de Microfilamentos/metabolismo , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Profilinas/metabolismo , Proteína Fosfatasa 2/metabolismo , Proteómica , Espectrina/metabolismo
16.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 90(5): 1083-90, 2014 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25216857

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To utilize the National Cancer Data Base to evaluate trends in brachytherapy and alternative radiation therapy utilization in the treatment of cervical cancer, to identify associations with outcomes between the various radiation therapy modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer in the National Cancer Data Base who received treatment from January 2004 to December 2011 were analyzed. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with type of boost radiation modality used and its impact on survival. RESULTS: A total of 7654 patients had information regarding boost modality. A predominant proportion of patients were Caucasian (76.2%), had stage IIIB (48.9%) disease with squamous (82.0%) histology, were treated at academic/research centers (47.7%) in the South (34.8%), and lived 0 to 5 miles (27.9%) from the treating facility. A majority received brachytherapy (90.3%). From 2004 to 2011, brachytherapy use decreased from 96.7% to 86.1%, whereas intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use increased from 3.3% to 13.9% in the same period (P<.01). Factors associated with decreased brachytherapy utilization included older age, stage IVA disease, smaller tumor size, later year of diagnosis, lower-volume treatment centers, and facility type. After controlling for significant factors from survival analyses, IMRT or SBRT boost resulted in inferior overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.55; P<.01) as compared with brachytherapy. In fact, the survival detriment associated with IMRT or SBRT boost was stronger than that associated with excluding chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.61' 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.04' P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation brachytherapy is a critical treatment component for locally advanced cervical cancer; however, there has been declining utilization of brachytherapy. Increased use of IMRT and SBRT boost coupled with increased mortality risk should raise concerns about utilizing these approaches over brachytherapy.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiocirugia/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Braquiterapia/mortalidad , Braquiterapia/tendencias , Instituciones Oncológicas/provisión & distribución , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Raciales/clasificación , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiocirugia/mortalidad , Radiocirugia/tendencias , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/mortalidad , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología
17.
Onco Targets Ther ; 7: 469-76, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24711703

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab (Bev) is associated with improved progression-free survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The use of Bev in patients with gynecologic malignancy is increasing; however, little is known about cumulative toxicity and response in patients retreated with Bev. Our goal was to determine cumulative side effects and response in patients retreated with Bev. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with recurrent gynecologic malignancy treated with Bev between January 2007 and March 2012 at a single institution were identified, including a subset who received Bev in a subsequent regimen. The primary outcome was Bev-associated toxicity, and the secondary outcome was response. RESULTS: Of 83 patients that received Bev for recurrent disease, 23 were retreated with Bev and four received Bev maintenance. Three patients (13%) developed grade 3 or 4 hypertension; all had a history of chronic hypertension. One (4.3%) patient developed grade 3 proteinuria, and one (4.3%) developed an enterovaginal fistula. Four patients discontinued Bev secondary to toxicity. Toxicity was not related to the cumulative number of cycles. Twenty-six percent of patients responded to Bev retreatment. On univariate analysis, there was a significant (P=0.003) overall survival advantage when the Bev-free interval was >9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-43.7) compared to ≤9 months (95% CI 2.1-11.5), 24.3 months, and 6.8 months. CONCLUSION: Retreatment of patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancy with Bev did not increase morbidity and was associated with treatment response. Physicians treating women with recurrent disease may consider a Bev-containing regimen even if prior regimen(s) included Bev. Future studies should prospectively evaluate the efficacy of this treatment strategy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA