Association between left bundle branch block and ventricular septal mid-wall fibrosis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with ventricular septal mid-wall fibrosis (SMF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, whether LBBB is also associated with SMF in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 210 patients with preserved LVEF (male, n = 116; female, n = 94; mean age, 44 ± 17 years). LBBB was defined as QRS duration ≥140 ms for men or ≥ 130 ms for women, QS or rS in V1-V2, mid-QRS notching or slurring in at least two leads (V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL). SMF determined by late gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance was defined as stripe-like or patchy mid-myocardial hyper-enhancement in the interventricular septal segments. RESULTS: SMF was detected in 24.8% (52/210) of these patients. The proportion of patients with SMF with LBBB was higher than the proportion of patients with SMF without LBBB (58.3% vs. 20.4%; P < 0.001). In the forward multivariate logistic analysis, LBBB (OR, 4.399; 95% CI, 1.774-10.904; P = 0.001) and age (OR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.006-1.051; P = 0.011) were independently associated with SMF. The presence of LBBB showed a sensitivity of 27%%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive value of 58%%, and negative predictive value of 80% for the detection of SMF. CONCLUSION: LBBB was significantly associated with SMF in hospitalized patients with preserved LVEF. Screening with a resting 12­lead ECG may help to identify patients who are at a high risk of the presence of SMF.

Efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has been established to be an effective therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and is recommended as the treatment of choice for many patients, including those with clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation (MR). However, there is little information available about the clinical efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF in patients with significant functional MR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 247 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation. The study included 28 (11.3%) patients with significant functional MR and 219 (88.7%) without significant functional MR. AF recurrence was defined as the occurrence of confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 seconds beyond 3 months after catheter ablation. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 20.1 ± 7.4 months (range, 3-36 months), 45 (18.2%) patients developed recurrence of AF. The recurrence rate of AF was higher in patients with significant functional MR than in those without significant functional MR (42.9% vs 15.1%; P < .001). Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that significant functional MR (hazard ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-6.72; P < .001), age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .009), the CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P = .017), and heart failure (HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.85-11.96; P = .001) were associated with the risk of recurrence. Multivariable analysis showed that significant functional MR (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.21-5.05; P = .013), age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P = .031), and heart failure (HR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.27-9.03; P = .015) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Patients with significant functional MR have an increased risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation.