RESUMEN
Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecologic malignancy, with a rising trend in related mortality rates. The assessment based on imaging examinations contributes to the preoperative staging and surgical management of EC. However, conventional imaging diagnosis has limitations such as low accuracy and subjectivity. Radiomics, utilizing advanced feature analysis from medical images, extracts more information, ultimately establishing associations between imaging features and disease phenotypes. In recent years, radiomic studies on EC have emerged, employing radiomic features combined with clinical characteristics to model and predict histopathological features, protein expression, and clinical prognosis. This article elaborates on the application of radiomics in EC research and discusses its implications.
RESUMEN
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-based quantitative parameters and the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) can differentiate small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) from adenocarcinoma (Adeno-Ca), and NSCLC with lymph node metastasis from NSCLC without lymph node metastasis. Materials and methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer (41 Adeno-Ca, 29 SCC, and 23 SCLC) who underwent DCE-MRI and enhanced T1 mapping prior to histopathological confirmation. Quantitative parameters based on DCE-MRI and ECV based on T1 mapping were compared between SCLC and NSCLC patients, between SCC and Adeno-Ca patients, and between NSCLC patients with and without lymph node metastasis. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each parameter. Spearman rank correlation was used to clarify the associations between ECV and DCE-MRI-derived parameters. Results: Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and ECV all performed well in differentiating SCLC from NSCLC (AUC > 0.729). Ktrans showed the best performance in differentiating SCC from Adeno-Ca (AUC = 0.836). ECV could differentiate NSCLCs with and without lymph node metastases (AUC = 0.764). ECV showed a significant positive correlation with both Ktrans and Ve. Conclusions: Ktrans is the most promising imaging parameter to differentiate SCLC from NSCLC, and Adeno-Ca from SCC. ECV was helpful in detecting lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. These imaging parameters may help guide the selection of lung cancer treatment.