Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis.

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on annual rate of relapse subject to treatment (ARRt) and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) compared to injectable immunomodulators (IMM), teriflunomide (TERI) and fingolimob (FTY), in real-life setting. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted using data of the French nationwide claims database, SNDS. All patients initiating IMM, TERI, FTY or DMF between 1 July 2015 and 12 December 2017, with 4.5 years of database history and 1-3.5 years of follow-up were included in this study. DMF patients were 1:1 matched to IMM, TERI or FTY using a high dimensional propensity score. Negative binomial regression and a logistic regression model were used to estimate the relative risk (RR ± [95% CI]) of ARRt and the odds ratio (OR ± [95% CI]) of disability progression, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 9304 subjects were identified: 29.0% initiated DMF, 33.2% TERI, 5.6% FTY and 32.2% an IMM. The matched cohorts consisted of 1779 DMF-IMM patients, 1679 DMF-TERI patients, and 376 DMF-FTY patients. DMF significantly reduced ARRt compared to IMM (RR 0.72 [0.61-0.86]) and TERI (0.81 [0.68-0.96]) and did not show any significant difference when compared with FTY. The risk of the progression of MS-specific disability was not significantly different for any matched cohorts. CONCLUSION: DMF is associated with lower risk of treated relapse for patients with RRMS than other first-line RRMS agents (TERI and IIM).

Intra-database validation of case-identifying algorithms using reconstituted electronic health records from healthcare claims data.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis performances of case-identifying algorithms developed in healthcare database are usually assessed by comparing identified cases with an external data source. When this is not feasible, intra-database validation can present an appropriate alternative. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate through two practical examples how to perform intra-database validations of case-identifying algorithms using reconstituted Electronic Health Records (rEHRs). METHODS: Patients with 1) multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses and 2) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were identified in the French nationwide healthcare database (SNDS) using two case-identifying algorithms. A validation study was then conducted to estimate diagnostic performances of these algorithms through the calculation of their positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). To that end, anonymized rEHRs were generated based on the overall information captured in the SNDS over time (e.g. procedure, hospital stays, drug dispensing, medical visits) for a random selection of patients identified as cases or non-cases according to the predefined algorithms. For each disease, an independent validation committee reviewed the rEHRs of 100 cases and 100 non-cases in order to adjudicate on the status of the selected patients (true case/ true non-case), blinded with respect to the result of the corresponding algorithm. RESULTS: Algorithm for relapses identification in MS showed a 95% PPV and 100% NPV. Algorithm for mCRPC identification showed a 97% PPV and 99% NPV. CONCLUSION: The use of rEHRs to conduct an intra-database validation appears to be a valuable tool to estimate the performances of a case-identifying algorithm and assess its validity, in the absence of alternative.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and inhaler device handling: real-life assessment of 2935 patients.

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be prevented by inhaled treatment. Errors in inhaler handling, not taken into account in clinical trials, could impact drug delivery and minimise treatment benefit. We aimed to assess real-life inhaler device handling in COPD patients and its association with COPD exacerbations.To this end, 212 general practitioners and 50 pulmonologists assessed the handling of 3393 devices used for continuous treatment of COPD in 2935 patients. Handling errors were observed in over 50% of handlings, regardless of the device used. Critical errors compromising drug delivery were respectively made in 15.4%, 21.2%, 29.3%, 43.8%, 46.9% and 32.1% of inhalation assessment tests with Breezhaler® (n=876), Diskus® (n=452), Handihaler® (n=598), pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) (n=422), Respimat® (n=625) and Turbuhaler® (n=420).The proportion of patients requiring hospitalisation or emergency room visits in the past 3 months for severe COPD exacerbation was 3.3% (95% CI 2.0-4.5) in the absence of error and 6.9% (95% CI 5.3-8.5) in the presence of critical error (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.14-3.04, p<0.05).Handling errors of inhaler devices are underestimated in real life and are associated with an increased rate of severe COPD exacerbation. Training in inhaler use is an integral part of COPD management.

Increased risk of narcolepsy in children and adults after pandemic H1N1 vaccination in France.

An increased incidence of narcolepsy in children was detected in Scandinavian countries where pandemic H1N1 influenza ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine was used. A campaign of vaccination against pandemic H1N1 influenza was implemented in France using both ASO3-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines. As part of a study considering all-type narcolepsy, we investigated the association between H1N1 vaccination and narcolepsy with cataplexy in children and adults compared with matched controls; and compared the phenotype of narcolepsy with cataplexy according to exposure to the H1N1 vaccination. Patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy were included from 14 expert centres in France. Date of diagnosis constituted the index date. Validation of cases was performed by independent experts using the Brighton collaboration criteria. Up to four controls were individually matched to cases according to age, gender and geographic location. A structured telephone interview was performed to collect information on medical history, past infections and vaccinations. Eighty-five cases with narcolepsy-cataplexy were included; 23 being further excluded regarding eligibility criteria. Of the 62 eligible cases, 59 (64% males, 57.6% children) could be matched with 135 control subjects. H1N1 vaccination was associated with narcolepsy-cataplexy with an odds ratio of 6.5 (2.1-19.9) in subjects aged<18 years, and 4.7 (1.6-13.9) in those aged 18 and over. Sensitivity analyses considering date of referral for diagnosis or the date of onset of symptoms as the index date gave similar results, as did analyses focusing only on exposure to ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine. Slight differences were found when comparing cases with narcolepsy-cataplexy exposed to H1N1 vaccination (n=32; mostly AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, n=28) to non-exposed cases (n=30), including shorter delay of diagnosis and a higher number of sleep onset rapid eye movement periods for exposed cases. No difference was found regarding history of infections. In this sub-analysis, H1N1 vaccination was strongly associated with an increased risk of narcolepsy-cataplexy in both children and adults in France. Even if, as in every observational study, the possibility that some biases participated in the association cannot be completely ruled out, the associations appeared robust to sensitivity analyses, and a specific analysis focusing on ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine found similar increase.

Choice of the denominator in case population studies: event rates for registration for liver transplantation after exposure to NSAIDs in the SALT study in France.

PURPOSE: The effect of denominator options on event rates was tested on the French part of the Study of Acute Liver Transplant (SALT). METHODS: SALT is a case population study of acute liver failure registered for transplantation (ALFT), exposed to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or non-overdose paracetamol, from 2005 to 2007. Population exposure was computed from the Intercontinental Medical Services' (IMS) and the French national healthcare insurance system's data as the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) sold or dispensed and the number of exposed patients. RESULTS: Nine ALFT cases were exposed to 10 NSAIDs and 49 to non-overdose paracetamol. NSAID sales ranged from 0.04 billion (niflumic acid) to 0.5 billion (ibuprofen) DDDs, amounting to 2.5 billion DDDs for all NSAIDs. The mean per-person exposure ranged from 13.1 (niflumic acid) to 43.2 (ketoprofen) DDDs, reaching 60.5 DDDs for any NSAID. The number of users ranged from 2 million (niflumic acid) to 13 million (ibuprofen), which was 26.6 million for all NSAIDs. The ALFT rates per billion DDDs ranged from 0 to 26 for individual NSAIDs and amounted to 4.6 for all NSAIDs. The ALFT rates per billion DDDs were inversely correlated with the average per-patient exposure (R(2) = 0.935, p = 0.0016). The ALFT rates per million users ranged from 0.31 to 0.49, which was 0.41 for all NSAIDs, with no difference between drugs and no effect of mean per-patient exposure (R(2) = 0.01, p = 0.9). Whether measured per DDD or per user, the event rate with paracetamol was three to five times higher than with NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: ALFT risk with NSAID seems to be user dependent rather than person-time (exposure) dependent. Choosing the wrong denominator in case population studies might give erroneous results.

Effectiveness of antibiotics for acute sinusitis in real-life medical practice.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Determining bacterial aetiology of acute sinusitis is difficult without employing invasive procedures. Most episodes of acute sinusitis resolve spontaneously. Antibiotics have demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in clinical trials yet little is known of their effectiveness in real-life treatment settings. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Most cases of untreated acute sinusitis resolved spontaneously. Antibiotics were more effective when given within the first 10 days of treatment. This had no effect on later recurrence. Patients with poor oro-dental condition or recent antibiotic use may derive the most benefit from an antibiotic prescription and this should be considered by prescribers. The antibiotics used were found to be equally effective. Existing recommendations to identify acute sinusitis with high probability of bacterial origin, such as the French recommendations, fever or duration of symptoms fail to identify patients in whom antibiotics are more effective. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of antibiotics in acute bacterial sinusitis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study with 2 months follow-up of 5640 patients with acute sinusitis included by a random sample from 1174 GPs and 120 ENT specialists. Main outcomes were short-term initial success, defined as the absence of prescription of (another) antibiotic or sinus lavage within 10 days, and lack of recurrence between the 11th and 60th day, after initial success. RESULTS: Initial success was found in 88.7% (95% CI 85.1, 91.4%) of patients without antibiotic prescription at inclusion and 96.2% (95% CI 95.7, 96.7%) of patients prescribed antibiotics. The 10 day adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for treatment failure (new antibiotic prescription or sinus drainage) with initial antibiotics compared with no antibiotics was 0.30 (95% CI 0.21, 0.42) with no difference between antibiotics. Antibiotics were more effective in patients with poor oro-dental condition (HR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.20) and in patients who had already used antibiotics during the previous 2 months (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03, 0.28). For patients without failure at 10 days, recurrence between the 11th and 60th day was similar whether or not they had initially been prescribed an antibiotic, 94.1% (95% CI 93.4, 94.7%) and 93.4% (95%CI 90.3, 95.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Most acute sinusitis cases not prescribed antibiotics resolve spontaneously. Antibiotics reduced by 3.3-fold the risk of failure within 10 days, without impact on later recurrence. The greatest benefit of antibiotics was found for patients with poor oro-dental condition or with antibiotic use within the previous 2 months.

Patterns and frequency of atypical antipsychotic prescribing in psychiatric medical centers: a cross-sectional national survey.

Studies describing atypical antipsychotics when compared with conventional antipsychotic drugs are few in France. This study aimed to describe the frequency and characteristics of atypical antipsychotic prescribing. A cross-sectional national survey was conducted from February to June 2003 in a random sample of 100 volunteer French psychiatrists practicing in public psychiatric medical centers. Each psychiatrist was asked to complete a questionnaire for patients to whom at least one antipsychotic was prescribed during the period of the survey. The characteristics of the patients treated with atypical antipsychotics were identified with a logistic regression model. A total of 1733 patients were included in the study. The main diagnoses were schizophrenia (46.1%) and other psychoses (40.8%), followed by mood disorders (10%) and other psychiatric disorders (2.5%). Among these patients, 56% had at least one prescription of an atypical antipsychotic, 42.1% at least one conventional antipsychotic with immediate action and 29.9% at least one conventional antipsychotic with delayed action. Seventy percent of patients were treated with single-drug atypical antipsychotics. Compared with conventional antipsychotics with immediate action, atypical antipsychotics were less likely to be prescribed to patients over 35 years of age [odds ratio (OR) 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.6], with duration of illness >10 years (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7), and were less likely to be used with concomitant corrector agents for neurological side effects (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.6). This study shows the important use of atypical antipsychotic drugs especially in schizophrenic patients and younger patients.

Effects of armagnac or vodka on platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular mortality is especially low in southwest France (the French Paradox). In previous experimental studies, we found that alcohol-free extracts of armagnac could inhibit human platelet function in vitro and experimental thrombosis in vivo. To test the possible relevance of these findings, we tested the effects of daily use of small quantities of armagnac against same alcohol strength, polyphenol-free vodka in healthy volunteers. METHOD: Randomized controlled trial comparing 5-year old armagnac (30 ml/day for 2 weeks) to same alcoholic strength vodka, in 20 healthy volunteers, on platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, and thrombin, as well as bleeding time, partial thromboplastin time (pTT), and plasma lipids during and after consumption. Platelet testing was done blind. RESULTS: After 14 days, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited more in armagnac (-31+/-3.2% compared to pretreatment values, p<.01) than in vodka (-11.0+/-6.8%, NS) users (p<.05, armagnac vs. vodka). A rebound increase of aggregation was found 2 weeks later in vodka but not in armagnac users. The same pattern was found for thrombin-induced aggregation, including post-treatment rebound. No effect was found on collagen-induced aggregation, bleeding time, pTT, or plasma lipids. CONCLUSION: The chronic ingestion of moderate quantities of armagnac modified platelet aggregation to ADP in healthy volunteers. The difference with the effects of same alcohol degree vodka is in favour of an effect of the nonalcoholic fraction in the effects of armagnac, rather than just alcohol. All spirits may not be equal for cardioprotection.

[Real-life use of inhaler devices for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care]. / Utilisation des systèmes d'inhalation dans la bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive.

The correct use of inhalation devices is an inclusion criterion in many comparative studies. However, patients can make errors, thus compromising the effectiveness of their own inhaler. The aim of the study is to evaluate inhaler use by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [n = 984]. General practitioners assessed inhalation technique, using a specific checklist previously established for each inhaler model (Aerolizer, Autohaler, Diskus, a pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) or a Turbuhaler). A total of 24% of the patients using a pMDI did not make an error compared with 34-40% of those using breath-actuated devices. The frequency of critical errors varied according to the device: 11.5-14.9% of the subjects using an Aerolizer, Autohaler or Diskus versus 37.4% and 38.1% of the patients using a pMDI and a Turbuhaler, respectively. The proper use of the Turbuhaler is often overestimated (24.7%) compared with the pMDI (2.1%). The development of educational programmes for patients and prescribers is needed to improve the management of COPD.

Causality of Drugs Involved in Acute Liver Failure Leading to Transplantation: Results from the Study of Acute Liver Transplant (SALT).

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been proposed to assess causality in drug-induced liver injury but none have been tested in the specific context of acute liver failure leading to transplantation (ALFT). OBJECTIVE: We took advantage of the Study of Acute Liver Transplant (SALT), a European case-population study of ALFT, to test different causality scales. METHODS: Causality was assessed by experts in SALT, a 7-country case-population study from 2005 to 2007 of adult otherwise unexplained ALFT, for all drugs found within 30 days prior to the date of initial symptoms of liver disease (index date), using information content, causality scales, and data circuit determined from a pilot study, Salome. RESULTS: The consensus points from Salome were to provide full data on drugs including international non-proprietary name (INN) and doses except for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to use the World Health Organization (WHO) causality scale. In SALT, among the 9,479 identified patients, 600 (6.3%) were cases of ALFT, of which 187 had been exposed to drugs within 30 days, without overdose. In 130 (69.5%) of these the causality score was possible, probable, or highly probable. CONCLUSION: In ALFT cases, once other clinical causes have been excluded and drug exposure established within 30 days, the main discriminant characteristic for causality will be previous knowledge of possible hepatotoxicity.

Transplantation for acute liver failure in patients exposed to NSAIDs or paracetamol (acetaminophen): the multinational case-population SALT study.

BACKGROUND: Most NSAIDs are thought to be able to cause hepatic injury and acute liver failure (ALF), but the event rates of those leading to transplantation (ALFT) remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to estimate population event rates for NSAID-associated ALFT METHODS: This was a case-population study of ALFT in 57 eligible liver transplant centres in seven countries (France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal and the UK). Cases were all adults registered from 2005 to 2007 for a liver transplant following ALFT without identified clinical aetiology, exposed to an NSAID or paracetamol (acetaminophen) within 30 days before the onset of clinical symptoms. NSAID and paracetamol population exposures were assessed using national sales data from Intercontinental Marketing Services (IMS). Risk was estimated as the rate of ALFT per million treatment-years (MTY). RESULTS: In the 52 participating centres, 9479 patients were registered for transplantation, with 600 for ALFT, 301 of whom, without clinical aetiology, had been exposed to a drug within 30 days. Of these 301 patients, 40 had been exposed to an NSAID and 192 to paracetamol (81 of whom were without overdose). Event rates per MTY were 1.59 (95 % CI 1.1-2.2) for all NSAIDs pooled, 2.3 (95 % CI 1.2-3.9) for ibuprofen, 1.9 (95 % CI 0.8-3.7) for nimesulide, 1.6 (95 % CI 0.6-3.4) for diclofenac and 1.6 (95 % CI 0.3-4.5) for ketoprofen. For paracetamol, the event rate was 3.3 per MTY (95 % CI 2.6-4.1) without overdoses and 7.8 (95 % CI 6.8-9.0) including overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: ALF leading to registration for transplantation after exposure to an NSAID was rare, with no major difference between NSAID. Non-overdose paracetamol-exposed liver failure was twice more common than NSAID-exposed liver failure.