Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 20(5): e12938, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863799

RESUMEN

A 57-year-old man was admitted with fever and thrombocytopenia 1 month after renal transplantation. He had never received a blood transfusion or travelled outside Spain. A peripheral blood smear revealed Plasmodium malariae and P. ovale parasites, diagnosis confirmed later by malaria PCR. The donor, from Equatorial Guinea, had negative thick and thin blood smears and rapid malaria antigen test prior to organ donation. Peripheral blood malaria PCR was not performed during donor screening. The second renal recipient and the liver recipient were evaluated and were found to be asymptomatic. Thick and thin films and rapid malaria diagnostic tests were negative for both patients and blood for malaria PCR was sent to the referral laboratory. The index patient was treated with oral chloroquine diphosphate, with a favorable outcome and was considered cured. Malaria PCR was negative for the other renal recipient and positive for P. malariae and P. ovale curtisi for the liver transplant patient. Both were treated with oral chloroquine and the liver recipient also completed treatment with primaquine phosphate. This reported case of multiorgan transmission of mixed malaria infection highlights the importance of PCR-based tests for Plasmodium in the screening of donors from endemic areas.


Asunto(s)
Internacionalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Malaria/transmisión , Antígenos de Protozoos/aislamiento & purificación , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Guinea Ecuatorial , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria/sangre , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plasmodium malariae/inmunología , Plasmodium malariae/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmodium ovale/inmunología , Plasmodium ovale/aislamiento & purificación , España , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos
2.
PLoS One ; 11(4): e0153754, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27097040

RESUMEN

We aimed to evaluate the correct assignment of HCV genotypes by three commercial methods-Trugene HCV genotyping kit (Siemens), VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 assay (Siemens), and Real-Time HCV genotype II (Abbott)-compared to NS5B sequencing. We studied 327 clinical samples that carried representative HCV genotypes of the most frequent geno/subtypes in Spain. After commercial genotyping, the sequencing of a 367 bp fragment in the NS5B gene was used to assign genotypes. Major discrepancies were defined, e.g. differences in the assigned genotype by one of the three methods and NS5B sequencing, including misclassification of subtypes 1a and 1b. Minor discrepancies were considered when differences at subtype levels, other than 1a and 1b, were observed. The overall discordance with the reference method was 34% for Trugene and 15% for VERSANT HCV2.0. The Abbott assay correctly identified all 1a and 1b subtypes, but did not subtype all the 2, 3, 4 and 5 (34%) genotypes. Major discordances were found in 16% of cases for Trugene HCV, and the majority were 1b- to 1a-related discordances; major discordances were found for VERSANT HCV 2.0 in 6% of cases, which were all but one 1b to 1a cases. These results indicated that the Trugene assay especially, and to a lesser extent, Versant HCV 2.0, can fail to differentiate HCV subtypes 1a and 1b, and lead to critical errors in clinical practice for correctly using directly acting antiviral agents.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , Hepacivirus/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/genética , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA