Impact of recipient and donor pretransplantation body mass index on early postosperative complications after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have assessed the impact of the pretransplantation recipient body mass index (BMI) on patient outcomes after lung transplantation (LT), but they have not specifically addressed early postoperative complications. Moreover, the impact of donor BMI on these complications has not been evaluated. The first aim of this study was to assess complications during hospitalization in the ICU after LT according to donor and recipient pretransplantation BMI. METHODS: All the recipients who underwent LT at Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, between January 2016 and August 2022 were included in this observational retrospective monocentric study. Postoperative complications were analyzed according to recipient and donor BMIs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. The 90-day and one-year survival rates were studied. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The Paris-North Hospitals Institutional Review Board approved the study. RESULTS: A total of 304 recipients were analyzed. Being underweight was observed in 41 (13%) recipients, a normal weight in 130 (43%) recipients, and being overweight/obese in 133 (44%) recipients. ECMO support during surgery was significantly more common in the overweight/obese group (p = 0.021), as were respiratory complications (primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (p = 0.006), grade 3 PDG (p = 0.018), neuroblocking agent administration (p = 0.008), prone positioning (p = 0.007)), and KDIGO 3 acute kidney injury (p = 0.036). However, pretransplantation overweight/obese status was not an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. An overweight or obese donor was associated with a decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation (p < 0.001), without affecting morbidity or mortality after LT. CONCLUSION: Pretransplantation overweight/obesity in recipients is strongly associated with respiratory and renal complications during hospitalization in the ICU after LT.

Change in end-tidal carbon dioxide outperforms other surrogates for change in cardiac output during fluid challenge.

Background: During fluid challenge, volume expansion (VE)-induced increase in cardiac output (Δ VE CO) is seldom measured. Methods: In patients with shock undergoing strictly controlled mechanical ventilation and receiving VE, we assessed minimally invasive surrogates for Δ VE CO (by transthoracic echocardiography): fluid-induced increases in end-tidal carbon dioxide (Δ VE E'CO2 ); pulse (Δ VE PP), systolic (Δ VE SBP), and mean systemic blood pressure (Δ VE MBP); and femoral artery Doppler flow (Δ VE FemFlow). In the absence of arrhythmia, fluid-induced decrease in heart rate (Δ VE HR) and in pulse pressure respiratory variation (Δ VE PPV) were also evaluated. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ROC s) reflect the ability to identify a response to VE (Δ VE CO ≥15%). Results: In 86 patients, Δ VE E'CO2 had an AUC ROC =0.82 [interquartile range 0.73-0.90], significantly higher than the AUC ROC for Δ VE PP, Δ VE SBP, Δ VE MBP, and Δ VE FemFlow (AUC ROC =0.61-0.65, all P <0.05). A value of Δ VE E'CO2 >1 mm Hg (>0.13 kPa) had good positive (5.0 [2.6-9.8]) and fair negative (0.29 [0.2-0.5]) likelihood ratios. The 16 patients with arrhythmia had similar relationships between Δ VE E'CO2 and Δ VE CO to patients with regular rhythm ( r 2 =0.23 in both subgroups). In 60 patients with no arrhythmia, Δ VE E'CO2 (AUC ROC =0.84 [0.72-0.92]) outperformed Δ VE HR (AUC ROC =0.52 [0.39-0.66], P <0.05) and tended to outperform Δ VE PPV (AUC ROC =0.73 [0.60-0.84], P =0.21). In the 45 patients with no arrhythmia and receiving ventilation with tidal volume <8 ml kg -1 , Δ VE E'CO2 performed better than Δ VE PPV, with AUC ROC =0.86 [0.72-0.95] vs 0.66 [0.49-0.80], P =0.02. Conclusions: Δ VE E'CO2 outperformed Δ VE PP, Δ VE SBP, Δ VE MBP, Δ VE FemFlow, and Δ VE HR and, during protective ventilation, arrhythmia, or both, it also outperformed Δ VE PPV. A value of Δ VE E'CO2 >1 mm Hg (>0.13 kPa) indicated a likely response to VE.

Acute Kidney Injury After Lung Transplantation: Perioperative Risk Factors and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased short-term and long-term mortality and morbidity after lung transplantation (LT). The primary objective of this study was to analyze the perioperative factors associated with AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) criteria during hospitalization in an intensive care unit (ICU) after LT. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational, prospective study. AKI was defined according to KDIGO criteria. Results are expressed as median, interquartile range, absolute numbers, and percentages. Statistical analyses were performed using χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test. P < .05 was considered to be significant. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and April 2018, 94 patients underwent LT (70% bilateral LT). AKI occurred during ICU stay in 46 patients (49%). KDIGO 1 AKI was observed in 16 patients (17%), KDIGO 2 in 14 patients (15%), and KDIGO 3 in 16 patients (17%), including 12 patients (75%) who required renal replacement therapy. AKI occurred before the fifth day after surgery for 38 patients (82% of the AKI patients). On multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with AKI were bilateral LT and mechanical ventilation >3 days (odds ratio [OR] 4.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.49; 13.63] P = .010 and OR 5.56 [1.25; 11.47] P = .018, respectively). AKI and the need for renal replacement therapy were significantly associated with ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: AKI is common during ICU stay after LT, especially after bilateral LT, and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased short-term and long-term mortality.

Impact of colonization pressure on acquisition of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in two intensive care units: a 19-year retrospective surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Colonization pressure is a risk factor for intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs). AIM: To measure the long-term respective impact of colonization pressure on ICU-acquired extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: All patients admitted to two ICUs (medical and surgical) between January 1997 and December 2015 were included in this retrospective observational study. Rectal and nasal surveillance cultures were obtained at admission and weekly thereafter. Contact precautions were applied for colonized or infected patients. Colonization pressure was defined as the ratio of the number of MDRO-positive patient-days (PDs) of each MDRO to the total number of PDs. Single-level negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate the incidence of weekly MDRO acquisition. FINDINGS: Among the 23,423 patients included, 2327 (10.0%) and 1422 (6.1%) were colonized with ESBL-PE and MRSA, respectively, including 660 (2.8%) and 351 (1.5%) acquisitions. ESBL-PE acquisition increased from 0.51/1000 patient-exposed days (PEDs) in 1997 to 6.06/1000 PEDs in 2015 (P<0.001). In contrast, MRSA acquisition decreased steadily from 3.75 to 0.08/1000 PEDs (P<0.001). Controlling for period-level covariates, colonization pressure in the previous week was associated with MDRO acquisition for ESBL-PE (P<0.001 and P=0.04 for medical and surgical ICU, respectively), but not for MRSA (P=0.34 and P=0.37 for medical and surgical ICU, respectively). The increase in colonization pressure was significant above 100/1000 PDs for ESBL-PE. CONCLUSION: Colonization pressure contributed to the increasing incidence of ESBL-PE but not MRSA. This study suggests that preventive control measures should be customized to MDROs.

Assessing the clinical or pharmaco-economical benefit of target controlled desflurane delivery in surgical patients using the Zeus anaesthesia machine.

The Zeus anaesthesia machine includes an auto-control mode which allows targeting of end-tidal volatile and inspired oxygen concentrations. We assessed the clinical benefits and economic impact of this target-controlled anaesthesia compared with conventional manually controlled anaesthesia. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive desflurane either with a fresh gas flow set by the anaesthetist or in auto-control mode. Drug delivery was adjusted to maintain bispectral index between 40-60 units and systolic arterial pressure under 15 mmHg above its pre-induction value (upper limit) and over 90 mmHg (lower limit). Blood pressure was maintained in the desired range for 89% and 91% of the maintenance period for auto-control and manual control respectively (p = 0.49). Bispectral index was in the desired range for 82% and 79% of the maintenance period, for auto-control and manual control respectively (p = 0.46). Oxygen consumption was more than halved by the use of auto-control mode, and mean (SD) desflurane consumption during surgery was 0.07 (0.04) vs 0.2 (0.07) ml.min(-1) in auto-control and manual control respectively (p < 0.0001). The number of drug delivery adjustments per hour was significantly lower in auto-control mode (mean (SD) 7 (2) vs 15 (12); p < 0.0001). Thus, the auto-control mode provided similar haemodynamic stability and bispectral control as did conventional manually controlled anaesthesia, but led to a reduction in gas and vapour consumption with a more clinically acceptable workload.

[Anaesthesia and right ventricular failure]. / Anesthésie et insuffisance cardiaque droite.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to present an update of the anaesthesic management in patients with right ventricular failure (RVF). DATA SOURCES: All references obtained from the medical database Medline related to the area and more specifically during the last five years were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The preanaesthesic visit leads to identify the etiology of RVF, to evaluate the functional reserve of the patient, to plan complementary exams and to inform the patients about the risks associated with the perioperative period. During the peroperative period, the monitoring depends of the severity of the illness; however the invasive monitoring of the systemic blood pressure seems always necessary. Any hemodynamic instability should be avoided during the peri-operative period. Since the risk of death is maximal in the first days after the anaesthesia, the patient is ideally managed in intensive care during this period. CONCLUSION: Right ventricular failure is often mis-estimated. However, the perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with RVF are important. In the perioperative period, the anaesthesiologist should identify patients at risk of right ventricular failure in order to adapt their management.