Levosimendan as an Antidote in Experimental Calcium Channel Blocker Intoxication.

ABSTRACT: The effects of the calcium sensitizer levosimendan on hemodynamics and survival in guinea pigs intoxicated with the calcium blockers verapamil or diltiazem were evaluated in a randomized controlled study. One hundred four animals were randomized to be intoxicated with either verapamil (2.0 mg/kg) or diltiazem (4.5 mg/kg) and thereafter further randomized into 6 groups which received either saline (control), 3 different regimes of levosimendan, calcium chloride, and levosimendan combined with calcium chloride. The hemodynamics and survival of the animals were followed for 60 minutes after intoxication.The negative inotropic effect of calcium blockers was seen as a decrease by over 70% of the positive derivative of the left ventricular pressure. This was reversed by levosimendan. Moreover, both verapamil and diltiazem-induced marked hypotension (-69% and -63% of the baseline value, respectively) which was also reversed by levosimendan. The combined levosimendan and calcium chloride treatment had a synergistic effect in reversing verapamil or diltiazem-induced deterioration in hemodynamics.Both verapamil and diltiazem intoxications decreased the survival rate of guinea pigs to 13%. Levosimendan addition improved survival dose-dependently up to a survival rate of 75% and 88% in the verapamil and diltiazem groups, respectively. Low dose of levosimendan combined with calcium chloride improved survival in verapamil and diltiazem group to 88% and 100%, respectively.In conclusion, the administration of levosimendan improved hemodynamics and survival in calcium channel blocker intoxicated guinea pigs. The synergistic effect of levosimendan and calcium chloride suggests that this combination could be an effective antidote in calcium channel blocker intoxications.

An experimental study of consecutive administration of ropinirole and apomorphine for emesis induction in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and effectiveness of consecutively administered ropinirole and apomorphine (both dopamine 2-like receptor agonists) for emesis induction in dogs. DESIGN: Prospective, crossover study design. SETTING: Institutional animal research facility. ANIMALS: Six healthy male purpose-bred Beagle dogs. INTERVENTIONS: Each dog received 4 treatments: (1) apomorphine infusion (21 µg/kg) over 30 minutes + ropinirole eye drops (3.75 mg/m2 ); (2) ropinirole infusion (108 µg/m2 ) over 30 minutes + apomorphine SC (100 µg/kg); (3) apomorphine SC (100 µg/kg) + ropinirole eye drops (7.5 mg/m2 ) after 30 minutes; and (4) ropinirole eye drops (7.5 mg/m2 ) + apomorphine SC (100 µg/kg) after 30 minutes. Infusions were administered via a catheter instrumented in the cephalic vein. Eye drops and SC injections were administered as described in the product inserts. Blood samples were taken for ropinirole and apomorphine concentration analysis before dosing and periodically following administrations. The washout period between the treatments was 5-7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Number of vomits and clinical signs were recorded. Alertness and heart rate were monitored in conjunction with blood sampling. The average number of vomits varied between 4.3 and 8.8 (range 1-16) following treatments. Signs of nausea, vomiting, and lethargy were seen in all individuals without significant differences between treatments. Moderate to marked, transient increase in heart rates was detected in all treatments. Infrequent noted side effects included ocular hyperemia, blepharospasms, and muscle tremors. Prior treatment with apomorphine significantly decreased the absorption of ropinirole eye drops. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profiles of this experimental study support that ropinirole and apomorphine could be administered consecutively in cases where the treatment using 1 substance has resulted in an incomplete evacuation of the stomach contents, and the attending veterinarian considers the use of a different agent to have benefits that outweigh the risks.