A phase Ib/II study of galunisertib in combination with nivolumab in solid tumors and non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this phase Ib/II open-label study, tumor immune suppression was targeted in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors and patients with recurrent/refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using galunisertib with nivolumab. METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, and were treatment-naive for anti-programmed cell death-1, its ligand, or transforming growth factor ß receptor 1 kinase inhibitors. Phase Ib was an open-label, dose-escalation assessment of the safety and tolerability of galunisertib with nivolumab in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Phase II evaluated the safety of galunisertib with nivolumab in NSCLC patients who had received prior platinum-based treatment but were immuno-oncology agent-naive. RESULTS: This trial was conducted between October 2015 and August 2020. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in phase I. In the phase II NSCLC cohort (n = 25), patients received 150 mg twice daily galunisertib (14 days on/14 days off dosing schedule for all phases) plus nivolumab at 3 mg/kg (intravenously every 2 weeks). In this phase, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were pruritus (n = 9, 36%), fatigue (n = 8, 32%), and decreased appetite (n = 7, 28%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs were observed. Six (24%) patients had confirmed partial response (PR) and 4 (16%) had stable disease; 1 additional patient had confirmed PR after initial pseudo-progression. The median duration of response was 7.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.75, NR). Among the 7 responders, including the delayed responder, 1 had high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%). The median progression-free survival was 5.26 months (95% CI: 1.77, 9.20) and the median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI: 8.15, NR). Interferon gamma response genes were induced post-treatment and cell adhesion genes were repressed, although the association of these observations with tumor response and clinical outcomes was not statistically powered due to limited samples available. CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary endpoint as galunisertib combined with nivolumab was well tolerated. Preliminary efficacy was observed in a subset of patients in the Phase 2 NSCLC cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02423343; 22.04.2015).

Association of ficolin-1 and ficolin-3 gene variation and pulmonary tuberculosis susceptibility in a Chinese population.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to estimate the association of ficolin-1 (FCN1) gene (rs10120023, rs1071583) and ficolin-3 (FCN3) gene (rs3813800, rs10794501) polymorphisms and pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) susceptibility, as well as their several clinical features, in a Chinese population. METHODS: This study included a cohort of 489 PTB patients and 489 healthy controls, and the four SNPs were genotyped by improved multiple ligase detection reaction (iMLDR). RESULTS: We found that there were no significant differences regarding the allele and genotype frequencies of FCN1 rs10120023, rs1071583 and FCN3 rs3813800, rs10794501 between PTB patients and healthy controls (all p > 0.05). The association of three main haplotypes (CC, CT, and TC) in FCN1 and three main haplotypes (CT, GA, and GT) in FCN3 with PTB susceptibility was also analyzed, and no significant association was detected (all p > 0.05). In FCN1, the rs1071583 TT genotype was significantly associated with the occurrence of drug resistance in PTB patients (p = 0.040). In addition, the GG genotype and G allele frequencies of rs3813800 in FCN3 gene were significantly higher in PTB patients with pulmonary infection (p = 0.027, p = 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: FCN1 and FCN3 genetic variation were not contributed to the pathogenesis of PTB in Chinese. While rs1071583 and rs3813800 variant might associate with several clinical characteristics of PTB.

Pharmacokinetics of sugammadex 16 mg/kg in healthy Chinese volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Elimination of sugammadex occurs predominantly via the kidneys, with the majority of the drug excreted unchanged in the urine. To date, most studies with sugammadex have been performed in non-Asian populations. The objectives of this open-label study were to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single-dose sugammadex (16 mg/kg) in healthy Chinese adult volunteers. METHODS: 12 Chinese subjects (6 male; 6 female) received intravenous sugammadex (16 mg/kg) as a 10-second bolus infusion. Blood samples were collected pre-sugammadex and at regular intervals up to 24 hours post-sugammadex for PK assessment. Safety was assessed via AEs, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Following sugammadex 16 mg/kg infusion, peak sugammadex concentration was 197 µg/mL, clearance was 99.7 mL/min, and apparent volume of distribution at equilibrium was 10.5 L. Plasma sugammadex concentrations showed a polyexponential decline over time, with an overall geometric mean (CV%) terminal half-life of 145 minutes (17.9%) (139 minutes (17.7%) for males; 152 minutes (18.6%) for females). No influence of gender on the PK of sugammadex was observed. Three subjects experienced an adverse events (AE) (dysgeusia of mild intensity), which was considered possibly or probably related to sugammadex. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiography or laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION: PK of sugammadex (16 mg/kg) was characterized in healthy Chinese subjects. Overall between-subject variability on clearance and apparent volume of distribution was ~ 10%. Sugammadex was generally well tolerated.

Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have suggested a potential risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared the incidence of HPD during treatment with nivolumab±ipilimumab versus natural tumor progression with placebo in post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind clinical trials. METHODS: ATTRACTION-2 randomized patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and progression on ≥2 prior regimens to nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W or placebo. CheckMate 451 randomized patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) and ongoing complete/partial response or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy to nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, nivolumab 1 mg/kg+ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W for four doses then nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or placebo. Patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug and with tumor scans at baseline and the first on-treatment evaluation were included in the HPD analyses. HPD definitions were ≥20%, ≥50%, and ≥100% increase in target lesion sum of the longest diameters (SLD) at the first on-treatment assessment. RESULTS: In the ATTRACTION-2 HPD-evaluable population, 243 patients received nivolumab and 115 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (33.7% vs 46.1%) and ≥50% (6.2% vs 11.3%); similar proportions had increases in SLD ≥100% (1.6% vs 1.7%). In the CheckMate 451 HPD-evaluable population, 177 patients received nivolumab, 179 nivolumab+ipilimumab, and 175 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (27.1%, 27.4% vs 45.7%), ≥50% (10.2%, 11.2% vs 22.3%), and ≥100% (2.8%, 2.8% vs 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab±ipilimumab was not associated with an increased rate of progression versus placebo in patients with GC, GEJC, or ED SCLC, suggesting that previous reports of HPD may reflect the natural disease course in some patients rather than ICI-mediated progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02538666; NCT02267343.

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451.

PURPOSE: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. METHODS: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested. RESULTS: Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P = .37; median, 9.2 v 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%). CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals.

Nivolumab Monotherapy and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CheckMate 032 Randomized Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab monotherapy is approved in the United States for third-line or later metastatic small cell lung cancer based on pooled data from nonrandomized and randomized cohorts of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of nivolumab ± ipilimumab (CheckMate 032; NCT01928394). We report updated results, including long-term overall survival (OS), from the randomized cohort. METHODS: Patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression after one to two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 3:2 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by number of prior chemotherapy regimens and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients received nivolumab and 96 nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Minimum follow-up for ORR/progression-free survival/safety was 11.9 months (nivolumab) and 11.2 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). ORR increased with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (21.9% versus 11.6% with nivolumab; odds ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-4.26; p = 0.03). For long-term OS, minimum follow-up was 29.0 months (nivolumab) versus 28.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab); median (95% confidence interval) OS was 5.7 (3.8-7.6) versus 4.7 months (3.1-8.3). Twenty-four-month OS rates were 17.9% (nivolumab) and 16.9% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 12.9% (nivolumab) versus 37.5% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and treatment-related deaths were n =1 versus n = 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas ORR (primary endpoint) was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, OS was similar between groups. In each group, OS remained encouraging with long-term follow-up. Toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy.

Factors influencing second renal allograft survival: a single center experience in China.

Second renal transplants are historically associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to assess long-term survival of second renal grafts from deceased donors performed at our center and to analyze risk factors associated with long-term graft outcome. Sixty-five second renal grafts were enrolled into this study, and compared to primary ones performed during the same period. Kaplan-Meier curve showed a graft survival rate of 89.2% at 1 year, 80% at 3 years, and 63.1% at 5 years, which were similar to that of primary graft. Univariate analysis showed that time to first graft loss, cold ischaemia time, HLA mismatch, primary maintenance immunosuppressant, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine at 1 year were significantly associated with regraft survival. Cox regression demonstrated the dominant effect of acute rejection episodes, primary maintenance immunosuppressant, serum creatinine at 1 year, and time to first graft loss as predictor of second graft outcome. However, when long-term survival of second graft was examined on the basis of Kaplan-Meier estimates, HLA mismatch was found to be significant. The second graft had more benefits of improved pre-transplant screening and post-transplant management, and its survival rate was satisfactory and similar to that of primary one. Immunologic factors such as acute rejection and primary immunosuppressant are the main determinants of long-term renal transplantation outcome.

Comparison of single bolus ATG and Basiliximab as induction therapy in presensitized renal allograft recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.

Presensitized renal allograft recipients require special management to improve their outcome, and there is no consensus on the optimal immunosuppressive strategy. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 82 patients, who were PRA positive pre-transplant (above 10%) and received single bolus ATG and basiliximab as induction therapy, and assessed safety and efficacy of two kinds of induction therapies. Patients of ATG group (n=40) received single bolus ATG (Fresenius, 9 mg/kg preoperatively) and those of basiliximab group (n=42) were given two doses of basiliximab (Simulect, Novartis, 20 mg) on days 0 and 4 post-transplant. All patients received standard triple immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus (FK-506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. The follow-up time was 12 months. There was no hyperacute rejection in two groups, and delayed graft function occurred in two patients of ATG group and three of basiliximab group. After 12-month follow-up, more acute rejection (AR) episodes were observed in basiliximab group than ATG group (35.7% vs. 15%, P=0.032). Although highly significant differences were observed between ATG group and basiliximab group with respect to the incidence of thrombocytopenia (P=0.001), single bolus ATG was well tolerated. Incidences of other adverse events and infection episodes did not differ between two groups (P>0.05). One-year patient and graft survival was 95%, 92.5% and 95.2%, 88.1% in ATG and basiliximab group respectively (P>0.05). Both single bolus ATG and basiliximab induction therapy achieved similar one-year graft/patient survival. However, single bolus ATG yielded much lower AR rate than basiliximab without increase in infection episodes and severe adverse events.

Phase 1/2 Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Nivolumab Plus Crizotinib for the First-Line Treatment of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Translocation - Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 370).

INTRODUCTION: Crizotinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, is a first-line treatment for ALK translocation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients eventually progress. Immunotherapies, including the programmed death-1 inhibitor nivolumab, have resulted in durable responses and long-term overall survival in patients with NSCLC. We hypothesized that combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy could result in more patients with responses and/or more durable responses. Herein we report data from a study assessing nivolumab plus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK translocation-positive NSCLC. METHODS: Group E in CheckMate 370 was a single-arm cohort designed to evaluate the safety of first-line nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus crizotinib (250 mg twice daily) in patients with ALK translocation-positive NSCLC. The primary endpoint of safety would be met if ≤20% of patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events by week 17. Objective response rate was a secondary endpoint. A planned safety review occurred in November 2016; the data cutoff was May 26, 2017. RESULTS: Of the first 13 patients treated with nivolumab plus crizotinib, 5 (38%) developed severe hepatic toxicities leading to the discontinuation of the combination. Of these, two patients died and the presence of severe hepatic toxicities may have contributed to death. Enrollment was closed and combination treatment discontinued due to observed grade ≥3 hepatic toxicities. Five patients (38%) had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support further evaluation of nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks plus crizotinib 250 mg twice daily.

Pre- and post-transplant monitoring of soluble CD30 levels as predictor of acute renal allograft rejection.

Identification of renal graft candidates at high risk of impending acute rejection (AR) and graft loss may be helpful for patient-tailored immunosuppressive regimens and renal graft survival. To investigate the feasibility with soluble CD30 (sCD30) as predictor of AR, sCD30 levels of 70 patients were detected on day 0 pre-transplant and day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 30 post-transplant. AR episodes in 6 months were recorded and then patients were divided into Group AR (n=11) and Group UC (n=59). Results showed that the patients had higher pre-transplant sCD30 levels than healthy people. A significant decrease of sCD30 was observed on the first day post-transplant and continued until day 14 post-transplant. Soluble CD30 presented a stable level from day 14 to 30 post-transplant. Pre-transplant sCD30 levels of Group AR were much higher than those of Group UC (P<0.001). Patients of Group AR also had higher sCD30 levels than those of Group UC on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14 (P<0.001). The sCD30 level presented a significantly delayed decrease in the patients of Group AR. Statistical results showed that the highest value of area under ROC curve (0.95) was obtained on day 5 post-transplant, suggesting that sCD30 levels on day 5 are of high predictive value. Therefore, sCD30 level may be a good marker of increased alloreactivity and of significant predictive value. It's necessary to monitor the variation of sCD30 in the early period post-transplant.

Effectiveness of rhythm control in persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation with overdrive atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs after linear right atrial catheter ablation.

Right atrial (RA) maze procedures using linear catheter ablation have had limited efficacy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that "hybrid" therapy using overdrive atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs can improve efficacy of catheter RA maze and expand its role to persistent or permanent AF. Catheter RA maze procedures were performed in 26 patients with persistent or permanent AF refractory to 4.5 +/- 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Overdrive dual-site RA pacing (21 patients) or high RA pacing (5 patients) was continued (n = 11) or instituted periablation (n = 15). All patients continued receiving previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs. Freedom from permanent AF (rhythm control), symptomatic and/or asymptomatic AF recurrences, the safety of hybrid therapy, and overall survival were assessed. There was no procedure-related mortality or stroke. Rhythm control was achieved in 24 patients (92%) within 3 months. During long-term follow-up (6 to 49 months, mean 17 +/- 10), rhythm control was maintained in 20 patients (77%). Nine patients (35%) had no AF recurrences, whereas 11 patients maintained rhythm control with infrequent AF recurrences. Device datalogs at the study cut-off point demonstrated no AF events in 6 patients, nonsustained atrial tachycardia in 2 patients, and brief asymptomatic paroxysmal AF in 12 patients. Actuarial patient survival was 95% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years of follow-up. Thus, hybrid therapy utilizing catheter RA maze procedures with overdrive atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs can be performed safely and can reestablish rhythm control in selected patients with refractory persistent or permanent AF.

[Biologic activity of bispecific single chain antibody against human gamma-seminoprotein and CD3 molecule].

AIM: To construct a recombinant vector which expresses bispecific single chain antibody (BsscFv) against human gamma-seminoprotein and CD3 molecule and evaluate its biologic activity. METHODS: The BsscFv gene was constructed by the splicing overlap extensive (SOE) PCR and then a flexible peptide linker was inserted between anti-human gamma-seminoprotein single chain Fv gene and anti-CD3 single chain Fv gene. The fusion gene was subcloned into the pSectag2-B plasmid and was expressed in HeLa cell lines. After being analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot, the expressed product was purified through a Ni(2+)-NTA superflow affinity chromatography column. Flow cytometry (FCM) was used to detect the binding activity of BsscFv to CD3(+) cell line Jurkat cells and prostate carcinoma cells LNCaP. In vitro killing effect on target cells (LNCaP) mediated by BsscFv was determined by chromium(51)-release test. The effect of CTLs mediated by BsscFv on inhibiting tumor growth was observed by utilizing nude mice bearing prostate cancer cells. RESULTS: DNA sequencing indicated that BsscFv gene consisted of 1,500 bp, encoding 500 amino acids. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis showed that the expressed product with relative molecular mass of 61,000 existed in culture supernatant of Hela cells. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that the binding rate of BsscFv to LNCaP cells and Jurkat cells was 54.1% and 53.7%, respectively. In vitro, BsscFv mediated cytotoxicity of CTLs to LNCaP cells as confirmed by chromium(51)-release assay. In prostate cancer nude mouse model, BsscFv inhibited tumor's growth as compared with control group. CONCLUSION: The BsscFv against human gamma-seminoprotein and CD3 molecule possesses certain biologic activity, and in vitro and in vivo it can mediate cytotoxicity of CTLs to prostate cancer cells.

[Significance of detecting urinary monocyte chemotactic peptide-1 in renal transplant recipient].

AIM: To detect the content of monocyte chemotactic peptide-1(MCP-1) and to investigate the role of MCP-1 in acute renal graft rejection. METHODS: Urinary MCP-1 level was detected by avidin biotin complex(ABC)ELISA. RESULTS: Urinary MCP-1 levels in renal function stable renal transplantation of recipients and control group were (416+/-21) microg/L and (408+/-11) microg/L, respectively. Urinary MCP-1 level in renal transplantation recipients with acute rejection was (1195+/-58) microg/L, which was notably higher than that in control group and renal function stable recipients (P<0.01). After anti-rejection treatment, urinary MCP-1 level decreased markedly in patients who responded to treatment. CONCLUSION: The urinary MCP-1 level is correlated closely with acute renal graft rejection and its increase may indicate ongoing acute renal rejection. Detection of urinary MCP-1 level may contribute to early diagnosis and prognostic judgement of acute graft rejection.