Folic acid prevents and partially reverses glucocorticoid-induced hypertension in the rat.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of folic acid on the increased pressure in rats treated with either adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or dexamethasone (Dex), and to further investigate the role of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH(4)) in any effect of folic acid by comparing the effect of BH(4) with that of folic acid in Dex hypertension. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were treated with saline, subcutaneous ACTH (0.2 mg/kg/d) or Dex (10 microg/rat/d). Folic acid (0.04 g/L drinking) or BH(4) (10 mg/kg/d intraperitoneally) was started before (prevention) and during (reversal) glucocorticoid treatment. RESULTS: Saline, BH(4), vehicle for BH(4), or folic acid alone did not change systolic blood pressure (BP). Systolic BP was increased by ACTH and Dex. Folic acid, but not BH(4), prevented the development of hypertension caused by ACTH and Dex treatment. The ACTH and Dex hypertension were partially reversed by folic acid. The BH(4) increased plasma total biopterin concentrations. The Dex decreased plasma NOx concentrations but had no effect on plasma biopterin concentrations. The ACTH and Dex increased plasma F(2)-isoprostane concentrations and decreased serum homocysteine concentrations compared with control but had no effect on serum folate concentrations. Folic acid increased serum folate concentrations compared with control but had no effect on homocysteine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Folic acid prevented and partially reversed both ACTH and Dex hypertension in rats without modifying the increase in plasma F(2)-isoprostane concentrations. Given that BH(4) failed to prevent ACTH or Dex hypertension, folic acid is unlikely to be acting through increased BH(4) production. The precise mechanism for the BP-lowering effect of folic acid in this model of hypertension remains to be determined.

Apocynin but not L-arginine prevents and reverses dexamethasone-induced hypertension in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone (Dex)-hypertension in rats is associated with increased oxidative stress. We investigated effects of the NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitor apocynin and the nitric oxide (NO) precursor L-arginine on Dex-hypertension to determine the relative roles of NAD(P)H oxidase and uncoupling in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and hypertension. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10/group) received Dex (20 microg/kg/day subcutaneously) or saline (vehicle) for 14 days. In a prevention study, rats received 4 days of apocynin treatement (1.5 mmol/L in drinking water) followed by Dex/saline for 12 days. In reversal studies, apocynin or L-arginine was given from day 8 to 14. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by tail cuff, and thymus weight was used as a marker of glucocorticoid activity. RESULTS: Administration of Dex increased SBP (104 +/- 3 to 122 +/- 3 mm Hg, P < .01, mean +/- SEM) and decreased thymus and body weight (P' < .05). Apocynin alone had no effect on SBP, BW, or thymus weight. Apocynin prevented (122 +/- 4 Dex, 111 +/- 3 mm Hg Apocynin+Dex, P' < .05) and reversed Dex-hypertension (130 +/- 4 to 116 +/- 4 mm Hg, P < .01). L-arginine did not reverse Dex-hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: In male SD rats, apocynin but not l-arginine prevented and reversed Dex-hypertension, suggesting that NAD(P)H oxidase-mediated superoxide production but not endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling is important in Dex-hypertension.

Defining the chromatin signature of inducible genes in T cells.

BACKGROUND: Specific chromatin characteristics, especially the modification status of the core histone proteins, are associated with active and inactive genes. There is growing evidence that genes that respond to environmental or developmental signals may possess distinct chromatin marks. Using a T cell model and both genome-wide and gene-focused approaches, we examined the chromatin characteristics of genes that respond to T cell activation. RESULTS: To facilitate comparison of genes with similar basal expression levels, we used expression-profiling data to bin genes according to their basal expression levels. We found that inducible genes in the lower basal expression bins, especially rapidly induced primary response genes, were more likely than their non-responsive counterparts to display the histone modifications of active genes, have RNA polymerase II (Pol II) at their promoters and show evidence of ongoing basal elongation. There was little or no evidence for the presence of active chromatin marks in the absence of promoter Pol II on these inducible genes. In addition, we identified a subgroup of genes with active promoter chromatin marks and promoter Pol II but no evidence of elongation. Following T cell activation, we find little evidence for a major shift in the active chromatin signature around inducible gene promoters but many genes recruit more Pol II and show increased evidence of elongation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the majority of inducible genes are primed for activation by having an active chromatin signature and promoter Pol II with or without ongoing elongation.