What are the respiratory health research priorities in Alberta, Canada? A stakeholder consultation.

OBJECTIVE: The Respiratory Health Strategic Clinical Network (RHSCN) was launched to facilitate respiratory and sleep health through implementation of innovative, patient-centred, evidence-informed coordinated services in Alberta. In collaboration with project partners, the RHSCN aimed to determine the respiratory research priorities for Alberta. DESIGN: The four phases of this research prioritisation project were (1) identifying research questions from stakeholders, (2) determining which research questions had been answered in existing literature, (3) prioritising unanswered questions and (4) finalising the priorities through an inperson workshop. SETTING: The study occurred in Alberta, Canada over a 2-year period beginning in March 2017. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 448 patients, clinicians and other stakeholders consented to participate in the survey. RESULTS: A total of 595 possible questions were submitted, with 343 unique questions identified. Of the questions, 94 were out of scope, 155 answered by existing literature and 10 were combined with others, while 83 were determined to be unanswered in the literature. Stakeholders were surveyed again to prioritise the remaining 83 questions and they were reviewed by the project's Steering Committee (clinicians and patients). At the inperson workshop, the Steering Committee identified 17 research topics as priority areas for respiratory and sleep research in Alberta. CONCLUSION: A stakeholder-led research prioritisation process identified optimal clinical management/follow-up, equitable access to services, and management of social, psychological and mental health issues related to respiratory/sleep health as priority research areas.

Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid plaque area measured by ultrasound (cross-sectional area of longitudinal views of all plaques seen) was studied as a way of identifying patients at increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death. METHODS: Patients from an atherosclerosis prevention clinic were followed up annually for up to 5 years (mean, 2.5+/-1.3 years) with baseline and follow-up measurements recorded. Plaque area progression (or regression) was defined as an increase (or decrease) of >/=0.05 cm(2) from baseline. RESULTS: Carotid plaque areas from 1686 patients were categorized into 4 quartile ranges: 0.00 to 0.11 cm(2) (n=422), 0.12 to 0.45 cm(2) (n=424), 0.46 to 1.18 cm(2) (n=421), and 1.19 to 6.73 cm(2) (n=419). The combined 5-year risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death increased by quartile of plaque area: 5.6%, 10.7%, 13.9%, and 19.5%, respectively (P<0.001) after adjustment for all baseline patient characteristics. A total of 1085 patients had >/=1 annual carotid plaque area measurements: 685 (63.1%) had carotid plaque progression, 306 (28.2%) had plaque regression, and 176 (16.2%) had no change in carotid plaque area over the period of follow-up. The 5-year adjusted risk of combined outcome was 9.4%, 7.6%, and 15.7% for patients with carotid plaque area regression, no change, and progression, respectively (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid plaque area and progression of plaque identified high-risk patients. Plaque measurement may be useful for targeting preventive therapy and evaluating new treatments and response to therapy and may improve cost-effectiveness of secondary preventive treatment.

Knowledge of and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS among school teachers in Belize.

OBJECTIVES: Although Belize currently has the highest rate of HIV infection in Central America, HIV/AIDS education is not formally included in the school curriculum. We assessed HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and attitudes of Belizean teachers. METHODS: Ninety-one teachers completed a survey of 55 questions developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA). Four outcomes included 'Knowledge of HIV/AIDS', 'Attitude towards people with HIV/AIDS', 'Instructional confidence', and 'Comfort with sensitive topics'. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with the outcomes. RESULTS: The majority of teachers scored in the average range for all four outcomes, as defined in this study. Statistically significant higher comfort and confidence levels were found for teachers with prior experience teaching responsible sexuality, those with formal training in HIV/AIDS, and for secondary school teachers. Knowledge scores did not differ significantly between any groups. CONCLUSIONS: While in general teachers in Belize have good HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, attitude, comfort, and instructional confidence, there are several subgroups of teachers who have lower comfort and instructional confidence scores. These subgroups can be targeted for HIV/AIDS training in order to increase their effectiveness as HIV/AIDS educators.