Molecular analysis of sunitinib resistant renal cell carcinoma cells after sequential treatment with RAD001 (everolimus) or sorafenib.

Sequential application of target drugs is standard procedure after renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients develop resistance. To optimize the sequence, antitumour effects of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 or the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib on RCC cells with acquired resistance to the TKI sunitinib was evaluated. RCC cells were exposed to 1 µM sunitinib for 24 hrs (as control) and for 8 weeks (to induce resistance) and then switched to RAD001 (5 nM) or sorafenib (5 µM) for a further 8 weeks. Tumour cell growth, cell cycle progression, cell cycle regulating proteins and intracellular signalling were then investigated. Short-term application of sunitinib (24 hrs) induced cell growth blockade with accumulation in the G2/M phase. RCC cells became resistant to sunitinib after 8 weeks, demonstrated by accelerated cell growth along with enhanced cdk1, cdk2, loss of p27, activation of Akt, Rictor and Raptor. Switching to sorafenib only slightly reduced growth of the sunitinib resistant RCC cells and molecular analysis indicated distinct cross-resistance. In contrast, full response was achieved when the cancer cells were treated with RAD001. p19 and p27 strongly increased, phosphorylated Akt, Rictor and Raptor decreased and the tumour cells accumulated in G0/G1. It is concluded that an mTOR-inhibitor for second-line therapy could be the strategy of choice after first-line sunitinib failure.

Intensified antineoplastic effect by combining an HDAC-inhibitor, an mTOR-inhibitor and low dosed interferon alpha in prostate cancer cells.

A significant proportion of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) eventually develop metastatic disease, which progresses to castration resistance, despite initial response to androgen deprivation. As anticancer therapy has become increasingly effective, acquired drug resistance has emerged, limiting efficacy. Combination treatment, utilizing different drug classes, exemplifies a possible strategy to foil resistance development. The effects of the triple application of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproic acid (VPA), the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus and low dosed interferon alpha (IFNα) on PCa cell growth and dissemination capacity were investigated. For that purpose, the human PCa cell lines, PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP were treated with the combined regimen or separate single agents. Cell growth was investigated by the MTT dye reduction assay. Flow cytometry served to analyse cell cycle progression. Adhesion to vascular endothelium or immobilized collagen, fibronectin and laminin was quantified. Migration and invasion characteristics were determined by the modified Boyden chamber assay. Integrin α and ß subtypes were investigated by flow cytometry, western blotting and RT-PCR. Integrin related signalling, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFr), Akt, p70S6kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)1/2 activation were also assessed. The triple application of VPA, everolimus and low dosed IFNα blocked tumour cell growth and dissemination significantly better than any agent alone. Antitumour effects were associated with pronounced alteration in the cell cycle machinery, intracellular signalling and integrin expression profile. Combining VPA, everolimus and low dosed IFNα might be a promising option to counteract resistance development and improve outcome in PCa patients.

CCL2 promotes integrin-mediated adhesion of prostate cancer cells in vitro.

PURPOSE: Chemokines undergo alterations during neoplasia. However, knowledge about their functional significance in prostate cancer (PCa) progression is still sparse. Since chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) is significantly up-regulated in patients with PCa, aim of the current study was to assess whether CCL2 contributes to invasive behavior of prostate cancer cells in vitro. METHODS: The human PCa cell line PC3 was stimulated with CCL2. Cell growth was investigated by MTT dye reduction assay. Cell adhesion was analyzed by measuring attachment to a human endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayer and immobilized collagen. Cell migration was assessed by a chemotactic assay. Integrin expression on the cell surface was evaluated by Western blot. Blocking studies were performed with anti-integrin α3, anti-integrin α6 and anti-integrin ß4 monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: PC3 cell growth 72 h after CCL2 exposure was significantly increased, compared to controls. Activation of tumor cells by CCL2 significantly enhanced tumor cell adhesion to HUVEC and immobilized collagen. CCL2, added for 4 or 24 h, elevated α6 and ß4 (4 > 24 h) integrin expression. α3 was enhanced after 4 h, but reduced after 24 h. Blocking either α3, α6 or ß4 led to significant suppression of tumor cell binding to immobilized collagen. CONCLUSIONS: CCL2 stimulates PCa cell adhesion and induces alterations in α3-, α6- and ß4-integrin expression on the cell surface. Blocking these integrins leads to a significant reduction in cell adhesion.

Cross-communication between histone H3 and H4 acetylation and Akt-mTOR signalling in prostate cancer cells.

Molecular tumour targeting has significantly improved anti-cancer protocols. Still, the addition of molecular targeting to the treatment regime has not led to a curative breakthrough. Combined mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition has been shown not only to enhance anti-tumour potential, but also to prevent resistance development seen under mono-drug therapy. This investigation was designed to evaluate whether cross-communication exists between mTOR signalling and epigenetic events regulated by HDAC. DU-145 prostate cancer cells were treated with insulin-like growth factor (IGF) to activate the Akt-mTOR cascade or with the HDAC-inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) to induce histone H3 and H4 acetylation (aH3, aH4). Subsequently, mTOR, Rictor, Raptor, p70s6k, Akt (all: total and phosphorylated), H3 and H4 (total and acetylated) were analysed by western blotting. Both techniques revealed a link between mTOR and the epigenetic machinery. IGF activated mTOR, Rictor, Raptor, p70s6k and Akt, but also enhanced aH3 and aH4. Inversely, IGFr blockade and knock-down blocked the Akt-mTOR axis, but simultaneously diminished aH3 and aH4. VPA treatment up-regulated histone acetylation, but also activated mTOR-Akt signalling. HDAC1 and 2 knock-down revealed that the interaction with the mTOR system is initiated by histone H3 acetylation. HDAC-mTOR communication, therefore, is apparent whereby tumour-promoting (Akt/mTOR(high), aH3/aH4(low)) and tumour-suppressing signals (Akt/mTOR(low) , aH3/aH4(high)) are activated in parallel. Combined use of an HDAC- and mTOR inhibitor might then diminish pro-tumour effects triggered by the HDAC- (Akt/mTOR(high)) or mTOR inhibitor (aH3/aH4(low)) alone.

The prostate cancer blocking potential of the histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 is not enhanced by the multi receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor TKI258.

Pharmacologic options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer are limited. It has been suggested that targeting intracellular molecules, which have been altered during neoplastic development, may slow tumor growth. Therefore, the growth-blocking potential of the histone deacetylase-inhibitor LBH589 and the multiple tyrosine kinase-inhibitor TKI258, applied alone or in combination, was investigated in a panel of prostate cancer cell lines. PC-3, DU-145 or LNCaP cells were treated with various concentrations of LBH589 and/or TKI258. Tumor cell growth, cell cycle regulating proteins, HDAC3- and HDAC4-expression and histone H3 and H4 acetylation were then evaluated by MTT assay and Western blotting. LBH589 dose-dependently blocked prostate cancer cell growth. In contrast, TKI258 did not down-regulate tumor cell growth up to a 1,000 nM dosage. LBH589 elevated histone H3 and H4 acetylation. The cell cycle regulators cyclin B, cyclin D1, cdk1 and cdk4 were down-regulated in PC-3, whereas the suppressor proteins p21 and p27 were up-regulated in LNCaP by LBH589. TKI258 up-regulated p27 in PC-3 or p21 in LNCaP and additionally elevated cyclin B, cyclin D1, cdk1 and cdk4 in both cell lines. Presumably, the increase in cyclin and cdk caused by TKI258 counteracts the benefit of p21 or p27 up-regulation, resulting in TKI258 non-responsiveness. The LBH589/TKI258-combination was not superior to the LBH589 single-drug use in terms of growth reduction. Obviously, TKI258 did not enhance the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells towards an HDAC based regimen. Therefore, the LBH589/TKI258-combination probably does not provide an optimum strategy in fighting advanced prostate cancer.

Low dosed interferon alpha augments the anti-tumor potential of histone deacetylase inhibition on prostate cancer cell growth and invasion.

We evaluated whether low-dosed interferon alpha (IFNa) may augment the anti-tumor potential of the histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) on prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. PC-3, DU-145, or LNCaP prostate cancer cells were treated with VPA (1 mM), IFNa (200 U/ml), or with the VPA-IFNa combination. Tumor cell growth, cell cycle progression, and cell cycle regulating proteins were then investigated by the MTT assay, flow cytometry, and western blotting. Tumor cell adhesion to endothelium or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins, as well as migratory properties of the cells, were evaluated. Integrin α and ß adhesion molecules and alterations of cell signaling pathways were analyzed. Finally, effects of the drug treatment on prostate cancer growth in vivo were determined in the NOD/SCID mouse model. VPA reduced tumor cell adhesion, migration, and growth in vitro. A much stronger anti-cancer potential was evoked by the VPA-IFNa combination, although IFNa in itself did not block growth or adhesion. The same effect was seen when tumor growth was evaluated in vivo. Molecular analysis revealed distinct elevation of histone H3 acetylation caused by VPA which was further up-regulated by VPA-IFNa, whereas IFNa alone did not alter H3 acetylation. The combinatorial benefit became obvious in Akt phosphorylation, p21 and p27 and integrin α1, α3, and ß1 expression. Application of low-dosed IFNa to a VPA based regimen profoundly boosts the anti-tumor properties of VPA. The combined use of VPA and low-dosed IFNa may therefore be an innovative option in treating advanced prostate cancer.

Molecular targeting of prostate cancer cells by a triple drug combination down-regulates integrin driven adhesion processes, delays cell cycle progression and interferes with the cdk-cyclin axis.

BACKGROUND: Single drug use has not achieved satisfactory results in the treatment of prostate cancer, despite application of increasingly widespread targeted therapeutics. In the present study, the combined impact of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitor RAD001, the dual EGFr and VGEFr tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 and the histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) on prostate cancer growth and adhesion in vitro was investigated. METHODS: PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cells were treated with RAD001, AEE788 or VPA or with a RAD-AEE-VPA combination. Tumor cell growth, cell cycle progression and cell cycle regulating proteins were then investigated by MTT-assay, flow cytometry and western blotting, respectively. Furthermore, tumor cell adhesion to vascular endothelium or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins as well as migratory properties of the cells was evaluated, and integrin α and ß subtypes were analyzed. Finally, effects of drug treatment on cell signaling pathways were determined. RESULTS: All drugs, separately applied, reduced tumor cell adhesion, migration and growth. A much stronger anti-cancer effect was evoked by the triple drug combination. Particularly, cdk1, 2 and 4 and cyclin B were reduced, whereas p27 was elevated. In addition, simultaneous application of RAD001, AEE788 and VPA altered the membranous, cytoplasmic and gene expression pattern of various integrin α and ß subtypes, reduced integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and deactivated focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Signaling analysis revealed that EGFr and the downstream target Akt, as well as p70S6k was distinctly modified in the presence of the drug combination. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous targeting of several key proteins in prostate cancer cells provides an advantage over targeting a single pathway. Since strong anti-tumor properties became evident with respect to cell growth and adhesion dynamics, the triple drug combination might provide progress in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Influence of the HDAC Inhibitor Valproic Acid on the Growth and Proliferation of Temsirolimus-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells In Vitro.

The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is elevated in prostate cancer, making this protein attractive for tumor treatment. Unfortunately, resistance towards mTOR inhibitors develops and the tumor becomes reactivated. We determined whether epigenetic modulation by the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, valproic acid (VPA), may counteract non-responsiveness to the mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus, in prostate cancer (PCa) cells. Prostate cancer cells, sensitive (parental) and resistant to temsirolimus, were exposed to VPA, and tumor cell growth behavior compared. Temsirolimus resistance enhanced the number of tumor cells in the G2/M-phase, correlating with elevated cell proliferation and clonal growth. The cell cycling proteins cdk1 and cyclin B, along with Akt-mTOR signaling increased, whereas p19, p21 and p27 decreased, compared to the parental cells. VPA significantly reduced cell growth and up-regulated the acetylated histones H3 and H4. Cdk1 and cyclin B decreased, as did phosphorylated mTOR and the mTOR sub-complex Raptor. The mTOR sub-member Rictor and phosphorylated Akt increased under VPA. Knockdown of cdk1, cyclin B, or Raptor led to significant cell growth reduction. HDAC inhibition through VPA counteracts temsirolimus resistance, probably by down-regulating cdk1, cyclin B and Raptor. Enhanced Rictor and Akt, however, may represent an undesired feedback loop, which should be considered when designing future therapeutic regimens.

Modulation of adhesion and growth of colon and pancreatic cancer cells by the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors belong to a promising class of antineoplastic agents which affect tumor growth, differentiation and invasion. The effects of the HDAC inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) were tested in vitro on preclinical colon and pancreatic cancer models. Human colon adenocarcinoma HT-29 and pancreatic carcinoma DanG cells were treated with 1 mM VPA for different time periods during cell proliferation MTT assays, and to evaluate the tumor cell adhesion to endothelial cell monolayers. Alterations of beta1 integrin subunits alpha1-6) were analyzed by flow cytometry and RT-PCR. VPA significantly caused growth arrest in tumor cells and prevented tumor cell attachment to the endothelium. HT-29 cell adhesion was blocked to a higher extent than the adhesion of DanG cells. VPA modified membranous integrin beta1 expression, quantity and quality (up- or down-regulation) which depended on the tumor type investigated. Furthermore, VPA diminished integrin coding mRNA in HT-29 but not in DanG cells. We conclude that VPA shifts the integrin beta1 subunit balance from a 'pathological' towards a 'physiological' expression pattern leading to reduced tumor growth and invasion. Further study is required to elucidate the molecular background of the post-transcriptional modifications of VPA in order to exploit the potential of this agent in the treatment of colon and pancreatic cancer.

HDAC Inhibition Counteracts Metastatic Re-Activation of Prostate Cancer Cells Induced by Chronic mTOR Suppression.

This study was designed to investigate whether epigenetic modulation by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition might circumvent resistance towards the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus in a prostate cancer cell model. Parental (par) and temsirolimus-resistant (res) PC3 prostate cancer cells were exposed to the HDAC inhibitor valproic acid (VPA), and tumor cell adhesion, chemotaxis, migration, and invasion were evaluated. Temsirolimus resistance was characterized by reduced binding of PC3res cells to endothelium, immobilized collagen, and fibronectin, but increased adhesion to laminin, as compared to the parental cells. Chemotaxis, migration, and invasion of PC3res cells were enhanced following temsirolimus re-treatment. Integrin α and ß receptors were significantly altered in PC3res compared to PC3par cells. VPA significantly counteracted temsirolimus resistance by down-regulating tumor cell⁻matrix interaction, chemotaxis, and migration. Evaluation of integrin expression in the presence of VPA revealed a significant down-regulation of integrin α5 in PC3res cells. Blocking studies demonstrated a close association between α5 expression on PC3res and chemotaxis. In this in vitro model, temsirolimus resistance drove prostate cancer cells to become highly motile, while HDAC inhibition reversed the metastatic activity. The VPA-induced inhibition of metastatic activity was accompanied by a lowered integrin α5 surface level on the tumor cells.

HDAC inhibition as a treatment concept to combat temsirolimus-resistant bladder cancer cells.

INTRODUCTION: Although the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) might be a promising molecular target to treat advanced bladder cancer, resistance develops under chronic exposure to an mTOR inhibitor (everolimus, temsirolimus). Based on earlier studies, we proposed that histone deacetylase (HDAC) blockade might circumvent resistance and investigated whether HDAC inhibition has an impact on growth of bladder cancer cells with acquired resistance towards temsirolimus. RESULTS: The HDAC inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) significantly inhibited growth, proliferation and caused G0/G1 phase arrest in RT112res and UMUC-3res. cdk1, cyclin B, cdk2, cyclin A and Skp1 p19 were down-regulated, p27 was elevated. Akt-mTOR signaling was deactivated, whereas acetylation of histone H3 and H4 in RT112res and UMUC-3res increased in the presence of VPA. Knocking down cdk2 or cyclin A resulted in a significant growth blockade of RT112res and UMUC-3res. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parental (par) and resistant (res) RT112 and UMUC-3 cells were exposed to the HDAC inhibitor VPA. Tumor cell growth, proliferation, cell cycling and expression of cell cycle regulating proteins were then evaluated. siRNA blockade was used to investigate the functional impact of the proteins. CONCLUSIONS: HDAC inhibition induced a strong response of temsirolimus-resistant bladder cancer cells. Therefore, the temsirolimus-VPA-combination might be an innovative strategy for bladder cancer treatment.

Altered expression of beta1 integrins in renal carcinoma cell lines exposed to the differentiation inducer valproic acid.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the kidney. Adhesion receptors of the beta1 integrin family are assumed to be involved in carcinogenesis, but it is not clear how they contribute to RCC progression. In an in vitro model, we evaluated growth and adhesion capacity of Caki-I and KTC-26 kidney carcinoma cell lines compared to normal renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTC). alpha1-alpha6beta1 integrin subunits in malignant and non-malignant cells were evaluated by Western blotting and RT-PCR, integrin surface expression was measured by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Additionally, tumor cells were allowed to re-differentiate in the presence of valproic acid (VPA) and dynamic alterations of the integrin profile were analyzed. Caki-I and KTC-26 were characterized by accelerated proliferation and adhesion to an endothelial cell monolayer, compared to PTC cells. The integrin beta1 repertoire in RCC cell lines was significantly different from that detected in PTC, and included down-regulated alpha2 and alpha6, but up-regulated alpha1, alpha3 and alpha5 proteins. VPA application reduced tumor malignancy which was evidenced by reduced cell growth and adhesion capacity. The reduction in tumor malignancy was paralleled by the integrin expression profile of renal tumor cells 'matching' the pattern seen in PTC. We assume that a sensitive integrin balance exists in normal renal epithelial cells, and that dysregulation of the 'physiological' receptor equipment drives these cells towards malignancy. VPA acted on all investigated integrin subtypes and restored the receptor pattern typical for non-malignant cells. Therefore, VPA may represent a novel therapeutic option in RCC treatment.

Amygdalin inhibits the growth of renal cell carcinoma cells in vitro.

Although amygdalin is used by many cancer patients as an antitumor agent, there is a lack of information on the efficacy and toxicity of this natural compound. In the present study, the inhibitory effect of amygdalin on the growth of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells was examined. Amygdalin (10 mg/ml) was applied to the RCC cell lines, Caki-1, KTC-26 and A498, for 24 h or 2 weeks. Untreated cells served as controls. Tumor cell growth and proliferation were determined using MTT and BrdU tests, and cell cycle phases were evaluated. Expression of the cell cycle activating proteins cdk1, cdk2, cdk4, cyclin A, cyclin B, cyclin D1 and D3 as well as of the cell cycle inhibiting proteins p19 and p27 was examined by western blot analysis. Surface expression of the differentiation markers E- and N-cadherin was also investigated. Functional blockade by siRNA was used to determine the impact of several proteins on tumor cell growth. Amygdalin treatment caused a significant reduction in RCC cell growth and proliferation. This effect was correlated with a reduced percentage of G2/M-phase RCC cells and an increased percentage of cells in the G0/1-phase (Caki-1 and A498) or cell cycle arrest in the S-phase (KTC-26). Furthermore, amygdalin induced a marked decrease in cell cycle activating proteins, in particular cdk1 and cyclin B. Functional blocking of cdk1 and cyclin B resulted in significantly diminished tumor cell growth in all three RCC cell lines. Aside from its inhibitory effects on growth, amygdalin also modulated the differentiation markers, E- and N-cadherin. Hence, exposing RCC cells to amygdalin inhibited cell cycle progression and tumor cell growth by impairing cdk1 and cyclin B expression. Moreover, we noted that amygdalin affected differentiation markers. Thus, we suggest that amygdalin exerted RCC antitumor effects in vitro.

Amygdalin delays cell cycle progression and blocks growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro.

AIMS: Despite impressive survival benefits from new agents to treat metastasized prostate cancer (PCa), progressive drug resistance hinders long-term response and restricts the efficacy of subsequent therapy. Due to reported antitumor activity of amygdalin and growing popularity for complementary and alternative medicine the potential of this natural, widely used substance to exert antineoplastic effects on prostate cancer cells has been assessed. MAIN METHODS: LNCaP (castration-sensitive), DU-145 and PC3 cells (castration-resistant) were exposed to different concentrations of amygdalin for 24h or 2weeks. Cell growth was measured by the MTT test, clonal formation by the clonogenic assay. Flow cytometry served to investigate apoptosis and cell cycle phases. Cell cycle regulating proteins and the mTOR-akt signaling axis were analyzed by western blotting. KEY FINDINGS: Amygdalin dose-dependently diminished tumor cell growth with maximum effects at 10mg/ml. Apoptosis of PC3 and LNCaP but not of DU-145 cells was reduced, whereas colony formation was suppressed in all cell lines. A decrease in the number of G2/M- and S-phase cells along with an elevated number of G0/G1-phase cells was recorded. The cell cycle proteins cdk 1, cdk 2 and cdk 4 as well as cyclin A, cyclin B and cyclin D3 were modulated by amygdalin after both 24h and 2weeks. Distinct effects on p19 and p27 expression and on Akt, Rictor and Raptor activation became evident only after 2weeks. SIGNIFICANCE: Amygdalin exhibits significant antitumor activity in both castration-sensitive and castration-resistant PCa cell lines and merits further evaluation for therapeutic purposes.

Amygdalin blocks the in vitro adhesion and invasion of renal cell carcinoma cells by an integrin-dependent mechanism.

Information about the natural compound amygdalin, which is employed as an antitumor agent, is sparse and thus its efficacy remains controversial. In this study, to determine whether amygdalin exerts antitumor effects on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells, its impact on RCC metastatic activity was investigated. The RCC cell lines, Caki-1, KTC-26 and A498, were exposed to amygdalin from apricot kernels, and adhesion to human vascular endothelium, immobilized collagen or fibronectin was investigated. The influence of amygdalin on chemotactic and invasive activity was also determined, as was the influence of amygdalin on surface and total cellular α and ß integrin expression, which are involved in metastasis. We noted that amygdalin caused significant reductions in chemotactic activity, invasion and adhesion to endothelium, collagen and fibronectin. Using FACScan analysis, we noted that amygdalin also induced reductions, particularly in integrins α5 and α6, in all three cell lines. Functional blocking of α5 resulted in significantly diminished adhesion of KTC-26 and A498 to collagen and also in decreased chemotactic behavior in all three cell lines. Blocking α6 integrin significantly reduced chemotactic activity in all three cell lines. Thus, we suggest that exposing RCC cells to amygdalin inhibits metastatic spread and is associated with downregulation of α5 and α6 integrins. Therefore, we posit that amygdalin exerts antitumor activity in vitro, and this may be linked to integrin regulation.

Mycophenolate mofetil modulates adhesion receptors of the beta1 integrin family on tumor cells: impact on tumor recurrence and malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Tumor development remains one of the major obstacles following organ transplantation. Immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus directly contribute to enhanced malignancy, whereas the influence of the novel compound mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on tumor cell dissemination has not been explored. We therefore investigated the adhesion capacity of colon, pancreas, prostate and kidney carcinoma cell lines to endothelium, as well as their beta1 integrin expression profile before and after MMF treatment. METHODS: Tumor cell adhesion to endothelial cell monolayers was evaluated in the presence of 0.1 and 1 microM MMF and compared to unstimulated controls. beta1 integrin analysis included alpha1beta1 (CD49a), alpha2beta1 (CD49b), alpha3beta1 (CD49c), alpha4beta1 (CD49d), alpha5beta1 (CD49e), and alpha6beta1 (CD49f) receptors, and was carried out by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Adhesion of the colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 was strongly reduced in the presence of 0.1 muM MMF. This effect was accompanied by down-regulation of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 surface expression and of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 coding mRNA. Adhesion of the prostate tumor cell line DU-145 was blocked dose-dependently by MMF. In contrast to MMF's effects on HT-29 cells, MMF dose-dependently up-regulated alpha1beta1, alpha2beta1, alpha3beta1, and alpha5beta1 on DU-145 tumor cell membranes. CONCLUSION: We conclude that MMF possesses distinct anti-tumoral properties, particularly in colon and prostate carcinoma cells. Adhesion blockage of HT-29 cells was due to the loss of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 surface expression, which might contribute to a reduced invasive behaviour of this tumor entity. The enhancement of integrin beta1 subtypes observed in DU-145 cells possibly causes re-differentiation towards a low-invasive phenotype.

Modulation of the CXC-chemokine expression profile on tumor cells by the immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil.

The most undesirable complication of an effective immunosuppressive therapy is neoplastic tumor recurrence or the development of de novo cancer. Though the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), has been introduced into clinical practice, no data dealing with the influence of MMF on tumor cell malignancy are available. We analyzed the adhesion capacity of colon, pancreas and kidney carcinoma cell lines to endothelium, as well as their chemokine profile before and after MMF treatment. Tumor cell adhesion to endothelial cell monolayers was evaluated in the presence of 0.1, 1, and 10 microM MMF and compared to unstimulated controls. Chemokine analysis concentrated on the CXC family, including 6 CXC-receptors (CXCR) and 15 CXC-ligands (CXCL), and was carried out by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. MMF strongly diminished the adhesion capacity of HT-29 colon tumor cells but not of DanG pancreas tumor cells to endothelium. MMF also had a strong impact on the chemokine profile of colon, kidney and pancreas carcinomas, whereby individual changes were observed, depending on the tumor type. Down-regulating effects on chemokines did not correlate with down-regulating effects on tumor cell adhesion. Since several of the chemokines investigated are regulatory elements in the process of cell transformation, dissemination and angiogenesis, we speculate that MMF might prevent post-transplant tumor recurrence and transendothelial migration. However, the efficacy of MMF might differ according to the tumor type.

CCL2 Chemokine as a Potential Biomarker for Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen is not reliable in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa), making the identification of novel, precise diagnostic biomarkers important. Since chemokines are associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis in diverse malignancies, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic relevance of chemokines in PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and early postoperative serum samples were obtained from 39 consecutive PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Serum from 15 healthy volunteers served as controls. Concentrations of CXCL12, CXCL13, CX3CL1, CCL2, CCL5, and CCL20 were measured in serum by Luminex. The expression activity of CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5, CXCR7, CXCL12, CXCL13, CX3CR1, CXCL1, CCR2, CCR5, CCR6, CCR7, CCL2, and CCL5 mRNA was assessed in tumor and adjacent normal tissue of prostatectomy specimens by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The associations of these chemokines with clinical and histological parameters were tested. RESULTS: The gene expression activity of CCL2 and CCR6 was significantly higher in tumor tissue compared to adjacent normal tissue. CCL2 was also significantly higher in the blood samples of PCa patients, compared to controls. CCL5, CCL20, and CX3CL1 were lower in patient serum, compared to controls. CCR2 tissue mRNA was negatively correlated with the Gleason score and grading. CONCLUSION: Chemokines are significantly modified during tumorigenesis of PCa, and CCL2 is a promising diagnostic biomarker.

Mycophenolate mofetil increases adhesion capacity of tumor cells in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces expression of the heterophilic binding elements intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and thereby prevents attachment of alloactivated leukocytes to donor endothelium. The authors speculated that MMF might further diminish receptors of the immunoglobulin superfamily which, however, act as homophilic binding elements. Because decrease of homophilic adhesion receptors correlates with tumor dissemination and metastasis, MMF could trigger development or recurrence of neoplastic tumors. METHODS: The authors analyzed the influence of MMF on homotypic adhesion receptors and its consequence for tumor cell attachment to an endothelial cell monolayer. Neuroblastoma (NB) cells, which self-aggregate by means of the homophilic-binding element neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), were used. Effects of MMF on the 140- and 180-kDa NCAM isoforms were investigated quantitatively by flow cytometry, Western blot, and reverse-transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The relevance of NCAM for tumor cell binding was proven by treating NB with NCAM antisense oligonucleotides. RESULTS: MMF profoundly increased the number of adherent NB cells, with a maximum effect at 0.1 microM, compared with controls. Decrease of NCAM on the cell surface was detected by flow cytometry. Western blot and RT-PCR demonstrated reduced protein and RNA levels of the 140- and 180-kDa isoforms. Treatment of NB cells with NCAM antisense oligonucleotides showed that reduced NCAM expression leads to enhanced tumor cell adhesion. CONCLUSIONS: MMF decreases NCAM receptors, which is associated with enhanced tumor cell invasiveness. The authors conclude that an MMF-based immunosuppressive regimen might increase the risk of tumor metastasis if this process is predominantly conveyed by means of homophilic adhesion proteins.

Amygdalin influences bladder cancer cell adhesion and invasion in vitro.

The cyanogenic diglucoside amygdalin, derived from Rosaceae kernels, is employed by many patients as an alternative anti-cancer treatment. However, whether amygdalin indeed acts as an anti-tumor agent is not clear. Metastasis blocking properties of amygdalin on bladder cancer cell lines was, therefore, investigated. Amygdalin (10 mg/ml) was applied to UMUC-3, TCCSUP or RT112 bladder cancer cells for 24 h or for 2 weeks. Tumor cell adhesion to vascular endothelium or to immobilized collagen as well as tumor cell migration was examined. Effects of drug treatment on integrin α and ß subtypes, on integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and total and activated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) were also determined. Integrin knock-down was carried out to evaluate integrin influence on migration and adhesion. A 24 h or 2 week amygdalin application distinctly reduced tumor cell adhesion and migration of UMUC-3 and RT112 cells. TCCSUP adhesion was also reduced, but migration was elevated under amygdalin. Integrin subtype expression was significantly and specifically altered by amygdalin depending on the cell line. ILK was moderately, and activated FAK strongly, lost in all tumor cell lines in the presence of amygdalin. Knock down of ß1 integrin caused a significant decrease in both adhesion and migration of UMUC-3 cells, but a significant increase in TCCSUP adhesion. Knock down of ß4 integrin caused a significant decrease in migration of RT112 cells. Since the different actions of amygdalin on the different cell lines was mirrored by ß1 or ß4 knock down, it is postulated that amygdalin influences adhesion and migratory properties of bladder cancer cells by modulating ß1 or ß4 integrin expression. The amygdalin induced increase in TCCSUP migratory behavior indicates that any anti-tumor benefits from amygdalin (seen with the other two cell lines) may depend upon the cancer cell type.