Follow-up of penicillin allergy labels 1 year after successful penicillin delabeling.

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy delabeling confers many benefits, including reduced patient morbidity and mortality and improved health economics. Reports suggest that both patients and clinicians often remain hesitant to take and prescribe penicillins, respectively, after penicillin delabeling. However, follow-up of an individual's penicillin allergy label and incorporation of this into relevant health care records after delabeling have not been well studied in the Australian population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the status of penicillin allergy labels in the community 1 year after penicillin delabeling at a tertiary hospital in Australia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using follow-up interviews with patients and community primary care providers after 1 year from the date of patients' penicillin delabeling at a tertiary hospital in New South Wales, Australia. The main outcome measures that were evaluated included patient willingness to accept penicillin for future infections, patient self-reported receipt of penicillin-based antibiotics after delabeling, accuracy of penicillin allergy labels in the records of the primary care provider, and prescription of penicillin-based antibiotics by the general practitioner. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were included in this study. The percentage of patients with a correct penicillin allergy status at 1-year follow-up was 94% in the hospital electronic medical record but only 37% in primary care records. At 1-year follow-up, 14% of delabeled patients continued to reject penicillin prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Better strategies are required to increase patient confidence in receiving penicillins after penicillin delabeling and to ensure that penicillin allergy labels are translated into the medical records at the primary care level.

A retrospective review of immunology patients with primary and/or secondary immunodeficiency, demonstrating the benefits of the rapid transitioning from intravenous immunoglobulin to subcutaneous immunoglobulin at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Forty-four of 50 immunology patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency receiving intravenous immunoglobulin at a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, were rapidly enrolled in the subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) programme at the onset of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Health and economic outcomes demonstrated that SCIg provides clinical efficacy as evidenced by the number of infections and maintenance of IgG levels, and also facilitates cost reduction in immunoglobulin maintenance programmes.

Oral food challenge outcomes in children and adolescents in a tertiary centre: A 5-year experience.

AIM: Oral food challenges (OFC) are an important tool in the assessment of food allergy. We sought to identify factors available at initial assessment visit which were associated with successful outcome or challenge failure in Australian children. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all paediatric patients who underwent OFC in our allergy service over a 5-year period. Clinical data comprising patient demographics, co-morbidities, skin prick test (SPT) results, nature of previous reactions, elapsed time since previous reactions and outcome at OFC were recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-six OFCs were conducted, with 56 cases (12.3%) resulting in a reaction. Likelihood of reaction at OFC was significantly increased for patients with atopic dermatitis (odds ratio 1.99). When stratified by food substance, atopic dermatitis had the strongest association with reaction within the peanut group (odds ratio 3.2), and no association was demonstrated for soy or prawn. Increasing SPT wheal size (P < 0.001) and previous history of anaphylaxis to the challenge food (P < 0.001) correlated with failure at OFC. A low-risk group was identified, of patients with no clear history of prior reaction to the challenge food, and SPT result <3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Factors identified at assessment visit which correlated with reaction at OFC are atopic dermatitis, prior history of anaphylaxis, and increasing SPT wheal size. Domiciliary OFC could be considered in a select low-risk group of patients undergoing food challenge. This study was performed at a single centre with limited sample size, further large-scale and multicentre study verification of our data will provide more accurate representation of the Australian demographic.

The utility of surrogate markers in predicting HLA alleles associated with adverse drug reactions in Vietnamese.

BACKGROUND: Screening for HLA-A*31:01/HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*57:01 and HLA-B*58:01 is recommended in selected populations for prevention of carbamazepine, abacavir, and allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Compared to conventional methods for detection of HLA alleles, PCR using a tag single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) can be cost-effective, particularly where the surrogate marker SNP is in absolute linkage disequilibrium with the relevant HLA allele. OBJECTIVE: To determine guidelines for prevention of SCARs though predictive screening for the Australian Vietnamese population, the prevalence of four HLA alleles (HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*57:01 and HLA-B*58:01) was examined. The utility of surrogate markers, rs2395029 and rs9263726, was investigated to predict for the presence of HLA-B*57:01 and HLA-B*58:01, respectively. METHODS: Genotyping for specific HLA alleles was performed in 152 healthy Vietnamese living in Sydney using validated and established PCR-based methods. SNP genotyping was conducted using restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: rs2395029 and rs9263726 strongly correlated with HLA-B*57:01 (κ = 1, p < 0.001) and HLA-B*58:01 (Κ = 0.9, p < 0.001) with 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for predicting the HLA-B*57:01 and HLA-B*58:01 carriers, respectively. A high prevalence of carriers of HLA-A*31:01 (3.29%), HLA-B*15:02 (14.47%), HLA-B*57:01 (6.58%) and HLA-B*58:01 (9.21%) was revealed. Conclusions: Screening is recommended for these alleles in Australian Vietnamese prior to introducing relevant therapies. SNPs, rs2395029 and rs9263726, can be successfully used as surrogate markers for HLA-B*57:01 and HLA-B*58:01 in this population.

Single-step direct drug provocation testing is safe for delabelling selected non-low-risk penicillin allergy labels.

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy labels are prevalent, and removal of incorrect labels improves patient outcomes and health economics. Labels may be classified as "low-risk" or "non-low-risk," of which the symptoms of the latter chiefly suggest immunoglobulin E-mediated etiology. Traditionally, "non-low-risk" allergy labels are evaluated by penicillin skin testing followed by graded multistep penicillin drug provocation testing (DPT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of assessing "non-low-risk" labels with single-step direct DPT. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled inpatients and outpatients of a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, with penicillin allergy labels requiring penicillin for first-line treatment. Patients were classified as "low-risk" or "non-low-risk" based on the allergy labels. All patients proceeded directly to amoxicillin DPT, unless there was a history of anaphylaxis within 10 years of assessment to a beta-lactam (except for cefazolin) or Gell and Coombs type 2, type 3, or severe type 4 reaction. This was followed by a course of amoxicillin. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (41 inpatients, 108 outpatients) were enrolled. No patient was excluded from the study. No patient experienced life-threatening reactions to the protocol. There were 85 patients who reported "non-low-risk" allergy labels. One patient developed generalized pruritus and rash that resolved with standard-dose antihistamines, 2 developed delayed benign maculopapular exanthem, and 3 experienced diarrhea during the course of amoxicillin. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, direct single-step DPT was safe, with only 6 patients with "non-low-risk" allergy experiencing benign reactions. We hope that further studies can be performed into single-step direct DPT to evaluate "non-low-risk" penicillin allergy labels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: LNR/16/HAWKE/452.

Safety of direct drug provocation testing in adults with penicillin allergy and association with health and economic benefits.

BACKGROUND: Nonprescription of penicillin-containing antibiotics in patients diagnosed with penicillin allergy is associated with morbidity and mortality. Adverse reactions to penicillins comprise type A and B reactions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of penicillin allergy evaluation without penicillin skin testing (PST) for adult patients with type B reactions and the health and economic benefits of this process. METHODS: Inpatients at an Australian tertiary hospital between April 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, with a diagnosis of type B penicillin allergy, requiring a penicillin-containing antibiotic for treatment, were included. All patients underwent clinical history review, PST, and drug provocation testing (DPT). RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty-three reported a history of type B or unknown adverse reactions. No patients had a history of anaphylaxis requiring intubation or epinephrine within the last 10 years or a history suggesting Gell and Coombs type 2, 3, or 4 (severe) hypersensitivity reaction. Seven did not complete DPT because the treating team used a ß-lactam antibiotic other than amoxicillin. Fifty-four of 56 remaining patients (96%) completed 3-day DPT to amoxicillin with no adverse reaction. Two experienced mild cutaneous reactions. Penicillin allergy evaluation was significantly associated with reduced length of stay, reduced hospital expenditure on bed and second-line antibiotics, and reduced readmission rates. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy evaluation with DPT without PST may be feasible for all adult patients with a reported history of type B reactions to penicillins who do not have a history of anaphylaxis within the last 10 years or a type 2, 3, or 4 (severe) hypersensitivity reaction.

Integrating basophil activation tests into evaluation of perioperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) remain the leading cause of perioperative anaphylaxis in Australia. Standard evaluation comprises history, skin tests, and in vitro specific immunoglobulin E tests. Drug provocation tests to suspected NMBA culprits are associated with a significant risk. Basophil activation testing (BAT) is a potentially useful in vitro test that is not commercially available in Australia or as part of standard evaluation. METHODS: All patients attending the Anaesthetic Allergy Clinic in Sydney, Australia between May 2017 and July 2018 exposed to an NMBA before the onset of anaphylaxis during their anaesthetic qualified for the study. We recruited 120 patients sequentially who received standard evaluation plus BAT using CD63, CD203c, and CD300a as surface activation markers. RESULTS: BAT results were expressed as % upregulation above the negative control and stimulation index (mean fluorescence index of stimulated sample divided by the negative control). We calculated cut-offs of 4.45% and 1.44 for CD63, and 8.80% and 1.49 for CD203c, respectively. Sensitivity was 77% with specificity of 76%. A subgroup of 10 patients with NMBA anaphylaxis had no sensitisation on skin tests. BAT using CD63 and CD203c showed sensitisation in six of these 10, and adding CD300a identified sensitisation in nine patients. BAT was positive in seven of nine patients with anaphylaxis of unknown aetiology. CONCLUSIONS: BAT may be a useful supplement to the standard evaluation in diagnosing NMBA anaphylaxis in patients with suggestive histories, but no sensitisation on skin tests. Ongoing study of this specific group of patients is required to clarify its utility in clinical practice.

Assessing cross-reactivity to neuromuscular blocking agents by skin and basophil activation tests in patients with neuromuscular blocking agent anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Following diagnosis of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) anaphylaxis, identifying safe alternatives for subsequent anaesthesia is critical. A patient with anaphylaxis to one NMBA can also have an allergic reaction to other NMBAs (cross-reactivity). Whilst drug provocation testing is standard for identifying or excluding allergy, there is significant risk. In vitro, after an allergen activates basophils, basophils express surface activation markers that can be measured by basophil activation testing (BAT). We compared cross-reactivity between NMBAs assessed by BAT against that by skin testing. METHODS: All patients attending an anaesthetic allergy clinic in Sydney, Australia between May 2017 and July 2018 diagnosed with NMBA anaphylaxis qualified for this study comparing intradermal skin tests and BAT with a panel of NMBAs (rocuronium, vecuronium, pancuronium, suxamethonium, cisatracurium). RESULTS: Of the 61 patients participating, sensitisation on skin testing and on BAT completely matched in only nine patients (15%). Sensitisation was not in agreement for pancuronium, cisatracurium and rocuronium, but was in agreement for vecuronium and suxamethonium. Nine patients with negative skin tests subsequently tolerated cisatracurium, and one false positive on BAT to cisatracurium was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of BAT in identifying safe NMBAs for subsequent anaesthesia needs further evaluation. BAT detects a different cross-reactivity profile to skin tests. Negative skin testing and BAT might increase confidence in performing drug provocation testing, but this and follow-up of subsequent anaesthesia in our cohort is necessary to determine the clinical significance of BAT sensitisation.

Skin Testing and Basophil Activation Testing Is Useful for Assessing Immediate Reactions to Polyethylene Glycol-Containing Vaccines.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of immediate reactions to drugs or vaccines containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and PEG derivatives is not fully elucidated. It is considered in many instances to be IgE-mediated. Diagnosis and management of PEG allergy is topical, as BNT162b and mRNA-1273 contain PEG (2[PEG-2000]-N), and ChAdOx1-S and NVX-CoV2373 contain polysorbate 80. mRNA vaccines contain PEG 2000, which encapsulates the mRNA to impair its degradation. This PEG MW is specific to mRNA vaccines and is not used in other drugs and vaccines. PEG 2000 allergy is not well studied, as higher PEG molecular weights are implicated in most of the PEG allergy published in the literature. METHODS: We performed a literature review on PEG allergy and sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of our protocol for assessment of PEG 2000 and polysorbate 80 reactions in an outpatient clinic setting. All patients referred to our drug allergy service between 1 July 2021 and 31 December 2021 with suspected immediate allergy to PEG or its derivatives were eligible for the study. Skin testing (ST) and basophil activation testing (BAT) were performed for all patients to multiple PEG molecular weights (MWs). RESULTS: We reviewed twenty patients during the study period. Five patients were allergic. Fifteen patients had a masquerade of allergy and were enrolled as control patients. PEG 2000, polysorbate 80, BNT162b, and ChAdOx1-S had excellent performance characteristics on skin testing. BAT showed high specificity for all vaccines and PEG MWs. DISCUSSION: In our small study, we found ST and BAT to add useful information, particularly for PEG 2000 allergy. Further study of our protocol in larger patient cohorts will provide more information on its performance characteristics and usefulness.

Use of adrenaline to manage suspected anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination: An Australian retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The rate of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccinations is estimated to be 2-11 cases per million doses administered. However, adrenaline is occasionally used in individuals who are later diagnosed with immunisation stress-related responses, as their initial presenting signs and symptoms can appear similar to that of anaphylaxis. This study aims to describe the clinical profile of individuals who had received adrenaline following a COVID-19 vaccine and their subsequent revaccination outcomes. METHODS: We examined notifications of cases who had received adrenaline following a COVID-19 vaccine in New South Wales, Australia. The cases were classified into Brighton Collaboration Case Definition (BCCD) for anaphylaxis, their clinical presentation, management and subsequent revaccination outcomes were compared. RESULTS: From 22 February 2021 to 30 September 2021, there were 222 cases where adrenaline was administered. Of these, 32 (14 %) fulfilled Level 1 BCCD, 59 (27%) Level 2, 2 (1%) Level 3, 97 (44%) Level 4 and 32 (14 %) Level 5. The most commonly reported symptoms were sensation of throat closure (n = 116, 52%), difficulty breathing (n = 82, 37%) and nausea (n = 55, 25 %). Of the 176 (79%) individuals who proceeded to further vaccination, 89 (51%) received the same vaccine formulation and only 14 (8%) experienced another allergic adverse event with 9 (5%) receiving adrenaline. CONCLUSION: Less than one in five individuals who received adrenaline met Level 1 BCCD criteria for anaphylaxis. Many reactions that were treated with adrenaline had little to no diagnostic certainty of anaphylaxis and in such cases repeat vaccination had a high likelihood of being tolerated. Increased awareness and education on objective signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis is required to ensure appropriate use of adrenaline.

Development and initial validation of a modified lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) assay in patients with DRESS and AGEP.

BACKGROUND: The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is an in vitro assay used to diagnose drug induced hypersensitivity reactions by detecting the activation and expansion of drug-specific memory T cells to the suspected implicated drug. Traditionally radiolabelled thymidine (3H-thymidine) has been used but requires the handling and disposal of radioactive materials. OBJECTIVE: To examine safe alternatives to 3H-thymidine, test assay modifications for improved assay sensitivity and evaluate the modified LTT in patients with DRESS and AGEP. METHODS: Four proliferation detection assays (BRDU, CyQUANT™, MTT and XTT) were screened for LTT sensitivity. XTT the most sensitive and practical was selected for further evaluation Modifications like autologous serum (AS) and regulatory T cell depletion (T-REG) were tested for improved assay sensitivity. Finally, an initial evaluation of the XTT-LTT was performed in 8 patients with DRESS and 2 with AGEP including cytokine testing. RESULTS: Of the non-radioactive alternatives we tested, XTT a colorimetric assay was the most sensitive and practical to move to evaluation. The addition of AS increased background signal. Depletion of T-REGs improved sensitivity but cell sorting time and risk of contamination limited benefit. Of eight patients diagnosed with DRESS and 2 with AGEP tested with XTT-LTT assay results showed our assay matched clinical findings of implicated drugs in 8/10 patients when using a stimulation index (SI) ≥ 2 and 8/10 with analysis by ANOVA. All ten patients were correctly diagnosed by either analysis. CONCLUSION: XTT appears to be a safe, viable alternative to 3H-thymidine, with high sensitivity and allowing direct cytokine quantification on specific patient cells.

The Immune Dysregulation of Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is established as a heterogeneous collection of disorders of immune dysregulation rather than an infectious complication of antibody deficiency. Approximately 70% of patients have one or more of the non-infectious complications of autoimmunity, enteropathy, polyclonal lymphocytic and malignancy. The CVID-disorders represent a particular challenge as they fall under an umbrella diagnosis governed currently by non-universal diagnostic criteria. The rubric of CVID is shrinking as next generation sequencing is progressively and rapidly identifying the genetic basis for many of its disorders. Although identification of monogenic cause of CVID allows for naming of separate or specific entities, it still provides valuable insight into the immune dysregulation of these disorders along with recognition of a polygenic basis of disease and cellular changes observed in innate and adaptive immune pathways. Cellular abnormalities in the T-cell (reduced regulatory T cells (Tregs) and increased T follicular helper cells), and B-cell compartments (reduced switched memory B-cells and increased peripheral CD21low cells) along with an increase in innate lymphoid cells type 3 promote a milieu for inflammation. Immune dysregulation also results from increased microbial translocation from impaired gastrointestinal barrier function in CVID-patients with loss of Tregs. An understanding of the manifestations and mechanisms of immune dysregulation allows for improved vigilance in screening for the diagnosis, monitoring for complications of disease and the continued development and introduction of targeted therapies for non-infectious phenotypes.

Medical treatment of polymeric cerebral granulomatous reactions following endovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedures are standard of care for an increasing range of cerebrovascular diseases. Many endovascular devices contain plastic and are coated with a hydrophilic polymer which has been rarely described to embolize, resulting in distal granulomatous inflammatory lesions within the vascular territory. METHODS: We reviewed three cases of cerebral granulomatous reactions that occurred after endovascular intervention for internal carotid aneurysms. The patient procedure details, presentation, relevant investigations, and treatment course are described. We also provide a literature review on endovascular granulomatous reactions. RESULTS: These three cases represent the largest biopsy proven series of cerebral granulomatosis following endovascular intervention. We highlight the variable clinical presentation, with two of the three cases having an unusually delayed onset of up to 4 years following the intervention. We show the characteristic histological findings of granulomatous lesions with foreign body material consistent with a type IV reaction, radiological abnormalities of enhancing lesions within the vascular territory of the intervention, and the requirement of prolonged immunosuppression for maintenance of clinical remission, with two of the three patients requiring a corticosteroid sparing agent. In comparison with the available literature, in addition to hydrophilic gel polymer, we discuss that plastic from the lining of the envoy catheter may be a source of embolic material. We also discuss the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration and the implementation of novel biomaterials for the prevention of these reactions in the future. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for increased awareness of this severe complication of cerebral endovascular procedures and further longitudinal studies of its prevalence, optimal management and preventative measures.