Immediate cardiopulmonary responses to consecutive pulmonary embolism: a randomized, controlled, experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) induces ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxia and increases pulmonary pressure and right ventricular (RV) afterload, entailing potentially fatal RV failure within a short timeframe. Cardiopulmonary factors may respond differently to increased clot burden. We aimed to elucidate immediate cardiopulmonary responses during successive PE episodes in a porcine model. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, blinded study of repeated measurements. Twelve pigs were randomly assigned to receive sham procedures or consecutive PEs every 15 min until doubling of mean pulmonary pressure. Cardiopulmonary assessments were conducted at 1, 2, 5, and 13 min after each PE using pressure-volume loops, invasive pressures, and arterial and mixed venous blood gas analyses. ANOVA and mixed-model statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: Pulmonary pressures increased after the initial PE administration (p < 0.0001), with a higher pulmonary pressure change compared to pressure change observed after the following PEs. Conversely, RV arterial elastance and pulmonary vascular resistance was not increased after the first PE, but after three PEs an increase was observed (p = 0.0103 and p = 0.0015, respectively). RV dilatation occurred following initial PEs, while RV ejection fraction declined after the third PE (p = 0.004). RV coupling exhibited a decreasing trend from the first PE (p = 0.095), despite increased mechanical work (p = 0.003). Ventilatory variables displayed more incremental changes with successive PEs. CONCLUSION: In an experimental model of consecutive PE, RV afterload elevation and dysfunction manifested after the third PE, in contrast to pulmonary pressure that increased after the first PE. Ventilatory variables exhibited a more direct association with clot burden.

Validation of Echocardiographic Measurements in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism in the RIETE Registry.

Background In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), echocardiographic identification of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction will inform prognostication and clinical decision-making. Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE) is the world's largest registry of patients with objectively confirmed PE. The reliability of site-reported RV echocardiographic measurements is unknown. We aimed to validate site-reported key RV echocardiographic measurements in the RIETE registry. Methods Fifty-one randomly chosen patients in RIETE who had transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed for acute PE were included. TTEs were de-identified and analyzed by a core laboratory of two independent observers blinded to site-reported data. To investigate reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots between the two observers, and between an average of the two observers and the RIETE site-reported data were obtained. Results Core laboratory interobserver variations were very limited with correlation coefficients >0.8 for all TTE parameters. Agreement was substantial between core laboratory observers and site-reported data for key parameters including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (ICC 0.728; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.594-0.862) and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (ICC 0.726; 95% CI, 0.601-0.852). Agreement on right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio (ICC 0.739; 95% CI, 0.443-1.000) was validated, although missing data limited the precision of the estimates. Bland-Altman plots showed differences close to zero. Conclusion We showed substantial reliability of key RV site-reported measurements in the RIETE registry. Ascertaining the validity of such data adds confidence and reliability for subsequent investigations.

Comparison of admittance and cardiac magnetic resonance generated pressure-volume loops in a porcine model.

Objective. Pressure-volume loop analysis, traditionally performed by invasive pressure and volume measurements, is the optimal method for assessing ventricular function, while cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard for ventricular volume estimation. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between the assessment of end-systolic elastance (Ees) assessed with combined CMR and simultaneous pressure catheter measurements compared with admittance catheters in a porcine model.Approach. Seven healthy pigs underwent admittance-based pressure-volume loop evaluation followed by a second assessment with CMR during simultaneous pressure measurements.Main results. Admittance overestimated end-diastolic volume for both the left ventricle (LV) and the right ventricle (RV) compared with CMR. Further, there was an underestimation of RV end-systolic volume with admittance. For the RV, however, Ees was systematically higher when assessed with CMR plus simultaneous pressure measurements compared with admittance whereas there was no systematic difference in Ees but large differences between admittance and CMR-based methods for the LV.Significance. LV and RV Ees can be obtained from both admittance and CMR based techniques. There were discrepancies in volume estimates between admittance and CMR based methods, especially for the RV. RV Ees was higher when estimated by CMR with simultaneous pressure measurements compared with admittance.