Access to the waiting list and to kidney transplantation for people living with HIV: A national registry study.

We compared access to a kidney transplantation (KT) waiting list (WL) and to KT between people living with HIV (PLHIV) and HIV-uninfected controls. Using the REIN (the national Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry), we included all PLHIV initiating dialysis in France throughout 2006-2010 and HIV-uninfected controls matched for age, sex, year of dialysis initiation, and the existence of a diabetic nephropathy. Patients were prospectively followed until December 2015. We used a competitive risk approach to assess the cumulative incidence of enrollment on WL and of KT, with death as a competing event (subdistribution hazard ratio adjusted on comorbidities, asdHR). There were 255 PLHIV in the REIN (median age 47 years) of whom 180 (71%) were also found in the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH-ANRS CO4) including 126 (70%) known to be on antiretroviral therapy with HIV viral suppression (VS). Five years after dialysis initiation, 65%, and 76%, of treated PLHIV with VS, and of HIV-uninfected controls were enrolled on a WL (asdHR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50-0.91). Access to KT was also less frequent and delayed for treated PLHIV with VS (asdHR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.52-1.10). PLHIV continue to face difficulties to access KT.

Re-engagement in care of people living with HIV lost to follow-up after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in Mali: Who returns to care?

OBJECTIVES: We assessed cumulative incidence rates of and factors associated with re-engagement in HIV care for PLHIV lost to follow-up in Mali. METHODS: HIV-1-infected individuals lost to follow-up before 31/12/2013, ≥ 18 years old, who started ART from 2006 to 2012 at one of 16 care centres were considered. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) was defined as an interruption of ≥ 6 months during follow-up. The re-engagement in care in PLHIV lost to follow-up before 31/12/2013 was defined as having at least one clinical visit after LTFU. The cumulative incidence rates of re-engagement in care was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and its predictive factors were assessed using Cox models. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical and immune status, period, region, centre expertise level, and distance from home at the start of ART plus a combined variable of duration of ART until LTFU and 12-month change in CD4 count were assessed. Multiple imputation was used to deal with missing data. RESULTS: We included 3,650 PLHIV lost to follow-up before December 2013, starting ART in nine outpatient clinics and seven hospitals (5+2 in Bamako and 4+5 in other regions): 35% male, median (IQR) age 35 (29-43), and duration of ART until LTFU 11 months (5-22). Among these PLHIV, 1,975 (54%) were definitively LTFU and 1,675 (46%) subsequently returned to care. The cumulative incidence rates of re-engagement in care rose from 39.0% at one year to 47.0% at three years after LTFU. Predictors of re-engagement in care were starting ART with WHO stage 1-2 and CD4 counts ≥ 200 cells/µL, being treated for ≥ 12 months with CD4 count gain ≥ 50 cells/µL, or being followed in Bamako. People followed at regional hospitals or outpatient clinics ≥ 5 km away, or being treated for ≥ 12 months with CD4 count gain < 50 cells/µL were less likely to return to care. CONCLUSIONS: Starting ART with a higher CD4 count, better gain in CD4 count, and being followed either in Bamako or close to home in the regions were associated with re-engagement in care.

Yearly number of patients diagnosed with primary HIV-1 infection in France estimated by a capture-recapture approach.

We used a two-source capture-recapture method to estimate the number of patients diagnosed at the time of primary HIV infection in France between 1999 and 2002. The sources were the French PRIMO cohort and the French Hospital Database on HIV. The estimated number of patients was 325 per year, which represents only 5% (approximately 6000 cases) of all new cases diagnosed each year and only 8% of all new infections (approximately 4000 cases).

Chronic dissection of the ascending aorta: surgical results during a 20-year period (previous surgery excluded).

OBJECTIVE: We study here the surgical results of chronic dissection involving the ascending aorta over the last 20 years. Patients with previous cardiac surgery, or proximal aortic repair, were excluded. The patients survived an acute dissection, undiagnosed as pauci- or asymptomatic. The aorta was normal or pathological (atheromatous aneurysm in 15 cases, Marfan's disease in 12 cases, and annuloectasic disease in 18 cases). Two patients had a bicuspid aortic valve. METHODS: Between January 1981 and December 2001, 77 patients (mean age 48+/-15) underwent surgery for chronic dissection of the ascending aorta; 60 patients had severe aortic regurgitation, 12 had Marfan syndrome, and 18 had annuloaortic ectasia. Only the ascending aorta was dissected in 37 patients, the ascending aorta and arch in 26, and the whole aorta in 14. Coronary artery disease occurred in five patients. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software. Different surgical procedures were used. The aortic arch was repaired in 40 cases; selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and partial circulatory arrest were used. Total aortic replacement was performed on four patients. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 10%. The only risk factor was the extent of the dissection. The rate of neurologic stroke was 2.5%. Late survival rate was 42+/-7.5% at 12 years for all the patients; it was 71+/-10% when only the ascending aorta was dissected, 44+/-11% when the ascending aorta and arch were dissected, and 33+/-15% when the whole aorta was dissected (p = 0.0329). The extent of the dissection was the only risk factor for late mortality. Reoperation was required for one proximal and five distal problems. CONCLUSION: In chronic aortic dissection, in-hospital and late mortality were related to the extent of the dissection; in-hospital mortality remained unchanged during the operative period.

Cohort Profile: French hospital database on HIV (FHDH-ANRS CO4).

The French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH) is a hospital-based multicentre open cohort with inclusions ongoing since 1989. The research objectives focus mainly on mid- and long-term clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies, as well as severe AIDS and non-AIDS morbidities, and public health issues relative to HIV infection. FHDH also serves to describe HIV-infected patients receiving hospital care in France. FHDH includes data on more than 120,000 HIV-infected patients from 70 French general or university hospitals distributed throughout France. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are infected by HIV-1 or HIV-2 and give their written informed consent. Standardized variables are collected at each outpatient visit or hospital admission during which a new clinical manifestation is diagnosed, a new treatment is prescribed or a change in biological markers is noted, and/or at least every 6 months. Since its inception, variables collected in FHDH include demographic characteristics, HIV-related biological markers, the date and type of AIDS and non AIDS-defining events, antiretroviral treatments and the date and causes of death, as reported in the medical records. Since 2005, data have also been collected on: co-infection with hepatitis B or C virus; alcohol and tobacco use; and non HIV-related biomarkers. Anyone can submit a research project by completing a standardized form available on the FHDH website (http://www.ccde.fr/_fold/fl-1385734776-429.pdf) or from the corresponding author, describing the context and objectives of the study. All projects are reviewed by the scientific committee.