RESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: Personal growth initiative (PGI) is regarded as a meaningful concept with potential value at both the individual and organizational levels, but little is known about the factors that contribute to nurses' PGI. This study aimed to explore how proactive personality and hospital work environment affect PGI of clinical nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September and October 2022 among 4414 nurses from 10 tertiary general hospitals in 10 cities in Sichuan, China, using a two-stage sampling method. Self-reported anonymous online questionnaires, such as sociodemographic information survey, personal growth initiative scale II, the 10-item proactive personality scale, and practice environment scale-nursing work index were used to collect data. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses were performed to examine research hypotheses. RESULTS: Among the control variables in this study, nurses' self-perceptions of general health status and professional title positively predicted PGI (ß = 0.462, 95%CI = 0.272-0.653; ß = 1.078, 95%CI = 0.508-1.648). After adding control variables, both proactive personality (ß = 1.143, 95%CI = 1.096-1.190) and work environment (ß = 3.391, 95%CI = 2.904-3.879) positively predicted PGI. The work environment positively moderated the association between proactive personality and PGI (ß = 0.108, 95%CI = 0.025-0.191). These predictors jointly explained 50.3% of the variance in PGI. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses with a greater tendency to have a typical proactive personality have higher levels of personal growth initiative, and this positive effect will be better highlighted in a healthier work environment. Nursing managers should prioritize the employment of people with proactive personality traits, focus on the development and stimulation of proactive personality traits in nurses, and establish a supportive work environment to maximize the personal growth initiative of nurses.
RESUMEN
Targeting protein kinase C (PKC) family was found to repress the migration and resistance of non-small cell lung cancer cells to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, none of the PKC inhibitors has been approved for anticancer therapy yet due to the limited efficacy in clinical trials, and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. l-lactic acidosis, a common condition comprising high l-lactate concentration and acidic pH in the tumor microenvironment, has been known to induce tumor metastasis and drug resistance. In this study, l-lactic acid was found to reverse the inhibitory effects of pan-PKC inhibitors GO6983 on PKC activity, cell migration, and EGFR-TKI resistance, but these effects were not affected by the modulators of lactate receptor GPR81. Interestingly, blockade of lactate transporters, monocarboxylate transporter-1 and -4 (MCT1 and MCT4), attenuated the intracellular level of GO6983, and its inhibitory effect on PKC activity, suggesting that lactic acid promotes the resistance to PKC inhibitors by competing for the uptake through these transporters rather than by activating its receptor, GPR81. Our findings explain the underlying mechanisms of the limited response of PKC inhibitors in clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Acidosis Láctica , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Simportadores , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Humanos , Ácido Láctico/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Transportadores de Ácidos Monocarboxílicos/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Simportadores/metabolismo , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health promotion behaviors are key determinant of health and well-being, and also play an important role in promoting successful aging. This study investigated levels of engagement in health promotion behaviors among Chinese rural older adults, and explored effects of perceived health competence, health education activities experience and sociodemographic variables on health promotion behavior in this population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional survey was performed. Participants were recruited by a multistage, stratified, cluster-sampling procedure from Nanbu County, Sichuan Province, China. All participants completed four paper questionnaires: sociodemographic characteristics and health care status survey, the Chinese version of the health promoting lifestyle profile-II (HPLP-II), perceived health competence scale and Lubben social network scale. Data were collected from July to August 2021. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the effects of different factors on health promotion behaviors. RESULTS: A total of 425 rural older adults with an average age of 72.7 years were included in analysis. The overall average score of HPLP-II was 101.6. The stepwise multiple linear regression analysis results showed that those who had higher perceived health competence (ß = 0.66, P < 0.001), experienced health education activities (ß = 0.254, P < 0.001), had physical examination (ß = 0.107, P < 0.001), was married (ß = 0.189, P < 0.001), had primary school education or above (ß = 0.189, P < 0.001), and had a per capita monthly household income of more than 1000¥ (ß = 0.085, P = 0.007), have higher levels of engagement in health promotion behaviors; while the level of health promotion behaviors of the older adults living alone was lower than that of living with their spouse or others (ß = -0.192, P < 0.001). Combination of the above variables accounted for a total of 69.1% of the variance in health promotion behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The level of health promotion behaviors among Chinese rural older adults is low. Perceived health competence and health education activities experience are two strong determinants of health promotion behaviors. Comprehensive health promotion programs aimed at improving perceived health competences and health literacy through health education activities may be an important part of optimizing the level of health promotion behaviors among rural older adults.
Asunto(s)
Educación en Salud , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Promoción de la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Disparities in access to a multidisciplinary cancer consultation (MDCc) persist, and the role of physician relationships remains understudied. This study examined the extent to which multilevel factors, including patient characteristics and patient-sharing network measures reflecting the structure of physician relationships, are associated with an MDCc and receipt of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery among patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA NSCLC from 2016 to 2017. We assembled patient-sharing networks and identified cancer specialists who were locally unique for their specialty, herein referred to as linchpins. The proportion of linchpin cancer specialists for each hospital referral region (HRR) was calculated as a network-based measure of specialist scarcity. We used multilevel multinomial logistic regression to estimate associations between study variables and receipt of an MDCc and multilevel logistic regression to examine the relationship between patient receipt of an MDCc and initial treatment. RESULTS: Our study included 6120 patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC, of whom 751 (12.3%) received an MDCc, 1729 (28.3%) consulted only a radiation oncologist, 2010 (32.8%) consulted only a surgeon, and 1630 (26.6%) consulted neither specialist within 2 months of diagnosis. Compared with patients residing in an HRR with a low proportion of linchpin surgeons, those residing in an HRR with a high proportion of linchpin surgeons had a 2.99 (95% CI, 1.87-4.78) greater relative risk of consulting only a radiation oncologist versus receiving an MDCc and a 2.70 (95% CI, 1.68-4.35) greater relative risk of consulting neither specialist versus receiving an MDCc. Patients who received an MDCc were 5.32 times (95% CI, 4.27-6.63) more likely to receive stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Physician networks are associated with receipt of an MDCc and treatment, underscoring the potential for leveraging patient-sharing network analysis to improve access to lung cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Medicare , Radiocirugia , Derivación y Consulta , Programa de VERF , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Radiocirugia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer centers rapidly adopted telehealth to deliver care remotely. Telehealth will likely remain a model of care for years to come and may not only affect the way oncologists deliver care to their own patients but also the physicians with whom they share patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine oncologist characteristics associated with telehealth use and compare patient-sharing networks before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in a rural catchment area with a particular focus on the ties between physicians at the comprehensive cancer center and regional facilities. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we obtained deidentified electronic health record data for individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer at Dartmouth Health in New Hampshire from 2018-2020. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify physician factors associated with telehealth encounters post COVID-19. Patient-sharing networks for each cancer type before and post COVID-19 were characterized with global network measures. Exponential-family random graph models were performed to estimate homophily terms for the likelihood of ties existing between physicians colocated at the hub comprehensive cancer center. RESULTS: Of the 12,559 encounters between patients and oncologists post COVID-19, 1228 (9.8%) were via telehealth. Patient encounters with breast oncologists who practiced at the hub hospital were over twice as likely to occur via telehealth compared to encounters with oncologists who practiced in regional facilities (odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.17-4.15; P=.01). Patient encounters with oncologists who practiced in multiple locations were less likely to occur via telehealth, and this association was statistically significant for lung cancer care (odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.76; P=.01). We observed an increase in ties between oncologists at the hub hospital and oncologists at regional facilities in the lung cancer network post COVID-19 compared to before COVID-19 (93/318, 29.3%, vs 79/370, 21.6%, respectively), which was also reflected in the lower homophily coefficients post COVID-19 compared to before COVID-19 for physicians being colocated at the hub hospital (estimate: 1.92, 95% CI 1.46-2.51, vs 2.45, 95% CI 1.98-3.02). There were no significant differences observed in breast cancer or colorectal cancer networks. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth use and associated changes to patient-sharing patterns associated with telehealth varied by cancer type, suggesting disparate approaches for integrating telehealth across clinical groups within this health system. The limited changes to the patient-sharing patterns between oncologists at the hub hospital and regional facilities suggest that telehealth was less likely to create new referral patterns between these types of facilities and rather replace care that would otherwise have been delivered in person. However, this study was limited to the 2 years immediately following the initial outbreak of COVID-19, and longer-term follow-up may uncover delayed effects that were not observed in this study period.