Population pharmacokinetics and humanized dosage regimens matching the peak, area, trough, and range of amikacin plasma concentrations in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models.

Amikacin is an FDA-approved aminoglycoside antibiotic that is commonly used. However, validated dosage regimens that achieve clinically relevant exposure profiles in mice are lacking. We aimed to design and validate humanized dosage regimens for amikacin in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models of Acinetobacter baumannii. Plasma and lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations after single subcutaneous doses of 1.37, 13.7, and 137 mg/kg of body weight were simultaneously modeled via population pharmacokinetics. Then, humanized amikacin dosage regimens in mice were designed and prospectively validated to match the peak, area, trough, and range of plasma concentration profiles in critically ill patients (clinical dose: 25-30 mg/kg of body weight). The pharmacokinetics of amikacin were linear, with a clearance of 9.93 mL/h in both infection models after a single dose. However, the volume of distribution differed between models, resulting in an elimination half-life of 48 min for the bloodstream and 36 min for the lung model. The drug exposure in ELF was 72.7% compared to that in plasma. After multiple q6h dosing, clearance decreased by ~80% from the first (7.35 mL/h) to the last two dosing intervals (~1.50 mL/h) in the bloodstream model. Likewise, clearance decreased by 41% from 7.44 to 4.39 mL/h in the lung model. The humanized dosage regimens were 117 mg/kg of body weight/day in mice [administered in four fractions 6 h apart (q6h): 61.9%, 18.6%, 11.3%, and 8.21% of total dose] for the bloodstream and 96.7 mg/kg of body weight/day (given q6h as 65.1%, 16.9%, 10.5%, and 7.41%) for the lung model. These validated humanized dosage regimens and population pharmacokinetic models support translational studies with clinically relevant amikacin exposure profiles.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of ceftriaxone single-dose therapy (0.125-1 g) to eradicate ceftriaxone-susceptible and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains in a hollow fibre infection model for gonorrhoea.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is threatening the gonorrhoea treatment, and optimizations of the current ceftriaxone-treatment regimens are crucial. We evaluated the pharmacodynamics of ceftriaxone single-dose therapy (0.125-1 g) against ceftriaxone-susceptible and ceftriaxone-resistant gonococcal strains, based on EUCAST ceftriaxone-resistance breakpoint (MIC > 0.125 mg/L), in our hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) for gonorrhoea. METHODS: Gonococcal strains examined were WHO F (ceftriaxone-susceptible, MIC < 0.002 mg/L), R (ceftriaxone-resistant, MIC = 0.5 mg/L), Z (ceftriaxone-resistant, MIC = 0.5 mg/L) and X (ceftriaxone-resistant, MIC = 2 mg/L). Dose-range HFIM 7 day experiments simulating ceftriaxone 0.125-1 g single-dose intramuscular regimens were conducted. RESULTS: Ceftriaxone 0.125-1 g single-dose treatments rapidly eradicated WHO F (wild-type ceftriaxone MIC). Ceftriaxone 0.5 and 1 g treatments, based on ceftriaxone human plasma pharmacokinetic parameters, eradicated most ceftriaxone-resistant gonococcal strains (WHO R and Z), but ceftriaxone 0.5 g failed to eradicate WHO X (high-level ceftriaxone resistance). When simulating oropharyngeal gonorrhoea, ceftriaxone 0.5 g failed to eradicate all the ceftriaxone-resistant strains, while ceftriaxone 1 g eradicated WHO R and Z (low-level ceftriaxone resistance) but failed to eradicate WHO X (high-level ceftriaxone resistance). No ceftriaxone-resistant mutants were selected using any ceftriaxone treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone 1 g single-dose intramuscularly cure most of the anogenital and oropharyngeal gonorrhoea cases caused by the currently internationally spreading ceftriaxone-resistant gonococcal strains, which should be further confirmed clinically. A ceftriaxone 1 g dose (±azithromycin 2 g) should be recommended for first-line empiric gonorrhoea treatment. This will buy countries some time until novel antimicrobials are licensed. Using ceftriaxone 1 g gonorrhoea treatment, the EUCAST ceftriaxone-resistance breakpoint is too low.

Individual Components of Polymyxin B Modeled via Population Pharmacokinetics to Design Humanized Dosage Regimens for a Bloodstream and Lung Infection Model in Immune-Competent Mice.

Polymyxin B is a "last-line-of-defense" antibiotic approved in the 1960s. However, the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of its four main components has not been reported in infected mice. We aimed to determine the PK of polymyxin B1, B1-Ile, B2, and B3 in a murine bloodstream and lung infection model of Acinetobacter baumannii and develop humanized dosage regimens. A linear 1-compartment model, plus an epithelial lining fluid (ELF) compartment for the lung model, best described the PK. Clearance and volume of distribution were similar among the four components. The bioavailability fractions were 72.6% for polymyxin B1, 12.0% for B1-Ile, 11.5% for B2, and 3.81% for B3 for the lung model and were similar for the bloodstream model. While the volume of distribution was comparable between both models (17.3 mL for the lung and ~27 mL for the bloodstream model), clearance was considerably smaller for the lung (2.85 mL/h) compared to that of the bloodstream model (5.59 mL/h). The total drug exposure (AUC) in ELF was high due to the saturable binding of polymyxin B presumably to bacterial lipopolysaccharides. However, the modeled unbound AUC in ELF was ~16.7% compared to the total drug AUC in plasma. The long elimination half-life (~4 h) of polymyxin B enabled humanized dosage regimens with every 12 h dosing in mice. Daily doses that optimally matched the range of drug concentrations observed in patients were 21 mg/kg for the bloodstream and 13 mg/kg for the lung model. These dosage regimens and population PK models support translational studies for polymyxin B at clinically relevant drug exposures.

Combination Therapy to Kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Its Nonreplicating Persister Phenotype.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) exists in various metabolic states, including a nonreplicating persister (NRP) phenotype which may affect response to therapy. We have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate discovery of effective Mtb treatment regimens and previously found pretomanid (PMD), moxifloxacin (MXF), and bedaquiline (BDQ) to readily kill logarithmic- and acid-phase Mtb. Here, we studied multiple concentrations of each drug in flask-based, time-kill studies against NRP Mtb in single-, two- and three-drug combinations, including the active M2 metabolite of BDQ. We used nonparametric population algorithms in the Pmetrics package for R to model the data and to simulate the 95% confidence interval of bacterial population decline due to the two-drug combination regimen of PMD + MXF and compared this to observed declines with three-drug regimens. PMD + MXF at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated Mtb. Unlike other states for Mtb, we observed no sustained emergence of less susceptible isolates for any regimen. The addition of BDQ as a third drug significantly (P < 0.05) shortened time to total bacterial suppression by 3 days compared to the two-drug regimen, similar to our findings for Mtb in logarithmic or acid growth phases.

Dose Fractionation of Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Tuberculosis: Impact of Dosing Interval and Elimination Half-Life on Microbial Kill and Resistance Suppression.

The repurposed agent moxifloxacin has become an important addition to the physician's armamentarium for the therapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis When a drug is administered, we need to have metrics for success. As for most antimicrobial chemotherapy, we contend that for Mycobacterium tuberculosis therapy, these metrics should be a decline in the susceptible bacterial burden and the suppression of amplification of less-susceptible populations. To achieve optimal outcomes relative to these metrics, a dose and schedule of administration need to be chosen. For large populations of patients, there are true between-patient differences in important pharmacokinetic parameters. These distributions of parameter values may have an impact on these metrics, depending on what measure of drug exposure drives the metrics. To optimize dose and schedule choice of moxifloxacin, we performed a dose fractionation experiment in the hollow fiber infection model. We examined 12-, 24-, and 48-h dosing intervals with doses of 200, 400, and 800 mg for each interval, respectively. Within each interval, we had an arm where half-lives of 12, 8, and 4 h were simulated. We attempted to keep the average concentration (Cavg) or area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) constant across arms. We found that susceptible bacterial load decline was linked to Cavg, as we had indicated previously. Resistance suppression, a nonmonotonic function, had minimum concentration (Cmin) as the linked index. The 48-h interval with the 4-h half-life had the largest less-susceptible population. Balancing bacterial kill, resistance suppression, toxicity (linked to peak concentration [Cpeak]), and adherence, we conclude that the dose of 400 mg daily is optimal for moxifloxacin.

Polymyxin B Pharmacodynamics in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: What You See May Not Be What You Get.

Dose range studies for polymyxin B (PMB) regimens of 0.75 to 12 mg/kg given every 12 h (q12h) were evaluated for bacterial killing and resistance prevention against an AmpC-overexpressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a blaKPC-3-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae in 10-day in vitro hollow-fiber models. An exposure-response was observed. But all regimens failed due to regrowth. Lower-dose regimens amplified isolates that expressed transient, lower-level adaptive resistance to PMB (MICs ≤ 4 mg/liter). Higher PMB dosages amplified isolates that expressed this resistance mechanism, a higher-MIC "moderately stable" adaptive resistance, and a higher-MIC stable resistance to PMB. Failure of the highest dose regimens was solely due to subpopulations that expressed the two higher-level resistances. Total and bioactive PMB concentrations in broth declined below targeted PK profiles within hours of treatment initiation and prior to bacterial regrowth. With treatment failure, the total PMB measured in bacteria was substantially higher than in broth. But the bioactive PMB in broth and bacteria were low to nondetectable. Together, these findings suggest a sequence of events for treatment failure of the clinical regimen. First, PMB concentrations in broth are diluted as PMB binds to bacteria, resulting in total and bioactive PMB in broth that is lower than targeted. Bacterial regrowth and treatment failure follow, with emergence of subpopulations that express transient lower-level adaptive resistance to PMB and possibly higher-level adaptive and stable resistances. Higher-dose PMB regimens can prevent the emergence of transient lower-level adaptive resistance, but they do not prevent treatment failure due to isolates that express higher-level resistance mechanisms.

Building Optimal Three-Drug Combination Chemotherapy Regimens To Eradicate Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Its Slow-Growth Acid Phase.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolic state affects the response to therapy. Quantifying the effect of antimicrobials in the acid and nonreplicating metabolic phases of M. tuberculosis growth will help to optimize therapy for tuberculosis. As a brute-force approach to all possible drug combinations against M. tuberculosis in all different metabolic states is impossible, we have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate the discovery. Using multiple concentrations of each drug in time-kill studies, we examined single drugs and two- and three-drug combinations of pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and bedaquiline plus its active metabolite against M. tuberculosis in its acid-phase metabolic state. We used a nonparametric modeling approach to generate full distributions of interaction terms between pretomanid and moxifloxacin for susceptible and less susceptible populations. From the model, we could predict the 95% confidence interval of the simulated total bacterial population decline due to the 2-drug combination regimen of pretomanid and moxifloxacin and compare this to observed declines with 3-drug regimens. We found that the combination of pretomanid and moxifloxacin at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated M. tuberculosis in its acid growth phase and prevented emergence of less susceptible isolates. The addition of bedaquiline as a third drug shortened time to total and less susceptible bacterial suppression by 8 days compared to the 2-drug regimen, which was significantly faster than the 2-drug kill.

The Funnel: a Screening Technique for Identifying Optimal Two-Drug Combination Chemotherapy Regimens.

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug discovery effort has generated a substantial number of new/repurposed drugs for therapy for this pathogen. The arrival of these drugs is welcome, but another layer of difficulty has emerged. Single agent therapy is insufficient for patients with late-stage tuberculosis because of resistance emergence. To achieve our therapeutic ends, it is requisite to identify optimal combination regimens. These regimens go through a lengthy and expensive evaluative process. If we have a modest group of 6 to 8 new or repurposed agents, this translates into 15 to 28 possible 2-drug combinations. There is neither time nor resources to give an extensive evaluation for all combinations. We sought a screening procedure that would identify combinations that had a high likelihood of achieving good bacterial burden decline. We examined pretomanid, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and bedaquiline in log-phase growth, acid-phase growth, and nonreplicative persister (NRP) phase in the Greco interaction model. We employed the interaction term α and the calculated bacterial burden decline as metrics to rank different regimens in different metabolic states. No relationship was found between α and bacterial kill. We chose bacterial kill as the prime metric. The combination of pretomanid plus moxifloxacin emerged as the clear frontrunner, as the largest bacterial declines were seen in log phase and acid phase with this regimen and it was second best in NRP phase. Bedaquiline also produced good kill. This screening process may identify optimal combinations that can be further evaluated in both the hollow-fiber infection model and in animal models of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Emergence of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolate Producing Derepressed blaPDC in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Ceftazidime (CAZ)-avibactam (AVI) is a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against type A and type C ß-lactamases. Resistance emergence has been seen, with multiple mechanisms accounting for the resistance. We performed four experiments in the dynamic hollow-fiber infection model, delineating the linkage between drug exposure and both the rate of bacterial kill and resistance emergence by all mechanisms. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate had MICs of 1.0 mg/liter (CAZ) and 4 mg/liter (AVI). We demonstrated that the time at ≥4.0 mg/liter AVI was linked to the rate of bacterial kill. Linkage to resistance emergence/suppression was more complex. In one experiment in which CAZ and AVI administration was intermittent and continuous, respectively, and in which AVI was given in unitary steps from 1 to 8 mg/liter, AVI at up to 3 mg/liter allowed resistance emergence, whereas higher values did not. The threshold value was 3.72 mg/liter as a continuous infusion to counterselect resistance (AVI area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] of 89.3 mg · h/liter). The mechanism involved a 7-amino-acid deletion in the Ω-loop region of the Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) ß-lactamase. Further experiments in which CAZ and AVI were both administered intermittently with regimens above and below the AUC of 89.3 mg · h/liter resulted in resistance in the lower-exposure groups. Deletion mutants were not identified. Finally, in an experiment in which paired exposures as both continuous and intermittent infusions were performed, the lower value of 25 mg · h/liter by both profiles allowed selection of deletion mutants. Of the five instances in which these mutants were recovered, four had a continuous-infusion profile. Both continuous-infusion administration and low AVI AUC exposures have a role in selection of this mutation.

Building Optimal Three-Drug Combination Chemotherapy Regimens.

Multidrug therapy is often required. Examples include antiviral therapy, nosocomial infections, and, most commonly, anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis therapy. Our laboratory previously identified a mathematical approach to identify 2-drug regimens with a synergistic or additive interaction using a full factorial study design. Our objective here was to generate a method to identify an optimal 3-drug therapy. We studied M. tuberculosis isolate H37Rv in log-phase growth in flasks. Pretomanid and moxifloxacin were chosen as the base 2-drug regimen. Bedaquiline (plus M2 metabolite) was chosen as the third drug for evaluation. Total bacterial burden and bacterial burden less-susceptible to study drugs were enumerated. A large mathematical model was fit to all the data. This allowed extension to evaluation of the 3-drug regimen by employing a Monte Carlo simulation. Pretomanid plus moxifloxacin demonstrated excellent bacterial kill and suppressed amplification of less-susceptible pathogens. Total bacterial burden was driven to extinction in 3 weeks in 6 of 9 combination therapy evaluations. Only the lowest pretomanid/moxifloxacin exposures in combination did not extinguish the bacterial burden. No combination regimen allowed resistance amplification. Generation of 95% credible intervals about estimates of the interaction parameters α (αs, αr-p, and αr-m) by bootstrapping showed the interaction was near synergistic. The addition of bedaquiline/M2 metabolite was evaluated by forming a 95% confidence interval regarding the decline in bacterial burden. The addition of bedaquiline/M2 metabolite shortened the time to eradication by 1 week and was significantly different. A model-based system approach to evaluating combinations of 3 agents shows promise to rapidly identify the most promising combinations that can then be trialed.

Developing New Drugs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Therapy: What Information Do We Get from Preclinical Animal Models?

Preclinical animal models of infection are employed to develop new agents but also to screen among molecules to rank them. There are often major differences between human pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and those developed by animal models of infection, and these may lead to substantial differences in efficacy relative to that seen in humans. Linezolid is a repurposed agent employed to great effect for therapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis In this study, we used the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) to evaluate the impact of different pharmacokinetic profiles of mice and nonhuman primates (NHP) versus humans on bacterial cell kill as well as resistance suppression. We examined both plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) profiles. We examined simulated exposures equivalent to 600 mg and 900 mg daily of linezolid in humans. For both plasma and ELF exposures, the murine PK profile provided estimates of effect that were biased low relative to human and NHP PK profiles. Mathematical modeling identified a linkage between minimum concentrations (Cmin) and bacterial kill and peak concentrations (Cpeak) and resistance suppression, with the latter being supported by a prospective validation study. Finding new agents with novel mechanisms of action against M. tuberculosis is difficult. It would be a tragedy to discard a new agent because of a biased estimate of effect in a preclinical animal system. The HFIM provides a system to benchmark evaluation of new compounds in preclinical animal model systems against human PK effects (species scale-up estimates of PK), to safeguard against unwarranted rejection of promising new agents.

First Penicillin-Binding Protein Occupancy Patterns for 15 ß-Lactams and ß-Lactamase Inhibitors in Mycobacterium abscessus.

Mycobacterium abscessus causes serious infections that often require over 18 months of antibiotic combination therapy. There is no standard regimen for the treatment of M. abscessus infections, and the multitude of combinations that have been used clinically have had low success rates and high rates of toxicities. With ß-lactam antibiotics being safe, double ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations are of interest for improving the treatment of M. abscessus infections and minimizing toxicity. However, a mechanistic approach for building these combinations is lacking since little is known about which penicillin-binding protein (PBP) target receptors are inactivated by different ß-lactams in M. abscessus We determined the preferred PBP targets of 13 ß-lactams and 2 ß-lactamase inhibitors in two M. abscessus strains and identified PBP sequences by proteomics. The Bocillin FL binding assay was used to determine the ß-lactam concentrations that half-maximally inhibited Bocillin binding (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC50s]). Principal component analysis identified four clusters of PBP occupancy patterns. Carbapenems inactivated all PBPs at low concentrations (0.016 to 0.5 mg/liter) (cluster 1). Cephalosporins (cluster 2) inactivated PonA2, PonA1, and PbpA at low (0.031 to 1 mg/liter) (ceftriaxone and cefotaxime) or intermediate (0.35 to 16 mg/liter) (ceftazidime and cefoxitin) concentrations. Sulbactam, aztreonam, carumonam, mecillinam, and avibactam (cluster 3) inactivated the same PBPs as cephalosporins but required higher concentrations. Other penicillins (cluster 4) specifically targeted PbpA at 2 to 16 mg/liter. Carbapenems, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime were the most promising ß-lactams since they inactivated most or all PBPs at clinically relevant concentrations. These first PBP occupancy patterns in M. abscessus provide a mechanistic foundation for selecting and optimizing safe and effective combination therapies with ß-lactams.

Effect of Moxifloxacin plus Pretomanid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Log Phase, Acid Phase, and Nonreplicating-Persister Phase in an In Vitro Assay.

Combination therapy is a successful approach to treat tuberculosis in patients with susceptible strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis However, the emergence of resistant strains requires identification of new, effective therapies. Pretomanid (PA824) and moxifloxacin (MXF) are promising options currently under evaluation in clinical trials for the treatment of susceptible and resistant mycobacteria. We applied our recently described screening strategy to characterize the interaction between PA824 and MXF toward the killing of M. tuberculosis in logarithmic growth phase (log phase), acid phase, and nonreplicating-persister (NRP) phase. Respective in vitro data generated for the H37Rv and 18b strains were evaluated in a microdilution plate system containing both drugs in combination. The Universal Response Surface Approach model from Greco et al. (W. R. Greco, G. Bravo, and J. C. Parsons, Pharmacol Rev 47:331-385, 1995) was used to characterize the nature of the interaction between both drugs; synergistic or additive combinations would prompt additional evaluation in the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) and in animal studies. The interaction between MXF and PA824 was additive against M. tuberculosis organisms in acid phase (interaction parameter [α] = 5.56e-8 [95% confidence interval {CI} = -0.278 to 0.278] and α = 0.408 [95% CI = 0.105 to 0.711], respectively), NRP phase (α = 0.625 [95% CI = -0.556 to 1.81] and α = 2.92 [95% CI = 0.215 to 5.63], respectively), and log phase (α = 1.57e-6 [95% CI = -0.930 to 0.930] and α = 1.83e-6 [95% CI = -0.929 and 0.929], respectively), prompting further testing of this promising combination for the treatment of tuberculosis in the HFIM and in animal studies.

Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime plus Avibactam against KPC-2-Bearing Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) combines ceftazidime with a diazabicyclooctane non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor. This has potent inhibitory activity against KPC-type enzymes. We studied activity of clinically relevant regimens of CAZ/AVI against two KPC-2-bearing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (sequence type 258 recovered sequentially from the same patient) with and without ompK36 mutations in a hollow fiber infection model. The baseline total bacterial burden exceeded 109 CFU. For both isolates, there was early multi-log CFU/ml reductions in the bacterial burden for all regimens. Bacterial subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to CAZ/AVI were isolated only from the no-treatment control arms. All CAZ/AVI regimens resulted in undetectable colony counts between days 6 and 8. At day 10, the total volume of each CAZ/AVI arm was plated, with no organisms recovered from any regimen, documenting complete eradication. A population model was fit to avibactam concentrations and total colony count outputs. The model fit was acceptable and demonstrated a large kill rate constant (Kkill = 6.29 h-1) and a relatively low avibactam concentration at which kill rate was half maximal (C50 = 2.19 mg/liter), concordant with the observed bacterial burden decline. A threshold analysis identified time > 4 mg/liter of avibactam as the index most closely linked to bacterial burden decline. Given the clinical outcomes seen with KPC-bearing organisms and the toxicities that occur when patients are treated with currently available polymyxins, drugs such as CAZ/AVI should have a prominent place in early therapy.

Generating Robust and Informative Nonclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Bacterial Infection Model Efficacy Data To Support Translation to Humans.

In June 2017, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, organized a workshop entitled "Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) for Development of Therapeutics against Bacterial Pathogens." The aims were to discuss details of various PK/PD models and identify sound practices for deriving and utilizing PK/PD relationships to design optimal dosage regimens for patients. Workshop participants encompassed individuals from academia, industry, and government, including the United States Food and Drug Administration. This and the accompanying review on clinical PK/PD summarize the workshop discussions and recommendations. Nonclinical PK/PD models play a critical role in designing human dosage regimens and are essential tools for drug development. These include in vitro and in vivo efficacy models that provide valuable and complementary information for dose selection and translation from the laboratory to human. It is crucial that studies be designed, conducted, and interpreted appropriately. For antibacterial PK/PD, extensive published data and expertise are available. These have been leveraged to develop recommendations, identify common pitfalls, and describe the applications, strengths, and limitations of various nonclinical infection models and translational approaches. Despite these robust tools and published guidance, characterizing nonclinical PK/PD relationships may not be straightforward, especially for a new drug or new class. Antimicrobial PK/PD is an evolving discipline that needs to adapt to future research and development needs. Open communication between academia, pharmaceutical industry, government, and regulatory bodies is essential to share perspectives and collectively solve future challenges.

GC-072: A Novel Therapeutic Candidate for Oral Treatment of Melioidosis and Infections Caused by Select Biothreat Pathogens.

Burkholderia pseudomallei (B. pseudomallei), the etiological agent of melioidosis, is a Gram-negative bacterium with additional concern as a biothreat pathogen. The mortality rate from B. pseudomallei varies depending on the type of infection and extent of available health care, but in the case of septicemia left untreated it can range from 50 - 90%. Current therapy for melioidosis is biphasic, consisting of parenteral acute-phase treatment for two weeks or longer, followed by oral eradication-phase treatment lasting several months. An effective oral therapeutic for outpatient treatment of acute-phase melioidosis is needed. GC-072 is a potent, 4-oxoquinolizine antibiotic with selective inhibitory activity against bacterial topoisomerases. GC-072 has demonstrated in vitro potency against susceptible and drug-resistant strains of B. pseudomallei and is also active against Burkholderia mallei, Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, and Francisella tularensis GC-072 is bactericidal both extra- and intracellularly, with rapid killing noted within a few hours and reduced development of resistance compared to ceftazidime. GC-072, delivered intragastrically to mimic oral administration, promoted dose-dependent survival in mice using lethal inhalational models of B. pseudomallei infection following exposure to a 24 or 339 LD50 challenge with B. pseudomallei strain 1026b. Overall, GC-072 appears to be a strong candidate for first-line, oral treatment of melioidosis.

Comparable Efficacy and Better Safety of Double ß-Lactam Combination Therapy versus ß­Lactam plus Aminoglycoside in Gram-Negative Bacteria in Randomized, Controlled Trials.

There is a great need for efficacious therapies against Gram-negative bacteria. Double ß-lactam combination(s) (DBL) are relatively safe, and preclinical data are promising; however, their clinical role has not been well defined. We conducted a metaanalysis of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of DBL compared to ß-lactam plus aminoglycoside combinations (BLAG). PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database were searched through July 2018. We included randomized controlled clinical trials that compared DBL with BLAG combinations. Clinical response was used as the primary outcome and microbiological response in Gram-negative bacteria as the secondary outcome; sensitivity analyses were performed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia coli Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. Safety results were classified by systems and organs. Thirteen studies evaluated 2,771 cases for clinical response and 665 cases for microbiological response in various Gram-negative species. DBL achieved slightly, but not significantly, better clinical response (risk ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.11) and microbiological response in Gram-negatives (risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.25) compared with BLAG. Sensitivity analyses by pathogen showed the same trend. No significant heterogeneity across studies was found. DBL was significantly safer than BLAG regarding renal toxicity (6.6% versus 8.8%, P = 0.0338) and ototoxicity (0.7 versus 3.1%, P = 0.0137). Other adverse events were largely comparable. Overall, empirically designed DBL showed comparable clinical and microbiological responses across different Gram-negative species, and were significantly safer than BLAG. Therefore, DBL should be rationally optimized via the latest translational approaches, leveraging mechanistic insights and newer ß-lactams for future evaluation in clinical trials.

Determination of the Dynamically Linked Indices of Fosfomycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Fosfomycin is the only expoxide antimicrobial and is currently under development in the United States as an intravenously administered product. We were interested in identifying the exposure indices most closely linked to its ability to kill bacterial cells and to suppress amplification of less susceptible subpopulations. We employed the hollow fiber infection model for this investigation and studied wild-type strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Because of anticipated rapid resistance emergence, we shortened the study duration to 24 h but sampled the system more intensively. Doses of 12 and 18 g/day and schedules of daily administration, administration every 8 h, and administration by continuous infusion for each daily dose were studied. We measured fosfomycin concentrations (by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), the total bacterial burden, and the burden of less susceptible isolates. We applied a mathematical model to all the data simultaneously. There was a rapid emergence of resistance with all doses and schedules. Prior to resistance emergence, an initial kill of 2 to 3 log10(CFU/ml) was observed. The model demonstrated that the area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio was linked to total bacterial kill, while the time that the concentration remained above the MIC (or, equivalently, the minimum concentration/MIC ratio) was linked to resistance suppression. These findings were also seen in other investigations with Enterobacteriaceae (in vitro systems) and P. aeruginosa (murine system). We conclude that for serious infections with high bacterial burdens, fosfomycin may be of value as a new therapeutic and may be optimized by administering the agent as a continuous or prolonged infusion or by use of a short dosing interval. For indications such as ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, it may be prudent to administer fosfomycin as part of a combination regimen.

The Combination of Fosfomycin plus Meropenem Is Synergistic for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Treating high-density bacterial infections is a challenging clinical problem. We have a paucity of new agents that can address this problem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a particularly difficult pathogen to treat effectively because of the plethora of resistance mechanisms it carries. Fosfomycin is an agent discovered circa 40 years ago. Recently, it has been resurrected in the United States and studied for intravenous therapy. We hypothesized that, to maximize its utility, it would require combination chemotherapy when used in a clinical circumstance in high-bacterial-burden infections. We chose to examine the combination of meropenem plus fosfomycin. These agents were studied in the hollow-fiber infection model. We utilized a fully factorial study design, looking at 2 doses of meropenem alone (1 and 2 g 8-hourly) and two doses of fosfomycin alone (6 and 8 g 8-hourly), as well as all possible combinations plus a no-treatment control. We used a high-dimensional model of 5 inhomogeneous differential equations with 5 system outputs to analyze all data simultaneously. Combination therapy outperformed all monotherapy regimens, with all combinations driving >6 log10 CFU/ml of bacterial killing. Combination therapy was able to counterselect resistance emergence (meropenem mutants being killed by the combination, as well as fosfomycin mutants being killed by the combination) in all regimens studied. The analysis demonstrated that the combination was significantly synergistic for bacterial cell killing and resistance suppression. Meropenem plus fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of high-burden Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and requires further study.

Effect of Linezolid plus Bedaquiline against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Log Phase, Acid Phase, and Nonreplicating-Persister Phase in an In Vitro Assay.

Tuberculosis is the ninth-leading cause of death worldwide. Treatment success is approximately 80% for susceptible strains and decreases to 30% for extensively resistant strains. Shortening the therapy duration for Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a major goal, which can be attained with the use of combination therapy. However, the identification of the most promising combination is a challenge given the quantity of older and newer agents available. Our objective was to identify promising 2-drug combinations using an in vitro strategy to ultimately be tested in an in vitro hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) and in animal models. We studied the effect of the combination of linezolid (LZD) and bedaquiline (BDQ) on M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv in log- and acid-phase growth and M. tuberculosis strain 18b in log- and nonreplicating-persister-phase growth in a plate system containing a 9-by-8 matrix of concentrations of both drugs alone and in combinations. A characterization of the interaction as antagonistic, additive, or synergistic was performed using the Greco universal response surface approach (URSA) model. Our results indicate that the interaction between LZD and BDQ is additive for bacterial killing in both strains for both of the metabolic states tested. This prescreen strategy was suitable to identify LZD and BDQ as a promising combination to be further tested in the HFIM. The presence of nonoverlapping mechanisms of drug action suggests each drug in the combination will likely be effective in suppressing the emergence of resistance by M. tuberculosis to the companion drug, which holds promise in improving treatment outcomes for tuberculosis.