Bouveret Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Endoscopic Therapy and a Novel Predictive Tool to Aid in Management.

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Bouveret syndrome is characterized by gastroduodenal obstruction caused by an impacted gallstone. Current literature recommends endoscopic therapy as the first line of intervention despite significantly lower success rates compared with surgery. The lack of treatment efficacy studies and the paucity of clinical guidelines contribute to current practices being arbitrary. The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors that predict outcomes of endoscopic therapy. Subsequently, a predictive tool was devised to predict the success of endoscopic therapy and recommendations were proposed to improve current management strategies of impacted gallstones in the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus was performed for articles that contained the terms "Bouveret syndrome," "Bouveret's syndrome," "gallstone" AND "gastric obstruction" and "gallstone" AND "duodenal obstruction" that were published between January 1, 1950 to April 15, 2018. Articles were reviewed by 3 reviewers and raw data collated. χ and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to test associations between predictors and endoscopic outcomes. A logistic regression model was then used to create a predictive tool which was cross validated. RESULTS: Failure of endoscopic therapy is associated with increasing gallstone length (P<0.0001) and impaction in the distal duodenum (P<0.05). Using multiple endoscopic modalities is associated with better success rates (P<0.05). The novel predictive tool predicted success of endoscopic therapy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic score of 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.94). CONCLUSION: In Bouveret syndrome, a selective approach to endoscopic therapy can expedite definitive treatment and improve current management strategies.

Evaluation of the oncogenic risk of diffuse gastric polyposis. A case report.

Benign polyps of the stomach undergo malignant transformation at a rate correlating to the histological type and size of the proliferative lesion. We report a case of a 50-year-old Caucasian woman, affected by a diffuse gastric polyposis of both hyperplastic and adenomatous type. At endoscopy polyps were more than 1,000, scattered over the entire gastric cavity. The patient underwent total gastrectomy. The perilesional gastric mucosa was characterized by the presence of either atrophic or metaplastic areas and by a mild dysplasia. A single tubulo-villous adenomatous polyp was also present in the ascending tract of the colon. The absence of both high-grade dysplastic lesions and outbreaks of neoplastic transformation well correlated with the histochemical and molecular features, confirming the highly proliferative pattern of the polyps in the lack of signs of malignant progression.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is useless. A prospective multicenter study.

AIM: We performed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) on the incidence of infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MATERIAL OF STUDY: All patients were at low-medium anesthetic and infectious risk and underwent LC for benign disease. At induction of anesthesia 41 patients received ampicillin-sulbactam 3g, 40 patients received ciprofloxacin 400mg intravenously, and 53 patients received no AP. RESULTS: Postoperative infection was observed in 11 patients (8.2%) in the entire study group. All ob served infections were superficial surgical site infections (SSIs), always located at the umbilical incision. Infection occurred in 3 patients (7.3%) in ampicillin-sulbactam group, in 3 patients (7.5%) in ciprofloxacin group and in 5 patients (9.4%) in nonantibiotic group (p=0.916). Univariate analysis showed that duration of operation, placement of a drain and postoperative hospital stay were significantly associated with the development of SSIs. At multivariate analysis, only duration of operation was statistically significant in predicting SSIs. DISCUSSION: The present study did not show any advantage in the use of AP, although in case of difficult surgery the risk of SSIs is increased, in particular in the umbilical incision. In all patients, the bile culture was sterile, then the infection of the umbilical site is not due to bacterial infection from the gallbladder. CONCLUSIONS: AP in elective LC should not be routinely performed. A particular attention to the preoperative cleaning and topical antibiotic therapy of the umbilical area is advised.

Meta-analysis of drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the role of drains in reducing complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database from January 1990 to June 2013 was performed to identify randomized clinical trials that compare prophylactic drainage with no drainage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The odds ratio for qualitative variables and standardized mean difference for continuous variables were calculated. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1939 patients randomized to a drain (960) versus no drain (979). The morbidity rate was lower in the no drain group (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 3.10; P = .003). The wound infection rate was lower in the no drain group (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 4.51; P = .01). Abdominal pain 24 hours after surgery was less severe in the no drain group (standardized mean difference, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 3.34; P < .0001). No significant difference was present with respect to the presence and quantity of subhepatic fluid collection, shoulder tip pain, parenteral ketorolac consumption, nausea, vomiting, and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: This study was unable to prove that drains were useful in reducing complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.