Trans-sacral interbody fixation in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity: complications and fusion rates at minimum two years follow-up.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the fusion rate and complications associated with trans-sacral interbody fusion (TSIF) in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity (ASD) over a two year follow-up period. Potential predictor variables associated with pseudarthrosis were also examined. METHODS: A retrospective clinical review was conducted on a consecutive series of ASD patients who underwent long fusions to the sacrum, with TSIF performed as a same-day or staged procedure. Patient demographics, bone mineral density, operative details, perioperative and late complications, and fusion rates were reviewed. Univariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with pseudarthrosis. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients with an average age of 55.3 ± 8.9 years. The perioperative complication rate was 28%, with 12% of the complications directly related to TSIF. The late complication rate was 33%, with 16% related to TSIF. The most common complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and postoperative ileus (7%). The overall radiographic fusion rate at two years was 86%. Univariate analysis revealed that revision surgery was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis (p = 0.027). Over the follow-up period, patients who underwent TSIF during long posterior fusions to the sacrum showed improvement in overall SRS scores, ODI scores, and SF-36 physical health and mental health (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TSIF is a relatively safe and minimally invasive method for achieving interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction in the treatment of ASD, with acceptable fusion rates and a low complication rate. However, TSIF is not recommended for revision reconstruction in ASD.

Incidences, causes and risk factors of unplanned reoperation within 30 days of craniovertebral junction surgery: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidences, causes, and risk factors for unplanned reoperation within 30 days of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery. METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2018, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CVJ surgery at our institution was conducted. The demographics, history of the disease, medical diagnosis, approach and type of operation, surgery duration, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Patients were divided into the no-reoperation group and the unplanned reoperations group. Comparison between two groups in noted parameters was analyzed to identify the prevalence and risk factors of unplanned revision and a binary logistic regression was performed to confirm the risk factors. RESULTS: Of 2149 patients included, 34(1.58%) required unplanned reoperation after the initial surgery. The causes for unplanned reoperation contained wound infection, neurologic deficit, improper screw placement, internal fixation loosens, dysphagia, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and posterior fossa epidural hematomas. No statistical difference was found in demographics between two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of reoperation of OCF was significantly higher than that of posterior C1-2 fusion (P = 0.002). In terms of diagnosis, the reoperation rate of CVJ tumor patients was significantly higher than that of malformation patients, degenerative disease patients, trauma patients, and other patients (P = 0.043). The binary logistic regression confirmed that different disease, fusion segment (posterior) and surgery time were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The unplanned reoperation rate of CVJ surgery was 1.58% and the major causes were implant-related failures and wound infection. Patients with posterior occipitocervical fusion or diagnosed with CVJ tumors had an increased risk of unplanned reoperation.

Evaluation of the Anatomical Reference Point in Posterior Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery: A Cadaveric Anatomical Study.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive atlantoaxial surgery offers the benefits of reduced trauma and quicker recovery. Previous studies have focused on feasibility and technical aspects, but the lack of comprehensive safety information has limited its availability and widespread use. This study proposes to define the feasibility and range of surgical safety using the intersection of the greater occipital nerve and the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique as a reference point. METHODS: Dissection was performed on 10 fresh cadavers to define the anatomical reference point as the intersection of the greater occipital nerve and the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle. The study aimed to analyze the safety range of minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion surgery by measuring the distance between the anatomical reference point and the transverse foramen of the axis, the distance between the anatomical reference point and the superior border of the posterior arch of the atlas, and the distance between the anatomical reference point and the spinal canal. Measurements were compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: The point where the occipital greater nerve intersects with the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle was defined as the anatomical marker for minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery. The distance between this anatomical marker and the transverse foramen of the axis was measured to be 9.32 ± 2.04 mm. Additionally, the distance to the superior border of the posterior arch of the atlas was found to be 21.29 ± 1.93 mm, and the distance to the spinal canal was measured to be 11.53 ± 2.18 mm. These measurement results can aid surgeons in protecting the vertebral artery and dura mater during minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The intersection of the greater occipital nerve with the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle is a safe and reliable anatomical landmark in minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery.