Atypical local brain connectivity in pediatric autism spectrum disorder? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of regional homogeneity studies.

Despite decades of massive neuroimaging research, the comprehensive characterization of short-range functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) remains a major challenge for scientific advances and clinical translation. From the theoretical point of view, it has been suggested a generalized local over-connectivity that would characterize ASD. This stance is known as the general local over-connectivity theory. However, there is little empirical evidence supporting such hypothesis, especially with regard to pediatric individuals with ASD (age [Formula: see text] 18 years old). To explore this issue, we performed a coordinate-based meta-analysis of regional homogeneity studies to identify significant changes of local connectivity. Our analyses revealed local functional under-connectivity patterns in the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex and superior frontal gyrus (key components of the default mode network) and in the bilateral paracentral lobule (a part of the sensorimotor network). We also performed a functional association analysis of the identified areas, whose dysfunction is clinically consistent with the well-known deficits affecting individuals with ASD. Importantly, we did not find relevant clusters of local hyper-connectivity, which is contrary to the hypothesis that ASD may be characterized by generalized local over-connectivity. If confirmed, our result will provide a valuable insight into the understanding of the complex ASD pathophysiology.

CBMAT: a MATLAB toolbox for data preparation and post hoc analyses in neuroimaging meta-analyses.

Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is a powerful technique in the field of human brain imaging research. Due to its intense usage, several procedures for data preparation and post hoc analyses have been proposed so far. However, these steps are often performed manually by the researcher, and are therefore potentially prone to error and time-consuming. We hence developed the Coordinate-Based Meta-Analyses Toolbox (CBMAT) to provide a suite of user-friendly and automated MATLAB® functions allowing one to perform all these procedures in a fast, reproducible and reliable way. Besides the description of the code, in the present paper we also provide an annotated example of using CBMAT on a dataset including 34 experiments. CBMAT can therefore substantially improve the way data are handled when performing CBMAs. The code can be downloaded from https://github.com/Jordi-Manuello/CBMAT.git .

The pathoconnectivity network analysis of the insular cortex: A morphometric fingerprinting.

Brain disorders tend to impact on many different regions in a typical way: alterations do not spread randomly; rather, they seem to follow specific patterns of propagation that show a strong overlap between different pathologies. The insular cortex is one of the brain areas more involved in this phenomenon, as it seems to be altered by a wide range of brain diseases. On these grounds we thoroughly investigated the impact of brain disorders on the insular cortices analyzing the patterns of their structural co-alteration. We therefore investigated, applying a network analysis approach to meta-analytic data, 1) what pattern of gray matter alteration is associated with each of the insular cortex parcels; 2) whether or not this pattern correlates and overlaps with its functional meta-analytic connectivity; and, 3) the behavioral profile related to each insular co-alteration pattern. All the analyses were repeated considering two solutions: one with two clusters and another with three. Our study confirmed that the insular cortex is one of the most altered cerebral regions among the cortical areas, and exhibits a dense network of co-alteration including a prevalence of cortical rather than sub-cortical brain regions. Regions of the frontal lobe are the most involved, while occipital lobe is the less affected. Furthermore, the co-alteration and co-activation patterns greatly overlap each other. These findings provide significant evidence that alterations caused by brain disorders are likely to be distributed according to the logic of network architecture, in which brain hubs lie at the center of networks composed of co-altered areas. For the first time, we shed light on existing differences between insula sub-regions even in the pathoconnectivity domain.

BACON: A tool for reverse inference in brain activation and alteration.

Over the past decades, powerful MRI-based methods have been developed, which yield both voxel-based maps of the brain activity and anatomical variation related to different conditions. With regard to functional or structural MRI data, forward inferences try to determine which areas are involved given a mental function or a brain disorder. A major drawback of forward inference is its lack of specificity, as it suggests the involvement of brain areas that are not specific for the process/condition under investigation. Therefore, a different approach is needed to determine to what extent a given pattern of cerebral activation or alteration is specifically associated with a mental function or brain pathology. In this study, we present a new tool called BACON (Bayes fACtor mOdeliNg) for performing reverse inference both with functional and structural neuroimaging data. BACON implements the Bayes' factor and uses the activation likelihood estimation derived-maps to obtain posterior probability distributions on the evidence of specificity with regard to a particular mental function or brain pathology.

A meta-analytic approach to mapping co-occurrent grey matter volume increases and decreases in psychiatric disorders.

Numerous studies have investigated grey matter (GM) volume changes in diverse patient groups. Reports of disorder-related GM reductions are common in such work, but many studies also report evidence for GM volume increases in patients. It is unclear whether these GM increases and decreases are independent or related in some way. Here, we address this question using a novel meta-analytic network mapping approach. We used a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 64 voxel-based morphometry studies of psychiatric disorders to calculate the probability of finding a GM increase or decrease in one region given an observed change in the opposite direction in another region. Estimating this co-occurrence probability for every pair of brain regions allowed us to build a network of concurrent GM changes of opposing polarity. Our analysis revealed that disorder-related GM increases and decreases are not independent; instead, a GM change in one area is often statistically related to a change of opposite polarity in other areas, highlighting distributed yet coordinated changes in GM volume as a function of brain pathology. Most regions showing GM changes linked to an opposite change in a distal area were located in salience, executive-control and default mode networks, as well as the thalamus and basal ganglia. Moreover, pairs of regions showing coupled changes of opposite polarity were more likely to belong to different canonical networks than to the same one. Our results suggest that regional GM alterations in psychiatric disorders are often accompanied by opposing changes in distal regions that belong to distinct functional networks.

Finding specificity in structural brain alterations through Bayesian reverse inference.

In the field of neuroimaging reverse inferences can lead us to suppose the involvement of cognitive processes from certain patterns of brain activity. However, the same reasoning holds if we substitute "brain activity" with "brain alteration" and "cognitive process" with "brain disorder." The fact that different brain disorders exhibit a high degree of overlap in their patterns of structural alterations makes forward inference-based analyses less suitable for identifying brain areas whose alteration is specific to a certain pathology. In the forward inference-based analyses, in fact, it is impossible to distinguish between areas that are altered by the majority of brain disorders and areas that are specifically affected by certain diseases. To address this issue and allow the identification of highly pathology-specific altered areas we used the Bayes' factor technique, which was employed, as a proof of concept, on voxel-based morphometry data of schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. This technique allows to calculate the ratio between the likelihoods of two alternative hypotheses (in our case, that the alteration of the voxel is specific for the brain disorder under scrutiny or that the alteration is not specific). We then performed temporal simulations of the alterations' spread associated with different pathologies. The Bayes' factor values calculated on these simulated data were able to reveal that the areas, which are more specific to a certain disease, are also the ones to be early altered. This study puts forward a new analytical instrument capable of innovating the methodological approach to the investigation of brain pathology.

Hubs of long-distance co-alteration characterize brain pathology.

It is becoming clearer that the impact of brain diseases is more convincingly represented in terms of co-alterations rather than in terms of localization of alterations. In this context, areas characterized by a long mean distance of co-alteration may be considered as hubs with a crucial role in the pathology. We calculated meta-analytic transdiagnostic networks of co-alteration for the gray matter decreases and increases, and we evaluated the mean Euclidean, fiber-length, and topological distance of its nodes. We also examined the proportion of co-alterations between canonical networks, and the transdiagnostic variance of the Euclidean distance. Furthermore, disease-specific analyses were conducted on schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. The anterodorsal prefrontal cortices appeared to be a transdiagnostic hub of long-distance co-alterations. Also, the disease-specific analyses showed that long-distance co-alterations are more able than classic meta-analyses to identify areas involved in pathology and symptomatology. Moreover, the distance maps were correlated with the normative connectivity. Our findings substantiate the network degeneration hypothesis in brain pathology. At the same time, they suggest that the concept of co-alteration might be a useful tool for clinical neuroscience.

The Neural Correlates of Time: A Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging Studies.

During the last two decades, our inner sense of time has been repeatedly studied with the help of neuroimaging techniques. These investigations have suggested the specific involvement of different brain areas in temporal processing. At least two distinct neural systems are likely to play a role in measuring time: One is mainly constituted of subcortical structures and is supposed to be more related to the estimation of time intervals below the 1-sec range (subsecond timing tasks), and the other is mainly constituted of cortical areas and is supposed to be more related to the estimation of time intervals above the 1-sec range (suprasecond timing tasks). Tasks can then be performed in motor or nonmotor (perceptual) conditions, thus providing four different categories of time processing. Our meta-analytical investigation partly confirms the findings of previous meta-analytical works. Both sub- and suprasecond tasks recruit cortical and subcortical areas, but subcortical areas are more intensely activated in subsecond tasks than in suprasecond tasks, which instead receive more contributions from cortical activations. All the conditions, however, show strong activations in the SMA, whose rostral and caudal parts have an important role not only in the discrimination of different time intervals but also in relation to the nature of the task conditions. This area, along with the striatum (especially the putamen) and the claustrum, is supposed to be an essential node in the different networks engaged when the brain creates our sense of time.

The alteration landscape of the cerebral cortex.

Growing evidence is challenging the assumption that brain disorders are diagnostically clear-cut categories. Transdiagnostic studies show that a set of cerebral areas is frequently altered in a variety of psychiatric as well as neurological syndromes. In order to provide a map of the altered areas in the pathological brain we devised a metric, called alteration entropy (A-entropy), capable of denoting the "structural alteration variety" of an altered region. Using the whole voxel-based morphometry database of BrainMap, we were able to differentiate the brain areas exhibiting a high degree of overlap between different neuropathologies (or high value of A-entropy) from those exhibiting a low degree of overlap (or low value of A-entropy). The former, which are parts of large-scale brain networks with attentional, emotional, salience, and premotor functions, are thought to be more vulnerable to a great range of brain diseases; while the latter, which include the sensorimotor, visual, inferior temporal, and supramarginal regions, are thought to be more informative about the specific impact of brain diseases. Since low A-entropy areas appear to be altered by a smaller number of brain disorders, they are more informative than the areas characterized by high values of A-entropy. It is also noteworthy that even the areas showing low values of A-entropy are substantially altered by a variety of brain disorders. In fact, no cerebral area appears to be only altered by a specific disorder. Our study shows that the overlap of areas with high A-entropy provides support for a transdiagnostic approach to brain disorders but, at the same time, suggests that fruitful differences can be traced among brain diseases, as some areas can exhibit an alteration profile more specific to certain disorders than to others.

Building diagnostic neuroimaging biomarkers for psychiatric disorders using reverse inference approaches: A viable route?

The advent of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) at the end of the 20th century opened the way toward a deeper understanding of the neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders, substantiating regional structural abnormalities underlying this group of clinical conditions. However, despite abundant and flourishing scientific research, sMRI methodologies are not currently integrated into daily diagnostic practice. One reason behind this failed translation may be the prevailing approach to logical reasoning in neuroimaging: The forward inference via frequentist-based statistics. This reasoning prevents clinicians from obtaining information about the selectivity of results, which are therefore of limited use regarding the definition of biomarkers and refinement of diagnostic processes. Recently, another type of inferential approach has started to emerge in the neuroimaging field: The reverse inference via Bayesian statistics. Here, we introduce the key concepts of this approach, with a particular emphasis on the clinical sMRI environment. We survey recent findings showing significant potential for clinical translation. Clinical opportunities and challenges for developing reverse inference-based neural markers for psychiatry are also discussed. We propose that a systematic sharing of imaging data across the human brain mapping community is an essential first step toward a paradigmatic clinical shift. We conclude that a defined synergy between forward-based and reverse-based sMRI research can illuminate current discussions on diagnostic brain markers, offering clarity on key issues and fostering new tailored diagnostic avenues.

Activation Likelihood Estimation Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis: a Powerful Tool for Emotion Research.

Over the past two decades, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the primary tool for exploring neural correlates of emotion. To enhance the reliability of results in understanding the complex nature of emotional experiences, researchers combine findings from multiple fMRI studies using coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA). As one of the most widely employed CBMA methods worldwide, activation likelihood estimation (ALE) is of great importance in affective neuroscience and neuropsychology. This comprehensive review provides an introductory guide for implementing the ALE method in emotion research, outlining the experimental steps involved. By presenting a case study about the emotion of disgust, with regard to both its core and social processing, we offer insightful commentary as to how ALE can enable researchers to produce consistent results and, consequently, fruitfully investigate the neural mechanisms underpinning emotions, facilitating further progress in this field.

Retrospective Bayesian Evidence of Null Effect in Two Decades of Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials.

Despite intense research on Alzheimer's disease, no validated treatment able to reverse symptomatology or stop disease progression exists. A recent systematic review by Kim and colleagues evaluated possible reasons behind the failure of the majority of the clinical trials. As the focus was on methodological factors, no statistical trends were examined in detail. Here, we aim to complete this picture leveraging on Bayesian analysis. In particular, we tested whether the failure of those clinical trials was essentially due to insufficient statistical power or to lack of a true effect. The strong Bayes' Factor obtained supported the latter hypothesis.

Unleashing the Power of Bayesian Re-Analysis: Enhancing Insights into Lecanemab (Clarity AD) Phase III Trial Through Informed t-Test.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials targeting Alzheimer's disease (AD) aim to alleviate clinical symptoms and alter the course of this complex neurodegenerative disorder. However, the conventional approach of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) commonly employed in such trials has inherent limitations in assessing clinical significance and capturing nuanced evidence of effectiveness on a continuous scale. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we conducted a re-analysis of the phase III trial of lecanemab, a recently proposed humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody with high affinity for Aß soluble protofibrils, using a Bayesian approach with informed t-test priors. METHODS: To achieve this, we carefully selected trial data and derived effect size estimates for the primary endpoint, the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). Subsequently, a series of Bayes Factor analyses were performed to compare evidence supporting the null hypothesis (no treatment effect) versus the alternative hypothesis (presence of an effect). Drawing on relevant literature and the lecanemab phase III trial, we incorporated different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for the primary endpoint CDR-SB as prior information. RESULTS: Our findings, based on a standard prior, revealed anecdotal evidence favoring the null hypothesis. Additional robustness checks yielded consistent results. However, when employing informed priors, we observed varying evidence across different MCID values, ultimately indicating no support for the effectiveness of lecanemab over placebo. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the value of Bayesian analysis in clinical trials while emphasizing the importance of incorporating MCID and effect size granularity to accurately assess treatment efficacy.

A Minimum Bayes Factor Based Threshold for Activation Likelihood Estimation.

Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) is among the most used algorithms to perform neuroimaging meta-analysis. Since its first implementation, several thresholding procedures had been proposed, all referred to the frequentist framework, returning a rejection criterion for the null hypothesis according to the critical p-value selected. However, this is not informative in terms of probabilities of the validity of the hypotheses. Here, we describe an innovative thresholding procedure based on the concept of minimum Bayes factor (mBF). The use of the Bayesian framework allows to consider different levels of probability, each of these being equally significant. In order to simplify the translation between the common ALE practice and the proposed approach, we analised six task-fMRI/VBM datasets and determined the mBF values equivalent to the currently recommended frequentist thresholds based on Family Wise Error (FWE). Sensitivity and robustness toward spurious findings were also analyzed. Results showed that the cutoff log10(mBF) = 5 is equivalent to the FWE threshold, often referred as voxel-level threshold, while the cutoff log10(mBF) = 2 is equivalent to the cluster-level FWE (c-FWE) threshold. However, only in the latter case voxels spatially far from the blobs of effect in the c-FWE ALE map survived. Therefore, when using the Bayesian thresholding the cutoff log10(mBF) = 5 should be preferred. However, being in the Bayesian framework, lower values are all equally significant, while suggesting weaker level of force for that hypothesis. Hence, results obtained through less conservative thresholds can be legitimately discussed without losing statistical rigor. The proposed technique adds therefore a powerful tool to the human-brain-mapping field.

Revealing the Selectivity of Neuroanatomical Alteration in Autism Spectrum Disorder via Reverse Inference.

BACKGROUND: Although neuroimaging research has identified atypical neuroanatomical substrates in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), it is at present unclear whether and to what extent disorder-selective gray matter alterations occur in this spectrum of conditions. In fact, a growing body of evidence shows a substantial overlap between the pathomorphological changes across different brain diseases, which may complicate identification of reliable neural markers and differentiation of the anatomical substrates of distinct psychopathologies. METHODS: Using a novel data-driven and Bayesian methodology with published voxel-based morphometry data (849 peer-reviewed experiments and 22,304 clinical subjects), this study performs the first reverse inference investigation to explore the selective structural brain alteration profile of ASD. RESULTS: We found that specific brain areas exhibit a >90% probability of gray matter alteration selectivity for ASD: the bilateral precuneus (Brodmann area 7), right inferior occipital gyrus (Brodmann area 18), left cerebellar lobule IX and Crus II, right cerebellar lobule VIIIA, and right Crus I. Of note, many brain voxels that are selective for ASD include areas that are posterior components of the default mode network. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of these spatial gray matter alteration patterns offers new insights into understanding the complex neurobiological underpinnings of ASD and opens attractive prospects for future neuroimaging-based interventions.

Six actions to improve detection of critical features for neuroimaging coordinate-based meta-analysis preparation.

Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is a research strategy widely used in the field of human brain imaging. Although dedicated tools as BrainMap or Neurosynth had been developed in past years, some of the crucial steps necessary to identify and compose the dataset are still user-based, resulting in a not standardized approach to literature search, as well as in time-consuming and prone to errors procedures. In particular, this concern involves the assessment of voxel-wise whole brain analyses in contrast to ROI-based ones, and the identification of available lists of peaks of effect (i.e., x,y,z coordinates of the foci). Here, we propose six simple actions that can be undertaken by any researcher and by the publishing system, allowing to limit the risk of erroneous decisions on the inclusion of experimental data in the meta-analytic dataset. This straightforward and useful strategy would reduce possible bias in CBMA, therefore allowing to obtain more reliable results.

A co-alteration parceling of the cingulate cortex.

The cingulate cortex is known to be a complex structure, involved in several cognitive and emotional functions, as well as being altered by a variety of brain disorders. This heterogeneity is reflected in the multiple parceling models proposed in the literature. At the present, sub-regions of the cingulate cortex had been identified taking into account functional and structural connectivity, as well as cytological and electrochemical properties. In the present work, we propose an innovative node-wise parceling approach based on meta-analytic Bayesian co-alteration. To this aim, 193 case-control voxel-based morphometry experiments were analyzed, and the Patel's κ index was used to assess probability of morphometric co-alteration between nodes placed in the cingulate cortex and in the rest of the brain. Hierarchical clustering was then applied to identify nodes in the cingulate cortex exhibiting a similar pattern of whole-brain co-alteration. The obtained dendrogram highlighted a robust fronto-parietal cluster compatible with the default mode network, and being supported by the interplay between the retrosplenial cortex and the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, rarely described in the literature. This ensemble was further confirmed by the analysis of functional patterns. Leveraging on co-alteration to investigate cortical organization could, therefore, allow to combine multimodal information, resolving conflicting results sometimes coming from the separate use of singular modalities. Crucially, this provides a valuable way to understand the pathological brain using data driven, whole-brain informed and context-specific evidence in a way not yet explored in the field.

Tasks activating the default mode network map multiple functional systems.

Recent developments in network neuroscience suggest reconsidering what we thought we knew about the default mode network (DMN). Although this network has always been seen as unitary and associated with the resting state, a new deconstructive line of research is pointing out that the DMN could be divided into multiple subsystems supporting different functions. By now, it is well known that the DMN is not only deactivated by tasks, but also involved in affective, mnestic, and social paradigms, among others. Nonetheless, it is starting to become clear that the array of activities in which it is involved, might also be extended to more extrinsic functions. The present meta-analytic study is meant to push this boundary a bit further. The BrainMap database was searched for all experimental paradigms activating the DMN, and their activation likelihood estimation maps were then computed. An additional map of task-induced deactivations was also created. A multidimensional scaling indicated that such maps could be arranged along an anatomo-psychological gradient, which goes from midline core activations, associated with the most internal functions, to that of lateral cortices, involved in more external tasks. Further multivariate investigations suggested that such extrinsic mode is especially related to reward, semantic, and emotional functions. However, an important finding was that the various activation maps were often different from the canonical representation of the resting-state DMN, sometimes overlapping with it only in some peripheral nodes, and including external regions such as the insula. Altogether, our findings suggest that the intrinsic-extrinsic opposition may be better understood in the form of a continuous scale, rather than a dichotomy.

Sex differences in brain homotopic co-activations: a meta-analytic study.

An element of great interest in functional connectivity is 'homotopic connectivity' (HC), namely the connectivity between two mirrored areas of the two hemispheres, mainly mediated by the fibers of the corpus callosum. Despite a long tradition of studying sexual dimorphism in the human brain, to our knowledge only one study has addressed the influence of sex on HC.We investigated the issue of homotopic co-activations in women and men using a coordinate-based meta-analytic method and data from the BrainMap database. A first unexpected observation was that the database was affected by a sex bias: women-only groups are investigated less often than men-only ones, and they are more often studied in certain domains such as emotion compared to men, and less in cognition. Implementing a series of sampling procedures to equalize the size and proportion of the datasets, our results indicated that females exhibit stronger interhemispheric co-activation than males, suggesting that the female brain is less lateralized and more integrated than that of males. In addition, males appear to show less intense but more extensive co-activation than females. Some local differences also appeared. In particular, it appears that primary motor and perceptual areas are more co-activated in males, in contrast to the opposite trend in the rest of the brain. This argues for a multidimensional view of sex brain differences and suggests that the issue should be approached with more complex models than previously thought.

Seeking Overlapping Neuroanatomical Alterations between Dyslexia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Replication Study.

The present work is a replication article based on the paper "Are there shared neural correlates between dyslexia and ADHD? A meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies" by McGrath and Stoodley (2019). In the original research, the authors used activation likelihood estimation (ALE), a technique to perform coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA), to investigate the existence of brain regions undergoing gray matter alteration in association with both attention-deficit/hyper-activity disorder (ADHD) and dyslexia. Here, the same voxel-based morphometry dataset was analyzed, while using the permutation-subject images version of signed differential mapping (PSI-SDM) in place of ALE. Overall, the replication converged with the original paper in showing a limited overlap between the two conditions. In particular, no significant effect was found for dyslexia, therefore precluding any form of comparison between the two disorders. The possible influences of biological sex, age, and medication status were also ruled out. Our findings are in line with literature about gray matter alteration associated with ADHD and dyslexia, often showing conflicting results. Therefore, although neuropsychological and clinical evidence suggest some convergence between ADHD and dyslexia, more future research is sorely needed to reach a consensus on the neuroimaging domain in terms of patterns of gray matter alteration.