A novel pseudo-dicentric variant of 16p11.2-q11.2 contains euchromatin from 16p11.2-p11.1 and resembles pathogenic duplications of proximal 16q.

An unusually large G-light band between 2 G-dark bands in the proximal long arm of chromosome 16 was found in a boy of 5 years of age ascertained with growth retardation, microcephaly, and dysmorphic features. Dual color bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization (BAC FISH) and oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (oaCGH) were used to show that these bands contained a euchromatic duplication of a minimum of 940 kb between base pairs 34,197,413-35,137,025 in 16p11.2-p11.1 as well as a duplication of the centromere and major 16qh/16p11.2 heterochromatic block, covering a minimum of 12.3 Mb. The same pseudo-dicentric chromosome was found in the father who has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The euchromatic region is not known to be subject to imprinting and overlaps multiple large copy number variations (CNVs) in the Database of Genomic Variants as well as similar CNVs that are benign or of uncertain significance in the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays database. We conclude that this family has a novel pseudo-dicentric euchromatic variant of chromosome 16 that is unlikely to be the cause of the variable phenotype in father and son but needs to be distinguished from heterochromatic variants or pathogenic duplications of proximal 16q.

Another family with a euchromatic duplication variant of 9q13-q21.1 derived from segmentally duplicated pericentromeric euchromatin.

Microscopically visible copy number variations within the proximal short arm heterochromatin and proximal long arm of chromosome 9 have been described as euchromatic variants (EVs) and are derived from extensive segmental duplications (SDs) that map to both the proximal short and long arms of chromosome 9. Recently, 3-4 additional copies of an SD cassette were found in 2 families with duplication EVs of 9q13-q21. Here, we report a third family with a duplication EV of 9q13-q21.1 that was ascertained at prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age and found in the fetus and her phenotypically normal mother. Dual-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization with bacterial artificial chromosomes RP11-246P17 and RP11-211E19 was consistent with the EV chromosome having 1-2 additional copies of a similar SD cassette, except that the SD-boundary clone RP11-88I18 was not apparently included. It is important to distinguish the 9q13-q21.1 EVs from possible pathogenic imbalances of chromosome 9, especially at prenatal diagnosis, as these EVs have no established phenotypic or reproductive consequences. The nature of the G-dark bands in 9q13-q21 EVs is briefly discussed.

Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: a clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent 15q13.3 microdeletions were recently identified with identical proximal (BP4) and distal (BP5) breakpoints and associated with mild to moderate mental retardation and epilepsy. METHODS: To assess further the clinical implications of this novel 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome, 18 new probands with a deletion were molecularly and clinically characterised. In addition, we evaluated the characteristics of a family with a more proximal deletion between BP3 and BP4. Finally, four patients with a duplication in the BP3-BP4-BP5 region were included in this study to ascertain the clinical significance of duplications in this region. RESULTS: The 15q13.3 microdeletion in our series was associated with a highly variable intra- and inter-familial phenotype. At least 11 of the 18 deletions identified were inherited. Moreover, 7 of 10 siblings from four different families also had this deletion: one had a mild developmental delay, four had only learning problems during childhood, but functioned well in daily life as adults, whereas the other two had no learning problems at all. In contrast to previous findings, seizures were not a common feature in our series (only 2 of 17 living probands). Three patients with deletions had cardiac defects and deletion of the KLF13 gene, located in the critical region, may contribute to these abnormalities. The limited data from the single family with the more proximal BP3-BP4 deletion suggest this deletion may have little clinical significance. Patients with duplications of the BP3-BP4-BP5 region did not share a recognisable phenotype, but psychiatric disease was noted in 2 of 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings broaden the phenotypic spectrum associated with 15q13.3 deletions and suggest that, in some individuals, deletion of 15q13.3 is not sufficient to cause disease. The existence of microdeletion syndromes, associated with an unpredictable and variable phenotypic outcome, will pose the clinician with diagnostic difficulties and challenge the commonly used paradigm in the diagnostic setting that aberrations inherited from a phenotypically normal parent are usually without clinical consequences.

A complex medical phenotype in a patient with triplication of 2q12.3 to 2q13 characterized with oligonucleotide array CGH.

We report an adult female with a left polycystic kidney, patent ductus arteriosus, left streak ovary, bicornuate uterus and deafness who presented with infertility. She has an intrachromosomal triplication of bands 2q12.3 to 2q13, with inversion of the central segment, which arose de novo from a paternal interchomosomal event. The triplication contains 68 known genes within the 7.28 Mb of DNA between base pairs 107,140,721 and 114,416,131. All intrachromosomal triplications are rare and, while partial duplications of 2q have been previously described, this patient is a unique surviving case of a triplication of proximal 2q.

Copy number changes of the microcephalin 1 gene (MCPH1) in patients with autism spectrum disorders.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a set of neurodevelopmental disorders with a strong genetic aetiology. Chromosomal rearrangements have been detected in 5-10% of the patients with ASD, and recent applications of array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) are identifying further candidate regions and genes. In this study, we present four patients who implicate microcephalin 1 (MCPH1) in band 8p23.1 as an ASD susceptibility gene. Patient 1 was a girl with a syndromic form of autistic disorder satisfying the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Oligonucleotide aCGH (oaCGH) showed that she had a classic inv dup del(8)(qter-> p23.1::p23.1-> p21.2) containing at least three candidate genes; MCPH1 and DLGAP2 within the 6.9-Mb terminal deletion and NEF3 within the concomitant 14.1-Mb duplication. Three further patients with MCPH1 copy number changes were found using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis in a cohort of 54 families with ASD patients. Our results show that ASD can be a component of the classical inv dup del(8) phenotype and identify changes in copy number of MCPH1 as a susceptibility factor for ASD in the distal short arm of chromosome 8.

Molecular investigation of a dicentric 13;17 chromosome found in a 21-week gestation fetus with multiple congenital abnormalities.

We report a 21-week gestation fetus terminated because of multiple congenital abnormalities seen on ultrasound scan, including ventriculomegaly, possible clefting of the hard palate, cervical hemivertebrae, micrognathia, abnormal heart, horseshoe kidney and a 2-vessel umbilical cord. On cytogenetic examination, the fetus was found to have a male karyotype with 45 chromosomes with a dicentric chromosome, which appeared to consist of the long arms of chromosomes 13 and 17. Molecular genetic investigations and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) unexpectedly showed that the derivative chromosome contained two interstitial blocks of chromosome 17 short arm sequences, totalling approximately 7 Mb, between the two centromeres. This effectively made the fetus monosomic for approximately 15 Mb of 17p without the concurrent trisomy for another chromosome normally seen following malsegregation of reciprocal translocations. It also illustrates the complexity involved in the formation of some structurally abnormal chromosomes, which can only be resolved by detailed molecular investigations.

Duplications of proximal 16q flanked by heterochromatin are not euchromatic variants and show no evidence of heterochromatic position effect.

Extra euchromatic material was found within the major heterochromatic block of chromosome 16 (16qh) in one de novo case and seven members of two families. In contrast to the euchromatic variants of chromosome 9 (9qh), which are derived from pericentromeric euchromatin, molecular cytogenetics confirmed that these duplications were of 16q11.2-->q12.2 in the de novo case, of 16q11.2-->q13 in three members of family 1 and 16q11.2-->q12.1 in four members of family 2. The duplication had arisen as a post-zygotic mitotic event in the mother of family 1 and been transmitted paternally in family 2. An insertional mechanism of origin is proposed for the duplications in case 1 and family 1. Expression at the 16q13 matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2)locus in families 1 and 2 was proportional to genomic copy number and not therefore consistent with position effect silencing due to the flanking blocks of heterochromatin. We conclude that proximal 16q duplications within 16qh are not novel euchromatic variants but associated with a variable phenotype including developmental delay, speech delay, learning difficulties and behavioural problems. The behavioural problems in families ascertained through affected children are much less severe than those encountered in previous patients ascertained as adults.