Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 30(4): 277-283, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36528258

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and predictive factors for same-day discharge (SDD) after robotic hysterectomy (RH) for benign indications to optimize patient selection by incorporating preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing RH for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were designated for SDD by implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study included 890 patients who underwent RH for benign indications between the years 2016 and 2021. Of these, 618 (69.4%) were discharged the same day and 272 (30.5%) were admitted for overnight stay. Both groups had similar age (46.4 vs 46.2 years), body mass index (28.3 vs 28.9), and indications for surgery. In multivariable logistic regression, factors that were significant for overnight stay were American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3, Charlson comorbidity index, previous laparotomy, and operative time. Other factors such as surgery start time and preoperative hemoglobin levels were not statistically significant. Postoperative outcomes were comparable for both groups with similar readmission and reoperation rates. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of SDD after RH in this cohort after implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol was almost 70%, and most of the predictive factors for overnight stay were nonmodifiable. Importantly, both groups had similar outcomes after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Alta del Paciente , Estudios de Factibilidad , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Internación , Readmisión del Paciente
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(7): 879-883, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35460879

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether advancing a manipulator increased the distance of the ureter to the cervix and/or vagina. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Academic institution. PATIENTS: A total of 22 intact fresh-frozen female pelvises. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 6 ureteral distances were measured per pelvis. Included were the following measurements on each side: (1) from the lateral cervical wall to the ureter at the intersection with the uterine artery; (2) from the lateral cervical wall to the parametrial ureter; and (3) from the vagina to the ureter at the intersection with the uterine artery. All measurements were obtained with and without advancement of a uterine manipulator. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The average distance from the ureter to the cervix and vagina without advancing the manipulator was 2.8 and 3.1 cm, respectively, and the distance from the parametrial ureter to the cervix was 3.3 cm. When the manipulator was advanced, all ureteral distances increased by 0.8, 0.6, and 0.6 cm, respectively, in 12 of the 22 pelvises (55%). Advancing the manipulator did not increase at least 1 of the distances in 10 of the 22 pelvises (45%). The advancement of the manipulator lengthened the 2 shortest ureteral distances of 1 cm noted in 1 pelvis (4.5%) by 0.9 and 0.4 cm. CONCLUSION: The uterine manipulator increased the distance of the ureter to the cervix and vagina for all measurements in 55.5% of the pelvises. The greatest increase was 0.9 cm. The manipulator did not increase at least 1 of the distances in 10 of the 22 pelvises (45.4%).


Asunto(s)
Uréter , Cadáver , Cuello del Útero , Femenino , Humanos , Pelvis , Estudios Prospectivos , Vagina
3.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 31(5): 686-693, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33727220

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in outpatient versus inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and assess enabling factors, cost and safety. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged 18 years or older who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer between January 2008 and September 2015 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. The surgical approach for hysterectomy was classified as open/abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic or robotic assisted. We described trends in surgical setting, perioperative costs and safety. The impact of patient, provider and hospital characteristics on outpatient migration was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 41 246 patients who met inclusion criteria. During the time period studied, we observed a 41.3% shift from inpatient to outpatient hysterectomy (p<0.0001), an increase in robotic hysterectomy, and a decrease in abdominal hysterectomy. The robotic hysterectomy approach, more recent procedure (year), and mid-sized hospital were factors that enabled outpatient hysterectomies; while abdominal hysterectomy, older age, Medicare insurance, black ethnicity, higher number of comorbidities, and concomitant procedures were associated with an inpatient setting. The shift towards outpatient hysterectomy led to a $2500 savings per case during the study period, in parallel to the increased robotic hysterectomy rates (p<0.001). The post-discharge 30-day readmission and complications rate after outpatient hysterectomy remained stable at around 2%. CONCLUSIONS: A significant shift from inpatient to outpatient setting was observed for hysterectomies performed for endometrial cancer over time. Minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, facilitated this migration, preserving clinical outcomes and leading to reduction in costs.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1417-1422, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917330

RESUMEN

Diaphragm metastases in ovarian cancer can be safely resected robotically in selected patients. The technique is similar to laparotomy, whether it is a peritoneal or full-thickness excision. Trocar placement is very important for successful resection and is dependent on the location of the disease. Metastases involving the left diaphragm and the ventral aspect of the right diaphragm are accessed with trocars placed slightly cranial to the umbilicus. Metastases in the dorsal aspect of the right diaphragm are removed with trocars in the upper quadrants. Metastases located in the lateral portion of the right diaphragm are excised using an infrahepatic approach, and those in the medial aspect are removed using a suprahepatic approach. In peritoneal resection, monopolar instruments must be kept at 10 W to 15 W to prevent contraction of the diaphragm and pleural perforation. Intraoperative pleural decompression is performed via an aspirating catheter. A video of the technique described in this report is available online (Supplementary Video 1).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Diafragma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Músculos/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias Abdominales/secundario , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Adulto , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Diafragma/patología , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de los Músculos/secundario , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas
5.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(7): 1268-1272, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30528830

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate pulmonary complications and diaphragm recurrence after resection of diaphragm metastases by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona, from January 1, 2004, through January 31, 2014. PATIENTS: Selected cohort of 29 patients. INTERVENTIONS: Diaphragm resection by MIS (robotics, 21; laparoscopy, 8) for EOC. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: To assess for pulmonary complications most likely due to diaphragm resection, patients were excluded if they had preoperative pleural effusions or pulmonary disease or had undergone additional upper abdominal procedures. Mean patient age was 58.7 years (standard deviation, 14.9) and mean BMI was 24.2 kg/m2 (standard deviation, 3.4). The mean size of diaphragm metastases was 56.7 mm (range, 2-145). Full-thickness resection was performed in 6 patients; 23 had peritoneal resection. Complete resection was achieved in all patients with no conversions to laparotomy. Two patients (6.9%) had pulmonary complications (pleural effusion). Six patients (20.7%) had diaphragm recurrence; 10 patients (34.5%) had recurrence at other abdominal sites. CONCLUSION: Resection of diaphragm metastases by MIS appears to be feasible and safe for selected patients, with similar recurrence as other abdominal sites.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/secundario , Diafragma/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias de los Músculos/secundario , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arizona , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de los Músculos/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(1): 77-83, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27581610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women considering risk reduction surgery after a diagnosis of breast/ovarian cancer and/or inherited cancer gene mutation face difficult decisions. The safety of combined breast and gynecologic surgery has not been well studied; therefore, we evaluated the outcomes for patients who have undergone coordinated multispecialty surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing simultaneous breast and gynecologic surgery for newly or previously diagnosed breast cancer and/or an inherited cancer gene mutation during the same anesthetic at a single institution from 1999 to 2013. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with a mean age of 50 years (range 27-88) were identified. Most patients had newly diagnosed breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (62 %) and 28 patients (38 %) had an identified BRCA mutation. Almost all gynecologic procedures were for risk reduction or benign gynecologic conditions (97 %). Mastectomy was performed in 39 patients (53 %), the majority of whom (79 %) underwent immediate reconstruction. The most common gynecologic procedure involved bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which was performed alone in 18 patients (25 %) and combined with hysterectomy in 40 patients (55 %). A total of 32 patients (44 %) developed postoperative complications, most of which were minor and did not require surgical intervention or hospitalization. Two of the 19 patients who underwent implant reconstruction (11 %; 3 % of the entire cohort) had major infectious complications requiring explantation. CONCLUSION: Combined breast and gynecologic procedures for a breast cancer diagnosis and/or risk reduction in patients can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity. Concurrent operations, including reconstruction, can be offered to patients without negatively impacting their outcome.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Carcinoma in Situ/genética , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/genética , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/genética , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Histerectomía , Mamoplastia , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingooforectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(7): 1170-1176, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28694166

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and learning curve of a sonographic mapping protocol for deep endometriosis (DE). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Tertiary referral center in the United States. PATIENTS: 117 consecutive patients who presented to our gynecology clinic with complaints of significant noncyclic pelvic pain of at least 6 months' duration, and/or clinical findings concerning for deep endometriosis and who were referred for transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound with bowel-preparation (TVUS-BP) performed by a single radiologist. Findings suspicious for DE were reported and correlated with surgical and histopathological findings. The duration of the examination and number of cases required to achieve proficiency were calculated for positive, equivocal, and negative findings. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 117 patients (median age, 35 years; range, 19-54 years) referred for TVUS-BP, 113 had complete examinations. Fifty-seven of these 113 patients underwent surgical exploration within 1 year, and DE was identified surgically in 23 of them. DE of the rectosigmoid colon and/or rectovaginal septum was detected with a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%). DE of the retrocervical region and/or uterosacral ligaments was detected with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 65%-97%) and specificity of 94% (95% CI, 81%-99%). Proficiency, defined by a flattening of the learning curve, was achieved after 70 to 75 scans. The mean duration of the examination was 42 ± 4 minutes initially, but declined to 15 ± 4 minutes once proficiency was achieved. Cases of equivocal or minimal disease demonstrated the greatest decline in examination duration. CONCLUSION: A newly applied TVUS-BP protocol for detection of pelvic DE is highly accurate and required only a modest learning curve to achieve procedural proficiency in a US tertiary referral center where physicians interpret but typically do not perform TVUS exams. Overcoming diagnostic uncertainty regarding minimal or equivocal disease appeared to be an important factor in the initial learning curve. With adequate training, TVUS-BP may be adapted as a primary diagnostic tool for detecting pelvic DE.


Asunto(s)
Catárticos/uso terapéutico , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/cirugía , Endosonografía/métodos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Cuidados Preoperatorios/educación , Vagina/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Colon Sigmoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Colon Sigmoide/efectos de los fármacos , Colon Sigmoide/patología , Educación Médica/métodos , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/patología , Enfermedades Peritoneales/patología , Enfermedades Peritoneales/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/efectos de los fármacos , Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Estados Unidos , Vagina/patología , Adulto Joven
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 212(1): 18-23, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25072737

RESUMEN

Power morcellation has come under scrutiny because of a highly publicized case of disseminated leiomyosarcoma following a laparoscopic hysterectomy. A recent Federal and Drug Administration safety communication discouraging use of power morcellators on presumed uterine leiomyoma further highlights the need for reexamination of uterine tissue extraction. This clinical opinion aims to summarize current approaches to uterine/fibroid tissue extraction including the associated immediate and long-term potential risks of open power morcellation. The known data about risk of uterine sarcoma is reviewed followed by a discussion of acceptable risk and informed consent in the context of shared-decision making.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía , Leiomioma/cirugía , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/instrumentación , Histerectomía/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Medición de Riesgo
10.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(1): 49-54, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25405578

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the survival of patients with node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer according to the 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review. Data from all consecutive patients with node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer (stages IIIC and IV) who underwent cytoreductive surgery at the Mayo Clinic from 1996 to 2000 were reassessed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the new FIGO stages. Multivariate Cox regression was performed, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves constructed. RESULTS: The distribution of the restaged patients was as follows: IIIA1, 23 patients (IIIA1i, 9 patients; and IIIA1ii, 14 patients); IIIA2, 3 patients; IIIB, 4; IIIC, 67 patients; IVA, 4 patients; and IVB, 15 patients. In the univariate analysis, the relative risk for positive nodes greater than 10 mm on the longer axis was 2.57 and 3.00 for patients with microscopic peritoneal disease, compared with patients with microscopic positive nodes. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, the univariate analyses revealed statistically significant differences for 2014 FIGO stages (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IVA-B), anatomical sites of peritoneal metastases, and disease staged at IIIC because of the presence of omental metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that survival was higher in patients restaged to IIIA-B than in those restaged to IIIC and IV (hazard ratios, 2.75 and 3.16, respectively; P = 0.002). The hazard ratio for patients with abdominal peritoneal metastases was 2.76 compared with patients with pelvic peritoneal metastases (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current 2014 FIGO staging system for ovarian cancer successfully correlates survival, anatomical location of peritoneal metastases, and extra-abdominal lymph node metastases.


Asunto(s)
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidad , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/mortalidad , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pélvicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Agencias Internacionales , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pélvicas/secundario , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
11.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 22(6): 1084-7, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26003533

RESUMEN

Prophylactic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy has been recommended for women at average risk for ovarian cancer. Vaginal hysterectomy is considered the preferred approach to a benign hysterectomy, and adnexectomy should not be considered a contraindication to this approach. This paper with accompanying video describes and demonstrates the round ligament technique and use of a vessel-sealing device to facilitate removal of the entire fallopian tube at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.


Asunto(s)
Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Histerectomía Vaginal , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Ligamento Redondo del Útero/cirugía , Salpingectomía , Trompas Uterinas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía Vaginal/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Ligamento Redondo del Útero/patología , Salpingectomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 22(6): 944-50, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25917276

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine perioperative outcomes and factors impacting operating time, length of hospital stay, and complications of patients undergoing surgery for stage 3 or 4 endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona. PATIENTS: Women (n = 493) with endometriosis stage 3 and 4 undergoing surgical excision between March 15, 2005, and December 31, 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Robotic-assisted (n = 331) or laparoscopic (n = 162) excision. MEASUREMENTS: Age, body mass index, comorbidities, number and type of procedures per patient, type of surgical approach, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications (within 42 days), and length of hospital stay. MAIN RESULTS: The mean patient age was 39.5 years; body mass index, 25.9; number of procedures, 3.3; operating time, 130.4 minutes; blood loss, 88.5 mL; and hospital stay, 1.0 days. Major complications occurred in 5 patients (1.5%). Fifty-nine patients (12.0%) underwent modified radical hysterectomy, 90 (18.3%) underwent ureteral and/or intestinal resection, and 3 (0.6%) underwent diaphragm resection. Factors significantly associated with operating time included age (p = .008) and blood loss, number of procedures per patient, and robotics (all p < .001). Length of stay was affected by age, operating time, and blood loss (all p < .001). Operating time was the only significant factor associated with postoperative complications (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Operating time is an independent and significant factor for postoperative complications and hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/cirugía , Histerectomía , Laparoscopía , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Robótica , Adulto , Arizona/epidemiología , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Índice de Masa Corporal , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 21(4): 674-81, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24486680

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL) for treatment of gynecologic malignant conditions. DESIGN: Prospective non-randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Tertiary center for women's health. PATIENTS: Sixty-two patients with gynecologic cancer operated on by the same surgical team. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-two patients underwent TIPAL via robotic-assisted laparoscopy, and 30 via conventional laparoscopy. Comparison analyses of perioperative outcomes and estimated costs were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no differences between robotic-assisted and laparoscopy insofar as age, body mass index, presurgical morbidity, operating time (92.5 minutes for robotics vs 96.6 minutes for laparoscopy), number of aortic nodes (12 vs. 12), hospitalization stay (2 vs. 2 days), or rate of complications (12.5% vs. 13.3%). Blood loss tended to be lower in the robotic group (75.0 vs. 92.5 mL; p = .08). Surgical cost was higher in the robotic group ($3.42 vs. $2.55; p < .001), although hospitalization cost was similar. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted and laparoscopy provide similar perioperative outcomes. However, the robotic-assisted approach is associated with higher surgical cost.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Aorta Abdominal , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología
15.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 21(5): 844-50, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24699301

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of postoperative complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Mayo Clinic Arizona. PATIENTS: All 1155 patients who underwent robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery between March 2004 and December 2009 were included. Patients were primarily white (94.3%), with a mean (SD) age of 51.5 (15.4) years, and were overweight, with body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 (6.8). INTERVENTIONS: Risk of complications, overall and according to Clavien-Dindo grade, and incidence of specific complications were analyzed. Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgical procedures were categorized postoperatively according to case type as benign simple (e.g., oophorectomy, simple hysterectomy) in 552 (47.8%) patients, benign complex (e.g., excision of invasive endometriosis) in 262 (22.7%), urogynecologic in 121 (10.5%), and oncologic in 220 (19.1%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.2% of patients. Postoperative complications of any type occurred in 18.4% of patients. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 2.7%. Urologic complications were more common in urogynecologic cases (5.8%) as compared with benign simple (0.5%), benign complex (2.7%), and oncologic (3.2%). Bleeding complications were most common in oncologic cases (5%). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications occurred in 5.2% of patients overall, and were >3-fold likely to occur in benign complex, urogynecologic, and oncologic cases than in benign simple cases. When adjusted for age, BMI, estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and previous pelvic surgery, complications were nearly twice as common for benign complex (odds ratio [OR] 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7), urogynecologic (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.4), and oncologic (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1) cases as for benign simple cases, although weakly significant. Case type, BMI, estimated blood loss, and length of stay remained important factors in predicting postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The incidence of complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery varies according to case type. Defining the role of patient and surgical variables such as case type in the occurrence of complications may help in identification of cases with increased risk, to improve patient counseling and surgical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Endometriosis/cirugía , Histerectomía , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Robótica , Miomectomía Uterina , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
16.
Gynecol Oncol ; 129(2): 336-40, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23357611

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of perioperative outcomes and survival of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreduction by robotics, laparoscopy, or laparotomy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 52 selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreduction by laparoscopy (9), laparotomy (33) or robotics (10) between January 2006 and December 2010. Comparison was made by a total of 21 factors including age, BMI, number of previous surgeries, tumor type and grade, number of procedures, and 15 types of procedures performed at secondary cytoreduction. RESULTS: For all patients, the mean operating time was 213.8 min, mean blood loss 657.4 ml; and mean hospital stay 7.5 days. Complete debulking was achieved in 75% of patients. Postoperative complications were noted in 36.5% of patients. Overall and progression-free survival at 3-years were 58.8% and 34.1%, respectively. Laparoscopy and robotics had reduced blood loss and hospital stay, while no differences were observed among the three groups for operating time, complications, complete debulking, and survival. CONCLUSION: Selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer benefit from a laparoscopic or robotic secondary cytoreduction without compromising survival. Robotics and laparoscopy provide similar perioperative outcomes, and reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy. Laparotomy seems preferable for patients with widespread peritoneal implants, multiple sites of recurrence, and/or extensive adhesions.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Robótica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Updates Surg ; 75(3): 743-755, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36472771

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors in feasibility and safety of same-day dismissal (SDD) of endometrial cancer patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and staging. A single-institution retrospective chart review of endometrial cancer patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy and staging between 2012 and 2021 was performed. Patient demographics, medical and surgical history, intra- and postoperative events were examined as possible factors related to non-SDD. These factors were analyzed using univariate (chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of the 292 patients, 117 (40%) had SDD, and 175 (60%) had non-SDD. The SDD rate increased from 13.8% to 88% over the 10-year study period. The factors significantly associated with non-SDD (p < 0.05) were surgery in the first 5 years after the introduction of the SDD and ERAS protocols (2012-2016), age > 75 years, and comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, anemia (Hb < 11 g/dl), and anticoagulant therapy. Extensive adhesiolysis, the performance of complete pelvic and/or aortic lymphadenectomy, operating time > 180 min, and PACU discharge after 2:00 p.m. were significant factors for non-SDD. Sentinel lymph node sampling was significantly associated with SDD (OR 0.050; CI 0.273-0.934, p = 0.029). We reported no significant difference in the number, setting and timing of any unscheduled postoperative contacts, complications, and readmissions between SDD and non-SDD groups. SDD after robotic hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. There are patient and surgery factors for the failure of SDD. The sentinel lymph node sampling was significantly associated with achieving SDD. Trial registration: Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol (#: 1764-05).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Histerectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Laparoscopía/métodos
18.
J Pers Med ; 13(7)2023 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37511669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Forty percent of women will experience prolapse in their lifetime. Vaginal pessaries are considered the first line of treatment in selected patients. Major complications of vaginal pessaries rarely occur. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched from 1961 to 2022 for major complications of vaginal pessaries using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms. The keywords were pessary or pessaries and: vaginal discharge, incontinence, entrapment, urinary infections, fistula, complications, and vaginal infection. The exclusion criteria were other languages than English, pregnancy, complications without a prior history of pessary placement, pessaries unregistered for clinical practice (herbal pessaries), or male patients. The extracted data included symptoms, findings upon examination, infection, type of complication, extragenital symptoms, and treatment. RESULTS: We identified 1874 abstracts and full text articles; 54 were assessed for eligibility and 49 met the inclusion criteria. These 49 studies included data from 66 patients with pessary complications amenable to surgical correction. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to grade the complications. Most patients presented with vaginal symptoms such as bleeding, discharge, or ulceration. The most frequent complications were pessary incarceration and fistulas. Surgical treatment included removal of the pessary under local or general anesthesia, fistula repair, hysterectomy and vaginal repair, and the management of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Pessaries are a reasonable and durable treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Complications are rare. Routine follow-ups are necessary. The ideal patient candidate must be able to remove and reintroduce their pessary on a regular basis; if not, this must be performed by a healthcare worker at regular intervals.

19.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 22(6): 987-92, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22706223

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic role of pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and positive nodes (stages IIIC and IV). METHODS: Retrospective chart review. Data from all consecutive patients with EOC and positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes (stage IIIC and IV) in Mayo Clinic from 1996 to 2000 were included. To evaluate the impact of nodal metastases, the extent of lymphadenectomy was compared according to the number of nodes removed and positive nodes resected. Multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for analysis. RESULTS: The median number of nodes removed was 31 (pelvic, 21.5, and aortic, 10), and the median number of positive nodes was 5. The 5-year overall survival was 44.8%. On multivariate analysis, only the extent of peritoneal metastases before surgery was a significant factor for survival (P = 0.001 for stage IIIC and P = 0.004 for stage IV). Analysis of 83 patients with advanced peritoneal disease more than 2 cm demonstrated before debulking, removal of more than 40 lymph nodes was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; P = 0.032; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.35). In 29 patients with advanced peritoneal disease and no residual disease after debulking, removal of more than 10 positive was a factor for survival. CONCLUSIONS: There was a survival benefit in patients with EOC with advanced peritoneal disease more than 2 cm before debulking when more than 40 lymph nodes were removed. There was an additional survival benefit in those patients with no residual disease after debulking when more than 10 positive nodes were removed.


Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Pelvis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
20.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 91(8): 965-9, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22583107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery in the management of ovarian remnant syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Mayo Clinic Arizona and Mayo Clinic Rochester, USA. POPULATION: Women who underwent surgical treatment for ovarian remnant syndrome. METHODS: The clinical records of 223 patients with histologically documented residual cortical ovarian tissue excised at Mayo Clinic by laparotomy, laparoscopy or a robotic approach, from January 1985 through February 2009, were reviewed. Data collected included the patient's age, body mass index, previous medical and surgical history, symptoms, prior management of ovarian remnant syndrome, preoperative imaging study, intraoperative details, postoperative course, complications and follow-up data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-seven patients (83.9%) were operated by laparotomy, 19 (8.5%) by laparoscopy and 17 (7.6%) by a robotic approach. Estimated blood loss and length of stay were significantly lower in the robotic and laparoscopic groups compared with laparotomy (p < 0.01). After a mean follow-up of 21.1 ± 32.4 months, the rate of pain improvement was 93.1, 94.4 and 71.4% for the laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of ovarian remnant syndrome offer advantages over laparotomy in terms of reduced blood loss, lower postoperative complications and shorter length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Ovario/cirugía , Ovariectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Robótica , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Ovario/etiología , Ovariectomía/efectos adversos , Ovariectomía/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA