Seronegative hepatitis C virus infection in Polish blood donors-Virological characteristics of index donations and follow-up observations.

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) was implemented in Poland in 1999 for screening of plasma for fractionation and for all blood donors in 2002. To analyze seronegative NAT-positive samples representing hepatitis C virus (HCV) window-period (WP) in the years 2000 to 2016 and to determine infection outcome. We analyzed results of 17 502 739 donations screened in minipools (6-48) or individually. Index samples underwent viral load (VL) quantification, genotyping and Ag, and anti-HCV re-testing using chemiluminescence (CMIA), electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA), and fourth-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IV EIA) assays. HCV-seronegative infections were identified in 126 donations (7.2/mln donations; 95% confidential intervals, 6.0-8.6). Frequency of NAT yields was decreasing over time. Of the initial 126 seronegative index cases 106 were retested: 32.1% were reactive in IV EIA, 11.3% in ECLIA, and 1.9% in CMIA. The lowest VL correlated with absent anti-HCV and HCV Ag, while VL was highest when the antigen was detectable and then it decreased when anti-HCV appeared at a level detectable by sensitive third generation tests while retesting. The proportion of genotype 1 was 38.9% in samples positive only for HCV RNA and 71.4% in samples that were anti-HCV reactive in re-testing. In parallel, genotype 3 frequency was 50% in the former group and 21% in the latter. NAT is an effective measure to limit HCV transmission by transfusion and IV EIA seems to have higher clinical sensitivity than ECLIA. Samples representing likely successive phases of early HCV infection were characterized by different genotype distribution probably due to very early elimination of genotype 3.

Molecular and serological infection marker screening in blood donors indicates high endemicity of hepatitis E virus in Poland.

BACKGROUND: Until now, markers of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection have not been studied in blood donors throughout Poland, and no acute case of HEV infection has been closely documented or confirmed by HEV RNA detection. The prevalence of HEV infection markers, including HEV RNA in Polish blood donors and virus genotypes was investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 12,664 individual donations from 22 Polish blood transfusion centers were tested for HEV RNA by transcription-mediated amplification. In addition, 3079 first-time donors sampled throughout Poland also were screened for antibodies to HEV. HEV RNA and immunoglobulin M-positive donations were confirmed using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting, respectively. RESULTS: Ten donors were identified as RNA initial reactive (one of 1266 donors), and six (one of 2109) were identified as repeat reactive and confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or seroconversion. Sequence analysis identified HEV Genotype 3c in one donor and Genotype 3i in two others. On average, 43.5% of donors were immunoglobulin G-positive. Immunoglobulin G seroprevalence ranged from 22.7% to 60.8% in group ages 18 to 27 years and 48 to 57 years, respectively and differed between administrative regions from 28.9% in Podlasie to 61.3% in Wielkopolska. Thirty-nine of the donors were immunoglobulin M-positive, and seven donors were IgM positive only (0.2%). Of 37 immunoglobulin M-reactive samples tested by Western blot, 24 (64.9%) were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate a high level of HEV endemicity throughout Poland compared with other countries. There is an urgent need to consider the protection of recipients of blood components against transfusion-transmitted HEV infection.

Evaluation and experience from routine use of chemiluminescence assays for serological screening of blood and plasma donations on the Alinity s system and the Alinity i system, two new fully-automated immunoassay systems in Poland.

In Poland, independent evaluations under the auspices of the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM) are mandated for any new device, assay, systems for screening samples from whole blood and plasma donors prior to implementation by Blood Transfusion Center (BTC). In last 5 years, two new systems were introduced to the market by Abbott GmbH, namely the Alinity s and the Alinity i. The evaluations performed for these two systems included the assessment of sensitivity, specificity and precision for each of the four mandatory serological screening markers in Poland: Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C virus antibodies (Anti-HCV), HIV antibodies (anti-HIV) and Syphilis antibodies (anti-Treponema pallidum, anti-TP). Sensitivity was assessed by testing seroconversion panels, HBsAg international reference standard, well characterized local samples, and dilution panels. Specificity was assessed by testing routine donor samples. The results from Alinity i assays were compared to the results from Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR and Ortho VITROS 3600 assays, while the results from Alinity s assays were compared to the results of ARCHITECT i2000SR assays. The evaluation of the Alinity s and Alinity i assays for sensitivity (100 %), specificity (99,92-100 %) and precision generated results that were as good as or better than generated by routinely used systems, were within acceptance criteria, and met all requirements for screening blood donor samples in accordance with Polish regulations. The specificity of the assays in routine use by BTCs, analyzed after approximately 150,000 donations on both systems, was comparable to the specificity observed during the evaluations at IHTM.

Head-to-head comparison of two transcription-mediated amplification assay versions for detection of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 in blood donors.

BACKGROUND: The second triplex transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay version (Ultrio Plus, Novartis Diagnostics) uses an additional reagent enhancing the disruption of hepatitis B virus (HBV) particles and release of DNA for the target capture probe. This study compares the performance of this new assay version with the previous one (Ultrio). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For analytical sensitivity assessment the World Health Organization HBV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) international standards and various genotype dilution panels were used. Individual donations (IDs) from 9980 first-time donors were screened simultaneously by serology and both TMA assay versions. RESULTS: The 50 and 95% limits of detection (LODs) for HBV using Ultrio Plus were 0.8 (0.6-1.0) and 4.6 (3.2-7.2) IU/mL, respectively, 2.4 (1.4-4.8)-fold more sensitive than Ultrio. The TMA assay versions had comparable LODs for HIV-1 and HCV. The improvement factors on analytical sensitivity panels of HBV Genotypes A to G ranged from 1.3 to 7.3 and 50% LODs (95% confidence interval) reduced from 12.5 (10-15) to 3.8 (3.2-4.4) copies/mL. One Ultrio Plus HBV Genotype D yield sample missed by the Ultrio assay in the donor screening study was detected with ninefold higher sensitivity. The specificities of ID nucleic acid test (ID-NAT) and serologic testing in a similar repeat test algorithm were 100 and 99.41%, respectively. CONCLUSION: More efficient target capture chemistry in the new TMA assay version significantly improved sensitivity and diminished variability in detecting HBV strains of various genotypes. We recommend a triplicate ID-NAT repeat test strategy to eliminate discriminatory tests on false-non-repeat-reactive (anti-HBc-nonreactive) donations.

[Parvovirus B19 DNA testing in Polish blood donors, 2004-2010]. / Badanie DNA parvowirusa B19 (B19V) u Polskich dawcoów krwi, 2004-2010.

UNLABELLED: Since 2004 Polish blood donors have been tested for parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA. The screening testing has been performed in donors of plasma for fractionation and anti-D and anti-HBs production and donors of erythrocytes used for immunization. AIM is to present methods of the testing, quality control and results in period 2004-2010. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Testing was performed in individual donation testing (IDT) in Regional Blood Transfusion Center (RBTC) in Lublin or in pools of 24 in Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine in Warsaw (IHTM). Quantitative testing with real-time PCR was preceded with nucleic acid isolation on silica based methods (Prepito Viral DNA/RNA, Chemagen and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, QIAGEN). Amplification was performed initially with home made method and later with commercial assay (Artus Parvo B19 RG PCR Kit on Rotor Gene 6 000). In total 17 625 donations were tested: 8 539 in pools and 9 090 individually. Beside routine external quality control programmes in which both laboratories participated (Proficiency Study VQC,Amsterdam, Holand; EQA Programe, Glasgow, Scotland), panel containing negative samples, positive with very high DNA B 19V level and plasma infected with genotype 2 was prepared for RBTC in Lublin. RESULTS: B19V infection frequency was 1:980 donations, low viraemic donations were detected most frequently (1:1 037). It was identified only one donation with DNA load that could cause potential health risk for plasma product recipients (1:17 625). In one of the donors B 19V DNA was observed for 3 years and 3 months. In acute or persistent phase of infection no clinical or laboratory symptoms (morphology of peripheral blood, ALT) were observed. Due to risk of underestimation of viral load connected with viral genome polymorphism all donations with B19V positive result were not allowed to be clinically used.

[HCV RNA testing for early diagnosis of hepatitis C in blood donors--new challenge for transfusion medicine and hepatology]. / Rozpoznanie wczesnego etapu zakazenia HCV u dawców krwi poprzez badanie RNA HCV--nowe wyzwanie dla transfuzjologii i hepatologii.

To improve the blood transfusion safety, according to the international recommendations anti-HCV negative blood donors are screened for HCV RNA. For decreasing the costs, the pools of 48 donor samples are tested. Until now 2,500,000 Polish donors were tested and HCV RNA was detected in 40. Anti-HCV was detected in plasma of all donors available for follow up for more than three months. No clinical symptoms were observed but in 20 donors slightly elevated ALT level was found. In the follow up, after detection of anti-HCV in 9/11 donors elevated ALT (167-2043 U/l) was observed. In two donors, out of 4 observed for more than 12 months HCV RNA was not detected in the follow up whereas anti-HCV were still present. In 7 donors probable source of infection was identified. The early detection of HCV infection is a serious challenge not only to transfusion medicine but also to general practitioners and hepatologists due to the necessity of further monitoring and treatment of infected individuals.

Characterization of HBV DNA+/HBsAg- blood donors in Poland identified by triplex NAT.

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been performed in Poland since 2005 on samples seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV). Tools included 24-donation pool testing (PT) using Cobas Amplicor or in individual donations (ID) by Procleix Ultrio. Seven of 761,666 (1:108,800) and 21/250,191 (1:11,900) HBV DNA-positive donations were identified and confirmed by alternative methods. HBV DNA load ranged between 11.6 and 4.6 x 10(4) IU/mL in 11 samples and could not be quantified in 17 samples. HBV genotypes A (56%) and D (4%) were found. The analysis of combined results from index, follow-up, and look-back samples identified four groups: (1) Two cases tested HBsAg positive with alternative, more sensitive, assays; (2) Four cases were in the pre-seroconversion window period; (3) Eight cases had a fluctuating pattern of HBV DNA and anti-HBs detection (recovered infection); and (4) twelve cases carried anti-HBc without anti-HBs, which might correspond to either chronic or recovered "occult" HBV infection. One donor with no HBV markers in the follow-up was excluded, and another was in the window period preceding anti-HBs. HBV NAT identified more confirmed positive donors than HCV or HIV NAT, and 1:250,000 could not be detected by anti-HBc screening. Serological and molecular studies on follow-up and look-back samples are important to classify donors. In conclusion, further studies are needed to determine whether the considerably higher yield of HBV DNA detection obtained with individual donation screening improves blood safety compared with anti-HBc screening.