RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study was to clarify whether the use of the oral contraceptive 2 mg dienogest/30 microg ethinylestradiol (DNG/EE) is associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than the use of other combined oral low-dose contraceptives (i.e. containing < or =30 microg EE), particularly oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel (LNG). The secondary objective was to investigate the VTE risk associated with drospirenone/ethinylestradiol (DRSP/EE) in comparison to low-dose LNG/EE. METHODS: This German community-based, case-control study recruited VTE cases from the primary care sector. Eligible cases were women aged 15-49 years with a VTE between January 2002 and February 2008. Four controls (women without a confirmed or potential VTE before the index date) were matched by age and region to each case. Medical information relevant for the assessment of VTE was abstracted from patient charts. Data on personal characteristics of the patients were collected via self-administered questionnaires. At the end of the study a blinded adjudication of the reported VTE was conducted. Conditional logistic regression techniques were used, adjusting for nine potential confounders, including personal history of VTE, family history of VTE, body mass index, duration of current combined oral contraceptive (COC) use and smoking. RESULTS: A total of 680 VTE cases and 2720 corresponding controls were analysed. The mean age of cases and controls was - as a result of matching - almost identical (36.1 years). A total of 35, 25, and 60 of the cases had used DNG-, DRSP- and LNG-containing low-dose COCs, respectively, at the time of the VTE diagnosis. The crude odds ratio (OR) for VTE associated with current COC use in comparison to women who had never used a COC before the index date was 1.9 (95% CI 1.5-2.5), the adjusted OR was 2.3 (95% CI 1.7-3.0). The point estimate of the crude OR of DNG/EE vs any other low-dose COCs was 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.3), the adjusted OR was 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.4). The crude ORs for DNG/EE and DRSP/EE vs low-dose LNG/EE were 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.8) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.6), respectively; the adjusted ORs were 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that COC use is associated with an increased risk of VTE. The VTE ORs (adjusted and crude) that compared DNG/EE and DRSP/EE with other low-dose COCs (including LNG/EE) were close to unity and do not indicate a higher risk for users of DNG/EE or DRSP/EE.
Asunto(s)
Androstenos/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efectos adversos , Nandrolona/análogos & derivados , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Adolescente , Adulto , Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anticonceptivos Orales/administración & dosificación , Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Levonorgestrel/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Nandrolona/administración & dosificación , Nandrolona/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the use-effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs) in Europe according to body mass index (BMI), weight, age, and other factors. STUDY DESIGN: In a planned secondary analysis, we used data from the European Active Surveillance Study on Oral Contraceptives, which was a prospective active cohort surveillance study of 59,510 OC users, to assess the effectiveness of OCs overall and by BMI, weight, age, duration of use, ethinylestradiol dose, regimen type, starting/switching status, and parity. Self-reported unplanned pregnancies during OC use were confirmed by interview. RESULTS: An analysis of OC effectiveness (112,659 women-years of exposure and 545 unplanned pregnancies) found little variation in effectiveness by BMI/weight. Failure rates decreased after 30 years of age and with an increasing duration of use. CONCLUSION: OC users in Europe reported high contraceptive effectiveness with "typical use." Failure rates decreased with age and duration of use. BMI and weight had little, if any, influence on effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Anticonceptivos Orales , Embarazo no Planeado , Factores de Edad , Anticonceptivos Orales/farmacología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Tablas de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most studies have found no increased risk of colon cancer associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), or even a decreased risk. But information about the effects of different HRT preparations is lacking. METHODS: A case-control study was performed within Germany in collaboration with regional cancer registries and tumor centers. Up to 5 controls were matched to each case of colon cancer. Conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Stratified analyses were performed to get an impression of the risk associated with different estrogens and progestins. RESULTS: A total of 354 cases of colon cancer were compared with 1422 matched controls. The adjusted overall risk estimate for colon cancer (ColC) associated with ever-use of HRT was 0.97 (0.71-1.32). No clinically relevant trends for ColC risk were observed with increasing duration of HRT use, or increasing time since first or last HRT use in aggregate. Whereas the overall risk estimates were stable, the numbers in many of the sub-analyses of HRT preparation groups (estrogens and progestins) were too small for conclusions. Nevertheless, if the ColC risk estimates are taken at face value, most seemed to be reduced compared with never-use of HRT, but did not vary much across HRT formulation subgroups. In particular, no substantial difference in ColC risk was observed between HRT-containing conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and other formulations more common in Europe. CONCLUSION: Ever-use of HRT was not associated with an increased risk of colon cancer. In contrary, most risk estimates pointed non-significantly toward a lower ColC risk in HRT ever user. They did not vary markedly among different HRT formulations (estrogens, progestins). However, the small numbers and the overlapping nature of the subgroups suggest cautious interpretation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Química Farmacéutica , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine if delivery and lactation are risk factors for complete intrauterine device perforations. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a reanalysis of the European Active Surveillance Study on Intra-Uterine Devices data set using complete penetration of the myometrium as the definition for perforation. RESULTS: Of the 61,448 women enrolled (70% levonorgestrel, 30% copper devices), we identified 58 complete perforations, 30 of which occurred in lactating women. Incidence per 1000 insertions was 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-6.4) for lactating and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.4-0.9) for nonlactating women. Time since delivery was also associated with perforation risk. CONCLUSIONS: Lactation and delivery are independent cofactors for perforation. Results do not differ when restricting the definition of perforation.
Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efectos adversos , Perforación Uterina/epidemiología , Perforación Uterina/etiología , Lactancia Materna , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Parto Obstétrico , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efectos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efectos adversos , Lactancia , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological studies have inconsistently shown a modestly increased breast cancer risk associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Limited information is available about different formulations--particularly concerning different progestins. METHODS: A case-control study was performed within Germany in collaboration with regional cancer registries and tumor centers. Up to 5 controls were matched breast cancer cases. Conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Stratified analyses were performed to compare the risk of different estrogens, progestins, and combinations. RESULTS: A total of 3593 cases of breast cancer were identified and compared with 9098 controls. The adjusted overall risk estimate for breast cancer (BC) associated with current or past use of HRT was 1.2 (1.1-1.3), and almost identical for lag times from 6 months to 6 years prior to diagnosis. No significant trend of increasing BC risk was found with increasing duration of HRT use, or time since first or last use in aggregate. Many established BC risk factors significantly modified the effect of HRT on BC risk, particularly first-degree family history of BC, higher age, lower education, higher body mass index (BMI), and never having used oral contraceptives (OCs) during lifetime. Whereas the overall risk estimates were stable, the numbers in many of the sub-analyses of HRT formulation groups (estrogens, progestins, and combinations) were too small for strong conclusions. Nevertheless, the BC risk seems not to vary much across HRT formulation subgroups. In particular, no substantial difference in BC risk was observed between HRT containing conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and other formulations more common in Europe. CONCLUSION: The BC risk of HRT use is rather small. Low risk estimates for BC and a high potential for residual confounding and bias in this observational study do not permit causal conclusions. Apparently, there is not much variation of the BC risk across HRT formulations (estrogens, progestins). However, the small numbers and the overlapping nature of some of the subgroups suggest cautious interpretation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The "Long-term Active Surveillance Study for Oral Contraceptives" investigated the risks of long-term use of a 21-day regimen of drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (DRSP) compared to established oral contraceptives (OCs) in a routine clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, non-interventional cohort study conducted in seven European countries with three main exposure groups: new users of DRSP, levonorgestrel-containing OCs (LNG), and OCs containing other progestogens (Other OCs). All self-reported clinical outcomes of interest (OoI) were validated via attending physicians and relevant source documents. Main OoI were serious clinical outcomes, in particular cardiovascular events. Comprehensive follow-up procedures were implemented. Statistical analyses were based on Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 1,113 study centers enrolled 59,510 women. Overall 28%, 26% and 45% of these women used DRSP, LNG and Other OCs, respectively. Study participants were followed for up to ten years (mean value, 5.4years), which generated 318,784 woman-years (WY) of observation. Low loss to follow-up and drop-out rates of 2.9% and 16.8% were achieved. DRSP, LNG, and Other OCs showed similar incidence rates of venous thromboembolism. Corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) were close to unity. For arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) and initiation of antihypertensive treatment statistically significant lower risks were found for DRSP compared to LNG and Other OCs. CONCLUSION: DRSP use was associated with similar general health risks and a low risk of ATE compared to OCs containing other progestogens. IMPLICATION STATEMENT: The 21-day regimen of drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives is associated with similar risk of VTE compared to other combined oral contraceptives as well as potentially with a lower risk of ATE.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Levonorgestrel/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efectos adversos , Progestinas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Androstenos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Estudios Longitudinales , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Farmacovigilancia , Progestinas/administración & dosificación , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the lifetime incidence of benign gynecological tumors. STUDY DESIGN: The German Cohort Study on Women's Health was launched in 1998 as historic cohort study with prospective follow up. The study ascertained self-reported information on tumors by calendar time. The incidence of benign gynecological tumors was calculated from the data of the first cohort period. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 396000 women-years of observation and 1676 benign tumors were observed. This lead to incidence estimates of 27.0, 18.6, and 23.3 per 100000 women-years of observation for all benign tumors of the uterus, ovary, and breast respectively. CONCLUSION: In absence of other data, it is reasonable to use incidence rates generated by a large cohort of German women as a best estimate for the population up to 65 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Enfermedad Fibroquística de la Mama/epidemiología , Alemania , Humanos , Leiomioma/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quistes Ováricos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the risks of short-term and long-term use of an etonogestrel-containing and ethinylestradiol-containing vaginal ring and combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in a routine clinical study population. METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled, noninterventional cohort study performed in the United States and five European countries with the following two cohorts: new users of the vaginal ring and new users of combined OCPs (starters, switchers, or restarters). The study population included 33,295 users of the vaginal ring or combined OCPs recruited by 1,661 study centers. Follow-up of study participants occurred for 2 to 4 years. Main clinical outcomes of interest were cardiovascular outcomes, particularly venous and arterial thromboembolism. These outcomes were validated by attending physicians and further adjudicated by an independent board. Comprehensive follow-up ensured low loss to follow-up. Statistical analyses were based on Cox regression models. Primary statistical variable was the venous thromboembolic hazard ratio (HR) for the vaginal ring compared with combined OCPs. RESULTS: Study participants were followed-up for 66,489 woman-years. Loss to follow-up was 2.9%. The venous thromboembolism incidence rates for the vaginal ring users and combined OCPs users were 8.3 and 9.2 per 10,000 woman-years, respectively. Cox regression analysis yielded crude and adjusted HRs for the vaginal ring users compared with combined OCPs users of 0.9 and 0.8 for venous thromboembolism (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.5-1.6 and 0.5-1.5) and 0.8 and 0.7 (95% CIs 0.2-2.5 and 0.2-2.3) for arterial thromboembolism, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vaginal ring use and combined OCP use were associated with a similar venous and arterial thromboembolic risk during routine clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : II.